[REMOVE ADS]




Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 103
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Robin always wanted to be Marvin...

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    Robin always wanted to be Marvin...
    True dat! He even recorded a song that sounds very much like "Trouble Man".

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by bradsupremes View Post
    Marv, did you listen to the piano version of “Blurred Lines” that I posted? Did you hear anything remotely similar in the melody that resembles the melody of “Got To Give It Up?”
    No I haven't. I will Brad thanks.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    5,666
    Rep Power
    313
    Then again I've heard it said that the Gaye family should pay Thicke & Pharrell for raising interest in a decades-forgotten, lesser MG song ...

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Marvin Gaye Estate Wins “Blurred Lines” Appeal, Pharrell & Robin Thicke Need To Cut The Check!

    http://hiphopwired.com/747712/marvin...cut-the-check/

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by PeaceNHarmony View Post
    Then again I've heard it said that the Gaye family should pay Thicke & Pharrell for raising interest in a decades-forgotten, lesser MG song ...
    I don't know where you're from but here in America, Marvin Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" was one of his greatest hits, not a lesser song. It was a Billboard number one Pop hit and and number one R&B hit. The album it was pulled from was "Live at the London Palladium" and it went to number 3 on the Billboard Hot 100 album chart and number 1 on Billboard's R&B album chart! It was huge it. It is now a classic.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    The album also became one of his most commercially successful albums during his tenure at Motown.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Just to refresh your memory....................


  9. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by bradsupremes View Post
    The people on the jury were not a panel of musical experts nor have knowledge in musical composition.

    Listen to this. Take away the cowbells, bass, instruments. Listen to the melody. Does it sound anything like "Got To Give It Up?"

    This does not even make sense. You're talking about stripping the song completely down and removing the parts that not only sounded very similar to Marvin Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" , they were also the parts that caused "Blurred Lines" to sell! If this was issued as a commercial recording, I can promise you it would not sell 5 copies. Nice try though.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    The 2013 hit single "Blurred Lines" by Robin Thicke, Pharrell Williams and song co-writer T.I. was the subject of a lawsuit for allegedly copying "Got to Give It Up". Thicke originally told the public both he and Pharrell were in the recording studio and suddenly Thicke told Pharrell "Damn, we should make something like that, something with that groove" and they wrote the song in less than an hour. However, Thicke later claimed this was all a lie and the song was entirely written by Pharrell.[4] Thicke stated "I was high on Vicodin and alcohol when I showed up at the studio."[5] On March 10, 2015, a federal jury found "Blurred Lines" infringed on "Got to Give It Up” and awarded nearly $7.4 million to Gaye's children. Jurors found against Pharrell and Thicke, but held harmless the record company and T.I - Wikipedia

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by PeaceNHarmony View Post
    Then again I've heard it said that the Gaye family should pay Thicke & Pharrell for raising interest in a decades-forgotten, lesser MG song ...


    Say what?

    Now you KNOW I gotta defend my boy! How is that song a forgotten, lesser known song in his catalog? That was one of the biggest hits of his career! LOL

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,574
    Rep Power
    240
    Charlie Wilson has seen it all and is careful who he performs with..... I think is excellent...


  13. #63
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by MIKEW-UK View Post
    Charlie Wilson has seen it all and is careful who he performs with..... I think is excellent...

    Charlie Wilson is one of our very, very few Classic artist that remains or should I say allowed to remain relevant in America today. It is all bizarre to me when I think about all that talent that gets shut out now.

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,574
    Rep Power
    240
    Marv,

    Truest words you ever said. Couldn't agree more

    Mike

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,303
    Rep Power
    369
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    This does not even make sense. You're talking about stripping the song completely down and removing the parts that not only sounded very similar to Marvin Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" , they were also the parts that caused "Blurred Lines" to sell! If this was issued as a commercial recording, I can promise you it would not sell 5 copies. Nice try though.
    This is what I’m talking about, Marv. The song is the melody and chord structure. That is what the piano is playing - the melody and chords. That is the song and that’s what is disputed. Is the melody that the piano is playing the same melody of “Got To Give It Up?” A song is not the groove and arrangement. You are confusing arrangements as the song. It’s not. It’s a sound and you can’t copyright a sound.

