Watching the "Unsung" documentaries, nearly each show has the group's downfall occur because at least one member [[usually more than one) gets addicted to drugs and ruins everything. Saw it on The Sylvers, Ohio Players, and Rose Royce episodes.
Which begs the question: Why? Why use when you have this great job? You don't have to work construction, hang drywall [[done that, won't do it again hopefully), pick weeds in a pea field [[done that, won't ever do it again), work on a belt line at a cannery [[yes, did that ... awful work), and so on. You get to do what you love and that's make music, and many people cheer you on for doing just that!
But if you use, you usually lose, though yeah there are some survivors like The Rolling Stones, and so forth. Those are exceptions to the rule.
I guess I can understand it a little: One, group is poor and struggling. Two, group gets a hit single and starts making lots of dough. Three, group has spare time on their hands. Four, no one told the group what to do with their money instead of blowing it.
It's a deadly formula, but c'mon, not using and being successful in music is 100 million times better than not only those jobs I mentioned, but also better than working behind a desk all day, isn't it?
Bookmarks