[REMOVE ADS]




Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 101 to 113 of 113
  1. #101
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by daviddh View Post
    To bad Mary doesn't plan a reunion with these ladies now. I think they would Rock it
    Susaye said she would be up for it. Mary didn't seem quite as keen when I asked her earlier this year. Not sure about Scherrie.

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,864
    Rep Power
    397
    i think a MSS reunion would not be wildly successful, except to a core of the fan base. Was anyone at the Scherrie and Susaye event a year or two ago? heard it was lightly attended. while I adore this lineup's recordings, their output is not recognized widely and so unless it was at a small club or intimate setting in a NY or LA, I doubt it would be worth the costs, logistics, rehearsal and effort.

    it might have been more impactful with the release of the Jean and Scherrie sets to do some press events with that. They could do 2 or 3 songs, sign autographs, promote the releases, etc. but Mary skipped out on the Jean one and Cindy was not available for the Scherrie one.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,864
    Rep Power
    397
    back to the original topic

    i'm surprised Motown never did any 12" remixes of the Sup songs from the era. With the songs doing very well on the Dance Charts, it would have made sense.

    Also from previous threads on here, Motown did not want to pursue another lineup of Sups when Jean and Lynda left. Story goes that Berry finally gave in to Mary and signed them, guess he felt he owed her. So they recorded the Sup 75 lp with a variety of producers to see what might generate interest. when the Holland productions proved pretty good and fan/disco response was quite strong, Motown figured maybe they could bring the group back and it could be a strong disco act. that's when Motown offered to re-manage the group. they could see that Pedro was already f'ing things up and the problems were quickly mounting. Motown felt there was an opportunity to make money and wanted Scherrie on lead. When mary and Pedro said no to the management and insisted mary lead, that pretty much made Motown wash their hands

    so the story goes at least

  4. #104
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    back to the original topic

    i'm surprised Motown never did any 12" remixes of the Sup songs from the era. With the songs doing very well on the Dance Charts, it would have made sense.

    Also from previous threads on here, Motown did not want to pursue another lineup of Sups when Jean and Lynda left. Story goes that Berry finally gave in to Mary and signed them, guess he felt he owed her. So they recorded the Sup 75 lp with a variety of producers to see what might generate interest. when the Holland productions proved pretty good and fan/disco response was quite strong, Motown figured maybe they could bring the group back and it could be a strong disco act. that's when Motown offered to re-manage the group. they could see that Pedro was already f'ing things up and the problems were quickly mounting. Motown felt there was an opportunity to make money and wanted Scherrie on lead. When mary and Pedro said no to the management and insisted mary lead, that pretty much made Motown wash their hands

    so the story goes at least
    I'm afraid you have pretty much hit the nail on the head with your assessment. It pretty much tallies up with what I have been told by two well placed sources. It was before I became involved at Motown but survivors from the time have told me how the demise of the Supremes came about. Well stated sup fan.

  5. #105
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,411
    Rep Power
    184
    true, there never were the standard 12 inch singles released on The Supremes at all..never dawned on me at the time.. DJs had to play them off the album which Im sure didnt make many of them happy in a 12 inch remix world of that time

  6. #106
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,900
    Rep Power
    401
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    When mary and Pedro said no to the management and insisted mary lead, that pretty much made Motown wash their hands

    so the story goes at least
    I don't doubt what you are saying as true, but the devil's advocate in me questions: did Mary REALLY have that much pull to say NO to Motown?

    The bottom line, I think is, that Mary herself didn't want to change. Not the name. Not the sound. Not the image. She was living in 1976 like it was 1966. Except the champagne no longer was flowing. Basically everything she had taken for granted a decade before she now had to work for.

    I mean, this is a woman that even in the 1980's was still wearing 60's and 70's Supremes gowns. If not with MSS, then at least when she struck out on her own, Mary should have ditched the gowns. And for sure ditched the 2 backup singers.

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,411
    Rep Power
    184
    I think that is correct

  8. #108
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,864
    Rep Power
    397
    Mary B - excellent points too. I'm going to guess that by 1973, mary was pretty worried. what would she do if not singing with the Sups? It had gotten to the point where Motown was done with the group. As were Jean and Lynda. so now where would that leave Mary? she had little to no major name recognition to establish somewhere else as a solo star. no tv or movie track record to go into that industry. This all begs the question as to whether Mary and Cindy "ruined" the hope for the Sups by no accepting Syreeta. I know i'm being VERY strong there, almost shocking! hehehe and I don't disagree with their decision to stay with jean. but by doing so they essentially killed off whatever minimal interest Berry and therefore Motown would have in the group post Diana. Everyone knows that no group lasts forever. they could have had more foresight to plan for the future by keeping in good graces with management

    just an observation

  9. #109
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,411
    Rep Power
    184
    well that's it..people act like Gordy wasn't the employer and everyone else was employees..well, they WERE!!

  10. #110
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,112
    Rep Power
    240
    BG once said If you do what I say ,Ill take you with me......the original line up did and was very successful but in the 70s,i think MW refused to go along with the program and found herself on the wrong side of the studio...so to speak

  11. #111
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,038
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by daviddh View Post
    BG once said If you do what I say ,Ill take you with me......the original line up did and was very successful but in the 70s,i think MW refused to go along with the program and found herself on the wrong side of the studio...so to speak
    I really don't think it fair to blame everything on Mary. She fought very hard to keep the Supremes going when Motown could not have cared less. I can well understand how she must have felt wary when Gordy surprisingly declared renewed interest in the group. Perhaps it was the wrong decision for the Supremes at the time, but clarity is easy in the full light of hindsight.

  12. #112
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,283
    Rep Power
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I really don't think it fair to blame everything on Mary. She fought very hard to keep the Supremes going when Motown could not have cared less. I can well understand how she must have felt wary when Gordy surprisingly declared renewed interest in the group. Perhaps it was the wrong decision for the Supremes at the time, but clarity is easy in the full light of hindsight.
    I agree 100%. It's easy for everyone here to give their opinion, you've seen the story from start to finish, then give your opinion on what Mary should have or shouldn't have done. Those who know individuals who were around then might give a bit of the story here and there but more than likely don't know the full situation so we form our conclusions on a partial story. If anyone of us were in the same situation how would we respond?

  13. #113
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by blackguy69 View Post
    I agree 100%. It's easy for everyone here to give their opinion, you've seen the story from start to finish, then give your opinion on what Mary should have or shouldn't have done. Those who know individuals who were around then might give a bit of the story here and there but more than likely don't know the full situation so we form our conclusions on a partial story. If anyone of us were in the same situation how would we respond?
    Bravo!!!!!!!!!!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.