[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 80

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,650
    Rep Power
    317

    Mary would love to have a supremes biopic made

    With the success of Dexter Fletcher's Bohemian Rhapsody, Mary Wilson wants him to call her and do the same for the Supremes' story.


    From an article By Halina Watts
    20:46, 1 MAR 2019


    Mary Wilson is urging Bohemian Rhapsody director Dexter Fletcher to give her a call.

    She hopes the infighting and stories behind the 1960s hitmakers can be turned into a blockbuster.

    She also blasted 2006 flick Dreamgirls, featuring Beyonce , insisting it “used” The Supremes’ story but insists they have far more interesting tales to tell.

    Speaking at Elton John’s Oscar Viewing party, she told me: “Dexter has got to call me.

    “You know they say Dreamgirls is based on The Supremes but it is nothing to do with us, they just used our history. We need a story on The Supremes.

    “Ours is much better than that in terms of the essence of women and what we did in a time when women weren’t even out there.”

    The Supremes – Diana Ross, Florence Ballard and Mary – were signed to Motown Records in 1961 and at their peak rivalled The Beatles, becoming America’s most successful vocal group.

    But, for all their hits and fame, the group were plagued by jealousy and substance abuse, all documented in Mary’s two autobiographies.

    In 1976, Florence, who struggled with alcohol, depression and poverty, was found dead in her Detroit home aged just 32 after suffering a heart attack.


    Some even questioned whether or not she had been murdered.

    Diana, 74, who was also at Elton’s Oscars party, quit the band in 1970 and had an ongoing feud with Mary who blamed Diana for destroying the band, claiming she forced out Florence before leaving the group to go solo.


    But Mary insists there are no hard feelings despite an awkward embrace at Elton’s party.

    When I asked about Diana, Mary said: “Di who? Oh, my friend. I would never disagree with what that woman had to say. We are glamour girls.”

    Dexter, give Mary a call!




    https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebri...works-14073621

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    I'd like that too. After all, they were one of the greatest American Pop groups.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    Yeah, a Supremes biopic would be great! But, with Dreamgirls out there already, people might think it's not worth doing. Hopefully not.
    Last edited by TomatoTom123; 03-01-2019 at 08:36 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    3,947
    Rep Power
    397
    Flo was not found dead at home. She died in the hospital. Hope they get their
    facts correct before they launch into a movie.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    199
    Rep Power
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by lakeside View Post
    Flo was not found dead at home. She died in the hospital. Hope they get their
    facts correct before they launch into a movie.
    This would never get made. There are too many people involved with strong connections in the film industry to make it not happen.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,027
    Rep Power
    317
    This film won't get made.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    360
    I used to really be about bio-pics, but over the years I’ve found most to be less and less enjoyable. I have a huge problem with most taking artistic liberties and making them historically inaccurate. More and more I find documentaries the proper route for this kind of subject matter. I’ve said for years that the Supremes story would be perfect for PBS’ American Masters. If done the right way they could pull off a stellar documentary, but it would have to be done without Wilson, Ross, Gordy, other Supremes or Motown having any say or control in how it’s written, presented, and edited. This would preserve their story without it being slanted to one’s perspective over the others.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,107
    Rep Power
    239
    Quote Originally Posted by bradsupremes View Post
    I used to really be about bio-pics, but over the years I’ve found most to be less and less enjoyable. I have a huge problem with most taking artistic liberties and making them historically inaccurate. More and more I find documentaries the proper route for this kind of subject matter. I’ve said for years that the Supremes story would be perfect for PBS’ American Masters. If done the right way they could pull off a stellar documentary, but it would have to be done without Wilson, Ross, Gordy, other Supremes or Motown having any say or control in how it’s written, presented, and edited. This would preserve their story without it being slanted to one’s perspective over the others.
    I totally agree with your statement. although I think all should be interviewed for it. but I doubt it will be made until …..

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by daviddh View Post
    I totally agree with your statement. although I think all should be interviewed for it. but I doubt it will be made until …..
    I think they all should be interviewed. Definitely. However I don't think any of them should have control or say over its edit or presentation. Too many cooks spoil the soup. I don't want it to have a Ross slant nor a Wilson or a Gordy slant.

