[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 42 of 42
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525

    A Tribute To the Girls

    There was a planned album for the Supremes titled A Tribute To the Girls in 1965. "Sincerely", "Around the World In 80 Days", and "Mr. Sandman" were apparently recorded for this project. I figure that "People", "Our Day Will Come", and "I Am Woman" would have probably made it onto the album, or considered for inclusion, once There's A Place For Us was scrapped. I'm not sure if any other songs were recorded for the Girls album. Hopefully George might chime in with additional information about this project.

    Anyway, if judging on the three official tracks for the album, I think we have a pretty good idea what direction the album was going to take. Undoubtedly, the girls would have turned in fine vocal performances, with some beautiful harmonies. What would your A Tribute To the Girls album look like? Any songs- from 1965 and back- that you would have loved to hear the ladies tackle?
    Last edited by RanRan79; 07-16-2020 at 02:05 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    My vision for the album would have had the girls mixing it up between some of the MOR type of songs and the more hip cuts. And of course it would be a group effort. I did a tracklist in the forum for this album once before. Can't remember what all I included, but I believe my idea has changed a bit from that point anyway. My A Tribute To the Girls album might look like this:

    1) Our Day Will Come...Ruby and the Romantics [[I would leave the track as it is already recorded by the Supremes, except I would remove the Andantes and replace completely with Diana and Flo)
    2) Sincerely...McGuire Sisters [[Same as above)
    3) Chapel Of Love...Dixie Cups [[Group harmony)
    4) Be My Baby...Ronettes [[Diana lead)
    5) Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow...Shirelles [[Mary lead)
    6) It's My Party...Lesley Gore [[Diana lead)


    7) Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy...Andrews Sisters [[Group harmony, with Flo doing the solo part)
    8) A Lover's Concerto...Toys [[I would leave the track as already recorded by the Supremes)
    9) Don't You Know...Della Reese [[Diana lead)
    10) Crazy...Patsy Cline [[Flo lead)
    11) Heat Wave...Martha and the Vandellas [[Diana lead)
    12) My Guy...Mary Wells [[Diana lead)

    Production wise, I would either have the tracks completed with an even sound so as not to be jarring as the girls go from a "Sincerely" to a "Heat Wave", or I would have the girls record the more current songs with a more "traditional" arrangement, while recording the other songs with a Motown sound, sort of like what happened during the Rodgers and Hart sessions.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    fun topic!

    I think the album would have including more of the There's A Place For Us songs including The Boy From Ipanema and Big City Babies Don't Cry, Fancy Passes. Around the World was also part of this set

    I think motown would have gone with older tunes

    1. Around the world in 80 days [[originally Bing Crosby but tons of girls covered it including Brenda Lee, Connie Francis, Chordettes)
    2. sincerely - McGuire Sisters
    3. Cheek to cheek - Boswell Sisters
    4. Will you still love me tomorrow - shirelles
    5. Mr Lee - The Bobbettes
    6. Our day will come - Rudy and the Romantics

    7. teach me tonight - DeCastro Sisters [[also Mary Wells just did a very of it at motown)
    8. boogei woogie bugle boy - Andrew Sisters
    9. Mr sandman - Chordettes
    10. Tonight you belong to me - Lennon Sisters
    11. Tammy - Debbie Reynolds
    12. Where the boys are - Connie Francis

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    we have more of the tracks for Broadway 2 Hollywood. Actually we have more than enough for a 12-track lp. So what do you think they would have used?

    The Happening
    All I Know About You - both of these were supposedly slated for the album

    there are then 7 songs recorded in late 66 and early 67:
    If I ruled the world
    Strangers in the night
    the sound of music
    tender is the night
    what now my love
    Who can i turn to
    the shadow of your smile

    So that's 9 songs

    there are some older Sup Hollywood songs like Dr Goldfoot, Surfer Boy and Beach Ball

    And then they recorded More and Somewhere in late 66 too. Who produced these sessions?

    Plus there's all of the leftovers from the There's A Place and Tribute to the Girls sets - Put on a happy face, Make Someone Happy, People, I am Woman, Around the World.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    I’m not as knowledgeable as a lot people on here per what’s left in the vaults. Is there a lot of Supremes stuff still unreleased?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    I’m not as knowledgeable as a lot people on here per what’s left in the vaults. Is there a lot of Supremes stuff still unreleased?
    i don't know for certain - Andy Skurow would be the best to answer that

    what i've gathered is there are still things from the DRATS and later periods. As they've done the various Expanded Editions, i believe they're pulling out most of the "acceptable" content and including it. Things that would be considered unacceptable are tracks with mistakes in them, where the singer is off pitch or messes up, etc. So i'd guess that we've received most of the acceptable stuff from 1961 - 66 or so.

