[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 84
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323

    Diana's AIN'T NO MOUNTAIN HIGH ENOUGH

    From high to higher
    By Mario Constantino Staff writer Calkins Media, Inc.

    Is it possible to take a great record and make it even greater?

    As sure as mountains are high and valleys are low.

    A textbook example is the Motown classic “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough,” which was written by husband-and-wife team Nickolas Ashford and Valerie Simpson. It was the first of numerous hit duets written by the pair for Marvin Gaye and Tammi Terrell, who reached No. 19 on the Billboard pop chart with it.

    The song was considered a landmark recording in 1967, but three years later, Ashford and Simpson, who were producing as well as writing for the label, were given the opportunity to help launch Diana Ross’ solo career and took “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough” to an even higher peak.

    Ross had left the Supremes the year before, and although she was the darling — and lover — of Motown honcho Berry Gordy Jr., she wasn’t doing nearly as well as her former act, which had already hit No. 10 on the charts with new lead singer Jean Terrell and “Up the Ladder to the Roof.”

    Ashford and Simpson were inspired by Stax legend Isaac Hayes, who at the time was taking short pop hits such as “Walk on By” and “By the Time I Get to Phoenix” and turning them into extended R&B workouts. They wanted to do the same, and Diana Ross was their test case.

    “I loved Diana Ross’ speaking voice. I thought she had a very sexy tone when she talked and when she sang. So we wrote extra lyrics, trying to stretch it out,” said Ashford, who passed away in 2011. “And Val came up with these new chords. That was one of our best assignments, trying to get that song to where it is. And I think still today, her version just feels like a masterpiece to me.”

    The song was transformed from an upbeat 2:28 pop charmer to a mesmerizing 6:16 stunner, featuring strings, extended spoken verses, and gospel-like backing vocals at the climax.

    Ashford and Simpson were delighted. Berry Gordy was not. The song was too long to be a single, and the chorus did not begin until the 4:20 mark, which was unheard of. Gordy wanted the chorus in the beginning. He refused to release it, and a standoff ensued.

    “We presented it to him, and he wanted to change the whole thing around and start with the chorus and forget all the slow build and drama, just to get to the point,” Simpson said. “We had to fight him on that, because he really wanted to change it.”

    But the song was so strong — it features Simpson on piano and backing vocals — that disc jockeys started making their own radio-friendly edits of the album track. Motown finally relented and released an official edited single that soared to the top two months after its release and stayed there for three weeks [[including the last week of September 1970), earning a Grammy nomination.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3,998
    Rep Power
    464
    I've always thought that Ashford & Simpson were influenced by the work of Isaac Hayes with their remake of 'Ain't No Mountain High Enough' with Diana Ross and this article proves it. It's also interesting to note there was a standoff between Gordy & A&S about the song. History has shown that A&S made the right call since this would be Diana Ross' first major hit as a solo act [[and it has remained one her best songs over the years). I first remember hearing the full-length album version of 'Mountain' on WMCA in the summer of 1970 just before the edited single was released. Loved it then and still do now.
    Last edited by Motown Eddie; 09-26-2012 at 11:24 AM. Reason: spelling

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,884
    Rep Power
    481
    ANMHE could easily be the definitive Diana signature tune; its in there with Stop in the Name of Love, Endless Love, Baby Love etc.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,008
    Rep Power
    263
    "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" was definitely the right move to make on everyone's' part to lift Diana career higher. It is easily identified as part of her signature songs. Berry Gordy was dead on to assigned Ashford and Simpson to Diana at this time. It was a winning combination that he should have stayed with but he wanted to broaden her career I am sure. I don't think Motown knew what to release as her first song, I heard "Someday" was initially suppose to be it then I heard "These Things Will keep Me Loving You" would be it and then out of no where came "Reach Out". It was surprising because Diana was pushing "Something's On My Mind" from her Lets see if Diana Can Make it alone show. I think the Public won out and wanted ANMHE more than anything else after hearing the LP.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,301
    Rep Power
    369
    I heard "These Things Will Keep Me Loving You" was the choice for her first single after "Someday" was decided to be Diana's last single with the Supremes. It probably a decision due to the fact that "These Things" sounded similar to "Someday" in which it has Johnny Bristol singing behind her. The funny thing is that Diana's version of "These Things" was originally assigned to the Supremes.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,884
    Rep Power
    481
    One of the big moments at a Diana Concert is the bridge between Do You Know Where You're Going To and Ain't No Mountain High Enough ~ it is almost guaranteed to make the crowd stand.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,454
    Rep Power
    223
    There was a touching TV moment last week on Good Morning America. Robin Roberts was in the hospital getting prepped for surgery. She had her sister and close friends in the room with her. They were her support team and were there for inspiration. Well, they all broke out singing ANMHE. Its seemes that this must be one of Robins favorite songs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,750
    Rep Power
    212
    Definitely one of Diana's best performances. But the version that really makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand up is the Funk Brothers' backing track as heard on Standing In The Shadows of Motown... almost their last hurrah, as the album's notes state. Of course none of this would have been possible without the brilliance of Ashford and Simpson's vision.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,454
    Rep Power
    223
    I agree. The instrumental track is fantastic. I have always loved that about this song. It is a song that I consider to be a pop music masterpiece. Also fun is the acapella version with just Diana.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,207
    Rep Power
    210
    I like this version the best.. but it's a very close copy production-wise, isn't it?


