[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    312

    A supremes anthology question

    Maybe this has been discussed,but why wasn't[the tears-mary on lead-buttered popcorn-flo on lead]included on the supremes anthology album?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,139
    Rep Power
    261
    If you are referring to the first vinyl issue from 1973, it's because Motown felt the public was not familiar enough with those songs. And they weren't.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    312
    If you believe that i got a bridge in brooklyn to sell you,and i guess the public just ate up[let me go the right way]hmmmmm?????

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by arr&bee View Post
    If you believe that i got a bridge in brooklyn to sell you,and i guess the public just ate up[let me go the right way]hmmmmm?????
    LOL!!!! hehehehehehehehehe..................!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,432
    Rep Power
    178
    Hehehehehehehehehe! Bayou Motown man speaks the truth.
    The facts speak for themselves, rather than scoffs and false conjectures
    'The Tears' would not see release until 1986 on "Never Before Released Masters From Today's Brightest Stars- The 1960's" and "Buttered Popcorn" failed to chart either pop or
    r & b. The public at large would have been unfamiliar with either song in 1973.
    And suprise! 'Let Me Go Right' did rather well on the r & b chart, peaking at #26, although on the pop chart it only made it into the top 100 at #90.

  6. #6
    honest man Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by arr&bee View Post
    Maybe this has been discussed,but why wasn't[the tears-mary on lead-buttered popcorn-flo on lead]included on the supremes anthology album?
    they were rubbish songs and did not deserve to be added

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,432
    Rep Power
    178
    It is true: "The truth will set you free"!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    312
    Listen up folks...the word[anthology]means[a collection of]so just like i asked the temps question i wonder about the omission of these two songs,i don't care if they sold big or not they were part of the group's history they shoulda been included!!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by arr&bee View Post
    Listen up folks...the word[anthology]means[a collection of]so just like i asked the temps question i wonder about the omission of these two songs,i don't care if they sold big or not they were part of the group's history they shoulda been included!!!
    I agree. I don't personally care for them but the very fact they exist should have meant their inclusion.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    312
    Thank you bluebrock.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,432
    Rep Power
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by arr&bee View Post
    Listen up folks...the word[anthology]means[a collection of]so just like i asked the temps question i wonder about the omission of these two songs,i don't care if they sold big or not they were part of the group's history they shoulda been included!!!
    Unless someone can demonstrate otherwise, all songs that a group recorded [[released and unreleased) are part of their history.
    The owners of the songs/recordings are those who decide what to release from that particular history and owe us no explanation as to their decisions.
    And, as has been demonstrated, one of the songs that you wish had been included on a 1973 release was still in the vaults until 1986.
    And you did mock Bayou Motown Man's answer to your question by suggesting that a song that was included shouldn't have been included because it did not sell well and therefore was not well known. It appears that you are now talking out of both sides of your mouth here.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,313
    Rep Power
    530
    The original Anthology collection didn't include unreleased material so I can understand why THE TEARS wasn't included.

    Re BUTTERED POPCORN, one could make a stronger argument for its inclusion as it was a single. However, it didn't chart. And even though the ANTHOLOGY series was meant to be more than a regular greatest hits collection, if they had included every single the girls had before WHERE DID OUR LOVE GO, there wouldn't have been a major hit featured until near the end of Side 2. Those compiling the collection might have thought that was too long to wait.
    Last edited by reese; 09-23-2015 at 11:32 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    312
    Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...hi carole,i'm always talking out of both sides but not this time,read the last thing i posted above...bye carol.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    4,308
    Rep Power
    335
    Quote Originally Posted by reese View Post
    The original Anthology collection didn't include unreleased material so I can understand why THE TEARS wasn't included.

    Re BUTTERED POPCORN, one could make a stronger argument for its inclusion as it was a single. However, it didn't chart. And even though the ANTHOLOGY series was meant to be more than a regular greatest hits collection, if they had included every single the girls had before WHERE DID OUR LOVE GO, there wouldn't have been a major hit featured until near the end of Side 2. Those compiling the collection might have thought that was too long to wait.
    This makes the most sense. As I recall, the vinyl Anthology included a few songs which were already pretty unfamiliar to most Supremes fans, such as "Let Me Go the Right Way," "Breath Taking Guy," and "Run Run Run." I knew these songs as album tracks but had no idea any of them were singles.

    At the time I purchased the Anthology, I thought it was a great overview of the girls' career. Half of Side 1 gave an inkling as to how the girls developed while trying to find their own sound. It even had a side devoted to their concept LPs, such as Liverpool/Sam Cooke/C&W/Rodgers and Hart and even one track from Funny Girl. I think it was brilliantly conceived and back then a 3-LP set was pretty rare on its own.

    I always thought the producers did a great job on this set.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,984
    Rep Power
    230
    "Let Me Go The Right Way" bw "Time Changes Things" was the first record I bought by the Supremes and to this day are 2 of my faves by them because they were a real group with tight harmonies.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    292
    Same for me motony. My older brother bought it and I heard those harmonies coming from his room and that's how I got hooked !

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by BayouMotownMan View Post
    If you are referring to the first vinyl issue from 1973, it's because Motown felt the public was not familiar enough with those songs. And they weren't.

    It came out in 1974.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by carole cucumber View Post
    Unless someone can demonstrate otherwise, all songs that a group recorded [[released and unreleased) are part of their history.
    The owners of the songs/recordings are those who decide what to release from that particular history and owe us no explanation as to their decisions.
    And, as has been demonstrated, one of the songs that you wish had been included on a 1973 release was still in the vaults until 1986.
    And you did mock Bayou Motown Man's answer to your question by suggesting that a song that was included shouldn't have been included because it did not sell well and therefore was not well known. It appears that you are now talking out of both sides of your mouth here.
    The anthology did not come out in 1973. It was released in 1974!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by carole cucumber View Post
    Hehehehehehehehehe! Bayou Motown man speaks the truth.
    The facts speak for themselves, rather than scoffs and false conjectures
    'The Tears' would not see release until 1986 on "Never Before Released Masters From Today's Brightest Stars- The 1960's" and "Buttered Popcorn" failed to chart either pop or
    r & b. The public at large would have been unfamiliar with either song in 1973.
    And suprise! 'Let Me Go Right' did rather well on the r & b chart, peaking at #26, although on the pop chart it only made it into the top 100 at #90.
    Why do you keep saying 1973. You the wrong year from Bayouman and you are just running with huh?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.