    There could very well still be some alt version of tunes or additional mixes. I believe songs like You Keep Me Hangin' On and Love Is Like An Itchin' In My Heart had multiple mixes as they experimented. I don't believe they've released the completely unedited version of Hangin where the backgrounds are singing through the entire record, with the complete and longer bridge AND the stop ending.

    There's also probably many live shows recorded and potentially the studio recordings of the tv appearances. Berry often had the acts record either with the studio orchestra/band or with a session orchestra in order to get the sound, mix and everything right for tv appearances. then the lead singer would sing live

    From 67 on there's potentially quite a bit left. Several tracks from the Disney lp are still in the vault. And we've not received the Expanded Editions for Reflections, Love Child, Sunshine or Cream of Crop. I think most of the Temptations duets are released, except maybe alt versions.

    There's a lot of 70s stuff, especially during the Jean years. Not sure there's much Scherrie era left as they did include a lot more alt versions and unreleased material in the Let Yourself Go cd set a few years ago

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    Thanks sup_fan. Very helpful.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    we have more of the tracks for Broadway 2 Hollywood. Actually we have more than enough for a 12-track lp. So what do you think they would have used?

    The Happening
    All I Know About You - both of these were supposedly slated for the album

    there are then 7 songs recorded in late 66 and early 67:
    If I ruled the world
    Strangers in the night
    the sound of music
    tender is the night
    what now my love
    Who can i turn to
    the shadow of your smile

    So that's 9 songs

    there are some older Sup Hollywood songs like Dr Goldfoot, Surfer Boy and Beach Ball

    And then they recorded More and Somewhere in late 66 too. Who produced these sessions?

    Plus there's all of the leftovers from the There's A Place and Tribute to the Girls sets - Put on a happy face, Make Someone Happy, People, I am Woman, Around the World.
    Yeah, I'm a little surprised the project was never released, although I guess the idea was ultimately scrapped in order to do the R&H project. Honestly I would've stuck with the B&H idea and just combined some of the none Rodgers and Hart cuts with some of the other B&H tracks. Both project sessions yielded better all around sounding cuts than what was done in 1965. Of course that should be expected. It shows how great everyone involved really were, that they just kept getting better and better.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    oh i think the R&H set is far superior to the Broadway one. of course i'm just taking about degrees of "good." B2H is quite strong but the vocals on R&H are better IMO. take The Sound of Music for instance - not terrible but not the best either. Plus i like the cohesiveness of doing a composer's songbook. I'm sure the legacy of Ella Fitzgerald's amazing songbooks influenced Berry and the motown crew

    both sets are an amazing leap forward in quality. there's an endearing "amateurish" quality to the productions on There's a place and even some of the I Hear A Symphony tracks. The couple of tracks from Tribute to Girls seem a bit stronger than There's a Place. again, the producers were learning just like the girls were. all of it was an evolution

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    I meant to say that I think the better album would've been combining tracks from the B&H sessions with that of the best from the R&H sessions. I don't know why I didn't catch that. Anyway, I wouldn't say that R&H is superior to B&H. Different, but not superior. And of course that's to be expected because it's two different producer sets. HDH were handling B&H, and I think their pop background is more present in the set. On the other hand, Gil Askey [[and Berry Gordy, but we all know it was just Gil) produced the R&H sessions and his background was jazz and MOR, so his skill set seems like it was right at home with the cuts.

    I am not really a fan of the original released R&H album. I personally think that most of the best cuts were kept in the vault and the inferior ones made it onto the album. I like to think this was a mistake that wasn't discovered until the album had been pressed up and sent out. But I've been faaaarrrrrr more impressed with the vaulted cuts that eventually surfaced on comps and finally the "expanded edition" than I have been with most of what made the original release.

    Interestingly, R&H is the first album since We Remember that is strictly Supremes. Had B&H been released, the Andantes presence- assuming that the Andantes weren't replaced by Flo and Mary before release- would be there on some cuts. Gil apparently wanted authentic Supremes, and for that he has my eternal respect.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    If I were going to complete B&H and leave R&H as it's own standalone project...hmmm. I would use the cuts that were intended for the B&H album first.

