[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 86
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    605
    Rep Power
    172

    Mary Wilson.........

    Hi guys...Reflections :The Supremes Legacy~ have just posted a clip of Mary Wilson singing "You Danced My Heart Around The Stars" saying that the song was produced by Gus Dudgeon plus a few others and that they had never seen the light of day but they will do very soon...is Mary's solo album getting not only a release at last but an expanded release at that...any info anyone?????

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,278
    Rep Power
    519
    In an earlier post, that Facebook page said that Mary had given the four unreleased Dudgeon masters to Sweet Feet Music, the same company that released her recent TIME TO MOVE ON. Supposedly something might be released between the summer and fall of this year.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    This is great. One of the co-writers of the song, talented poet and spoken word artist, Stevie Kalinich contacted me about a year ago and explained that he and Ken Hirsch wrote the song especially for Mary and .....wow! Did she ever do it justice!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by reese View Post
    In an earlier post, that Facebook page said that Mary had given the four unreleased Dudgeon masters to Sweet Feet Music, the same company that released her recent TIME TO MOVE ON. Supposedly something might be released between the summer and fall of this year.
    I am very excited and curious as to what they will do to those songs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    It would be great if they could also formally release one of the more recent remixes of "Red Hot".

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,555
    Rep Power
    182
    Quote Originally Posted by mowsville View Post
    Hi guys...Reflections :The Supremes Legacy~ have just posted a clip of Mary Wilson singing "You Danced My Heart Around The Stars" saying that the song was produced by Gus Dudgeon plus a few others and that they had never seen the light of day but they will do very soon...is Mary's solo album getting not only a release at last but an expanded release at that...any info anyone?????
    “You Danced My Heart Around the Stars” was released on CD in 2015 [[“California Feeling 2”).

    “Pick Up The Pieces” was released in the 80s on a Motown Compilation CD titled “Motown Year By Year 1980.”
    Last edited by longtimefan; 02-22-2018 at 12:58 AM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,472
    Rep Power
    181
    Quote Originally Posted by longtimefan View Post
    “You Danced My Heart Around the Stars” was released on CD in 2015 [[“California Feeling 2”).

    “Pick Up The Pieces” was released in the 80s on a Motown Compilation CD titled “Motown Year By Year 1980.”
    And "You're The Light That Guides My Way" was released on Soul Survivors 2 in 1998.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    "Midnight Dancer" was released as a single in Europe.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    Still will be nice if these songs get some more exposure; many people don't know them. And we are kind of at the now or never stage with all the Motown artists ageing.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,751
    Rep Power
    391
    was Pick Up The Pieces ever officially released in the US as a single? I thought only Red Hot was released

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,751
    Rep Power
    391
    haha - hit submit too soon

    the MW album is not her best work but not terrible either. the four Gus tracks though are excellent an a sad, missed opportunity. can only imagine if where released and part of a second album

    after Mary left the group in June 77, what sparked the legal battle? was she still under contract to Motown as a supreme? if she was no longer in the group, was she in the process of renegotiating her contract to be a solo artist on the label?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Rep Power
    203
    If I’m correct, both Mary and Cindy were under contract as the Supremes til spring 1978. The lawsuit started when the South American tour wasn’t cancelled and Scherrie and Susaye was going. Promoters were threatening to sue Mary. She asked them to come back but they said without Pedro. She asked Lynda but she wanted too much money. That’s when Cindy came on board and they found Debbie Sharpe. I’m guessing Motown didn’t like what Mary did and threatened to sue. And Mary countered. Plus Mary was 7 months pregnant with Pedro jr.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by blackguy69 View Post
    If I’m correct, both Mary and Cindy were under contract as the Supremes til spring 1978. The lawsuit started when the South American tour wasn’t cancelled and Scherrie and Susaye was going. Promoters were threatening to sue Mary. She asked them to come back but they said without Pedro. She asked Lynda but she wanted too much money. That’s when Cindy came on board and they found Debbie Sharpe. I’m guessing Motown didn’t like what Mary did and threatened to sue. And Mary countered. Plus Mary was 7 months pregnant with Pedro jr.
    Cindy Birdsong was under contract through the end of 1977. Mary was officially finished with the Supremes as of June 12, 1977. She was still signed to Motown as single artist [[until she found out that it was inactive). Scherrie and Susaye were also still signed to Motown as "Supremes". The lawsuit of Wilson v Motown had nothing to do with the South American Tour, but with the fact that Motown had taken advantage of Mary Wilson [[Florence Ballard and Diana Ross) by signing them illegally as they were all underage and had no legal representation prior to contract signing [[Mary's mother couldn't even read or write). That violated California labor laws for starters. There were a lot of other things involved in this lawsuit including the fact that Motown had illegally "replaced" Mary on some Supremes recordings between 1968-69, which according to her contract they could not due if she was not ill and available to record. etc,etc. Mary had strong case. Motown settled with her by offering her a new solo contract. Motown never threaten to sue Mary at that time.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Rep Power
    203
    Mary herself said she and Cindy were still under contact as the supremes

