Originally Posted by
danman869
RanRan and ThomMG both hit the nail on the head, IMO. As I was reading the thread [[before getting to Thom's post), I was thinking, "Flo left the Supremes in July 1967 and then didn't start recording for ABC until around April 1968. The likelihood that Flo was singing anything at performance level during those 9 months is about nil, so... her voice probably faltered because it wasn't being used." Plus, as both said: smoking and drinking.
Flo's voice on the ABC material wasn't amazing, but I think it was a combination of non-use, smoking and drinking, and the wrong material. If George Kerr said her voice in '68 wasn't quite what it had been during her Supremes years, that also leads me to believe that they were going for a "Supremes sound" for her ABC material [[which I would believe in listening to it) and they had to realize they weren't going to get that because, duh, they didn't sign Diana Ross to ABC, they signed Florence Ballard. Not that this was the focus on this discussion, but I think the ABC material mainly suffered because much of the material wasn't well chosen nor was the production that great on a lot of the album filler. Even the worst Motown album filler track [[IMO) was still, "MOTOWN!" whereas a lot of Flo's ABC album filler was just that: filler. It never would've happened, but I wish Flo was signed as a solo [[a la David Ruffin) to Motown rather than ABC. The backing tracks would've been strong and I think Motown producers would have had a better idea of her capabilities and how to record her voice. Maybe it wouldn't have been phenomenal, but I think it would've been better than the ABC material.
Bookmarks