    Strangers In the Night
    What Now My Love
    Shadow Of Your Smile [[Even though I don't particularly care for it)
    Tender Is the Night [[Same as above)
    Who Can I Turn To
    If I Ruled the World
    Fancy Passes 67
    All Of A Sudden My Heart Sings

    And then I would round the album out with:

    Whistle While You Work from the Disney sessions
    Davy Crockett from the Disney sessions
    A Dream Is A Wish Your Heart Makes from the Disney sessions

    Which of course means I would scrap the Disney idea, although I actually like it. And then to complete the album I would add:

    The Happening

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    i don't mind the Disney project as a stand-alone. i believe the idea was to record something more for the kid market. so i see the project sort of like the Xmas album. while it's a concept album, there's a very specific audience

    For B2H, i'd do

    Strangers in the night
    what now my love
    shadow of your smile
    the happening
    tender is the night
    who can i turn to
    if i ruled the world
    more
    somewhere [[from the 1966 sessions)
    a studio recording version of Mille/Rose/Mame medley
    finish the vocals to On A Clear Day You Can see Forever

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    While i don't know that i'd call the released 12 songs inferior, it's clear they selected the tracks the emphasized Diana more. some truly excellent cuts were left in the vault.

    for a revised 1 disc R&H, i'd do

    Lady is a tramp - but re-record it to give M and F some more to do with it, similar to their live act
    Mountain Greenery
    Lover
    My Romance
    Falling in love with love
    This can't be love
    Blue Room
    Johnny One Note - with Flo on lead
    little girl blue
    when or where
    It never entered my mind
    Spring is here

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    I like the idea of the Disney project on it's own, but only if it were being released at Christmas time. It's possible that the public might have viewed this kind of album as the Supremes doing way too much, and thus ignoring it, similar as to what happened with Funny Girl.

    My R&H album:

    Where Or When
    Lover
    My Heart Stood Still
    Falling In Love With Love
    Bewitched, Bothered, Bewildered
    Manhattan

    Blue Room
    I Didn't Know What Time It Was
    Johnny One Note
    I Could Write A Book
    There's A Small Hotel
    It Never Entered My Mind

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    Ran!!! how could you cut Little Girl Blue?!?!? lolol

    that's one of my fav songs from R&H, regardless of who sings it. just adore the emotional fiber to the tune. And Diana's solo version on Touch Me In the AM is IMO one of her most perfect vocal recordings of her entire 60+ year career.

    So i'm a bit partial to the tune

    i think the sup version is lovely. Also love Nina Simone's version. stunning!!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    I like the idea of the Disney project on it's own, but only if it were being released at Christmas time. It's possible that the public might have viewed this kind of album as the Supremes doing way too much, and thus ignoring it, similar as to what happened with Funny Girl.

    My R&H album:

    Where Or When
    Lover
    My Heart Stood Still
    Falling In Love With Love
    Bewitched, Bothered, Bewildered
    Manhattan

    Blue Room
    I Didn't Know What Time It Was
    Johnny One Note
    I Could Write A Book
    There's A Small Hotel
    It Never Entered My Mind
    i think the Disney album would have made a fine Xmas release. sure it would never had achieved sales figures like A Go Go or the GH set. I don't know the exact timing for the release but the songs were completed in the fall of 67 so it could easily have been prepared for a holiday release.

    in Aug 67 GH was released and hit #1 by the last week of October. it then spent the next 18 weeks in the top 5!!!!!!! it was so incredibly hot of a release that i think you could have gotten away with the Disney project released in Nov or so for the holidays. i bet lots of Xmas trees would have had copies of GH for the teenager in the house and then Disney for their little brother or sister.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    Ran!!! how could you cut Little Girl Blue?!?!? lolol

    that's one of my fav songs from R&H, regardless of who sings it. just adore the emotional fiber to the tune. And Diana's solo version on Touch Me In the AM is IMO one of her most perfect vocal recordings of her entire 60+ year career.

    So i'm a bit partial to the tune

    i think the sup version is lovely. Also love Nina Simone's version. stunning!!
    Easy: I'm not as enamored with it as you are.

