[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 72
  1. #1

    IS SDF Turmning Into a You Tube Promo arena

    Have to say I'm getting a bit bored of seeing new message subjects rushing to read them and finding out they are a link to You Tube - surely SDF members can find these on their own?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,728
    Rep Power
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_nixon View Post
    Have to say I'm getting a bit bored of seeing new message subjects rushing to read them and finding out they are a link to You Tube - surely SDF members can find these on their own?
    There are a lot of them, but I think I understand the reasons behind them and that's to take the emphasis off of the negative Supremes' threads and get members back to discussing the music.. It has been fun discussing something other than the Supremes.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,545
    Rep Power
    193
    I think this is just an effort to spark commentary and discussions on these songs and to break up the monotony of all the Supremes threads

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Yep that's exactly what we're doing. I'm tired of seeing that kind of talk.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,728
    Rep Power
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    Yep that's exactly what we're doing. I'm tired of seeing that kind of talk.
    Amen! I'm sick of the madness. I don't even listen to the Supremes music anymore because I don't want to in the midst of the craziness. To me, it's had a negative impact on the Supremes.' legacy..something I'm sure none of them would welcome.
    Last edited by Kamasu_Jr; 11-02-2010 at 02:05 PM.

  6. #6
    topdiva1 Guest
    I hope not.

  7. #7
    Would agree all that rubbish gets on my nerves as well but this is in danger of taking over - maybe it would be better to give the Supremes posters a room of their own.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Well I am actually trying to balance it out with some discussion not related to the Supremes but it's hard.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,728
    Rep Power
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_nixon View Post
    Would agree all that rubbish gets on my nerves as well but this is in danger of taking over - maybe it would be better to give the Supremes posters a room of their own.
    How long have some asked for that? But it hasn't been done. And the members who keep up the most drama don't want to be secluded away from the rest of the forum because they'd be ignored.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    I just think we need more topics to balance it all out. It was getting boring anyway. Just spicing it up.
    Last edited by midnightman; 11-02-2010 at 02:32 PM.

  11. #11
    I agree with Paul Nixon and wonder if it would be better to have a seperate section on SDF for people to post up their youtube clips, and thus leave these forums for people to discuss Motown & much more!

    moprh

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,657
    Rep Power
    323
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_nixon View Post
    Have to say I'm getting a bit bored of seeing new message subjects rushing to read them and finding out they are a link to You Tube - surely SDF members can find these on their own?
    The people who replied to this question turned it into another Supremes thread. Sad.
    In answer to your question, I sometimes post a link to YouTube to further the discussion of the thread.
    Example: In a recent thread, the originator asked what our favorite Stylistics song was. Since my selection was obscure, I posted a You Tube link so that the song could be heard and further the discussion.

    This forum discuses music. You Tube has music that we can listen to and watch. What's the problem?

    How easily each discussion is linked to the Supremes

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    ^ Sorry about that, I tried not to. LOL
    I'm just gonna avoid that name unless there's a topic of them I think will have healthy discussion.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,893
    Rep Power
    481
    Bury the Supremes threads.........or most of them. I think it's great.

    Love the Youtube thing for a while; it exposes some long forgotten songs and reminds us of some great songs.

    I'm all for a Supremes Room. It is all just idle talk anyway and if it helps us old farts fiddle away the day, let's have it.

    I think a Supremes Room separate from Motown will please many and perhaps bring back some posters.

    Also, every 3 weeks..........I'd suggest Ralph go in the Supremes Room............and hit DELETE ALL and then we'll have a re-start.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_nixon View Post
    Have to say I'm getting a bit bored of seeing new message subjects rushing to read them and finding out they are a link to You Tube - surely SDF members can find these on their own?
    I'm with you. The good thing is that the focus is back on music instead of tabloid-type gossip, but I never cared for music videos. I find them quite annoying, too. It's like instead of actually talking about music, people just throw up a video without any real musical discussion. It's the easy way out. Stephanie made a post about the way Chris Clark's "Love's Gone Bad" song was poorly arranged, and I made a post agreeing with her. Instead of posting some video clip, we actually made conversation. Sadly, the art of conversation is going away. If people aren't avoiding it, they are shouting at, berating, and insulting each other instead of exchanging ideas.