    There is a way to tell their story with the trials and tribulations without having anyone come out looking like a villain or a victim, but the focus has to be on their career, achievements, and why they were so successful. It cannot be about the backstage drama.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by bradsupremes View Post
    I think they all should be interviewed. Definitely. However I don't think any of them should have control or say over its edit or presentation. Too many cooks spoil the soup. I don't want it to have a Ross slant nor a Wilson or a Gordy slant.

    There is a way to tell their story with the trials and tribulations without having anyone come out looking like a villain or a victim, but the focus has to be on their career, achievements, and why they were so successful. It cannot be about the backstage drama.
    This is 2019. It has to have the drama! Most people know that there was plenty of drama associated with The Supremes story. To X that out or to go light on it would be a big mistake and a receipe for disaster. I'd like to see Spike Lee direct it. He did a great job with the film Malcolm X. You cannot bring a fluff piece to the public today, especially when the subject is one where the drama is just as legendary as the group itself! If they do it right, there will be NO comparison to what was presented in the film "Dreamgirls".
    Last edited by marv2; 03-02-2019 at 07:31 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,692
    Rep Power
    535
    Quote Originally Posted by bradsupremes View Post
    I used to really be about bio-pics, but over the years I’ve found most to be less and less enjoyable. I have a huge problem with most taking artistic liberties and making them historically inaccurate. More and more I find documentaries the proper route for this kind of subject matter. I’ve said for years that the Supremes story would be perfect for PBS’ American Masters. If done the right way they could pull off a stellar documentary, but it would have to be done without Wilson, Ross, Gordy, other Supremes or Motown having any say or control in how it’s written, presented, and edited. This would preserve their story without it being slanted to one’s perspective over the others.
    I'm with you Brad. The Dreamgirls movie really put the nail in the coffin for a Supremes movie IMO, because they even changed aspects of the play to become even more Supremes like. Also I think it would very difficult to get a film maker who would be willing to tell the girls' story without bias. Chances are we'd either get someone who was anti Ross or someone who is pro Ross [[cuz lets be real, Diana is the only reason anyone would jump at the chance to do this movie, motivated by love or hate) and neither type would bring justice to the story. A doc would allow for a more impartial story. Also there would be plenty of room to tell the whole story from beginning to end, including the 70s Supremes.

    I get so annoyed that the ladies' story has been reduced to the negative. Mary was so concerned with selling books that she relied heavily on the negative moments while Diana was so concerned with doing the opposite of Mary that, with the exception of her childhood, we really didn't get much substance. I still want to know more about their recording experiences and performance experiences. Mary wrote a quick little paragraph in her first book about the Supremes performing in Bermuda in early 1964. I wanted to know more about that, like why were the Supremes- who didn't yet have a hit- chosen for this engagement? Were they paired up with anyone? It's hard to believe they were the headliner at the place where they were booked. And how rich of an experience must it have been for Flo, who used to live in the projects, and Mary and Diana, who were still living in the projects, to be in a place like Bermuda? That's crazy to think about. But it's the kind of stuff I'd rather learn than to watch a reenactment of Florence telling Diana to go to hell or vice versa.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    I'm with you Brad. The Dreamgirls movie really put the nail in the coffin for a Supremes movie IMO, because they even changed aspects of the play to become even more Supremes like. Also I think it would very difficult to get a film maker who would be willing to tell the girls' story without bias. Chances are we'd either get someone who was anti Ross or someone who is pro Ross [[cuz lets be real, Diana is the only reason anyone would jump at the chance to do this movie, motivated by love or hate) and neither type would bring justice to the story. A doc would allow for a more impartial story. Also there would be plenty of room to tell the whole story from beginning to end, including the 70s Supremes.

    I get so annoyed that the ladies' story has been reduced to the negative. Mary was so concerned with selling books that she relied heavily on the negative moments while Diana was so concerned with doing the opposite of Mary that, with the exception of her childhood, we really didn't get much substance. I still want to know more about their recording experiences and performance experiences. Mary wrote a quick little paragraph in her first book about the Supremes performing in Bermuda in early 1964. I wanted to know more about that, like why were the Supremes- who didn't yet have a hit- chosen for this engagement? Were they paired up with anyone? It's hard to believe they were the headliner at the place where they were booked. And how rich of an experience must it have been for Flo, who used to live in the projects, and Mary and Diana, who were still living in the projects, to be in a place like Bermuda? That's crazy to think about. But it's the kind of stuff I'd rather learn than to watch a reenactment of Florence telling Diana to go to hell or vice versa.
    Exactly. That should be the focus of a documentary - their career, their work. I would almost base a lot of it on the Expanded Edition timelines. Look at Ron Howard's Eight Days A Week documentary about the Beatles' last US tour. It received rave reviews. I know some people want the drama, but look at all those horrible music documentaries done in UK and here in the US that were all about Flo's firing and death. Enough of that stuff. No one comes out looking good. An honest documentary following their work and experiences would do wonders to a damaged image and may form a new found respect among the music industry.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,852
    Rep Power
    461
    No movies without the consent of Berry and Diana, no Motown music