    Diana's version is really enjoyable. The Supremes version just doesn't "best" the cuts I included. My original list had 13 songs because I miscounted. Had to go through a painful track by track review of what I could live with cutting. In the end I had to send "This Can't Be Love" back into the vault. I wonder how often the Supremes' actual producers pulled their hair out when trying to narrow down album tracks.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    i think the Disney album would have made a fine Xmas release. sure it would never had achieved sales figures like A Go Go or the GH set. I don't know the exact timing for the release but the songs were completed in the fall of 67 so it could easily have been prepared for a holiday release.

    in Aug 67 GH was released and hit #1 by the last week of October. it then spent the next 18 weeks in the top 5!!!!!!! it was so incredibly hot of a release that i think you could have gotten away with the Disney project released in Nov or so for the holidays. i bet lots of Xmas trees would have had copies of GH for the teenager in the house and then Disney for their little brother or sister.
    Actually some of the songs weren't completed until the following year, according to DFTMC, so if it were readied for Christmas it would've been Christmas 1968, and then it would've competed with TCB, although I'm sure ultimately it wouldn't have been a contest. Was Love Child album still on the charts at Christmas time 68?

    But as is, I think the Disney sessions produced some great music. The instrumentation is wonderful, the vocals are beautiful. It's one of my favorite projects from the group.

    Since you and I seem to be the only ones who care about this kind of topic, is there a project that never was that you would have liked to have seen the girls take on? And of course this isn't limited to the original trio, but any grouping.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    a few of the songs were finished in early 68. i wonder if that was sort of a last gasp for the project? most of the tracks were ready in the fall but maybe they were already thinking. as if they got most of it ready in the fall of 67 for a holiday release but weren't quite done. and then their priorities started to shift to other things and it ran out of steam

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    Easy: I'm not as enamored with it as you are.

    Diana's version is really enjoyable. The Supremes version just doesn't "best" the cuts I included. My original list had 13 songs because I miscounted. Had to go through a painful track by track review of what I could live with cutting. In the end I had to send "This Can't Be Love" back into the vault. I wonder how often the Supremes' actual producers pulled their hair out when trying to narrow down album tracks.
    I'd argue to keep This Can't Be Love as part of the magic of this project was that some songs were re-imagined with a Motown style and sound. They didn't simply follow the traditional style and approach for every song but made some of them their own.

    it really must have been a struggle to pick which 12 to keep. Although their job was probably easier than ours as they were looking for the 12 best that featured diana.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,313
    Rep Power
    218
    My revised R&H album would have been...
    1. Falling In Love With Love
    2. Mountain Greenery
    3. This Can't Be Love
    4. Blue Room
    5. I Didn't Know What Time It Was
    6. Betwitched, Bothered and Bewildered [[version with Flo and Mary harmonizing during the verses with Diana)
    7. Lover
    8. Thou Swell
    9. My Romance
    10. Johnny One Note
    11. My Heart Stood Still
    12. Manhattan [[according to Bluebrock, Diana said her and Flo lobbied for this track to be on the album and were disappointed when it wasn't)

    As others stated, clearly the original album tracks chosen were to highlight Diana. Which is a shame because a lot of those unreleased tracks really highlight the group as a whole.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,965
    Rep Power
    378
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    But as is, I think the Disney sessions produced some great music. The instrumentation is wonderful, the vocals are beautiful. It's one of my favorite projects from the group..
    I really think Diana does a fantastic job on both the R &H album and in particular the Disney songs. On Disney her vocals are warm, fun and expressive.
    I think part of Diana’s ongoing appeal has been that she is rarely afraid to reveal the inner child part of her persona which lays within most of us. I think that’s why she appears so at home on appearances such as Sesame St and the Muppet Show.
    With the exception of “Blue Room” which i consider one of the best songs recorded for the R &H project, i think the track listing is pretty good. Apparently even BG was taken aback at just how good this album turned out.
    My only minor gripe is that Florence was not given a solo. I think she would have been great on “This Can’t Be Love”.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by floyjoy678 View Post
    My revised R&H album would have been...
    1. Falling In Love With Love
    2. Mountain Greenery
    3. This Can't Be Love
    4. Blue Room
    5. I Didn't Know What Time It Was
    6. Betwitched, Bothered and Bewildered [[version with Flo and Mary harmonizing during the verses with Diana)
    7. Lover
    8. Thou Swell
    9. My Romance
    10. Johnny One Note
    11. My Heart Stood Still
    12. Manhattan [[according to Bluebrock, Diana said her and Flo lobbied for this track to be on the album and were disappointed when it wasn't)

    As others stated, clearly the original album tracks chosen were to highlight Diana. Which is a shame because a lot of those unreleased tracks really highlight the group as a whole.
    I never realized it before, but those of you who mentioned it in this thread are probably right. Perhaps that why I prefer more of the vaulted cuts than the ones that made the album.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I really think Diana does a fantastic job on both the R &H album and in particular the Disney songs. On Disney her vocals are warm, fun and expressive.
    I think part of Diana’s ongoing appeal has been that she is rarely afraid to reveal the inner child part of her persona which lays within most of us. I think that’s why she appears so at home on appearances such as Sesame St and the Muppet Show.
    With the exception of “Blue Room” which i consider one of the best songs recorded for the R &H project, i think the track listing is pretty good. Apparently even BG was taken aback at just how good this album turned out.
    My only minor gripe is that Florence was not given a solo. I think she would have been great on “This Can’t Be Love”.
    I've never thought of Flo on "This Can't Be Love", but I have to agree with you. I think she would have done well with it.