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by bradsupremes View Post
    This is what I’m talking about, Marv. The song is the melody and chord structure. That is what the piano is playing - the melody and chords. That is the song and that’s what is disputed. Is the melody that the piano is playing the same melody of “Got To Give It Up?” A song is not the groove and arrangement. You are confusing arrangements as the song. It’s not. It’s a sound and you can’t copyright a sound.
    I will have to hear the melody and chord structure for "Got to Give it Up" in order to make a real comparison then.

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,734
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I don't know where you're from but here in America, Marvin Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" was one of his greatest hits, not a lesser song. It was a Billboard number one Pop hit and and number one R&B hit. The album it was pulled from was "Live at the London Palladium" and it went to number 3 on the Billboard Hot 100 album chart and number 1 on Billboard's R&B album chart! It was huge it. It is now a classic.
    You got that right. "Got to Give It Up" is not only a party staple, but it's constantly used in television shows and movies of all genres. That song is legend. Some folks need to stop with the bullshit.

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    You got that right. "Got to Give It Up" is not only a party staple, but it's constantly used in television shows and movies of all genres. That song is legend. Some folks need to stop with the bullshit.
    I agree with you 1000%! Cut the B.S. and all will be right with the World!

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    5,666
    Rep Power
    313
    If they ever end up with any money I'll revise my opinion if they donate it ALL to Black Lives Matter or another similar group. Otherwise ...


  20. #70
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    You got that right. "Got to Give It Up" is not only a party staple, but it's constantly used in television shows and movies of all genres. That song is legend. Some folks need to stop with the bullshit.
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I agree with you 1000%! Cut the B.S. and all will be right with the World!
    Ah I love this place...

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    123
    Rep Power
    91
    I agree. But things get complicated with these things. The thing is the family needs to iron things out on their own. Marvin's music rights can be settled if the family can agree. I listened to Marin's BBC special and one of Marvin's producers said that Marvin completed an album after Midnight Love that is ready to be released. The producer said the album probably will not see the light of day because the families are fighting each other and are going through several lawsuits. So this madness has nothing to do with Robin. They need to handle this on their own.

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by Encyclopedia Mack View Post
    I agree. But things get complicated with these things. The thing is the family needs to iron things out on their own. Marvin's music rights can be settled if the family can agree. I listened to Marin's BBC special and one of Marvin's producers said that Marvin completed an album after Midnight Love that is ready to be released. The producer said the album probably will not see the light of day because the families are fighting each other and are going through several lawsuits. So this madness has nothing to do with Robin. They need to handle this on their own.

    I thought "Sanctified Lady" was recorded after "Midnight Love".

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by Encyclopedia Mack View Post
    I agree. But things get complicated with these things. The thing is the family needs to iron things out on their own. Marvin's music rights can be settled if the family can agree. I listened to Marin's BBC special and one of Marvin's producers said that Marvin completed an album after Midnight Love that is ready to be released. The producer said the album probably will not see the light of day because the families are fighting each other and are going through several lawsuits. So this madness has nothing to do with Robin. They need to handle this on their own.
    Marvin had a current BBC special? And if the families are fighting, it's Janis, Marvin III, Nona and Frankie vs. Zeola and Jeanne.

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481
    So typical; if there’s any chance of any money for nothing, the families swarm, fight to the death, give the money to the lawyers and come out with nothing

    Didn’t Mary say she finally got tired of fighting and paying lawyers?

    Bad stuff

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    So typical; if there’s any chance of any money for nothing, the families swarm, fight to the death, give the money to the lawyers and come out with nothing

    Didn’t Mary say she finally got tired of fighting and paying lawyers?

    Bad stuff
    So typical of whom? Money for nothing? Could you explain yourself?

  26. #76
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    I still remember a few years ago, Zeola argued that they wouldn't receive any of the money and they were [[dead) broke or whatever. But if I know anything about family is that some wanna leech off of you. Marvin's sisters definitely rub me the wrong way. Zeola mostly from what she said about that fateful day on April 1, 1984.