    OTOH, it's probably not much different than posting audio clips, but there's something about videos that doesn't jibe with music.

    Kamasu has it right. I get so sick of seeing threads about the Supremes/Mary Wilson/Diana Ross. It's like people forget there was more to Motown than those people, and more to Detroit music than Motown.

    I have said it more than once that I would like to see more technical discussion around here, about how classic recordings were made, but, I guess with this bunch, it ain't gonna happen. I thought we'd get some of that with Tom Moulton hanging out here, but I guess not.
    Last edited by soulster; 11-02-2010 at 03:26 PM.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenpwood View Post
    I think this is just an effort to spark commentary and discussions on these songs and to break up the monotony of all the Supremes threads
    Yeah, it's like some of us try to discuss other artists like Earth, Wind & Fire, Parliament/Funkadelic, The Temptations, Rick James, Jermaine Jackson, James Brown...but so many people here are stuck on the Supremes. And, I don't think I remember ever seeing a thread about the Four Tops. They were once Motown too!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by Kamasu_Jr View Post
    Amen! I'm sick of the madness. I don't even listen to the Supremes music anymore because I don't want to in the midst of the craziness. To me, it's had a negative impact on the Supremes.' legacy..something I'm sure none of them would welcome.
    Dude, I just started a poll trying to find out exactly where the forum is on the Supremes popularity, and no one can even answer it.

    I started a poll on hi-rez, and only got one person who probably even knew what they were.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    The people who replied to this question turned it into another Supremes thread. Sad.
    In answer to your question, I sometimes post a link to YouTube to further the discussion of the thread.
    Example: In a recent thread, the originator asked what our favorite Stylistics song was. Since my selection was obscure, I posted a You Tube link so that the song could be heard and further the discussion.

    This forum discuses music. You Tube has music that we can listen to and watch. What's the problem?

    How easily each discussion is linked to the Supremes
    But, that's the thing: people don't discuss the music more. They just throw up more videos. Look what happened to the Disco thread: for a time it was nothing but a barrage of videos without much discussion.

    I have posted a few vids too, but I want the music to be discussed.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    ^ That was kinda like what I was trying to do and I'm trying to do that now. Y'all can help! LMAO! Isn't there anything you wanna discuss that hasn't been discussed and want to discuss? I'll probably be the only guy replying back though.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    292
    Here we go -- another controversy about this now!!Relax everyone. Cant people just nicely post their comments about whatever they want? The key is simply respect.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    7,587
    Rep Power
    256
    Interesting, there is a Four Tops Levi Stubbs thread which I started some time ago. Personally I use youtube or other videos to illustrate a point I've made in the narrative or some other perspective. The Supreme threads I avoid with a passion, the numerous reasons have all been stated.

    Recently there has been a rash of single postings which are basically links to other videos, which are really duplicates of threads that folk are already discussing. This is more nerve racking to me than the Supremes threads because basically they are without substance. Furthermore the more that people post like this, the more they become akin to spam. There are so many threads that the more salient and informative threads get lost in the mix.

    Thats my 2 cent for now........

    Oh yes, I'd rather talk about the music and Motown with SDF members anyday, than talk about another forum member. History has shown us its not a productive utililzation of time.
    Last edited by paladin; 11-02-2010 at 04:00 PM.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    I guess it's up for us to add more input. I'm gonna stop it with the spamming though. I can see how it can drive folks nuts but, I don't know, I guess it seems like we're just looking at the board and going elsewhere LOL or that's just me I don't know.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    7,587
    Rep Power
    256
    I understand your concern, but I've learned over the years that the forum is not a "static place", sometimes we all need to adapt and adjust our pace a bit and it generally bears fruit. Sure sometimes we step away, only to return more vibrant and interesting than we were before. There have been several recent low points, including some new members that were totally out of the box and off the wall, that situation has been quelled to some extent, but I am not convinced that it's over.

    I don't blame you at all Midnightman for trying to "hold up" the forum. I just didn't agree with your method. In fact I appreciate your attempts to illustrate and discuss a problem rather than resorting to telling me to stick foreign objects up my a** because you don't agree with me. Like many of you I like coming here because of the subject matter and with enough thought and the injection of intelligent assessments the forum will jumpstart and reboot itself. Just watch and see..........and thank you again for trying .... and yes you do know.