    I also agree with your thoughts on Diana's appeal. That's part of the magic of why she was so popular. The fun of it all is so apparent, even when all you have is the audio, such as the Disney recordings.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,965
    Rep Power
    378
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    I've never thought of Flo on "This Can't Be Love", but I have to agree with you. I think she would have done well with it.

    I also agree with your thoughts on Diana's appeal. That's part of the magic of why she was so popular. The fun of it all is so apparent, even when all you have is the audio, such as the Disney recordings.
    I believe it was Diana’s idea that Mary duet with her on “Falling In Love” so it was only by random chance that particular duet ever came about.
    Flo would definitely have added some sas to “This Can’t Be Love”. I think it would have been perfect for her voice in much the same way “Boots For Walking” would have been.
    I’m usually quite happy with Diana on lead, but the R&H album is one in particular that i wish Mary and Flo had been given a full solo on.
    Although Diana’s does a great job on all the songs, i would have loved to have heard what Mary’s sultry tones could have done with “Thou Swell” or “My Romance”.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I believe it was Diana’s idea that Mary duet with her on “Falling In Love” so it was only by random chance that particular duet ever came about.
    Flo would definitely have added some sas to “This Can’t Be Love”. I think it would have been perfect for her voice in much the same way “Boots For Walking” would have been.
    I’m usually quite happy with Diana on lead, but the R&H album is one in particular that i wish Mary and Flo had been given a full solo on.
    Although Diana’s does a great job on all the songs, i would have loved to have heard what Mary’s sultry tones could have done with “Thou Swell” or “My Romance”.
    Absolutely. With Diana as one of my absolute favorite vocalists period, I'm usually in heaven whenever she's singing lead. But I'm also wild about Flo's voice; Mary's less so, although I think her a very good vocalist, particularly when she's "on". But it's hard not to hear some songs and think it might not be Diana's strength and instead is more Flo or Mary's strength. "These Boots" is a perfect example of this. Now don't get me wrong, I actually dig Diana's vocal on it as is. But I will say that one of Diana's weaknesses was lack of sass when a song called for it.

    Of the hit songs, I feel it's a rare argument that's worth my time of whether Mary or Flo were a better fit. Most of those songs were tailor made for Diana and I just don't see the point in debated that. But there are exceptions. I think "Where Did Our Love Go" may very well have been as big as it was if the lead had in fact been handed to Mary. Mary's interpretation would have surely been a little different. Diana's delivery, as the legend goes, was the result of a annoyed young lady who couldn't get her way. She didn't want to sing the song in the first place, but if she had to, she wanted to sing it her way. She was told "no" and so went in and gave what she thought was going to be a subpar performance. And the rest is history. However, Mary, who also didn't like the song, hadn't had a lead since early 1963. I doubt Hitsville had chandeliers at the time, but surely Mary would've found a light fixture to swing back and forth across had she been told the lead was hers. And thus her approach would've been different. But I think the result could have still been a major hit record. I can't really think of another of the group's hits that Mary would've been a good fit for. Perhaps "Baby Love" and "Come See About Me", because of their simplicity and their "young girl aches for her guy" typical girl group storylines, which Mary's "typical" girl group type voice might have fit.*shrugs*

    Flo on the other hand...I think it's as Diana writes in her book, that those songs were too small for a voice like Flo's, so as much as I love me some Flo Ballard singing, I can't imagine her on most of those cuts, with two exceptions: Itching and Hangin On. With "Itching In My Heart", that track just screams Flo ripping through it. I could definitely hear her tearing it up. Especially if she approached it the way Diana does on the "scratch" version, starting off low and sultry and then building. One might argue that if HDH had deviated from the "Diana is the lead singer" motto, and Gordy of course signed off on releasing a single at this point with another Supreme on lead, "Itching" might have done even better than it did.

