Leaving Neverland, HBO

[carlo]

Maybe Dan Reed didn't make a U-turn, but he admitted that the narrative presented in his documentary is flawed. To base an entire documentary SOLELY on the accounts of two accusers, with no hard evidence to confirm their claims, and then to say as the director, that you spent months researching, so you can confidently say that these claims are irrefutable, and then ONLY to have these claims contradicted within weeks of the documentary airing...it's not a good look. MJ did a lot of things that made himself look bad, whether or not he did anything, who knows. But this is certainly not a good look. For you to say that you were abused from 1988 to 1992, and then have that claim contradicted by HARD EVIDENCE [[ie. train station was not open until two years after the end of his timeline of abuse)...it just does not add up, especially when he is claiming that after 1992, MJ replaced him with other boys and he was no longer in the picture. So what is it then? If you are saying that you were replaced, but now saying that the abuse continued well into your teens??

I have read some other contradictions as well, regarding Wade's story. There was something about him saying spending Thanksgiving weekend of a specific year with MJ, and it was proved that MJ was in Australia at the time and then went into rehab afterward. I am sure it is only the beginning of these contradictions. But y'all can believe what you want to.