[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 31 of 31
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,888
    Rep Power
    397

    Mary Wilson and Bernard Gibson's "Tempts"

    I just saw a post that Mary will be performing with Bernard Gibson's "Temptations Revue". I am assuming that this was the group once lead by Dennis Edwards?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    This must be fake news because Mary has said numerous times that she would not appear on stage with a fake group with no original members.

    Keeping track of group changes is hard but I think that Bernard Gibson was part of Dennis' revue and got fired.

    He now has a group called Liv-in-Proof and is using is currently touring with a tribute to Dennis

    In this world of fake news, take none of this as fact. It is my interpretation of what I just researched.Maybe things have changed since last month

    Bernard Gibson performed with Dennis Edwards' Temptations Revue for a decade. Liv-N-Proof of that is Bernard's group that took the stage to honor Dennis' memory at the R & B Music Hall of Fame induction ceremony in 2018.


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,312
    Rep Power
    530
    I saw a similar mention about this show, perhaps on Facebook, but I don't remember. In any event, here is more info.

    https://micommonwealth.com/getpdf.asp?imageID=9681

    Re the fake groups, I thought as long as they said they were a review that they weren't breaking the law?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,888
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    This must be fake news because Mary has said numerous times that she would not appear on stage with a fake group with no original members.

    Keeping track of group changes is hard but I think that Bernard Gibson was part of Dennis' revue and got fired.

    He now has a group called Liv-in-Proof and is using is currently touring with a tribute to Dennis

    In this world of fake news, take none of this as fact. It is my interpretation of what I just researched.Maybe things have changed since last month

    Bernard Gibson performed with Dennis Edwards' Temptations Revue for a decade. Liv-N-Proof of that is Bernard's group that took the stage to honor Dennis' memory at the R & B Music Hall of Fame induction ceremony in 2018.

    It's not fake news. Mary Wilson herself posted it in the MARY WILSON SUPREME Facebook group.

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/9451...4457820998521/

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,888
    Rep Power
    397

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,888
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by reese View Post

    Re the fake groups, I thought as long as they said they were a review that they weren't breaking the law?
    I think you're right reese. But I wonder how many Temptations Revues there are out there? So you slap on the word "Revue" and you can basically get away with what Mary has been fighting for.

    I know the concept is that a touring group of "Supremes" potentially could take bookings away from "real" Supremes, like Mary or Scherrie and Susaye. But wouldn't a "Supremes Tribute" do the same thing?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    199
    Rep Power
    89
    These people fronting these "fake" groups should be ashamed of themselves. They are appropriating other people's hard work, not to mention their legacies. These people had absolutely no part of these groups when they were at the peak of their successes. They didn't make the sacrifices, they didn't put in the long hours at the studio, yet here they are making money off of other people's accomplishments.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,312
    Rep Power
    530
    Quote Originally Posted by marybrewster View Post
    I think you're right reese. But I wonder how many Temptations Revues there are out there? So you slap on the word "Revue" and you can basically get away with what Mary has been fighting for.

    I know the concept is that a touring group of "Supremes" potentially could take bookings away from "real" Supremes, like Mary or Scherrie and Susaye. But wouldn't a "Supremes Tribute" do the same thing?
    I think there was a Glenn Leonard Temptations Revue at some point. But at least he was an actual member of the group.

    I would think the potential for lost income can be a big factor for these acts. I mean, if a promoter books a Tempts revue in January, how likely is he going to book Otis' Tempts months later? It must be hard for those concerned and the market is probably shrinking.

    I know both Mary and Martha have said they wouldn't appear with bogus groups. But they also have bills to pay. Martha herself said that she tried not to appear with groups like the bogus Marvelettes, but her own work was cut off so badly that she had no other choice. Mary might be in the same position. That's why it is nice that they have teamed up for some joint dates.
    Last edited by reese; 07-26-2018 at 10:28 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,726
    Rep Power
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by marybrewster View Post
    I think you're right reese. But I wonder how many Temptations Revues there are out there? So you slap on the word "Revue" and you can basically get away with what Mary has been fighting for.

    I know the concept is that a touring group of "Supremes" potentially could take bookings away from "real" Supremes, like Mary or Scherrie and Susaye. But wouldn't a "Supremes Tribute" do the same thing?
    I think the real issue was groups touring and promoting themselves as the real thing. The use of the word "revue" is real sketchy IMO, because even a legit act can call themselves a revue, but if they are billed and promoted as a tribute group, I don't see the problem. If you have a Supremes Tribute on one side of town and the actual Supremes on another side of town, I imagine one show will be packed while the other would probably be cancelled. Many times people were paying to see these acts thinking they were seeing the originals. And if you pay to see them once and walk away thinking you've seen the real thing, then the actual real thing comes to town, fans were probably less likely to go to that show thinking they've been there and done that. Of course I've always thought that was a bigger issue for other artists and not so much Mary Wilson, as it's hard for me to believe that any Supremes fan- even a casual one- is duped into believing that the Supremes reunited without a headline.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by marybrewster View Post
    It's not fake news. Mary Wilson herself posted it in the MARY WILSON SUPREME Facebook group.

