[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 50 of 105

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    187
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I think with Nile Rodgers at the helm it could have worked for Diana.. Beefed up bass line and guitar licks a plenty would have lent it a more funky, sophisticated feel.
    I can imagine Diana conducting a huge singalong with the Central Park crowd. Everybody together “HOLIDAY”.
    It certainly would have proved a bigger crowd pleaser then “Pieces Of Ice”.
    Not sure i agree Ollie. The standard of his production on Workin Overtime was shockingly bad. Without Bernard he just wrote tunes that were either bang average and /or were in the wrong key for Diana.
    I know he was under the influence during the sessions, but he had seemingly forgotten how to write or choose a song sympathetic to Diana's vocal strengths.
    I am not sure Diana would have accepted the song at that stage of her career. She was already too old for such fodder, as indeed she was for Girls. That ill thought out ditty was bad enough.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,940
    Rep Power
    402
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluebrock View Post
    Not sure i agree Ollie. The standard of his production on Workin Overtime was shockingly bad. Without Bernard he just wrote tunes that were either bang average and /or were in the wrong key for Diana.
    I know he was under the influence during the sessions, but he had seemingly forgotten how to write or choose a song sympathetic to Diana's vocal strengths.
    I am not sure Diana would have accepted the song at that stage of her career. She was already too old for such fodder, as indeed she was for Girls. That ill thought out ditty was bad enough.
    lolol well you know i sort of like Girls. for the period and times, i think it works. it's superficial and more style than substance.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,081
    Rep Power
    407
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    lolol well you know i sort of like Girls. for the period and times, i think it works. it's superficial and more style than substance.
    Style is not a word that immediately springs to mind when assessing “Girls”.
    Another word that funnily enough also starts with the letter S seems more appropriate.
    IMO of course.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,940
    Rep Power
    402
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    Style is not a word that immediately springs to mind when assessing “Girls”.
    Another word that funnily enough also starts with the letter S seems more appropriate.
    IMO of course.
    lolol see to me, Girls sounds very of the time. very 82/83. it's just a pop confection. not intended to be a major groundbreaking tune for the ages.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    187
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    Style is not a word that immediately springs to mind when assessing “Girls”.
    Another word that funnily enough also starts with the letter S seems more appropriate.
    IMO of course.
    Ha ha. I'm with you all the way on this one Ollie!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.