  11. #11
    RossHolloway Guest
    Indeed that is always a great performace when she mixes those two songs together

  12. #12
    RossHolloway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jillfoster View Post
    I like this version the best.. but it's a very close copy production-wise, isn't it?

    You're joking right? While the instrumentation is respectable, vocally this version doesn't do the lyrics justice. lol Diana Ross' version is sung with passion and its sung as she would sing it to her lover. I've heard Diana's version a million times and it still gives me chills when I hear it. This version, not so much.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Here is the acapella version of the song. It is clear that Diana Ross did not contribute a lot to the recording in my opinion. She most talked/read the lyrics and sang a few notes, made somoe yelping sounds etc. The choir and the musicians did most of the work. Give a listen:


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,884
    Rep Power
    481

  15. #15
    jazzy j Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Here is the acapella version of the song. It is clear that Diana Ross did not contribute a lot to the recording in my opinion. She most talked/read the lyrics and sang a few notes, made somoe yelping sounds etc. The choir and the musicians did most of the work. Give a listen:

    Marv,
    You are one bitter hag, really,quit being such a little bitch so much,
    your really looking like a fool....

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by RossHolloway View Post
    You're joking right? While the instrumentation is respectable, vocally this version doesn't do the lyrics justice. lol Diana Ross' version is sung with passion and its sung as she would sing it to her lover. I've heard Diana's version a million times and it still gives me chills when I hear it. This version, not so much.
    If Yoko Ono screeched Ain't Know Mountain High Enough like an alley cat jiilfoster would say it sounded better than Diana's version. LOL

    Roberta

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by jazzy j View Post
    Marv,
    You are one bitter hag, really,quit being such a little bitch so much,
    your really looking like a fool....
    Excuse me? I beg your pardon?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Sorry Rob but a 31 year old clip does not change the fact the vocals were just not there! Sorry, but without all of the backing voices and instrumentation, there is no song!
    Last edited by marv2; 09-28-2012 at 08:19 AM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,898
    Rep Power
    216
    Ross is in fine voice here but I have to agree with Marv here. It was the background singers and the arrangement as well as the music that shot this song to number one. Ross talking in the beginning helped to sell the song but her singing didnt. All she is doing is talking and saying ....ahhhhh ahhhh, wooh woooh. Truth be told I never understood how this song charted as highly as it did I think it was the drama of the arrangement.

    I love her voice but other than the talking interlude I have always felt that the music, production and the background voices made this song. Someday We Will Be Together is another story.

  20. #20
    jazzy j Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Excuse me? I beg your pardon?
    Fan or not, we here are sick of you bashing Diana, we all know Mary Wilson could not have done better, where is here hits, how many millions does she have, when does here hit CD comes out? Starting to think your Mary herself not Marv

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,167
    Rep Power
    189
    After 42 years this song still stands up and is a fantastic arrangement, vocal etc. It's still played all the time. The public loved it and took it to #1. I'm not a huge Diana fan anymore but I will certainly give her credit where it's due. Her debut album was beautiful from start to finish. I swear, some of you get fired up over nothing.

    Off and runnin'...

  22. #22
    RossHolloway Guest
    @Stephanie -But couldn't you pretty much say that about ANY song? Take away the instrumentations, the arrangements and the background singers and there's not much left to ANY song. I think that's a ridiculous and crazy statement to make.

