[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 58
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,648
    Rep Power
    317

    Stop In The Name Of Love

    I just listened to the original mono 45 version of Stop In The Name Of Love that I bought in 1965. There have been a few threads here stating that no Supreme is on THAT released version except Diana Ross.

    Today, we know that there are alternate takes, and re-mixes and erasing original vocals and replacing them with new. Of course I know Diana's and Mary's voice, but when they are all singing together, I wouldn't know if it were Supremes , Andantes, or what. [[And I profess to be a Supremes fan
    ) I always thought that the released hit version in 1965 was SUPREMES with Diana Flo and Mary singing the title in harmony, possibly augmented by other singers.

    I don't want to start a new controversy here, but I was just wondering if any conclusion was reached in the various threads that it was indeed Mary and Flo with Diana on the original release.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,847
    Rep Power
    461
    Of course there is a conclusion. It is just one that old time fans of the group and side takers in a purported war don't like.

    The 50th Anniversary Singles Collection says that 4 days after DMF recorded the song, the Andantes redid it and got the release. And it also says this is revised from the Complete Motown Singles. And it does not say the Andantes were added, which it could have. And you have had George and Andy post on here saying no hurt was intended, no intent to downgrade some Supremes [[and who the hell would really care at this stage beyond 12 fans?), but it was simply a historical correction.

    Mary has let all this go. So should the fans that can't accept it.

    When I go listen to the song now, I hear it differently. I never would have imagined it was anyone other than Mary and Flo.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,648
    Rep Power
    317
    Thanks . So with all the re-issues and alternate takes, is there a release of the original version with the actual Supremes now? if there is, I probably have it and would like to listen to it along side the released version. One more question. Why was it decided that the Supremes original recording was not good enough for release and had to be redone with Andantes singing along with the lead singer of Supremes?

    Again, please know that I am not trying to create any controversy with these questions. I love all the Supremes and have seen all the configurations perform live. Whether they were on the recordings or not takes away nothing from them. I am curious why someone at Motown would release something other than the Supremes when it was already recorded

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    129
    Rep Power
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Of course there is a conclusion. It is just one that old time fans of the group and side takers in a purported war don't like.

    The 50th Anniversary Singles Collection says that 4 days after DMF recorded the song, the Andantes redid it and got the release. And it also says this is revised from the Complete Motown Singles. And it does not say the Andantes were added, which it could have. And you have had George and Andy post on here saying no hurt was intended, no intent to downgrade some Supremes [[and who the hell would really care at this stage beyond 12 fans?), but it was simply a historical correction.

    Mary has let all this go. So should the fans that can't accept it.

    When I go listen to the song now, I hear it differently. I never would have imagined it was anyone other than Mary and Flo.

    LOL @ "who the hell cares beyond 12 fans"!

    The liner notes to the expanded "More Hits" CD says "January 5 1965: Stop! In the Name of Love" is cut by the Supremes. The girls dub in their vocals on January 7 and again on January 11 with help from the Andantes. The latter becomes the released version."

    At least I can be certain of one thing. For the many times I saw F, M, & D perform, it was F, M, and D singing [[and later C, M, & D).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,847
    Rep Power
    461
    OK, well then 128 fans care.

    But there is a version on the Supremes Boxset, the dark pink set, that very clearly has Florence in the background. The sound is much like the sound on Nothing But Heartaches, Manhattan, You Keep Me Hanging On etc.

    And it is very clearly different than the single.

    And to many people, perhaps better.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,317
    Rep Power
    173
    The difference is that on the relesased version their is another voice or two that is mixed in making it sound different than the 1st version. three or four vocals on the bkg of the released version as opposed to two voices on the demo version both versions have Mary & Flo one released version has the Andante [[s) added in.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,847
    Rep Power
    461

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,167
    Rep Power
    188
    Now that is funny jobeterob.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    I like this one much better. Mary, Flo and Diane singing "Stop In the Name of Love"..........................from the record!