    But this is just another silly sensationalist article that is damaging if it’s anything

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    No movies without the consent of Berry and Diana, no Motown music
    Bingo. I believe Gordy has a final sign off on what gets used. I think if a documentary was done that wasn’t about the “backstage drama,” but rather their career and the hard work put into it, I think it may be something he may consider.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,650
    Rep Power
    317
    This idea was hatched up at a party among people who probably had a few drinks in them. The success of BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY probably inititated the conversation. I don't expect the idea to go any further than just party conversation.

    I like the idea of a documentatary on PBS. There are some excellent ones on AMERICAN MASTERS

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,283
    Rep Power
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    This idea was hatched up at a party among people who probably had a few drinks in them. The success of BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY probably inititated the conversation. I don't expect the idea to go any further than just party conversation.

    I like the idea of a documentatary on PBS. There are some excellent ones on AMERICAN MASTERS
    this reads more like the national enquirer than an actual interview.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,349
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    With the success of Dexter Fletcher's Bohemian Rhapsody, Mary Wilson wants him to call her and do the same for the Supremes' story.


    From an article By Halina Watts
    20:46, 1 MAR 2019


    Mary Wilson is urging Bohemian Rhapsody director Dexter Fletcher to give her a call.

    She hopes the infighting and stories behind the 1960s hitmakers can be turned into a blockbuster.

    She also blasted 2006 flick Dreamgirls, featuring Beyonce , insisting it “used” The Supremes’ story but insists they have far more interesting tales to tell.

    Speaking at Elton John’s Oscar Viewing party, she told me: “Dexter has got to call me.

    “You know they say Dreamgirls is based on The Supremes but it is nothing to do with us, they just used our history. We need a story on The Supremes.

    “Ours is much better than that in terms of the essence of women and what we did in a time when women weren’t even out there.”

    The Supremes – Diana Ross, Florence Ballard and Mary – were signed to Motown Records in 1961 and at their peak rivalled The Beatles, becoming America’s most successful vocal group.

    But, for all their hits and fame, the group were plagued by jealousy and substance abuse, all documented in Mary’s two autobiographies.

    In 1976, Florence, who struggled with alcohol, depression and poverty, was found dead in her Detroit home aged just 32 after suffering a heart attack.


    Some even questioned whether or not she had been murdered.

    Diana, 74, who was also at Elton’s Oscars party, quit the band in 1970 and had an ongoing feud with Mary who blamed Diana for destroying the band, claiming she forced out Florence before leaving the group to go solo.


    But Mary insists there are no hard feelings despite an awkward embrace at Elton’s party.

    When I asked about Diana, Mary said: “Di who? Oh, my friend. I would never disagree with what that woman had to say. We are glamour girls.”

    Dexter, give Mary a call!




    https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebri...works-14073621

    LOL at "She also blasted 2006 flick Dreamgirls" But Mary Wilson had no problem promoting the film for Extra and taking there $5,000 check for gushing about it on there show.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    LOL at "She also blasted 2006 flick Dreamgirls" But Mary Wilson had no problem promoting the film for Extra and taking there $5,000 check for gushing about it on there show.
    I recall that too. She is good at putting the dollar signs before her principles.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    5,666
    Rep Power
    312
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    LOL at "She also blasted 2006 flick Dreamgirls" But Mary Wilson had no problem promoting the film for Extra and taking there $5,000 check for gushing about it on there show.
    Sadly, Ms. Roberta, with Wilson & the $upremes it's all about the check. Would you have any interest in a Supremes biopic? I would not. Why bother? All the real history is known and performances are readily available on YouTube, etc, and we still get to see/hear the glorious lead singer of the Supremes live. The tired history of Wilson's $upremes-era antics and struggles to make a living afterward are well known and don't need rehashing, nor do the sad stories of Florence. I hope you are well!