    Jeanne & Zeola may also be the reason why there's a hold up on that documentary and mini-series that are being planned about Marvin's life [[projects that got the okay of MG's publishing company and Motown).

  27. #77
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481
    Generally your heirs are spouses and children and siblings would come below them and parents

    Did Marvin have a will!

    How did siblings get mixed up in this?

  28. #78
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Marvin didn't leave behind a will. They had to force his 17-year-old son to be executor of his estate because he didn't write one. But I imagine if he had a will, none of his siblings would've been included and his mother was dying at the time. And when the estate was formed, Jeanne, Zeola and Frankie Sr. weren't included. I imagine they included just Marvin III, Nona [[when she was grown) and Lil Frankie [[when he got grown) because that's his estate basically. His siblings shouldn't jump in anyway. They got no business to ask for any of that change.

    By the way, all of Marvin's grandkids [[the ones known anyway) are grown [[not sure about Lil Frankie, who looks JUST LIKE MARVIN btw, but I don't think he has kids).
    Last edited by midnightman; 04-02-2018 at 09:51 PM.

  29. #79
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,680
    Rep Power
    194
    If you don't hear the similarity between BL and GTGIU, you are in the minority. It doesn't take a degree or years of musical experience to hear that the resemblance is beyond striking and hardly coincidental.

    Yes, many songs borrow the same chord structure and harmonies, but with BL, its the sum of all of its parts that add up to a Marvin Gaye-rip off.

    At best, BL is a lazy spin-off of a Marvin Gaye classic. At its heart, its a lazy attempt at a vintage soul revival with horribly distasteful lyrics that overtly disregards sexual consent, as sung by a washed-up creep who's probably taken one too many Viagra.

    Personal opinions aside, Thicke and Pharrell - for the music biz veterans that they are - were stupid not to have learned anything from the mess that was the George Harrison v. Bright Tunes [["My Sweet Lord" v. "He's So Fine") fiasco.

  30. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by antceleb12 View Post
    If you don't hear the similarity between BL and GTGIU, you are in the minority. It doesn't take a degree or years of musical experience to hear that the resemblance is beyond striking and hardly coincidental.

    Yes, many songs borrow the same chord structure and harmonies, but with BL, its the sum of all of its parts that add up to a Marvin Gaye-rip off.

    At best, BL is a lazy spin-off of a Marvin Gaye classic. At its heart, its a lazy attempt at a vintage soul revival with horribly distasteful lyrics that overtly disregards sexual consent, as sung by a washed-up creep who's probably taken one too many Viagra.

    Personal opinions aside, Thicke and Pharrell - for the music biz veterans that they are - were stupid not to have learned anything from the mess that was the George Harrison v. Bright Tunes [["My Sweet Lord" v. "He's So Fine") fiasco.
    All I will say to that is Uh huh, YEP! LOL!!!! Write that check Pharrell and Robin the Boy Wonder...... LOL!

  31. #81
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by antceleb12 View Post
    If you don't hear the similarity between BL and GTGIU, you are in the minority. It doesn't take a degree or years of musical experience to hear that the resemblance is beyond striking and hardly coincidental.

    Yes, many songs borrow the same chord structure and harmonies, but with BL, its the sum of all of its parts that add up to a Marvin Gaye-rip off.

    At best, BL is a lazy spin-off of a Marvin Gaye classic. At its heart, its a lazy attempt at a vintage soul revival with horribly distasteful lyrics that overtly disregards sexual consent, as sung by a washed-up creep who's probably taken one too many Viagra.

    Personal opinions aside, Thicke and Pharrell - for the music biz veterans that they are - were stupid not to have learned anything from the mess that was the George Harrison v. Bright Tunes [["My Sweet Lord" v. "He's So Fine") fiasco.
    I agree with you, ant [[by the way long time no see).

    You know what's so funny about the whole thing, Robin Thicke basically threw Pharrell under the bus during that whole thing, he tried to pin the whole thing on Pharrell, which exposes him too because it shows all he can do is write lyrics [[and by the way he wrote that song, it was horrible anyway; that song was an anthem for the douchebags).