    Last edited by marv2; 09-28-2012 at 08:17 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,847
    Rep Power
    461
    nathanj06

    Posts:1,674Now that is funny jobeterob.

    We all have to believe what we want to believe. It truly makes little difference but it is an interesting topic to Motown fans that know the history.

    But we can't convince each other and we only believe whatever gets us through the night.

    When you listen to Florence singing behind Diana on the version on the Pink Box Set, you know that the people singing behind Diana on the 45 do not include Florence Ballard.

    The only reason this was ever raised by the producers of the newest singles set was to clarify the historical record for the fans.

    And it is obvious that in some quarters, it wasn't welcome news.

    Interesting that Mary Wilson doesn't appear to care and I'm sure she received the newest set.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,317
    Rep Power
    173
    Not. If that is not Flo and Mary with whoever is helping they must want to be Supremes very badly, I hear the Flo Ballard voice very clearly on this version Marv, just threw in from the acapella set,
    Thank you very much. And both versions with Flo and Mary and whoever is helping gets me through the night. Why would they replace Flo and Mary when they sang on the other four numbers one from wdolg thru bimaa.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by franjoy56 View Post
    Not. If that is not Flo and Mary with whoever is helping they must want to be Supremes very badly, I hear the Flo Ballard voice very clearly on this version Marv, just threw in from the acapella set,
    Thank you very much. And both versions with Flo and Mary and whoever is helping gets me through the night. Why would they replace Flo and Mary when they sang on the other four numbers one from wdolg thru bimaa.

    That's the whole point. They would not replace them, the sound was still very critical at that point. Some people just want to be stupid.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,680
    Rep Power
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Some people just want to be stupid.
    That's uncalled for. I don't believe that it's just Mary and Flo on the released version, but that doesn't make me "stupid." And I don't think that you are stupid because you disagree. And that's all I'll say about that.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by antceleb12 View Post
    That's uncalled for. I don't believe that it's just Mary and Flo on the released version, but that doesn't make me "stupid." And I don't think that you are stupid because you disagree. And that's all I'll say about that.
    I was not talking about you. That would be impossible since this is the first and only time you posted in this thread.

  15. #15
    smark21 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by franjoy56 View Post
    Not. If that is not Flo and Mary with whoever is helping they must want to be Supremes very badly, I hear the Flo Ballard voice very clearly on this version Marv, just threw in from the acapella set,
    Thank you very much. And both versions with Flo and Mary and whoever is helping gets me through the night. Why would they replace Flo and Mary when they sang on the other four numbers one from wdolg thru bimaa.
    Maybe because integrity was not a high priority at Motown?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,804
    Rep Power
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by franjoy56 View Post
    Not. If that is not Flo and Mary with whoever is helping they must want to be Supremes very badly, I hear the Flo Ballard voice very clearly on this version Marv, just threw in from the acapella set,
    Thank you very much. And both versions with Flo and Mary and whoever is helping gets me through the night. Why would they replace Flo and Mary when they sang on the other four numbers one from wdolg thru bimaa.
    Maybe the answer is simply that they did things like that then, and didn't think it was a big deal.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    Well Mary and Flo thought it was a big deal, as do many fans.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,847
    Rep Power
    461
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    Well Mary and Flo thought it was a big deal, as do many fans.
    I would not be so sure Mary thinks its a big deal or cares. She gets all the new releases sent to her by the producers and Motown. She knows what the liner notes say. She advertises many of these sets on her website. And she hasn't said she is angered by any of the revelations. Perhaps because it is no surprise to her anymore.

    I notice she is advertising Motown the Musical too!