  23. #23
    RossHolloway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    This is the special that made me fall in love with Diana Ross. To me this is Diana Ross at her peak. Five months after this show aired, I bought my first Supreme's album, and now I have everything that has been released by both The Supremes and Diana Ross.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by jazzy j View Post
    Fan or not, we here are sick of you bashing Diana, we all know Mary Wilson could not have done better, where is here hits, how many millions does she have, when does here hit CD comes out? Starting to think your Mary herself not Marv
    I wasn't bashing Diana Ross. I was commenting on this song. I think you have some kind of deep seated issues or an unnatural emotional attachment to Diana Ross the person.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by RossHolloway View Post
    @Stephanie -But couldn't you pretty much say that about ANY song? Take away the instrumentations, the arrangements and the background singers and there's not much left to ANY song. I think that's a ridiculous and crazy statement to make.
    No, I think Stephanie is right. With this particular song, "Ain't No Mountain High Enough", Diana Ross just talks mostly through it and the real musical portion is coming from the choir and musicians.

  26. #26
    RossHolloway Guest
    ^ Go back and READ the very first post. The article quotes Nic Ashford, the songs writer, as saying that Diana has a very sexy speaking and singing voice and wanted to stretch that element of the song. Diana speaking thru the record is ONE of the elements that make the song memorable. "And I think still today, her version just feels like a masterpiece to me.”

    I think most people see it Nic Ashford's and Valerie Simpson's way more so than you and Stephanie's way. Not to mention that it hit #1, sold millions and is still being played and talked about 42 years later. History certainly isn't on either one of your sides. lol

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    "Disco Duck" by Rick Dees & his cast of idiots also hit #1 but that doesn't mean it was a good record. Marvin Gaye & Tammi Terrell's original version was far superior.......they sang!

  28. #28
    RossHolloway Guest
    AGAIN, I'll favor my ear and my heart over your opinion. And you can't compare Marvin & Tammi's version to Diana's version because they're not the same. It's ok if you don't care for the song, that's your opinion, you're entitled to it. History has recorded Diana's version as a big #1 hit.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,984
    Rep Power
    230
    the part of the whole thang I don't like is the fact that when Diana Ross started having solo records the background singers got a bigger role in the recordings then the other Supremes ever got.My fave version of the song is the Marvin & Tammi original but the productions are like comparing apples to oranges.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,884
    Rep Power
    481
    Motony raises an interesting point that was raised 30 years ago.

    In the final years of the classic supremes, the supremes weren't on many of the records and on ones they were on, they were pushed way back in the mix.

    And in 1970, on both Diana Ross and Aretha Franklin records, their background singers were more prominent than the Supremes ever got behind Diana...........as in Ain't No Mountain High Enough and I Say A Little Prayer.

    Probably the sound changed and the producers went along with it all.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,207
    Rep Power
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    If Yoko Ono screeched Ain't Know Mountain High Enough like an alley cat jiilfoster would say it sounded better than Diana's version. LOL

    Roberta
    Oh heavens no. Diana Ross can outsing Yoko Ono even if she was gagged. I just feel Diana's spoken parts are too overwrought, she recites them like a bad soap opera actress. Vikki's version is more natural in the vocal approach. But make no mistake, this version of the song is all about the production, and the vocalist is just secondary. When it comes to Diana, Vocally, "Remember Me" makes this sound like doggie doo.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,167
    Rep Power
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    "Disco Duck" by Rick Dees & his cast of idiots also hit #1 but that doesn't mean it was a good record. Marvin Gaye & Tammi Terrell's original version was far superior.......they sang!
    Alot of songs you may not like go to #1. Disco Duck was a novelty and people bought it. That is a far cry from Ain't No Mountain. I like the Marvin & Tammi version too but the arrangements are totally different which is why Diana's stands out which I prefer. Marv, is it ok if someone has a different opinion than you?

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Sure! and vice-versa! I just don't think we should place personal attacks on other forum members [[curse them and call them out of their name). I had a different opinion from this person JazzyJ and he lobbied an attack [[although a weak-kneed attack) on me. You understand?