    With "You Keep Me Hanging On"...this is one where interpretation could be up to the singer. Diana's vocal comes across as a woman tired. She's sick of this shit. Done. But it's a weary tired. She's almost begging to be left alone. I think Flo's would have been more sassy, more forceful. She's tired, but not weary. She's not begging, she's demanding. And the way I hear it in my head is with the original Funks' track. Yeah, I definitely feel like "Hangin" is one where Diana wasn't the only option.

    Which brings me back to "Boots". As I said, I love Diana's vocal, but I think I love it because it's Diana. However, she doesn't bring nearly as much of the sass that even Nancy Sinatra brings to it, and I think that bold vocal is part of what makes "These Boots" a great song originally. Flo would've kept that original spirit, and then added some. Just like I feel like Flo "bested" Sam Cooke on "Good News", I think it's quite possible Florence may have been able to "best" Nancy Sinatra on "These Boots" if given a chance.

    If only Tall Tales Turner hadn't suckered us in with his pretend time revelation that Florence did indeed record a lead for the song. Dickhead.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    There are also many album cuts and vaulted cuts that I do think both Flo and Mary were either a viable option or even the better option than Diana.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I believe it was Diana’s idea that Mary duet with her on “Falling In Love” so it was only by random chance that particular duet ever came about.
    Flo would definitely have added some sas to “This Can’t Be Love”. I think it would have been perfect for her voice in much the same way “Boots For Walking” would have been.
    I’m usually quite happy with Diana on lead, but the R&H album is one in particular that i wish Mary and Flo had been given a full solo on.
    Although Diana’s does a great job on all the songs, i would have loved to have heard what Mary’s sultry tones could have done with “Thou Swell” or “My Romance”.
    agreed - the R&H set is truly excellent and the group sounds great. but it's definitely a Diana spotlight versus some of the earlier concept albums which were more of a group spotlight. But some of the production values on those earlier ones lack the polish of R&H.

    I still say never having the girls do Sing For Your Supper was a horrible oversight. It was written by R&H for a female trio! hello?!?! lol and the Mamas and Papas did it on the tv special. so it would have been a natural to include in the album

    As for a Flo solo, I hadn't thought about This Can't Be Love but that is a good one. I'd have liked her doing the full lead on Manhattan too. Or Johnny One Note. The lyrics of these two a fun and playful. and the comedic aspects of them would also have fit her sassy and "wink" approach and tone.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    Ran - i agree that Flo's voice had a unique quality and may or may not have translated well to many of the Sups own material, as lead. While the songs on her solo lp are, for the most part, just inferior tunes and/or productions to the majority of the Supremes' catalog, the style and approach was much more inline with Diana's vocals than Flo's. Flo comes across too whiny and pinched.

    So within the A side releases, i don't really hear many good opportunities for her. Perhaps YKMHO as she's clearly evident in the choruses and sounds great wailing the title refrain

    as for album tracks:

    WDOLG - I wonder how she might have done on Breathtaking. her vocals on her line in the chorus are stunning and i'd like to have heard her in more ballads. i hate People and the studio version by the Sups is dreadful, IMO. mostly due to the cluttered arrangement which is too brassy and the dirge-like pace the girls are unfortunately forced to sing at. I wonder if Flo could have done some of those Mary Wells styled songs - medium tempo, more in her mid range. And like Mary Wells, I think Flo had more of a presence of a "Woman that knows" rather than cutesy ingenue like Diana.

    More Hits - again with the Mary Wells approach, maybe have Flo sing Whisper. and maybe mary do I'm In Love Again

    Symphony - i'd give Flo Unchained Melody. in the EE, there's the alt version where Diana does NOT sing the bridge with M and F. if you listen closely, Flo does some excellent vocal work and interpretation on "I'll be coming home, wait for me." Also this version by DMF is pretty "white bread" ironic given they're black and the original was sung by a white guy. So adding a bit of Flo's sass and soul could have helped. Mary could have done Yesterday too.

    A Go Go - I agree about Boots. or maybe Sloopy. or maybe Satisfaction and then include it on the lp

    HDH - i think mary would have rocked Mother You, Smother You. And Flo - none of the issued tracks seem to really fit her as well. Can I Get A Witness was considered and she certainly could have added some gospel flare to that one

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Sup I gotta run, but I'll come back with my thoughts!

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,965
    Rep Power
    378
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    agreed - the R&H set is truly excellent and the group sounds great. but it's definitely a Diana spotlight versus some of the earlier concept albums which were more of a group spotlight. But some of the production values on those earlier ones lack the polish of R&H.