    Kdubya

  24. #24
    smark21 Guest
    There is obviously a ton of music posted at youtube and it's a good source to turn at a music discussion board like this to get people talking about a song, an artist, a genre. Not everyone may have the song[[s) under discussion and having a handing link to play it, hear it, see it, is a good way of generating discussion. What should be done--ban you tube links and limit discussion to those who know the song and can recall it? Also, most of the youtube videos for vintage songs are not videos per se, but either a bunch of still photos of the artist, or a shot of a 45 being played, not exactly a visual that will ruin the song for you. And if you can't bear to look, minimize your screen, scroll down or turn away from your monitor and listen. It's stupid to bitch about having to watch a youtube video to hear a song when there are easy solutions to avoid the visual if you so choose.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by smark21 View Post
    There is obviously a ton of music posted at youtube and it's a good source to turn at a music discussion board like this to get people talking about a song, an artist, a genre. Not everyone may have the song[[s) under discussion and having a handing link to play it, hear it, see it, is a good way of generating discussion. What should be done--ban you tube links and limit discussion to those who know the song and can recall it? Also, most of the youtube videos for vintage songs are not videos per se, but either a bunch of still photos of the artist, or a shot of a 45 being played, not exactly a visual that will ruin the song for you. And if you can't bear to look, minimize your screen, scroll down or turn away from your monitor and listen. It's stupid to bitch about having to watch a youtube video to hear a song when there are easy solutions to avoid the visual if you so choose.
    I don't think that is what they are talking about. I think it is totally find to use a video clip as an example, to buttress a discussion in progress or the beginning of a new thread. To simply put up a barrage of new threads with a bunch of random songs/artists is irritating. I do understand and appreciate Midnightman's and a few others thoughts behind it. That was my way of thinking when I started the "What is Your Favorite Temptations Song and Why?" "Stevie Wonder the 1966-71 Period" and "The Disco Era" threads. Part of the problem is that there is hardly any time to discuss a certain, specific recording before 5 more are put up.

  26. #26
    uptight Guest
    I don't mind the videos or scrolling down them in a thread. They usually pertain to the subject. Why moan about these free services like YouTube and SDF? FREE..!

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by smark21 View Post
    There is obviously a ton of music posted at youtube and it's a good source to turn at a music discussion board like this to get people talking about a song, an artist, a genre. Not everyone may have the song[[s) under discussion and having a handing link to play it, hear it, see it, is a good way of generating discussion. What should be done--ban you tube links and limit discussion to those who know the song and can recall it? Also, most of the youtube videos for vintage songs are not videos per se, but either a bunch of still photos of the artist, or a shot of a 45 being played, not exactly a visual that will ruin the song for you. And if you can't bear to look, minimize your screen, scroll down or turn away from your monitor and listen. It's stupid to bitch about having to watch a youtube video to hear a song when there are easy solutions to avoid the visual if you so choose.
    Earlier today, I started a thread with a discussion about the song. I did not use a YouTube video. I uploaded a clip of the song so it wouldn't be clouded by visual images. I also uploaded a relatively obscure song by Etta James. Yet, it sank like an anvil. It makes me think people here would rather just post videos.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    Here we go -- another controversy about this now!!Relax everyone. Cant people just nicely post their comments about whatever they want? The key is simply respect.
    Precisely!!!

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    7,587
    Rep Power
    256
    That was my way of thinking when I started the "What is Your Favorite Temptations Song and Why?" "Stevie Wonder the 1966-71 Period" and "The Disco Era" threads. Part of the problem is that there is hardly any time to discuss a certain, specific recording before 5 more are put up.

    That is an irritating feeling but sometimes people just pull the trigger so fast when posting videos that they forget to read what the subject is about as the original poster intended. I've seen so many examples of this that its laughable. Not only will people post videos but literally entire discography's of an artist or artist that has absolutely nothing to do with the origin thread. But again I tend to stay away from those threads and sympathize with the threads creator because "his/her subject matter has went to hell in a hand basket. Sometimes the proof is in the pudding as they say, a thread will have 12 replies and 500 views ....WTF ?

