[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 28 of 28

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,788
    Rep Power
    569
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    Thing being, would the Tempts have had the time or inclination for a duets album in 72. It certainly would have been perfect for the Supremes.
    Not convinced the funk stylings of Hutch or Whitfield would have been right for Jeans voice but who knows?. New style/direction and all that. The Webb album was everything they should not have been doing at that point in time. Perhaps a hook up with Whitfield or Hutch might have provided the group with their very own “Lady Marmalade.
    To me, the number one reason to go with Jean Terrell as Diana's replacement is that they had one thing in common: both of their voices were pliable. They had this wonderful ability to adapt their style of singing to the style of song, and do it without losing their identity. So to my ears, Jean's voice would have perfectly fit a funky song Norman crafted for her as easily as it would a Jimmy Webb production. Plus, keep in mind, Norman was more than a writer/producer of funky, psychedelic soul, even though he's largely remembered for it.

    But Norman and the other options I mentioned in the other post are limited options because of Motown's tendency to work with in-house producers. I really believe the Jean Supremes best option was bringing in an outside producer not named Jimmy Webb.

    Regarding Willie Hutch, now that I think about it, someone suggested him for the Scherrie Supremes, which I thought was a great idea. I think Scherrie in particular would've sounded great on his productions.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,091
    Rep Power
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    To me, the number one reason to go with Jean Terrell as Diana's replacement is that they had one thing in common: both of their voices were pliable. They had this wonderful ability to adapt their style of singing to the style of song, and do it without losing their identity. So to my ears, Jean's voice would have perfectly fit a funky song Norman crafted for her as easily as it would a Jimmy Webb production. Plus, keep in mind, Norman was more than a writer/producer of funky, psychedelic soul, even though he's largely remembered for it.

    But Norman and the other options I mentioned in the other post are limited options because of Motown's tendency to work with in-house producers. I really believe the Jean Supremes best option was bringing in an outside producer not named Jimmy Webb.

    Regarding Willie Hutch, now that I think about it, someone suggested him for the Scherrie Supremes, which I thought was a great idea. I think Scherrie in particular would've sounded great on his productions.
    An Ashford & Simpson produced album might have been less radical. I agree about Hutch working with MS&S. His funky productions would have work well on a voice like Scherrie’s.
    .

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,948
    Rep Power
    403
    i think if they'd postponed the duets until summer 71, that would have allowed SL, the single and a follow up single to all have the focus. then move to 1 album of duets, maybe with this lineup:

    knock on my door
    River Deep
    For your love
    one more bridge to cross
    if you could see me now
    I'm glad about it

    melodie
    function at the junction
    what do you have to do
    reach out and touch
    stoned soul picnic
    you got what it takes

    River and I'm Glad about it are the singles. maybe Melodie

    than after the duets, you move onto the Touch project.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.