    I still say never having the girls do Sing For Your Supper was a horrible oversight. It was written by R&H for a female trio! hello?!?! lol and the Mamas and Papas did it on the tv special. so it would have been a natural to include in the album

    As for a Flo solo, I hadn't thought about This Can't Be Love but that is a good one. I'd have liked her doing the full lead on Manhattan too. Or Johnny One Note. The lyrics of these two a fun and playful. and the comedic aspects of them would also have fit her sassy and "wink" approach and tone.
    I don’t think the group ever sounded as cohesive as they do on the R&H album.
    Regarding the singles, it’s Diana all the way for me. It’s her voice that lends those songs that something extra. I don’t think even WDOLG would have sounded as special or done quite as well with Mary or indeed Florence on lead.
    Regarding the R&H set, Flo’s voice really enhances a lot of those tracks. She was perfect for “This Can’t Be Love” or perhaps “I Could Write A Book”. I find “Manhattan” one of the weakest songs recorded for the project. I don’t think the song really suits any of their voices.
    Its a great shame none of the R&H songs featured all three women on lead. “You Took Advantage Of Me” might have proved a good one. Diana sounding coquettish, Mary sultry and Flo dryly unamused lol.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I don’t think the group ever sounded as cohesive as they do on the R&H album.
    Regarding the singles, it’s Diana all the way for me. It’s her voice that lends those songs that something extra. I don’t think even WDOLG would have sounded as special or done quite as well with Mary or indeed Florence on lead.
    Regarding the R&H set, Flo’s voice really enhances a lot of those tracks. She was perfect for “This Can’t Be Love” or perhaps “I Could Write A Book”. I find “Manhattan” one of the weakest songs recorded for the project. I don’t think the song really suits any of their voices.
    Its a great shame none of the R&H songs featured all three women on lead. “You Took Advantage Of Me” might have proved a good one. Diana sounding coquettish, Mary sultry and Flo dryly unamused lol.
    that's a great idea on another shared lead too. and yes! the tone and the trumpet on Advantage add that *wink, wink* element plus the lyrics would work great too

    Diana:
    I'm a sentimental sap, that's all
    What's the use of trying not to fall?
    I have no will, you've made your kill
    'cause you took advantage of me!

    Mary:
    I'm just like an apple on a bough
    And you're gonna shake me down somehow
    So, what's the use,
    You've cooked my goose
    'cause you took advantage of me!

    Diana:
    I'm so hot and bothered that I don't
    Know my elbow from my ear
    I suffer something awful each time you go
    And much worse when you're near

    Flo:
    Here I am with all my bridges burned
    Just a babe in arms where
    You're concerned
    So lock the doors and call me yours
    'cause you took advantage of me.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    1,245
    Rep Power
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I don’t think the group ever sounded as cohesive as they do on the R&H album.
    Regarding the singles, it’s Diana all the way for me. It’s her voice that lends those songs that something extra. I don’t think even WDOLG would have sounded as special or done quite as well with Mary or indeed Florence on lead.
    Regarding the R&H set, Flo’s voice really enhances a lot of those tracks. She was perfect for “This Can’t Be Love” or perhaps “I Could Write A Book”. I find “Manhattan” one of the weakest songs recorded for the project. I don’t think the song really suits any of their voices.
    Its a great shame none of the R&H songs featured all three women on lead. “You Took Advantage Of Me” might have proved a good one. Diana sounding coquettish, Mary sultry and Flo dryly unamused lol.
    Spot on post! I agree with all of it.
    WDOLG is one of the catchiest tracks HDH ever produced and possibly could have been a hit no matter who sang lead, but Diana totally owns it, forever. [[I do love Mary's background.)
    Florence would have been great on This Can't Be Love and I Could Write A Book [["dryly unamused" Lol)
    Manhattan is not a favorite R&H song. The Supremes' version needed more work.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    the girls' Manhattan would have worked better with lines being traded off too. the duet with the girls doubling much of the vocals doesn't really add much. I've wondered if it was originally meant to be a Flo lead. or they recorded both girls in full and then were going to splice them together so that they're trading off lines.