    What should be done--ban you tube links and limit discussion to those who know the song and can recall it? Also, most of the you tube videos for vintage songs are not videos per se, but either a bunch of still photos of the artist, or a shot of a 45 being played, not exactly a visual that will ruin the song for you.


    Of course not, but there is another thing that happens on the forum and its based upon mutual respect, its the inherent ability that we have have in wanting to share life experiences just the same as we share information about records, collecting and our favorite artists. I personally love the exchanges that occur when folk from the UK say this record was a big hit in the UK and then we say well it wasn't a big hit over here [[US) ?

    I learned about Northern Soul and All Nighters and the records that were played at those venues. Some obscure, others familiar. Thats the basic premise and foundation for SDF and it works very well when left to its own devices and adherence to the rules of the joint. I've posted extensively about young people who look in here for answers to their soul questions, Satipe's kids are always in the forefront of my mind and yes some of our younger members have the requisite "modern attention span" and can do some pretty wacky things but overall I think we're doing just fine.


    I have noticed that putting up a gazillion videos in a thread makes it load a hell of a lot slower.............LOL
    Last edited by paladin; 11-02-2010 at 11:08 PM.

  30. #30
    uptight Guest
    Okay, yes. A gazillion videos does make a thread load slower on some people's computers. Although I have a fast internet connection, I can see where scrolling past the big, chunky YouTube clips in a thread to get to the actual information can be a bit cumbersome for some folks. Too much of a good thing can be bad. What was recently a cool feature on SDF can turn out to be irritating of abused.

    I generally don't mind it and can ignore irrelevant postings.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    It's a nine day wonder. The novelty of posting links to YouTube will soon wear off. I approve of the motive for doing this, namely to make the forum more balanced.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,051
    Rep Power
    178
    Can I just say, the youtube links have been a boon to me, seeing all these great artists, or hearing them. I have heard tracks, seen great performances I would NEVER have seen. HOWEVER, saying that, I do agree that the plot has been lost, so to speak, when, yes, we should be discussing the MUSIC, the ARTISTS and so on. The good thing is, we can discuss this like sensible adults. You are not forced to follow links. You dont even have to read the relevant topic. Just go with the flow. If a topic attracts you..go. If it dont, leave it alone. If you post a thread about and artist, song, whatever, GREAT. I have learned, and enjoyed SO MUCH from my fellows here. May it continue. And YES, A seperate thread for all SUPREME beings would be nice....lol..PAULO XXXX

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,760
    Rep Power
    195
    i think it would be beter to just post the youtube links.but it wouldnt be the end of the world if it stayed as it is.just try and control the amount each of us posts,i aint one...........i dont know how to do it!

    the supremes forum.i get the impression those who eat each other on the subject would feel like they're being deported.which is not true. they are,and we know they are,far too touchy.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,917
    Rep Power
    242
    I really don't get the aversion to posted links from youtube, dailymotion or anywhere else. When 2 or more people want to
    talk about a song, compare songs or artists or introduce others to music they may not have heard it's quite logical to
    post a link. Youtube is a tool to me and as long as I'm willing to pay the cost of owning and maintaining internet accessibility
    I'm willing to use whatever tools I need to do whatever I'm able. If you don't want to watch a video don't watch it. There are thousands of songs on youtube I like to listen to even if the footage is just a record cover because much of it is available virtually no place else for public listening. The Joytones This Love I'm Giving You doesn't get any play on commercial radio today, not even oldies stations like WCBS, for example. A lot of classic soul, early R&B and black jazz is out of print , not on itunes and may never see a cd or mp3 release but if someone has put it up on youtube I can listen to it
    while I wash my dishes or mop my floor as if I had it in my own record collection. The genie is out of the bottle, folks, and I'm not trying to put it back...please....

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    I'm not against YouTube. I guess it's that when people post the vids here, they don't really discuss the music. And, for me, they're annoying to scroll past.

    I have posted at least one song on YouTube, and it was a fluke that it worked. I can't seem to make the site accept the full length of a clip.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,917
    Rep Power
    242
    Soulster, youtube and sights like it are primarily for viewing and listening, they're not forums, per se but it all really depends
    on which videos and how much the posters and those that view and/or listen to them know about the music. Some videos
    will only get a few comments and others many more as you can see...

    http://www.youtube.com/comment_servl...&v=p_ywkpVJ624


    Obviously there is some discussion going on....

