[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 43 of 43
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,008
    Rep Power
    263

    Back in my arms again ........high inergy

    What happen to these girls ? They are the only ones that I know who were brave enough to tackle this song and did a good job of it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,051
    Rep Power
    178
    AH..love this group. Have all their albums. Started a thread on them too. They did a, not too bad job on this Supremes classic. Maybe if we keep on tryin, we can persuad Universal to put a Best Of CD. Cheers..Paulo xxx

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    472
    Rep Power
    178
    Good rendition from the group once called "New Supremes" by Motown while the "old" Supremes were still around! "He's A Pretender" was my favorite by H.I.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,008
    Rep Power
    263
    I remember them being good dancers and singers. Motown was never at a lost for talent.

  5. #5
    smark21 Guest
    Good vocals, but I don't care for the production and arrangment. Back in My Arms is a song that needs horns.

  6. #6
    miss_lish Guest
    Horns, Miss Ross, Mary, and Flo.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,008
    Rep Power
    263
    I have heard Barbara and Vernessa are still singing singing but I wonder what ever happen to the other two ladies. I think their names were Linda and Michelle.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    James

    Isn't it Linda that takes the place in "Flo, she don't know.."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,886
    Rep Power
    481
    I heard the word "Lynda" in this song; this certainly is a forgotten Supremes song; even on Youtube, it doesn't get much play. I prefer the Supremes version;it was the original; this one didn't stray far from it. The difference between this one and the Supremes was this one cut out any background and I enjoyed the Supremes behind Diana; although one of the live versions of the Supremes has a background so different, I wondered if the record had been colored with heavy Andantes.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,599
    Rep Power
    203
    I don't think the Andantes were on the Supremes recording. High Inergy had become a trio long before they disbanded.
    Gwen Gordy was responsible for them and had them down here in Florida working when their first lp was out. Did anyone
    ever see the Carol Burnett Show where she did a spoof of You Can't Turn Me Off?
    I thought it was very bad PR from Motown to promote these girls as the "new Supremes" regardless of the actual
    Supremes still being a part of Motown.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    I agree with Randy's point about PR.....I thought it was well harsh on the ladies to expect them to live up to that standard. But I guess that is what PR machines are meant to do.....

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by randy_russi View Post
    I don't think the Andantes were on the Supremes recording. High Inergy had become a trio long before they disbanded.
    Gwen Gordy was responsible for them and had them down here in Florida working when their first lp was out. Did anyone
    ever see the Carol Burnett Show where she did a spoof of You Can't Turn Me Off?
    I thought it was very bad PR from Motown to promote these girls as the "new Supremes" regardless of the actual
    Supremes still being a part of Motown.
    Mary Wilson's lawyer, Mr. Turk thought it was bad PR too, hehehehehehe.........!

    I saw that Carol Burnett episode you are referring to.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    I felt bad for Mary Wilson too. That PR was not nice for her.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by theboyfromxtown View Post
    I felt bad for Mary Wilson too. That PR was not nice for her.
    Nor for Scherrie Payne or Susaye Greene who were the Supremes at that time.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,706
    Rep Power
    185
    Don't know much about his group. I think I had one of their LP's. Guess I was still into the real deal Supremes. I thought I had read where really only one girl could/did sing [[leads)....the other two were basically dancers. Not sure if the other two were even on the recordings? Maybe someone here could clarify that. Then, were the Andantes still singing then and would they have been on their recordings? Thanks for any clarification.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Nor for Scherrie Payne or Susaye Greene who were the Supremes at that time.
    Absolutely! It must have been very hurtful...it was so unnecessary too.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    584
    Rep Power
    207
    Blueskies, the Andantes stopped singing for Motown when Motown moved to LA so it would be unlikely the girls are on the High Inergy songs.

  18. #18
    topdiva1 Guest
    Calling High Energy The NEW Supremes - was just another example of how expendable you could be at Motown if you were not in favor.

    Certainly this was hurtful to The Supremes at the time. and did nothing for High Energyu

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    Topdiva1

    Agreed.....it wasn't good for both groups.

    We all know you have to be tough to be in business but it seems you have to be even tougher if it's the music business.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,886
    Rep Power
    481
    The High Energy version sounds like a complete solo with some background singers; the Supremes version sounds like more of a group.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by topdiva1 View Post
    Calling High Energy The NEW Supremes - was just another example of how expendable you could be at Motown if you were not in favor.

    Certainly this was hurtful to The Supremes at the time. and did nothing for High Energyu

    What made it a really rotten thing to do was naming the group "High Inergy" after one of the Supremes recent albums at that time. They just changed the E to and I in energy!

  22. #22
    smark21 Guest
    In the late 80's, Motown promoted The Good Girls as the "New Supremes" and had them cover "Love is Like an Itching in My Heart". However The Good Girls enjoyed nowhere near the success of other girl groups of that era like Expose and The Cover Girls, let alone The Supremes.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by smark21 View Post
    In the late 80's, Motown promoted The Good Girls as the "New Supremes" and had them cover "Love is Like an Itching in My Heart". However The Good Girls enjoyed nowhere near the success of other girl groups of that era like Expose and The Cover Girls, let alone The Supremes.
    They couldn't even come close to En Vogue!

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,008
    Rep Power
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by smark21 View Post
    In the late 80's, Motown promoted The Good Girls as the "New Supremes" and had them cover "Love is Like an Itching in My Heart". However The Good Girls enjoyed nowhere near the success of other girl groups of that era like Expose and The Cover Girls, let alone The Supremes.
    The Good Girls ----I remember them well and how pretty they were. However, I always felt it was odd to name them THE GOOD GIRLS. "Your Sweetness Is My Weakness" use to be the jam at the club.