    We know "Happy" ain't all original either. And I know Stevie tried to stick up for him, but God dammit if "Frontin'" didn't sound like "I Can't Help It"...

  32. #82
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    123
    Rep Power
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    Marvin had a current BBC special? And if the families are fighting, it's Janis, Marvin III, Nona and Frankie vs. Zeola and Jeanne.
    Not current. They replay it on the BBC website often.

  33. #83
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481
    If there is no Will, the heirs are the spouse [and there can be more than one] and the children; but if one of the children predeceased Marvin, their children would take the predeceased child’s share.

    That’s what intestate legislation [no will] nearly always provides.

    Siblings are never involved unless there is no spouse and no children

    So something else is being argued here

    Who were the writers and producers of Got To Give It Up? They will be in on this.

    I suspect the only real money coming in is from the use of the songs in commercials and movies - because they aren’t selling much anymore

  34. #84
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    If there is no Will, the heirs are the spouse [and there can be more than one] and the children; but if one of the children predeceased Marvin, their children would take the predeceased child’s share.

    That’s what intestate legislation [no will] nearly always provides.

    Siblings are never involved unless there is no spouse and no children

    So something else is being argued here

    Who were the writers and producers of Got To Give It Up? They will be in on this.

    I suspect the only real money coming in is from the use of the songs in commercials and movies - because they aren’t selling much anymore
    I don't know where you got your information , but thank goodness "Blurred Lines" made a
    lot of money!

    Blurred Lines the total profits made were US$16.67 million [[A$21.3 million).

    http://www.news.com.au/entertainment...733ff681d02a9a

  35. #85
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    If there is no Will, the heirs are the spouse [and there can be more than one] and the children; but if one of the children predeceased Marvin, their children would take the predeceased child’s share.

    That’s what intestate legislation [no will] nearly always provides.

    Siblings are never involved unless there is no spouse and no children

    So something else is being argued here

    Who were the writers and producers of Got To Give It Up? They will be in on this.


    I suspect the only real money coming in is from the use of the songs in commercials and movies - because they aren’t selling much anymore
    Marvin was the sole writer. Art Stewart is credited as the producer. But Marvin due to having EP powers on his London Palladium album [[as well as being a producer of the live album) still gets royalty cuts from producing even now.

    GTGIU was in several soundtracks over the years. Shoot, in the future, it could be used for commercials. God knows how many times Let's Get It On has been used in the past. Every Easter week, the Reeses commercial featuring LGIO continues to air to this day.

    Blurred Lines was a multi-million dollar song.

  36. #86
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,896
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    Robin always wanted to be Marvin...
    And Marvin always wanted to be Martha. Or Mary. Or Diana.

  37. #87
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by marybrewster View Post
    And Marvin always wanted to be Martha. Or Mary. Or Diana.
    LOL you got jokes.

  38. #88
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    LOL you got jokes.
    Not sure how much of a joke this is anymore, as things get revealed.

    If there is some money flowing down the pipe, you would think that the family would have some interest in resolving things between themselves - so they get some of it while they are all alive.

    Some of this just makes no sense.

  39. #89
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,734
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    His siblings shouldn't jump in anyway. They got no business to ask for any of that change.
    I agree that this fight- whether I actually agree with the fight or not- is the business of the estate, and it seems like the estate would be Marvin's descendants, not his siblings. But I wouldn't say the siblings have no right to ask for anything. If Marvin were my brother [[or my sister) I'd like to think I would get broke off a little something, especially if it were a large amount.

  40. #90
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,734
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Not sure how much of a joke this is anymore, as things get revealed.

    If there is some money flowing down the pipe, you would think that the family would have some interest in resolving things between themselves - so they get some of it while they are all alive.

    Some of this just makes no sense.
    That's the sad thing about a lot of these situations. And I'm not even talking strictly rich and famous. I see this played out in families that have no riches at all. The money becomes more important than the relationships. I like to think that I'd tell my family to take the money and stick it up their asses rather than me spend time fighting or begging for a cut. So many folks place an importance on money. As my grandmother would say, when you die you can't take it with you. So what's the point?