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    7,587
    Rep Power
    256
    Youtube is a tool to me and as long as I'm willing to pay the cost of owning and maintaining internet accessibility
    I'm willing to use whatever tools I need to do whatever I'm able. If you don't want to watch a video don't watch it. There are thousands of songs on youtube I like to listen to even if the footage is just a record cover because much of it is available virtually no place else for public listening. The Joytones This Love I'm Giving You doesn't get any play on commercial radio

    So true Splanky, the advantage that we have is we are a "forum" and can engage in lengthy formal/informal discussions about the music, video's, producers, writers etc. You cant do that on you tube and in many cases fans on you tube get into very nasty public commentary which is not regulated and it becomes difficult to read because it conveys absolutely nothing about the artists or the video . The Supreme threads often remind me of the "You Tube crazies" therefore I don't participate by routinely ignoring them. By the way This Love, is a Chicago Staple, thats heard regualry on the Herb Kent Show and at literally all the Stepper Sets. Its a great song.......and yes by God, you're right the internet is not free.........

    Kdub

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,893
    Rep Power
    481
    The Supremes threads remind you of YouTube crazies because some of the same SD posters have a variety of Youtube names ~ there are people here who can give you the list; Youtube does kick people off because some of the SD posters have gotten the boot from Youtube and had to get new names so they could continue to entertain the world [[smile).

    If SD becomes a Youtube posting forum for a while, it isn't the end of the world. It won't last; or has it already died?

    Remember when we had the mass "favorite song" threads?

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Lol people get into nasty debates here too. Just saying.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    The Supremes threads remind you of YouTube crazies because some of the same SD posters have a variety of Youtube names ~ there are people here who can give you the list; Youtube does kick people off because some of the SD posters have gotten the boot from Youtube and had to get new names so they could continue to entertain the world [[smile).

    If SD becomes a Youtube posting forum for a while, it isn't the end of the world. It won't last; or has it already died?

    Remember when we had the mass "favorite song" threads?
    It'll get picked up, if not by me or copley, then someone else. I've tried to do different topics but some of y'all who complain don't enter. Not a major problem with me but just stating the obvious.

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,743
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by motownmorph1 View Post
    I agree with Paul Nixon and wonder if it would be better to have a seperate section on SDF for people to post up their youtube clips, and thus leave these forums for people to discuss Motown & much more!

    moprh
    ...well morph ...we do have such a place on SDF ...where I've been posting up to 20 youtubes ...daily...!!!

    http://soulfuldetroit.com/showthread...ETROIT-JUKEBOX

    ...I've even include The Supremes ...every now and then...!

    Last edited by grapevine; 11-08-2010 at 09:14 AM.

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,893
    Rep Power
    481
    Good one Grape. Funny how we use SD for different purposes and are not always sure what is going on in a different area.

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,135
    Rep Power
    199
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_nixon View Post
    Have to say I'm getting a bit bored of seeing new message subjects rushing to read them and finding out they are a link to You Tube - surely SDF members can find these on their own?
    Well, it is up each one of us to start topics on the things we like to discuss. If you want more music discussions - then start one or two!!

    There is so much whining and complaining about "we don't like this", we don't like that", "separate section for this", "separate section for that"......

    This is a community message board, not a private country club!!

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by grapevine View Post
    ...well morph ...we do have such a place on SDF ...where I've been posting up to 20 youtubes ...daily...!!!

    http://soulfuldetroit.com/showthread...ETROIT-JUKEBOX

    ...I've even included The Supremes ...every now and then...!

    Ugh how in the eff did I miss that?! I'm gonna BOOKMARK IT!

  45. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,760
    Rep Power
    195
    nothing wrong with complaining........as long as its constructive.but not change for the sake of change.