    Still i don't know that this is the song out of the 25 they recorded that i'd think to give to Flo. it's too cutesy for her bigger vocals. more in line with Diana's kittenish girly approach

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Sup, I'm still compiling my list of songs I can hear Flo and Mary leading on. Need a little more time.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I don’t think the group ever sounded as cohesive as they do on the R&H album.
    Regarding the singles, it’s Diana all the way for me. It’s her voice that lends those songs that something extra. I don’t think even WDOLG would have sounded as special or done quite as well with Mary or indeed Florence on lead.
    Regarding the R&H set, Flo’s voice really enhances a lot of those tracks. She was perfect for “This Can’t Be Love” or perhaps “I Could Write A Book”. I find “Manhattan” one of the weakest songs recorded for the project. I don’t think the song really suits any of their voices.
    Its a great shame none of the R&H songs featured all three women on lead. “You Took Advantage Of Me” might have proved a good one. Diana sounding coquettish, Mary sultry and Flo dryly unamused lol.
    I would say the tracks for Ballads and Blues and C&W rival anything they did on R&H.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    C&W definitely displays more 3 part harmony work. but obviously the song choice, and on some tracks the song production, is inferior. You Didn't Care has great vocals but is a weak and meandering song when compared to A Small Hotel or Bewitched.

    Also the musicality of the girls had grown considerably by R&H. their vocals are more controlled, better lyric interpretation.

    it's fascinating though to listen to these and compare and enjoy their development and growth

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    C&W definitely displays more 3 part harmony work. but obviously the song choice, and on some tracks the song production, is inferior. You Didn't Care has great vocals but is a weak and meandering song when compared to A Small Hotel or Bewitched.

    Also the musicality of the girls had grown considerably by R&H. their vocals are more controlled, better lyric interpretation.

    it's fascinating though to listen to these and compare and enjoy their development and growth
    I was responding to Ollie's comment about the group never sounding as cohesive as they did on R&H. Song ingredients aside, vocally I think the Supremes were as lock step with one another on those earlier projects as they would be on R&H, which I agree displays some of their best overall work. Actually I'd say they sounded more together on those earlier projects than even R&H. To me, the combo of Flo on top, Mary on the bottom, and Diana in the middle, couldn't be beat. Nor that of just Flo on top, Mary on bottom. During the R&H sessions there are times when Flo is almost as low as Mary, and I'm not as fond of that.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,965
    Rep Power
    378
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post

    Also the musicality of the girls had grown considerably by R&H. their vocals are more controlled, better lyric interpretation
    That is what makes the R & H album the best group effort for me. Their vocals had never sounded quite so polished, mature and assured as on this project.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    204
    Rep Power
    61
    My Funny Valentine is an absolutely essential element for both the Rodgers & Hart collection and career retrospectives; it is one of Diana's all-time best performances!

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Alright Sup, here I go with songs I think either Flo or Mary were as good an option or better than Diana [[and in a couple cases, each other):


    Meet sessions= I think Flo was a better option for "Too Hot". I think she could've brought a necessary sizzle to the song that Diana either didn't or was incapable of doing. But honestly, that's the only song that I feel Flo was a superior option for during that first year or so of recordings. Now, other songs that I think Flo would've sounded good on are "Let Me Go the Right Way", "Never Again", "Those DJ Shows", "You Bring Back Memories", and the first two versions of "You're Gonna Come To Me".


    Regarding Mary, I actually think she was as good of an option or an even better option than Diana on most of those early songs, with the notable exception of "Those DJ Shows". I also think Mary was a better fit for "Save Me A Star" and "Heavenly Father".


    WDOLG sessions= I think Flo could've handled versions 3&4 of "You're Gonna Come To Me", "Run, Run, Run", "Lovelight", "Everyday I'll Love You More", "My Imagination", "Honey Babe", "Don't Take It Away", "Long Gone Lover" and "He Means the World To Me". Of these I feel like Flo was the superior option for "My Imagination". I also think it's possible Flo would have done a good job on "Let Me Hear You Say I Love You".


    Mary: "Where Did Our Love Go", "Come On Boy", "A Breath Taking Guy".


    Liverpool sessions= Surprisingly, I find some of these songs might have been up Flo's alley. I could hear her doing the lead on "Hard Days Night", "Can't Buy Me Love", "House Of the Rising Sun", "Do You Love Me", "You Can't Do That". On the latter, I LOVE Diana's lead for some reason. It's not like it's a standout in her vocal work, but it just does something to me. Yet, I think Flo might have been a better option because the sass in telling someone they can't do something, might have made for an even more entertaining performance.


    For Mary, "Because", and maybe "World Without Love".


    I'll return with Supremes Sing CWP, We Remember, More Hits and Merry Christmas tomorrow. Or the next day. Or...

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,761
    Rep Power
    391
    good list ran! eager to see the rest

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.