[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    20,256
    Rep Power
    378

    Defense of Marriage Act is DEAD because it was unconstitutional!


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by midnight johnny View Post
    Praise Jesus for it was wrong and treated homosexual gentlemen and lesbian ladies like 2nd class citizens. The Supreme court did the right thing imo.

    "It doesn't matter who you love or how you love. The only thing that matters is that you love, and it doesn't matter what you are, as long as you are good."

    Roberta

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    And, yet, the Voting Rights Act was essentially gutted yesterday. It's a sad day for All U.S. Americans. Many of those voter suppression laws went into effect yesterday.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    And, yet, the Voting Rights Act was essentially gutted yesterday. It's a sad day for All U.S. Americans. Many of those voter suppression laws went into effect yesterday.
    Sad day yesterday but real happy news today. This thread is about the defeat of doma. Now i was real upset over the Voting rights act yesterday but this is a thread about the defeat of doma which is real happy news. Perhaps we should start a seperate Voting Rights Act thread as it isnt fair to spoil this thread.

    Sincerely.

    Roberta
    Last edited by Roberta75; 06-26-2013 at 07:47 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,949
    Rep Power
    656
    The Voting Rights decision saddened me. One more thing that Justice Thomas can use to show everybody that he loves sucking conservative penis more than objectively viewing the Constitution. Bravo, boy. Maybe they'll let you come into the country club through the front door now.

    Naaaahhh... Not even now.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    GAY marriage! Oh, where is the outrage on this forum? Where?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,949
    Rep Power
    656
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    GAY marriage! Oh, where is the outrage on this forum? Where?
    Soulster, they are out paying for their marriage licenses and do not have time post.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    743
    Rep Power
    175
    It's been over 10 years in Canada, now that all provinces and territories and the federal government recognize the same sex marriages and long term relationships and the rights and responsibilities that go along with it. Rights and protections are important for everyone.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,949
    Rep Power
    656
    Quote Originally Posted by drlorne View Post
    It's been over 10 years in Canada, now that all provinces and territories and the federal government recognize the same sex marriages and long term relationships and the rights and responsibilities that go along with it. Rights and protections are important for everyone.
    Well, you guys have it all wrong. Here in America, we recognize the right of anyone to keep and bear arms, even to the point that people who are unable to responsibly own them obtain them for all manner of illegal ends. Tens of thousands of murders aren't as important as our narrowly-interpreted Constitution. However, we do recognize that there are a couple of hundred fraudulent voters who cast ballots every four years in the presidential elections, so if we have to disenfranchise tens of thousands of legitimate electors to keep that few from influencing the election [[sarcasm intended), then so be it! You Canucks need to get your priorities right.
    Last edited by Jerry Oz; 06-27-2013 at 12:35 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by drlorne View Post
    It's been over 10 years in Canada, now that all provinces and territories and the federal government recognize the same sex marriages and long term relationships and the rights and responsibilities that go along with it. Rights and protections are important for everyone.
    Its real obvious to me that homosexual gentlemen and lesbian ladies should have had the right to marry the partner that they love just like hetrosexual men and ladies. I was real happy with the Supreme court ruling yesterday. Whoopi Goldberg said it best years ago when she said on the view If you dont agree with gay marriage then dont marry a gay. Its that simple folks. Ive said it before and ill say it again tolerance and acceptance is Gods way.

    ""It doesn't matter who you love or how you love. The only thing that matters is that you love, and it doesn't matter what you are, as long as you are good."

    My pastor is prepared to marry my gay nephew and his boyfried when they decide to marry and Aunt Roberta will be standing proudly beside them.

    Roberta

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Oz View Post
    Well, you guys have it all wrong. Here in America, we recognize the right of anyone to keep and bear arms, even to the point that people who are unable to responsibly own them obtain them for all manner of illegal ends. Tens of thousands of murders aren't as important as our narrowly-interpreted Constitution. However, we do recognize that there are a couple of hundred fraudulent voters who cast ballots every four years in the presidential elections, so if we have to disenfranchise tens of thousands of legitimate electors to keep that few from influencing the election [[sarcasm intended), then so be it! You Canucks need to get your priorities right.
    Man! You're on a roll!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    Its real obvious to me that homosexual gentlemen and lesbian ladies should have had the right to marry the partner that they love just like hetrosexual men and ladies. I was real happy with the Supreme court ruling yesterday. Whoopi Goldberg said it best years ago when she said on the view If you dont agree with gay marriage then dont marry a gay. Its that simple folks. Ive said it before and ill say it again tolerance and acceptance is Gods way.

    ""It doesn't matter who you love or how you love. The only thing that matters is that you love, and it doesn't matter what you are, as long as you are good."

    My pastor is prepared to marry my gay nephew and his boyfried when they decide to marry and Aunt Roberta will be standing proudly beside them.

    Roberta
    I know a few gays/lesbians who married straight back in those "good 'ol 80s", the time of Jerry Falwell and Ronald Reagan. What good did that do anyone? It hurt the person they married because it was under false pretenses, and if there were kids involved, they had to deal with a divorce and embarrassment.

    I think the positive thing this ruling does is encourage people to come out of the closet and not live lies just because society tells them what they want is wrong.

    I am straight, but I support humans being able to make the choices that's right for them.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    I know a few gays/lesbians who married straight back in those "good 'ol 80s", the time of Jerry Falwell and Ronald Reagan. What good did that do anyone? It hurt the person they married because it was under false pretenses, and if there were kids involved, they had to deal with a divorce and embarrassment.

    I think the positive thing this ruling does is encourage people to come out of the closet and not live lies just because society tells them what they want is wrong.

    I am straight, but I support humans being able to make the choices that's right for them.
    Great posting soulster and like you im also straight but I fully support marriage equality for all. What I find real hypocritical is when you have folks like draft dodger Rush Limbaugh holling on and on about upholding traditional marriage and marriage is between one man and one woman when Limbaughs now on his 4th marriage.

    Best to you.

    Roberta

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Oz View Post
    Well, you guys have it all wrong. Here in America, we recognize the right of anyone to keep and bear arms, even to the point that people who are unable to responsibly own them obtain them for all manner of illegal ends. Tens of thousands of murders aren't as important as our narrowly-interpreted Constitution. However, we do recognize that there are a couple of hundred fraudulent voters who cast ballots every four years in the presidential elections, so if we have to disenfranchise tens of thousands of legitimate electors to keep that few from influencing the election [[sarcasm intended), then so be it! You Canucks need to get your priorities right.
    Jerry you nailed ! I vote in every election that I can. I always think about those that fought and died so that I and everyone else good excersize our franchise.

    Clarence Thomas is a jerk from the word Go!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post

    Clarence Thomas is a jerk from the word Go!
    And, he participates in his wife's tea-bagger activities. he should be kicked off the Supreme Court for all his conflict of interests.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,949
    Rep Power
    656
    Clarence Thomas went for years on SCOTUS without asking a single question, which is unprecedented. He was the deciding vote on Citizens United, after he spoke before the group in favor of their cause before their case was heard. He is an activist, not a jurist.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    And, he participates in his wife's tea-bagger activities. he should be kicked off the Supreme Court for all his conflict of interests.
    I remember that now! They looked the other way when it was discovered that he spoke at some of his wife's tea party gatherings. That was a total conflict of interest and he should be ashamed.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Oz View Post
    Clarence Thomas went for years on SCOTUS without asking a single question, which is unprecedented. He was the deciding vote on Citizens United, after he spoke before the group in favor of their cause before their case was heard. He is an activist, not a jurist.
    He is also a first class, grade A, asshole........!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.