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    316
    Rep Power
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_nixon View Post
    Have to say I'm getting a bit bored of seeing new message subjects rushing to read them and finding out they are a link to You Tube - surely SDF members can find these on their own?
    There are a few forum members, who shall remain nameless, who do go overboard with the YouTube links. They can't make a point without suggesting that we take time away from reading threads and navigating around the forum to listen to some tinny sound sample of a song they like or watch some damned video that I've already seen before. It's irritating, so much so, I've put these people on my ignore list because I know they can't respond to a thread without throwing in a YouTube reference.
    These YouTube links can cause havoc on my work computer; They slow it down; Drain my memory and cause other problems. I'd like to strangle some of the culprits.
    There's a thread on the main floor that's full of YouTube links. I wish some people would get back to writing, describing why they like something , rather than referring me to YouTube.
    Last edited by Motown_M_1056; 11-14-2010 at 07:46 PM.

  47. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    202
    Rep Power
    170
    I have a friendly little suggestion...I've been known to *occasionally* insert a YouTube link if it's an obscure piece that's difficult to find, but I find it much less irritating when you link text [[example: Isley Brothers: My Love Is Your Love) rather than embedding videos. The link will open in a separate window, allowing users to keep reading the thread they're on while listening to Motown gems. If your tag is descriptive, that way forum members know what the link is and can click to view if they wish without slowing down everyone's connection with umpteen embedded videos.

    To hyperlink text:
    1. Copy the YouTube URL that you want to embed.
    2. Compose your post on Soulful Detroit. Click on the "Insert Link" icon [[the globe with chain) and paste the URL. Give the tag a descriptive name [[Artist: Song Title) so people know what it is they're linking to.
    3. Preview your post to make sure that the link displays correctly [[as short text and not a long URL).
    4. Listen for the collective sigh of relief as hundreds of users can load a full page in record time!
    Last edited by vcq; 11-14-2010 at 07:36 PM.

  48. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,207
    Rep Power
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Motown_M_1056 View Post
    There are a few forum members, who shall remain nameless, who do go overboard with the YouTube links. They can't make a point without suggesting that we take time away from reading threads and navigating around the forum to listen to some tinny sound sample of a song they like or watch some damned video that I've already seen before. It's irritating, so much so, I've put these people on my ignore list because I know they can't respond to a thread without throwing in a YouTube reference.

    These YouTube links can cause havoc on my work computer; They slow it down; Drain my memory and cause other problems. I'd like to strangle some of the culprits.
    There's a thread on the main floor that's full of YouTube links. I wish some people would get back to writing, describing why they like something , rather than referring me to YouTube.
    Then perhaps you should consider using your work computer for WORK. I'm a member of several message boards, music and non music related, and this is the first time I've EVER heard complaints about embedded youtube videos. I mean, if they didn't pertain to the conversation, i'd understand that.. but they always do, as far as I can see.

  49. #49
    smark21 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Motown_M_1056 View Post
    There are a few forum members, who shall remain nameless, who do go overboard with the YouTube links. They can't make a point without suggesting that we take time away from reading threads and navigating around the forum to listen to some tinny sound sample of a song they like or watch some damned video that I've already seen before. It's irritating, so much so, I've put these people on my ignore list because I know they can't respond to a thread without throwing in a YouTube reference.
    These YouTube links can cause havoc on my work computer; They slow it down; Drain my memory and cause other problems. I'd like to strangle some of the culprits.
    There's a thread on the main floor that's full of YouTube links. I wish some people would get back to writing, describing why they like something , rather than referring me to YouTube.
    Then you better not do anything at work to make your bosses want to fire you, because if they decide they no longer want you around, they will look at your work computer internet usage and notice you're on the internet at a music forum making posts and playing videos when you should be working and they'll use it as a documented cause to let you go.

  50. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    316
    Rep Power
    169
    [QUOTE=smark21;19126]Then you better not do anything at work to make your bosses want to fire you, because if they decide they no longer want you around, they will look at your work computer internet usage and notice you're on the internet at a music forum making posts and playing videos when you should be working and they'll use it as a documented cause to let you go.[/QUOTE[



    One of the benefits of owning a business is that I can do exactly as I please. I don't have to worry about someone else checking my work computer to see what I'm doing. Who's gonna let me go? Me? Not hardly. I AM THE BOSS!
    It is a pain and costly constantly relying on my computer techs to make things right again because of errors and other problems caused by YouTube links.
    Thank you very much.
    Last edited by Motown_M_1056; 11-15-2010 at 09:14 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.