    When you next go to Burger King, ask the person in line in front of you if they like Mary & Flo on Stop in the Name of Love or if they think it's the Andantes? They'll either look at you like your nuts or perhaps give you a bop on the nose.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,318
    Rep Power
    218
    I'm a big Supremes fan especially of the original group but nowadays I really could care less who is on a song, I like all those songs regardless of who's singing in the background. I think when I first heard years ago that the Andantes did the backgrounds on the Xmas album instead of Mary and Flo I was disappointed yet deep down I always was kinda suspicious about those backgrounds. And the same goes for Stop in the name of love and in fact I asked one of the Andantes[[either Marlene or Louvaine I forget) myself about 7 or 8 years ago in a yahoo chat group if they were on the song and she said yes. I don't know how someone can listen to that acapella version and tell me that it's only 2 voices their hearing in the background. I find it very interesting the whole thing so I don't get mad or upset. What can you do? Have Mary go back into the studio and add her voice on those songs? What's done is done. I'm interested to see if the liner notes of the "I Hear A Symphony" album says anything about the Andantes on those songs, there's a few songs on that album that I'm pretty sure are not Mary and Flo.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,847
    Rep Power
    461


    Here is the alternate version of Stop in the Name of Love from the 2000 Box Set with Florence Ballard so clearly in the background.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    And remember Flo got the Andantes kicked off of You Cant Hurry Love. Now lazy ol Mary and Flo showed up for that and did pretty good Id say lol.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    295
    Rep Power
    178
    Really... We were ALL duped! I always loved the Supremes but when Jean took over in 1970 I realised I truly LOVED the Supremes. Little did I know back then that most of 'Right On' and every other release until 'Jimmy Webb' [[Because Lynda and Mary are on every cut of that album) was just Jean and some terrific background vocalists with an occasional 'sprinkling' of M&C. Who cares? It all sounded Supreme to me. I think some things are better left unsaid.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,454
    Rep Power
    222
    Why is there so much controversy regarding "Stop in the name"? Hasn't it been established that there are a few recorded versions of this song? Some with Flo and Mary and at least one that is not? Also, I thought Flo wasn't on "You can't hurry love".

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,318
    Rep Power
    218
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    And remember Flo got the Andantes kicked off of You Cant Hurry Love. Now lazy ol Mary and Flo showed up for that and did pretty good Id say lol.
    Luke that was "The Happening" not "You Can't Hurry Love". And I assume maybe Flo had had enough by that point from "Stop!" and "You Can't Hurry Love" and finally decided to do something about it.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,870
    Rep Power
    396
    Can someone please simplify?

    From what I am reading, the released version of "Stop!" [[the version that we hear on the radio, etc.) features Diana ONLY, no other Supremes?

    Or is it that it features Diana, Flo, Mary and the Andantes?

  26. #26
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    397
    Rep Power
    160
    I love the stop in the name of love medley with baby love and come see about me on the lost and found CD. That version has Flo and Mary for sure on the background. Only problem is that they dont sing the whole song but in my opinion it's better than the released version.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,847
    Rep Power
    461
    The released 45 is Diana and the Andantes.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by marybrewster View Post
    Can someone please simplify?

    From what I am reading, the released version of "Stop!" [[the version that we hear on the radio, etc.) features Diana ONLY, no other Supremes?

    Or is it that it features Diana, Flo, Mary and the Andantes?
    It features Diane, Mary and Flo. I don't know about the Andantes or one of them backing the Supremes.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    441
    Rep Power
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    I would not be so sure Mary thinks its a big deal or cares. She gets all the new releases sent to her by the producers and Motown. She knows what the liner notes say. She advertises many of these sets on her website. And she hasn't said she is angered by any of the revelations. Perhaps because it is no surprise to her anymore.



    I notice she is advertising Motown the Musical too!