  41. #91
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by Encyclopedia Mack View Post
    Not current. They replay it on the BBC website often.
    You mean that one from a few years ago? I know of the Stubborn Kinda Fellow one [[as well as the 1994 documentary that aired on the BBC)...

  42. #92
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Not sure how much of a joke this is anymore, as things get revealed.

    If there is some money flowing down the pipe, you would think that the family would have some interest in resolving things between themselves - so they get some of it while they are all alive.

    Some of this just makes no sense.
    Well I think there's still some bitterness because, remember, Zeola Gaye released her memoirs and basically called Janis trash and that's a reason Marvin's kids no longer communicate with her and the rest of the Gay/Gaye family, I imagine. That's not something that can be easily forgiven.

  43. #93
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    123
    Rep Power
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    You mean that one from a few years ago? I know of the Stubborn Kinda Fellow one [[as well as the 1994 documentary that aired on the BBC)...
    I believe that was it. It was broken up into 4-5 parts. That's all I'm saying is it looks hypocrite for the family. No disrespect. But don't whoop and holler about your father's/husband music with Blurred Lines. But then they can't get together amongst each other to preserve Marvin's legacy. They have been going at this for almost 4 decades. Who do we go to about that?

  44. #94
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    I agree that this fight- whether I actually agree with the fight or not- is the business of the estate, and it seems like the estate would be Marvin's descendants, not his siblings. But I wouldn't say the siblings have no right to ask for anything. If Marvin were my brother [[or my sister) I'd like to think I would get broke off a little something, especially if it were a large amount.
    I do know that Marvin Gaye very much loved his siblings, especially Sweetie aka Zeola. I had the opportunity to see his brother Frankie perform after Marvin had passed. Frankie could have been Marvin's twin. His experiences in Vietnam were Marvin's inspiration for the album "What's Going On?".

  45. #95
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    Well I think there's still some bitterness because, remember, Zeola Gaye released her memoirs and basically called Janis trash and that's a reason Marvin's kids no longer communicate with her and the rest of the Gay/Gaye family, I imagine. That's not something that can be easily forgiven.
    Janis was what Zeola Gaye said she was. It was the truth and i don't have problem with it.

  46. #96
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by Encyclopedia Mack View Post
    I believe that was it. It was broken up into 4-5 parts. That's all I'm saying is it looks hypocrite for the family. No disrespect. But don't whoop and holler about your father's/husband music with Blurred Lines. But then they can't get together amongst each other to preserve Marvin's legacy. They have been going at this for almost 4 decades. Who do we go to about that?
    It is quite messy.

  47. #97
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by Encyclopedia Mack View Post
    I believe that was it. It was broken up into 4-5 parts. That's all I'm saying is it looks hypocrite for the family. No disrespect. But don't whoop and holler about your father's/husband music with Blurred Lines. But then they can't get together amongst each other to preserve Marvin's legacy. They have been going at this for almost 4 decades. Who do we go to about that?
    Maybe Berry Gordy could step in there. He is after all a relative. He's Marvin III's uncle and Marvin Gaye's former brother in law.

  48. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Maybe Berry Gordy could step in there. He is after all a relative. He's Marvin III's uncle and Marvin Gaye's former brother in law.
    Thats just bullcrap. The things that you make up. LOLOLOLOLOLOL. Mr Gordy is 88 and isnt interested in getting into and Gaye sibling family fightin.

  49. #99
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,734
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    Thats just bullcrap. The things that you make up. LOLOLOLOLOLOL. Mr Gordy is 88 and isnt interested in getting into and Gaye sibling family fightin.
    What's made up? Berry Gordy is Marvin III's uncle. Marv suggested Gordy might step in, not that Gordy had stepped in. And I don't think it's a bad idea if Gordy cares to do it.

  50. #100
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    347
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    What's made up? Berry Gordy is Marvin III's uncle. Marv suggested Gordy might step in, not that Gordy had stepped in. And I don't think it's a bad idea if Gordy cares to do it.
    IMO Bery Gordy aint getting involved in no Gaye sibling family drama imo.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.