    No the one group that came close to surpassing the Supremes were the Honey Cone. However they were not on the Motown label.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    Very true James...and I can remember a time when Honey Cone beat the Supremes in one of those US popularity polls.

    And the fact that Honey Cone were HDH's replacement was a hard pill to swallow.

  26. #26
    topdiva1 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    What made it a really rotten thing to do was naming the group "High Inergy" after one of the Supremes recent albums at that time. They just changed the E to and I in energy!

    Motown could be rotten, and at times acting more like a spoiled child than a corporation.

  27. #27
    smark21 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by theboyfromxtown View Post
    Very true James...and I can remember a time when Honey Cone beat the Supremes in one of those US popularity polls.

    And the fact that Honey Cone were HDH's replacement was a hard pill to swallow.
    But how long did Honey Cone last? Not as long as the Supremes and though they may have beaten them out in a popularity poll, they didn't have as many hits as The Supremes. Or Expose for that matter.

  28. #28
    miss_lish Guest
    Didn't TLC surpass The Supremes?

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,008
    Rep Power
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by theboyfromxtown View Post
    Very true James...and I can remember a time when Honey Cone beat the Supremes in one of those US popularity polls.

    And the fact that Honey Cone were HDH's replacement was a hard pill to swallow.
    Your absolutely right John
    and I remember when I first heard "Want Ads" and then came "Stick Up", "One Monkey", and "The Day I Found Myself." These girls had found the right formula and the best writers and then Bamn they were gone

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,845
    Rep Power
    180
    Yes that really suked for the MSS. Not really relating to this thread, but I thought maybe, just maybe, MSS might take off. I really liked the title song. MSS [[can't for Cindy!) was so much much better than High Inergy. I remember that the record store set up a special display rack outside the store to promote High Energy.

  31. #31
    smark21 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by miss_lish View Post
    Didn't TLC surpass The Supremes?
    In total sales [[singles and albums) though not in terms of number of charted singles and #1 singles as TLC took years between album projects. Then Destiny's Child overtook TLC. Also have to take into account that the pop music marketplace of the 90's and early 00's was a lot different than the one in the 60's and 70's. In terms of top ten singles, The Supremes far outpace any other group. Others who did well on that chart include TLC, Destiny's Child, and Expose.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    smark21

    Spot on...you're right, it wasn't very long that the Honey Cone were at the top but at the time, I thought it WOULD last as long as it did for the Supremes.

    I soon learnt my lesson though!

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,392
    Rep Power
    191
    Aah yes, I remember giving you that spanking!

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,886
    Rep Power
    481
    And he enjoyed it right?

    Elegant again! This will be fun; welcome back.

    For a while, a brief while, Honey Cone looked like they would be hitmakers, like the old Supremes, especially after Want Ads was #1 Pop. The were funkier and more soulful than the female Motown groups and the glitz of the Supremes had grown tired. But Honey Cone didn't last very long ~ basically, the 3 hits starting with Want Ads and they started to slip just like the 70's Supremes.

    Looking back, I think I agree with what has been written by music historians which was it was the beginning of a singer/songwriter time and vocalists on their own ~ especially Carole King, James Taylor, Jim Croce but also Stevie Wonder and Marvin Gaye as well as vocalists like Diana, Aretha and Dionne. The singing group concept went into remission.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    Elegant... I have missed you baby!

    Everything has been fine here whilst you've been away....no problems whatsoever.

    Isn't that right Rob?

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    129
    Rep Power
    168
    Thanks for posting this! I had their first album [[Turnin' On) but had never heard this.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    265
    Rep Power
    170
    Scherrie Payne recorded Want Ads [[with The Supremes) but Honey Cone's version got released first. Things could have been so different.

  38. #38
    smark21 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by markdtiller View Post
    Scherrie Payne recorded Want Ads [[with The Supremes) but Honey Cone's version got released first. Things could have been so different.
    Want Ads by Honey Cone came out in 1970. Scherrie didn't join the Supremes until late 1973. Maybe Scherrie recorded Want Ads with Glass House?

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,515
    Rep Power
    183
    After Hi Inergy's last album, Barbara Mitchell recorded a solo-album on Capitol around 1984 :





    Second album around 1986, with Cameo's soul army and released by their label on Polygram :





    Lately into gospel [[ edit : thought it was Barbara from Hi Inergy ... my bad )

    Last edited by cozmic; 02-18-2011 at 09:11 PM.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    That clip of the woman singing gospel is not the Barbara Mitchell of High Inergy.

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,515
    Rep Power
    183
    Ah i see, thanks for the heads up !
    So that's Barbara Rogers Mitchell : http://www.discogs.com/artist/Barbara+Mitchell+%283%29

    Also found a brief update from a family member :

    "...Vernessa Mitchell and Barbara Mitchell are in Atlanta and Michell Rumph and Linda Howard
    are in Pasadena. Michelle Rumph is my mother..."


    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Where_are_...he_time_Thanks

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    9
    Rep Power
    166
    Quote Originally Posted by cozmic View Post
    Ah i see, thanks for the heads up !
    So that's Barbara Rogers Mitchell : http://www.discogs.com/artist/Barbara+Mitchell+%283%29

    Also found a brief update from a family member :

    "...Vernessa Mitchell and Barbara Mitchell are in Atlanta and Michell Rumph and Linda Howard
    are in Pasadena. Michelle Rumph is my mother..."


    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Where_are_...he_time_Thanks
    Thanks for posting the link about the update of these ladies.

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    391
    I used to love their version too. I didn't think the reference to Linda [[when it would normally be Flo) fitted well into the song. So I still used to sing FLO! LOL

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.