    When you next go to Burger King, ask the person in line in front of you if they like Mary & Flo on Stop in the Name of Love or if they think it's the Andantes? They'll either look at you like your nuts or perhaps give you a bop on the nose.
    Jobeterob, I love the Burger King scenario. IMO I liked the songs, now that I know or think I know who was on what song or not on what song it does not take away from the fact that I like the songs. As a drummer, when I first started reading about Motown , perhaps in the mid to late 70's one would have you believe that Benny Benjaman was the primary drummer in the studio a la double J on bass. At one time that may have been the case, but the styles of Pistol and Uriel became apparent after really listening, and subsequently there are others who played on the tracks as well. I like Benny, but again , I like the songs.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by ivyfield View Post
    Really... We were ALL duped! I always loved the Supremes but when Jean took over in 1970 I realised I truly LOVED the Supremes. Little did I know back then that most of 'Right On' and every other release until 'Jimmy Webb' [[Because Lynda and Mary are on every cut of that album) was just Jean and some terrific background vocalists with an occasional 'sprinkling' of M&C. Who cares? It all sounded Supreme to me. I think some things are better left unsaid.
    That is not true. Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong are on every single that was released with Jean Terrell on lead. On classic hits such as "Up the Ladder to the Roof" and "Stoned Love" it is only those three on the recordings.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,317
    Rep Power
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    That is not true. Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong are on every single that was released with Jean Terrell on lead. On classic hits such as "Up the Ladder to the Roof" and "Stoned Love" it is only those three on the recordings.
    and here are a few more Mary and Cindy tracks for the 70's Supremes
    that we know they are on:

    Together we can make such sweet music
    Then I met you
    It Time to break Down.
    Everybodys got the right to love
    The Lovin Country
    But I love you more
    Over and Over [[with the A's)
    Now The Bitter Now the Sweet [[with the A's)
    Love It Came to me this time.
    Bridge over troubled Water.
    Na Na Hey Kiss Him Goodbye.
    Floy Joy.
    Have I lost You. & Here Comes the Sunrise [[with Sherlie Matthews)
    Nathan Jones. [[ooooh Nathan)
    Come Together
    Is there a place in his Heart for me.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,317
    Rep Power
    173
    and hear are some great tracks that we no are Mary & Flo backing Diana Ross from the 60's
    "Long Gone Lover" [[with a Flo Ballard outro lead)
    A Breath Taking Guy [[with Mary and Flo getting solo lines at the chorus
    "He's My Honey Boy"
    "Going Down for the Third Time"
    Mother You Smother You
    Nothing But Heartaches
    Come See About Me,
    Whisper You love me
    Back In My Arms Again
    The Only Time I'm Happy
    Ask Any Girl
    I'll turn to Stone
    This Can't Be Love
    Lover
    Manhattan
    My Heart Stood Still
    A Lovers Concerto
    He's All I got
    The Man with the Rock and Roll Banjo Band [[Diana & Flo unison)
    Sunset [[Diana & Mary leads) just to name a few.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,804
    Rep Power
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    Well Mary and Flo thought it was a big deal, as do many fans.
    Yes, but, as I've said before on this forum, the past is a different country and it's pointless trying to impose today's morality onto yesteryears.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,870
    Rep Power
    396
    Quote Originally Posted by skooldem1 View Post
    Why is there so much controversy regarding "Stop in the name"? Hasn't it been established that there are a few recorded versions of this song? Some with Flo and Mary and at least one that is not? Also, I thought Flo wasn't on "You can't hurry love".
    Cheers to that.

    Where are the threads on "The Composer" and "No Matter What Sign You Are" and "I'm Living In Shame" and "Someday We'll Be Together"?