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/9451...4457820998521/

    Mary appeared in the UK with a group of 20 and 30 year old Drifters. I think if the money is good Mary will take the gig if its not muvch money shes gonna pull the Fake Groups card imo. I persionally think she should have never taken that gig but she probably needed the money and weve gotta do what we gotta do to eat.

    http://www.digitalspy.com/music/news...legends-shows/

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    164
    Rep Power
    161
    Name:  unnamed.jpg
Views: 1045
Size:  78.5 KB

    Mary is performing with this group this coming weekend.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    Mary appeared in the UK with a group of 20 and 30 year old Drifters. I think if the money is good Mary will take the gig if its not muvch money shes gonna pull the Fake Groups card imo. I persionally think she should have never taken that gig but she probably needed the money and weve gotta do what we gotta do to eat.

    http://www.digitalspy.com/music/news...legends-shows/
    Yes she did. I was at that show. Mary was billed 4th behind Dionne, Roberta and the "fake" Drifters. It was a good pay day for her so i guess principles go out of the window if it helps pay the bills.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    This must be fake news because Mary has said numerous times that she would not appear on stage with a fake group with no original members.

    Keeping track of group changes is hard but I think that Bernard Gibson was part of Dennis' revue and got fired.

    He now has a group called Liv-in-Proof and is using is currently touring with a tribute to Dennis

    In this world of fake news, take none of this as fact. It is my interpretation of what I just researched.Maybe things have changed since last month

    Bernard Gibson performed with Dennis Edwards' Temptations Revue for a decade. Liv-N-Proof of that is Bernard's group that took the stage to honor Dennis' memory at the R & B Music Hall of Fame induction ceremony in 2018.

    No! You must have totally misunderstood her and the Truth in Music legislation. If a group that does not consist of any of it's original members, then they must be advertised as a "Tribute" act. Is Bernard Gibson claiming that his group are "The Temptations"?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    This must be fake news because Mary has said numerous times that she would not appear on stage with a fake group with no original members.

    Keeping track of group changes is hard but I think that Bernard Gibson was part of Dennis' revue and got fired.

    He now has a group called Liv-in-Proof and is using is currently touring with a tribute to Dennis

    In this world of fake news, take none of this as fact. It is my interpretation of what I just researched.Maybe things have changed since last month

    Bernard Gibson performed with Dennis Edwards' Temptations Revue for a decade. Liv-N-Proof of that is Bernard's group that took the stage to honor Dennis' memory at the R & B Music Hall of Fame induction ceremony in 2018.

    It says right here on this concert poster, as clear as day and in perfect English......"Temptations Revue"!


    https://micommonwealth.com/getpdf.asp?imageID=9681

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by marybrewster View Post
    I think you're right reese. But I wonder how many Temptations Revues there are out there? So you slap on the word "Revue" and you can basically get away with what Mary has been fighting for.

    I know the concept is that a touring group of "Supremes" potentially could take bookings away from "real" Supremes, like Mary or Scherrie and Susaye. But wouldn't a "Supremes Tribute" do the same thing?
    if you had ever followed what Mary and F.A.M.E. fought for, then you would automatically know that this is the case and this is a non-issue thread. Just advertise the concert and stop grasping for controversy because there is none here.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,535
    Rep Power
    125
    I swear to God, if those two sing I'm Going to Make You Love Me, I am calling the police.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    A group with NO original members though? Dennis been dead since February.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    A group with NO original members though? Dennis been dead since February.
    That's why it is called "Temptations Review" or it could have been called "A Tribute to the Temptations" By the way, this is not Dennis old Temptations Review group. David Sea and Paul Williams Jr. are not a part of this billed act as the Temptations Review. Also, Dennis was not an original Temptation, but he was an original member of the "Dennis Edwards' Temptation Review". Confusing huh? LOL!

    Now regarding "The Original Vandellas", Rochelle Laughthunn was not an original Vandella, but Roz and Nettie both were.
    Last edited by marv2; 07-27-2018 at 10:59 PM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,045
    Rep Power
    214
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    That's why it is called "Temptations Review" or it could have been called "A Tribute to the Temptations" By the way, this is not Dennis old Temptations Review group. David Sea and Paul Williams Jr. are not a part of this billed act as the Temptations Review. Also, Dennis was not an original Temptation, but he was an original member of the "Dennis Edwards' Temptation Review". Confusing huh? LOL!