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by PeaceNHarmony View Post
    Sadly, Ms. Roberta, with Wilson & the $upremes it's all about the check. Would you have any interest in a Supremes biopic? I would not. Why bother? All the real history is known and performances are readily available on YouTube, etc, and we still get to see/hear the glorious lead singer of the Supremes live. The tired history of Wilson's $upremes-era antics and struggles to make a living afterward are well known and don't need rehashing, nor do the sad stories of Florence. I hope you are well!
    I have to say if it were me and I could earn the odd crust here and there for talking about - writing about - going on TV about whatever - I would as well. In this day and age none of these girls are gonna earn a fortune and have to take the cash where they can. Diana obviously finds it easier to make money - she has a bigger history than Mary - so I cannot knock anyone for trying to make a buck or two. I can's see anyone investing the kind of money you need into a movie like this when the story [[albeit maybe wrong or from the wrong perspective) has been told and for another the Supremes are not Freddie Mercury nor Elton John...now as with Marvin Gaye and The Temptations a musical featuring all their songs might just work and it could cover both eras of the group..

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    5,666
    Rep Power
    312
    Quote Originally Posted by paul_nixon View Post
    I have to say if it were me and I could earn the odd crust here and there for talking about - writing about - going on TV about whatever - I would as well. In this day and age none of these girls are gonna earn a fortune and have to take the cash where they can. Diana obviously finds it easier to make money - she has a bigger history than Mary - so I cannot knock anyone for trying to make a buck or two. I can's see anyone investing the kind of money you need into a movie like this when the story [[albeit maybe wrong or from the wrong perspective) has been told and for another the Supremes are not Freddie Mercury nor Elton John...now as with Marvin Gaye and The Temptations a musical featuring all their songs might just work and it could cover both eras of the group..
    I quite agree with you and also don't really find fault with the lesser-knowns earning their 'odd crusts' where they can while Stevie, Diana, & Smokey continue their legendary careers. My only interest would be in a 'Beatles Anthology' type of oral-history documentary of either the Supremes or Motown in it's entirety.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,534
    Rep Power
    124
    Pardon me, excuse me, but for all intents and purposes, Dreamgirls was the story of the Supremes. It was the story told from the "fictionalized" perspective of a "super talent" being relegated to the sidelines because of a "less talented hussy." However, we all know that Flo was never a Jennifer Holliday. She was an average singer with a loud voice. And we also know that Diana's voice sold hundreds of millions of records. But, Dreamgirls was clearly the story of the Supremes told from Flo's victimized perspective.

    Another untold perspective of the Supremes would be how the 2 backup gals were insanely jealous of the big star, and how their jealousy destroyed their friendships, careers, and lives.
    Last edited by Circa 1824; 03-02-2019 at 08:26 AM.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,283
    Rep Power
    204
    And I see the Ross fanatics ready to strike

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,283
    Rep Power
    204
    Ran you called this one lol. Hypocrisy at its finest is clearly displayed on this thread.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    230
    Rep Power
    71
    Am I in the minority here who would WANT a real Supremes biopic? Maybe a mishmash of Mary, the ego of Diana that sold records, and the tragedy of Flo? Maybe all three's point-of-view in one blender? It's too bad the Brewster-Douglass projects got destoryed.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,411
    Rep Power
    183
    yes you're in the minority..

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,027
    Rep Power
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by IMissFlo93 View Post
    Am I in the minority here who would WANT a real Supremes biopic? Maybe a mishmash of Mary, the ego of Diana that sold records, and the tragedy of Flo? Maybe all three's point-of-view in one blender? It's too bad the Brewster-Douglass projects got destoryed.
    Unfortunately you are.
    Only thing a Supremes biopic would do is rehash stuff that was buried years ago.
    I let their legacies do the talking, not any Supremes tea.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by IMissFlo93 View Post
    Am I in the minority here who would WANT a real Supremes biopic? Maybe a mishmash of Mary, the ego of Diana that sold records, and the tragedy of Flo? Maybe all three's point-of-view in one blender? It's too bad the Brewster-Douglass projects got destoryed.
    You are not in the minority. There are a LOT people that would like to see a movie made of the true story of the Supremes, warts and all, they are just not in this thread. If there is money to be made, it will get made regardless of some with fragile egos and embarrassments over their poor personal behavior. The story has been out there for years anyway. Now we just need to see it on the screen