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,898
    Rep Power
    216
    I know I am in the minority and for anyone who has been on this forum they KNOW I am not a Ross basher I have all of her albums except for some of the RCA stuff I only have two of those [[I lost Workin Overtime which I dont miss) Aint no Mountain High Enough has never been one of my favorite Ross tunes. I personally think she has a good voice but IMO its the background singers and the music that make this I like Tammi and Marvins version better but hey I have the album so Motown got their money from me.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,167
    Rep Power
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Sure! and vice-versa! I just don't think we should place personal attacks on other forum members [[curse them and call them out of their name). I had a different opinion from this person JazzyJ and he lobbied an attack [[although a weak-kneed attack) on me. You understand?
    It was a simple question and had nothing to do with an attack on you by someone else. Do you understand? Don't have a meltdown over it.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by nathanj06 View Post
    It was a simple question and had nothing to do with an attack on you by someone else. Do you understand? Don't have a meltdown over it.
    I am not having a meltdown, I am laughing at you LOL! I thought I had answered your question but apparently not, soooo.......

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I wasn't bashing Diana Ross. I was commenting on this song. I think you have some kind of deep seated issues or an unnatural emotional attachment to Diana Ross the person.
    I hope no one on the board points out that you may have the same kind of deep seated issue or an unnatural emotional attachment to Mary Wilson the person that you accuse Jazzy J of having to Diana

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    ... I just don't think we should place personal attacks on other forum members [[curse them and call them out of their name). I had a different opinion from this person JazzyJ and he lobbied an attack [[although a weak-kneed attack) on me. You understand?
    I understand. What I don't understand is why in the past you have attacked me if I disagreed with you by telling me that I am stupid, don't know what I'm talking about, its none of my business, I don't need to know that. You understand?

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Here is the acapella version of the song. It is clear that Diana Ross did not contribute a lot to the recording in my opinion. She most talked/read the lyrics and sang a few notes, made somoe yelping sounds etc. The choir and the musicians did most of the work. Give a listen:
    It doesn't sound like much when separated from the superb production. But what we are hearing here is her reactions to the rest of the production. It's like listening to a one sided phone conversation. Doesn't make much sense unless you know what the person on the other phone is saying.

    I prefer Vikki Carr's spoken part on her version over Diana's spoken part interpretation. Vikki speaks hers naturally like a conversation. Diana has unnatural pauses in her words to coincide with the music.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    I hope no one on the board points out that you may have the same kind of deep seated issue or an unnatural emotional attachment to Mary Wilson the person that you accuse Jazzy J of having to Diana
    NAhhhhh there's a difference. I've known Mary for years. I don't think this guy knows Diane at all. If he did, he would not have ANY attachment to her I promise! LOL!

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    I understand. What I don't understand is why in the past you have attacked me if I disagreed with you by telling me that I am stupid, don't know what I'm talking about, its none of my business, I don't need to know that. You understand?
    I've never cursed at you to my knowledge. Are you trying to pick a fight?

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I've never cursed at you to my knowledge. Are you trying to pick a fight?
    I never professed that you cursed at me. I said that when I say something that you disagree with, you call me stupid, or say that I don't know what I'm talking about. If I ask you a follow up question about something that you post, which may be unanswerable, you say that I don't need to know that or that it is none of my business. I never accused you of cursing at me. But you have an acute way of insulting me when you disagree with me. And then you accuse me of trying to pick a fight. I'm not. Are you?
    Last edited by milven; 09-29-2012 at 11:46 AM.

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    I never professed that you cursed at me. I said that when I say something that you disagree with, you call me stupid, or say that I don't know what I'm talking about. If I ask you a follow up question about something that you post, which may be unanswerable, you say that I don't need to know that or that it is none of my business. I never accused you of cursing at me. But you have an acute way of insulting me when you disagree with me. And then you accuse me of trying to pick a fight. I'm not. Are you?
    I wasn't even talking to you TODAY so how in the hell am I trying a fight? Geez!

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I wasn't even talking to you TODAY so how in the hell am I trying a fight? Geez!
    Actually, you asked me if I was trying to start a fight. I replied that I wasn’t and then asked you if you were trying to start a fight. Also, you are posting on a public board where we can all reply to a post even if it isn’t addressed to us. If it is private, then there is a place where you could have written a private note to the member. Our conversation in this thread was started by your below post, which was not addressed to me, but to another member. Here’s an instant replay.

    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Sure! and vice-versa! I just don't think we should place personal attacks on other forum members [[curse them and call them out of their name). I had a different opinion from this person JazzyJ and he lobbied an attack [[although a weak-kneed attack) on me. You understand?
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    I understand. What I don't understand is why in the past you have attacked me if I disagreed with you by telling me that I am stupid, don't know what I'm talking about, its none of my business, I don't need to know that. You understand?