    Now regarding "The Original Vandellas", Rochelle Laughthunn was not an original Vandella, but Roz and Nettie bother were.
    thank you for pointing this out Marv - Mary is doing nothing wrong by performing with the tribute act Whoever they are. They are not billing themselves as the Temptations…… It’s like the now defunct, finally, sounds of the supremes - They didn’t fill them selves as the supremes, however their patter and bios often indicated that they were originals. I’m glad it’s over for them and I hope Mary gets more gigs because of it.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    That's why it is called "Temptations Review" or it could have been called "A Tribute to the Temptations" By the way, this is not Dennis old Temptations Review group. David Sea and Paul Williams Jr. are not a part of this billed act as the Temptations Review. Also, Dennis was not an original Temptation, but he was an original member of the "Dennis Edwards' Temptation Review". Confusing huh? LOL!

    Now regarding "The Original Vandellas", Rochelle Laughthunn was not an original Vandella, but Roz and Nettie bother were.
    Yeah that is really confusing. I guess if it works like that, more power to 'em. Long as they do the originals justice [[and seeing they worked with Dennis, they should lol)

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    Yeah that is really confusing. I guess if it works like that, more power to 'em. Long as they do the originals justice [[and seeing they worked with Dennis, they should lol)
    Midnightman, these guys DID NOT work with Dennis. Dennis had a whole separate group. I don't who these guys are. I am sure they are going to explain who they are to the audience tomorrow. I think my brother may be going to see this.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,354
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    Yeah that is really confusing. I guess if it works like that, more power to 'em. Long as they do the originals justice [[and seeing they worked with Dennis, they should lol)
    I doubt the audience will care much as this is a free concert.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,656
    Rep Power
    323
    Quote Originally Posted by mistercarter2u View Post
    Name:  unnamed.jpg
Views: 1045
Size:  78.5 KB

    Mary is performing with this group this coming weekend.
    This is a video of Mary on a local tv show being interviewed to promote the show. But it is the same old questions that she answered a million times, and of course yes, she still talks to Diana - they are sisters. She wants to called Miss Wilson just like Miss Ross. She seems to be having trouble with her wig because one piece keeps falling in front of her eyes. And, to me, there seems to be something different with her eyes or eye makeup. I can not idenfify what makes her look different here, but she does look different. Also, she seems a bit manic, maybe trying to fit too much into a brief interview. Sadly, she didn't really get a chance to promote the show. Has anyone seen the show?:

    http://www.fox2detroit.com/good-day/...f-the-supremes

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    This is a video of Mary on a local tv show being interviewed to promote the show. But it is the same old questions that she answered a million times, and of course yes, she still talks to Diana - they are sisters. She wants to called Miss Wilson just like Miss Ross. She seems to be having trouble with her wig because one piece keeps falling in front of her eyes. And, to me, there seems to be something different with her eyes or eye makeup. I can not idenfify what makes her look different here, but she does look different. Also, she seems a bit manic, maybe trying to fit too much into a brief interview. Sadly, she didn't really get a chance to promote the show. Has anyone seen the show?:

    http://www.fox2detroit.com/good-day/...f-the-supremes
    In the questions and answers segment of her recent live show Diana told the audience she and Mary were not in touch, yet here Mary is insisting that they are in touch. Therefore one of them is telling lies. Mmm. I shall let you guess which one of them is speaking the truth and which one of them is telling porkies.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by milven View Post
    This is a video of Mary on a local tv show being interviewed to promote the show. But it is the same old questions that she answered a million times, and of course yes, she still talks to Diana - they are sisters. She wants to called Miss Wilson just like Miss Ross. She seems to be having trouble with her wig because one piece keeps falling in front of her eyes. And, to me, there seems to be something different with her eyes or eye makeup. I can not idenfify what makes her look different here, but she does look different. Also, she seems a bit manic, maybe trying to fit too much into a brief interview. Sadly, she didn't really get a chance to promote the show. Has anyone seen the show?:

    http://www.fox2detroit.com/good-day/...f-the-supremes
    That was great and funny. Mary sure does have a large family. My mother and sister just went to Mary's cousin Linda's BBQ a couple of weeks ago.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluebrock View Post
    In the questions and answers segment of her recent live show Diana told the audience she and Mary were not in touch, yet here Mary is insisting that they are in touch. Therefore one of them is telling lies. Mmm. I shall let you guess which one of them is speaking the truth and which one of them is telling porkies.
    I thought I heard Mary say, "but not much". Who cares? Mary call Diane ok? LOL!

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,535
    Rep Power
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Mary call Diane ok?
    I am sure she has tried hundreds of times because her relationship with Ross is her bread and butter.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318


    This has nothing to do with Diana, folks.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,888
    Rep Power
    397
    I sure wish Mary had brushed her wig before the interview. Unless she's trying to serve some Diana a la Ed Sullivan.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post


    This has nothing to do with Diana, folks.
    I think you'll find mr midnight that everything has something to do with Diana

    Also, where do you find all these wonderful Motown related gifs?!

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by TomatoTom123 View Post
    I think you'll find mr midnight that everything has something to do with Diana

    Also, where do you find all these wonderful Motown related gifs?!
    Tumblr and GIPHY.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.