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,318
    Rep Power
    219
    I know this would never happen but a documentary style sit down interview with Diana, Mary and Berry would be my cup of tea. The three of them talking about the hard work, the early days, details of recording the hits and albums, the Copa and just reminisce with each other.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    827
    Rep Power
    111
    Behind every good film script there is a conflict, a tension, unless you make films like Doris Day's.
    According to which of the girls the film will focus on, A film about the Supremes will only focus on the rivalries within the group.
    Besides, whether we like it or not, the story ends badly. Only Diana Ross' destiny can make you dream and Flo's destiny can make you cry.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    839
    Rep Power
    158
    I read the topic headline and thought, chucklingly, "Well, peopple in hell want ice water, too." No way could such a pic be made without the music, and the rights will remian where they are until it goes into public doman, at which time nobody will care anyhow. Dream on...

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    360
    If they couldn't get those Florence bio-pics made then there is no way a Supremes one will happen.

    The best shot for the Supremes story to be told is in a documentary, but it has to be done the right way.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by bradsupremes View Post
    If they couldn't get those Florence bio-pics made then there is no way a Supremes one will happen.

    The best shot for the Supremes story to be told is in a documentary, but it has to be done the right way.
    You mean like that Michael Jackson documentary that debuts on HBO this month? I think the Supremes story is compelling enough to get a theatrical flim made, but it is going to have be no holds barred! Kinda like Mary's book,but more...... There has to be some serious drama included.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,774
    Rep Power
    188
    I think there will be a movie in the future about the life of Diana Ross. It will include her time with the Supremes. But I think the main focus would be Diana Ross. There would be too many distractors to ever get a Supremes movie made. The big one would be permission to use the original songs.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,852
    Rep Power
    461
    I believe one of the reasons that the Supremes are overlooked for recognition by the Grammys and American Music Awards etc is that the image has been damaged by sensationalism that is overplayed; on Facebook you now see all the time references to the Supremes not singing in some of the songs which is a negative; and who the hell would want to put them on tv when you don’t know if Diana will show and Mary now has a reputation for acting up and out

    They don’t need more damage done to the image

  36. #36
    Unfortunately I think that ship sailed with the Dreamgirls movie. I think Mary Wilson's life would make a very interesting movie, but cooperation from all sides at this point is extremely doubtful. She has been trying for this for many years and without the music rights, no one wants to touch it.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    Isn’t the music in public domain already ? Or just in Europe?. One thing Dreamgirls did Right was coming up with some great music and at times almost came close to the Supremes magic. Though some don’t want the truth to come out if it did it would contribute to a fascinating drama. Regardless of the conflicts or because of it makes great drama as well as focusing on their amazing talent and brilliance of Motown.

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,650
    Rep Power
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    Isn’t the music in public domain already ? Or just in Europe?. One thing Dreamgirls did Right was coming up with some great music and at times almost came close to the Supremes magic. Though some don’t want the truth to come out if it did it would contribute to a fascinating drama. Regardless of the conflicts or because of it makes great drama as well as focusing on their amazing talent and brilliance of Motown.
    Our publice domain laws are kind of complicated and over my head, but generally speaking, it will be quite a few years before any Motown song is in public domain

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,299
    Rep Power
    519
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    Our publice domain laws are kind of complicated and over my head, but generally speaking, it will be quite a few years before any Motown song is in public domain
    I think recordings from pre-1963 are in the public domain in some markets besides the US. But I believe publishing is a totally different animal with compositions going into the P.D. after 80 years.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by reese View Post
    I think recordings from pre-1963 are in the public domain in some markets besides the US. But I believe publishing is a totally different animal with compositions going into the P.D. after 80 years.
    Berry Gordy no longer owns the publishing to Motown songs and he is now 89 years old......

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Berry Gordy no longer owns the publishing to Motown songs and he is now 89 years old......
    He still has the power to sign off on what gets used. He sold off the catalog, but the buck still stops with him. Smart move on his part.

    Gordy look great and has incredible energy for being 89 years old. Good for him and I hope he keeps going. There's many at his age who are not as fortunate.