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    564
    Rep Power
    186
    Regarding Stop in the Name of Love:
    Let's say that the recording is going into the Grammy hall of fame, the Smithsonian, or you are selling an original acetate to Pawn Stars. Both Jobeterob and I come in with our respective acetates or original copies. The first thing these people will ask us is DO WE HAVE PROOF THAT THIS IS THE ORIGINAL, AND WHO SANG ON IT.
    Jobeterob then pulls out the Supremes 50th anniversary and points out that the compilers say that the Andantes are on the released version. I then present all of the logs, recording session notes, session logbooks, index cards, records from the Motown library and they all say the same thing about who was on all of the recordings: Diana, Mary, Flo and one of the Andantes.
    Who do you think these people would believe? Of course, they would believe the 1965 documentation. THIS IS PROOF. THIS IS FACT.
    Every time someone starts a forum on the Supremes background on any record, Jobeterob always inserts something to the effect that Mary and Flo didn't sing on Stop! and to Mary it doesn't matter. Jobeterobs consistent writing regarding Mary follows a pattern; it is underhanded in a sly sort of way.
    Also, I believe that this is an underhanded way to take away the Supremes and Motown's legacy. You read reviews and articles and hear documentaries abouts 60's music and Motown is presented as almost throwaway records, as if African-Americans practically stumbled into making records, as if it is impossible for African Americans to do this, THEY HAD TO HAVE significant help from white people; the mafia, liberals, corporate backers [[take your pick).
    Just saw a documentary on girl groups. It was stated that what swept all of the girl groups away was the British Invasion which was the "new sound". Motown wasn't even mentioned. I could go on and on, but this reply is already too long.
    Until I see facts [[real facts, not opinions), then I am going with the Proof which was written by the people who were there in 1965: On Stop in the Name of Love, the singers are Flo, Mary, Diana and one of the Andantes [[either Marlene or Jackie).

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,375
    Rep Power
    218
    Perhaps some of you feel like me. Since 1964, I've loved The Supremes--Diana, Mary, & Florence--as a group and as individuals. Each, to me, was very important to their recordings. It saddens me that Motown may not have felt the same way. There's nothing to be done about it at this point, certainly. But the personnel on those recordings makes a difference. And that it didn't make a difference to some at Motown is painful to now learn--particularly, I would imagine, to group members who weren't always included. Was Motown's "Sound of Young America" really just a sound to be cranked out and marketed under any pretext?

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    [QUOTE=stingbeelee;125652] Jobeterobs consistent writing regarding Mary follows a pattern; it is underhanded in a sly sort of way.
    QUOTE]

    I am glad that someone else figured this out. Jobeterob always does this. I recognize this years ago about him.

  38. #38
    RossHolloway Guest
    Hasn't this dead horse been beaten enough?

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,432
    Rep Power
    178
    [QUOTE=stingbeelee;125652]Regarding Stop in the Name of Love:
    Let's say that the recording is going into the Grammy hall of fame, the Smithsonian, or you are selling an original acetate to Pawn Stars. Both Jobeterob and I come in with our respective acetates or original copies. The first thing these people will ask us is DO WE HAVE PROOF THAT THIS IS THE ORIGINAL, AND WHO SANG ON IT.
    Jobeterob then pulls out the Supremes 50th anniversary and points out that the compilers say that the Andantes are on the released version. I then present all of the logs, recording session notes, session logbooks, index cards, records from the Motown library and they all say the same thing about who was on all of the recordings: Diana, Mary, Flo and one of the Andantes.
    Who do you think these people would believe? Of course, they would believe the 1965 documentation. THIS IS PROOF. THIS IS FACT.

    People might believe, but that wouldn't necessarily be fact or proof of who's on which recording. You DON'T have ALL of the logs, recording session notes, session logbooks, index cards from the Motown library to be able to say that they all say the same thing. You also don't have access to the original master tapes to play them back and to isolate the various tracks of each version to take a closer listen. People such as Harry Weinger, Andy Skurow, and George Solomon do.
    My bet is that the logs/session notes, don't say 'and one of the Andantes'. I wouldn't be surprised if neither version that has been debated several times lists the Andantes. I suspect that in playing back the master tape to both versions and isolating the background vocals , one could hear an immediate difference. I've played the cd versions in question back to back and hear a tremendous difference in the background voices in the Jan 7 and Jan 11 recordings. [[And remember it had been reported that on hearing 'Forever Came Today' Flo believed that she was in the background. Obviously one of the Andantes was able to imitate her tones enough that Flo was fooled)
    Songs that we used to believe featured the actual Supremes in the background from 'Forever Came Today' through 'Someday We'll Be Together' may not even list the names of the background singers in the logs.
    Back then we had no reason not to believe that the names on the label were the voices we were hearing. Revelation came when people such as Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong decided to speak out decades later. That's why there's still discussion over who the actual voices are with Diana are on 'Someday We'll Be Together'. Maxine & Julia Waters have been officially listed but some others have also claimed to be in the background .