    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I've never cursed at you to my knowledge. Are you trying to pick a fight?
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    I never professed that you cursed at me. I said that when I say something that you disagree with, you call me stupid, or say that I don't know what I'm talking about. If I ask you a follow up question about something that you post, which may be unanswerable, you say that I don't need to know that or that it is none of my business. I never accused you of cursing at me. But you have an acute way of insulting me when you disagree with me. And then you accuse me of trying to pick a fight. I'm not. Are you?
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I wasn't even talking to you TODAY so how in the hell am I trying a fight? Geez!

  45. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,167
    Rep Power
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I wasn't even talking to you TODAY so how in the hell am I trying a fight? Geez!
    I see four posts by you that say "today" so clearly you have talked to milven. I also wanted to point out that I never said you didn't answer my question. What you came back with was sarcasm and childishness. It may help if you learned not to be so condescending when someone replies to you in a respectful way. I take it you know Diana Ross enough to call her Diane? That's been an inside joke on people for years. Many people, including myself, have met up with Mary Wilson numerous times. It doesn't mean she's my best friend. She's just a person as is Diana. I know this is pointless as you can't argue with a horse. I'll just stand by for your next rant. Peace out.

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    I've already spent too much time on this, but I was just reading the STOP IN THE NAME thread and saw that another member was calling you out for calling him stupid because he disagreed with you. I'm seeing a pattern here. But I am not the moderator so all I can do is point it out. Below is the conversation for the STOP IN THE NAME thread

    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Some people just want to be stupid.
    Quote Originally Posted by antceleb12 View Post
    That's uncalled for. I don't believe that it's just Mary and Flo on the released version, but that doesn't make me "stupid." And I don't think that you are stupid because you disagree. And that's all I'll say about that.

  47. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    Actually, you asked me if I was trying to start a fight. I replied that I wasn’t and then asked you if you were trying to start a fight. Also, you are posting on a public board where we can all reply to a post even if it isn’t addressed to us. If it is private, then there is a place where you could have written a private note to the member. Our conversation in this thread was started by your below post, which was not addressed to me, but to another member. Here’s an instant replay.

    You are trippin! My post :

    " Sure! and vice-versa! I just don't think we should place personal attacks on other forum members [[curse them and call them out of their name). I had a different opinion from this person JazzyJ and he lobbied an attack [[although a weak-kneed attack) on me. You understand?
    "

    was in direct response to Nathan0j who was also sticking his nose in where it did not belong. Now I am not going to spend a whole lot of time going back and forth with you on this. JazzyJ cursed me and called me out of my name because he disagreed with my opinon of Diana Ross' record "Ain't No Mountain High Enough". Anyone that can read down this thread will see that.

  48. #48
    smark21 Guest
    Well, back to Diana’s vocal on Ain’t No Mountain High Enough. Her spoken word vocal really does tread the line between campy melodrama and sincerely and emotionally affecting performance. Depending on my mood when I hear the song, sometimes I take it straight and sometimes It’s very camp. That might be another reason for its enduring popularity as one can enjoy the song on a number of levels.

  49. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    You are trippin!
    Perhaps I am trippin ! Cause here I am trying to post logically with you while you accuse people on a public forum that we are sticking our nose where it does not belong [[as you did above) or calling us stupid because we do not agree with you.

    Keep on doing what you're doing to all of us on this forum. There will be no retaliation to you from the moderator. In fact, I'll probably be accused of being the trouble maker. Okay, I'm done. Gotta go "trippin"

  50. #50
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    Perhaps I am trippin ! Cause here I am trying to post logically with you while you accuse people on a public forum that we are sticking our nose where it does not belong [[as you did above) or calling us stupid because we do not agree with you.

    Keep on doing what you're doing to all of us on this forum. There will be no retaliation to you from the moderator. In fact, I'll probably be accused of being the trouble maker. Okay, I'm done. Gotta go "trippin"
    milven, you seem like a nice and real responsible person so if I may, I'd like to offer you the following advice. Do yourself a favor and stick marv2 on ignore. He has neither a lick of shame and he act like a catty and mean schoolgirl. He loves to start trouble and then sit back while people who challenge him get banned.

    He needs to pay attention to these words from the book of Proverbs.

    "Here are things that that the Lord hates, that are an abomination to him: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that make haste to run to evil, a false witness who breathes out lies, and one who sows discord among brothers."

    Think about those words and you'll see who he really is. Put him on ignore milven and you'll enjoy this forum a lot more.

    Yours, with every good wish.

    Roberta

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.