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,297
    Rep Power
    360
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    Isn’t the music in public domain already ? Or just in Europe?. One thing Dreamgirls did Right was coming up with some great music and at times almost came close to the Supremes magic. Though some don’t want the truth to come out if it did it would contribute to a fascinating drama. Regardless of the conflicts or because of it makes great drama as well as focusing on their amazing talent and brilliance of Motown.
    I really loved the Dreamgirls film when it came out back in 2006. Over the years, my view of the film has changed a lot and I find a lot of faults in the casting, the rewritten second act, the music production, and the overt effort to blur the lines in the Dreams and Supremes/Motown story. I had a lot of friends who believed the film was a factual retelling of the Supremes story and I can understand why Ross/Wilson/Gordy would be upset with Bill Condon making it too close to home. The stage production certainly implies it's about the Supremes, but the film pushed it to the extreme. Almost as if Bill Condon and the producers were winking to the audience and saying "Get it. It's really about the Supremes."

    I actually wish the film was remade or one of the networks would do a Dreamgirls Live that was more faithful to the original stage production.

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    There will eventually be a film made on the Supremes. There really is not a lot left to hide. They were too big of a musical act to not have their story made into a theatrical film. I understand there are some people that have a problem with their story being put right up in their faces, but most of their story is already out there in the public. It is going to happen sooner or later.

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,107
    Rep Power
    239
    but i wonder if [[some) of the non sense is just rumour.? these ladies were trail blazers.
    they didn't have anyone to help them with the sudden fame and fortune and they lost their balance as a result. some will blow things out of the water.
    anyway I documentary would probably be best

  45. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    The Dreamgirls movie was pretty cheesy. It was certainly about the Supremes -what with their 70s! ?? Album covers on the wall . Kind of weird. They made Diana and Flo into different people and changed history . Quite odd when you think about it. Did they do all that not to get sued or to please some people?

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    The Dreamgirls movie was pretty cheesy. It was certainly about the Supremes -what with their 70s! ?? Album covers on the wall . Kind of weird. They made Diana and Flo into different people and changed history . Quite odd when you think about it. Did they do all that not to get sued or to please some people?
    I think so, because Diana Ross was scared to death that they were going to present some truths that she went around to some television at the time and pretend joke that she may go see the movie with her lawyers LOL! The movie was even about her and the Beyonce character looked like a saint compare to how Diana Ross is in reality.

  47. #47
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,774
    Rep Power
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I think so, because Diana Ross was scared to death that they were going to present some truths that she went around to some television at the time and pretend joke that she may go see the movie with her lawyers LOL! The movie was even about her and the Beyonce character looked like a saint compare to how Diana Ross is in reality.
    And Mary went on interviews playing the victim again on how she wasn't paid for the movie Dreamgirls. LOL!

  48. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,852
    Rep Power
    461
    Berry and Diana made a bigger star out of Billie Holiday in death than she ever was in life and made money for her estate in a way that wouldn’t happen today

    Yuck - to feel forced to support wife beaters like Pedro and Louis!

  49. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    5,666
    Rep Power
    312
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Berry and Diana made a bigger star out of Billie Holiday in death than she ever was in life and made money for her estate in a way that wouldn’t happen today

    Yuck - to feel forced to support wife beaters like Pedro and Louis!
    This is true. Pre-LSTB there were very few Holiday lps in print. Since the movie Lady's recordings have never been out of print.

  50. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    2,391
    Rep Power
    280
    Quote Originally Posted by PeaceNHarmony View Post
    This is true. Pre-LSTB there were very few Holiday lps in print. Since the movie Lady's recordings have never been out of print.
    Sorry, but that is simply not true. I have multiple Verve, Clef, Norgran, and Decca/MCA records from Billie Holiday in my collection, many that date from the period between her death and before Lady Sings the Blues. Decca aggressively re-released Billie’s catalog immediately after her death, as did Verve/MGM. The Billie Holiday Story was in print continuously between 1959 and 1985. I have every single print of TBHS and am happy to provide photos of the copyright dates when I get back to my collection.

    Nor is it true what Jobeterob wrote. Billie’s Carnegie Hall concert and book brought a very high level of notoriety to her work. Lady Sings the Blues was about making Diana Ross a star. It had little to no impact on Billie or her legacy. She stood on her own. And still does.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.