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    stingbeelee you nailed it! I am in 100% agreement! I believe my ears and those people that were actually there at those sessions. That is why I know that on "Stop In the Name of Love" [[the hit version) it is Diana Ross on lead, strongly supported by Florence Ballard, Mary Wilson and perhaps some other girl backing the Supremes for a fuller sound. Anything else or any other "theories" is just wasting my time.

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,432
    Rep Power
    178
    [QUOTE=marv2;125695] I believe my ears and those people that were actually there at those sessions.

    I'm curious... who do you know that was actually at the Jan. 5, Jan. 7 & Jan. 11 sessions? Have they put their recollections on paper or on the internet? I'm sure that I'm not the only one at SDF who'd like to read them.
    I was surprised to see that even Mary Wilson makes no mention in "Dreamgirl" of any recording date for 'Stop In The Name Of Love' other than Jan. 5, the date the band track was recorded. Session logs obviously show vocals recorded at the subsequent 2 sessions. I can't recall ever reading or hearing that Flo mentioned any specifics for the vocal recording dates of 'Stop In the Name Of Love' either
    Wouldn't it be wild if Berry Gordy who mixed both versions [[even though Brian Holland and Lamont Dozier produced both) decided to give Diana Ross an extra-special [and somewhat secretive] 21st birthday present. A single on which Diana was the sole Supreme and to which the background vocals of Supreme-sound-alikes [[the Andantes) were added. The single did hit #1 on the pop chart very near March 26, 1965- Diana's 21st birthday.
    If that was the case, only Berry & Diana would have known at the time. As we've come to find out over the years, with Motown anything was possible.

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    Well said stingbeelee. It is quite obvious what some peoples' intentions are. And to dismiss Cindy and Mary from much of the 70s recordings flies in the face of reality. Frank WIlson loved their voices and Smokey put Mary more out in front in the 70s. The BLOSSOMS are all over Jimmy Webb.

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    [QUOTE=carole cucumber;125700]
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I believe my ears and those people that were actually there at those sessions.

    I'm curious... who do you know that was actually at the Jan. 5, Jan. 7 & Jan. 11 sessions? Have they put their recollections on paper or on the internet? I'm sure that I'm not the only one at SDF who'd like to read them.
    I was surprised to see that even Mary Wilson makes no mention in "Dreamgirl" of any recording date for 'Stop In The Name Of Love' other than Jan. 5, the date the band track was recorded. Session logs obviously show vocals recorded at the subsequent 2 sessions. I can't recall ever reading or hearing that Flo mentioned any specifics for the vocal recording dates of 'Stop In the Name Of Love' either
    Wouldn't it be wild if Berry Gordy who mixed both versions [[even though Brian Holland and Lamont Dozier produced both) decided to give Diana Ross an extra-special [and somewhat secretive] 21st birthday present. A single on which Diana was the sole Supreme and to which the background vocals of Supreme-sound-alikes [[the Andantes) were added. The single did hit #1 on the pop chart very near March 26, 1965- Diana's 21st birthday.
    If that was the case, only Berry & Diana would have known at the time. As we've come to find out over the years, with Motown anything was possible.
    As I said just above, any other "theories" are just a waste of my time! Next.......
    It was Diane Mary and Flo on that and most of all the other records put out by "The Supremes" accept it and move on.

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,432
    Rep Power
    178
    [QUOTE=marv2;125713]
    Quote Originally Posted by carole cucumber View Post

    As I said just above, any other "theories" are just a waste of my time! Next.......
    It was Diane Mary and Flo on that and most of all the other records put out by "The Supremes" accept it and move on.
    I'm always amazed at how people contradict themselves with statements like 'It's a waste
    of my time' only to not only take the time to read a post but then respond to it- proving that it obviously wasn't a waste of time after all.

  45. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,317
    Rep Power
    173
    [QUOTE=carole cucumber;125721]
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post

    I'm always amazed at how people contradict themselves with statements like 'It's a waste
    of my time' only to not only take the time to read a post but then respond to it- proving that it obviously wasn't a waste of time after all.
    stingbeebee said it best, and what you are saying is going through my one ear and out the other, Stop In The Name of Love belongs to Diana, Mary, Flo, and whoever claims to have been added to the track, that song is one of the most sung by the trio on stage as well I don't think that song was ever left out of the act when it was performed on stage by all Supremes through their demise.

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,036
    Rep Power
    213
    yes
    it was often in

  47. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,847
    Rep Power
    461
    Excellent research and post Carole Cucumber.

    It is interesting to research this and read the debate although most is just emotional talk.

    In the end, the girls still made it a good show when they did Stop.

    I notice the sound on Any Girl In Love is very similar to the sound on Stop in the Name of Love and not like the sound of Florence Ballard on the Box Set when she participates on Stop in the Name of Love.

  48. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,318
    Rep Power
    218
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Excellent research and post Carole Cucumber.

    It is interesting to research this and read the debate although most is just emotional talk.

    In the end, the girls still made it a good show when they did Stop.

    I notice the sound on Any Girl In Love is very similar to the sound on Stop in the Name of Love and not like the sound of Florence Ballard on the Box Set when she participates on Stop in the Name of Love.
    So in conclusion is it: Diana and the Andantes....Diana, Mary and Flo....Diana, Mary, Flo and an Andante....or [[my opinion) Diana, Mary, Flo and the Andantes?

  49. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    564
    Rep Power
    186
    Hi to Carole Cucumber; thanks for your well-thought-out and thoughful rebuttal to me regarding Stop! In the name of Love. This is what I like about this forum, people can debate about subjects in a spirited and analytical way without name calling and bashing each other. I looked back to the past forums about this subject and came upon Andy's and George's entries on past forums. Andy stated on 12/27/11:

    " Stop! In The Name Of Love is the latest hot topic, so I’ll acknowledge it here. Listen to the alternate from disc 2 of More Hits, also in a different mix on the box set. Now listen to the live versions on At The Copa, or the video from the Hollywood Palace. They are all consistent. Now listen to the released “hit” version. The voice you are hearing, is Jackie Hicks. Go back to McNair’s Fancy Passes, you’ll hear Jackie there. You’ll hear her on Run Run Run. But you’ll also hear her clearly on Ask The Lonely by the Four Tops, I Heard It Through The Grapevine by Marvin Gaye and dozens of other non-Supremes songs"

    I guess this means that Jackie was on Stop! by herself, or that she is singing with Mary and Flo, or that you can distinguish her voice from Marlene's and Louvains? To me, the statement is inconclusive.

    Also, George stated on 02/24/12:
    There was no reason to pull the multitrack tapes for The Complete Motown Singles or Diana Ross & The Supremes Singles Collection. We used only original mixes and the multitracks are only necessary for remixing a song. We were working on More Hits By The Supremes and The Singles Collection at the same time and were doing new mixes of several songs for More Hits. That is when we discovered some new information about back up vocals and after much deliberation adjusted the liner notes to both collections.

    I am not sure, but I think the original mix was 3 track? If so, then isn't it much more difficult to isolate the background vocals, especially if they are tracked with the lead, one clue to this is the Motown Kareoke version of Stop!; apparently not all of the background vocals could be extracted; as the backing vocals during the lead part are not there.

    Also, there must be notes, indexs and session logs somewhere; didn't the union keep close tabs on Motown to make sure they wrote down all of the personnel on the sessions?

    In conclusion Carole, I believe, thru my hearing, that it is Flo, Mary and Jackie singing on the released version of Stop! It is, to me, a fasinating debate.

  50. #50
    RossHolloway Guest
    Maybe we should be asking these questions to HDH. I bet they could shed some light on this dead horse.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.