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,266
    Rep Power
    203
    And I know the lawsuit has nothing to do with the tour.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by blackguy69 View Post
    And I know the lawsuit has nothing to do with the tour.
    So what do you think about her Gus Dudgeon tracks finally being released?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,340
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    So what do you think about her Gus Dudgeon tracks finally being released?
    In an earlier post, that Facebook page said that Mary had given the four unreleased Dudgeon masters to Sweet Feet Music, the same company that released her recent TIME TO MOVE ON. Supposedly something might be released between the summer and fall of this year.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    I think one of the big points of the lawsuit was conflict of interest per Motown recording her and having managed her/ the Supremes , right?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    I think one of the big points of the lawsuit was conflict of interest per Motown recording her and having managed her/ the Supremes , right?
    Exactly. They, Motown use to negotiate Mary and the Supremes contracts for them.....with themselves! LOL!!!!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    Here is the Facebook post:


    Sweet Feet Music
    Like Page
    February 19 at 1:46pm
    Mary Wilson and Sweet feet Music had a great time at The Nikko . Get ready for A RED HOT summer and fall. Mary gave me THE MASTERS of FOUR RARE unreleased tracks , giving them a good listen and then off to JCK Music for Digital Remastering .
    Keep it sweet . #BeSupreme

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,751
    Rep Power
    391
    i understand Mary's suit against Motown and what it entailed. but my assumption is that her RESPONDED to a lawsuit from motown with her suit. was motown's lawsuit about her S American tour as a Supreme? what was the legal action motown was bringing against her, considering she was a signed artist on the roster.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    927
    Rep Power
    187
    Mary performed all 4 of those songs on a UK TV show called Black Stage I think...the performances are youtube....You Danced My Heart is a masterpiece....Love Talk and Save Me are also nice songs...I am a CCR fan and find Mary's Green River horrible and unlistenable. It strips Linda Ronstadt for her version of Tumblin' Dice of my "Worst Cover Ever" trophy.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    i understand Mary's suit against Motown and what it entailed. but my assumption is that her RESPONDED to a lawsuit from motown with her suit. was motown's lawsuit about her S American tour as a Supreme? what was the legal action motown was bringing against her, considering she was a signed artist on the roster.

    No Mary Wilson's lawsuit was not a counter suit to one Motown brought against her. Motown did not file a suit against Mary. In regards to that South American tour in the Summer of 1977, I believe you are referring to something you may have read about Motown might consider suing club owners for billing Mary's act as "The Supremes". Motown did not sue them. Mary's lawsuit in 1978 was for the reasons I mentioned above.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by gman View Post
    Mary performed all 4 of those songs on a UK TV show called Black Stage I think...the performances are youtube....You Danced My Heart is a masterpiece....Love Talk and Save Me are also nice songs...I am a CCR fan and find Mary's Green River horrible and unlistenable. It strips Linda Ronstadt for her version of Tumblin' Dice of my "Worst Cover Ever" trophy.
    I liked "Green River" but I do not like how she performed it on that show. I like how she did it on other shows and I like the audio recording just fine.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    I think Sweet Feet could really do a great job of updating "Save Me". I would also think it would be a good idea to have Mary re-record parts of the song to update it.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,751
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    No Mary Wilson's lawsuit was not a counter suit to one Motown brought against her. Motown did not file a suit against Mary. In regards to that South American tour in the Summer of 1977, I believe you are referring to something you may have read about Motown might consider suing club owners for billing Mary's act as "The Supremes". Motown did not sue them. Mary's lawsuit in 1978 was for the reasons I mentioned above.
    ah gotcha! id read online something about Motown suing mary following the SA tour, which I thought strange. I would understand if there were conflicts between Scherrie/Susaye and Motown and mary over this.

    Mary's suit was a strong one, with a lot of important issues addressed in it. But one has to wonder if she should or shouldn't have launched it. Was Motown in summer of 77 doing anything to move mary into a solo career? was there any activity with producers? Seems like she should have clearly understood that if she filed such as grievance it would all but destroy any hope of a future successful career. And even if the did offer a solo contract, she should have been more than savvy enough with Motown's behavior to realize any solo work would simply be token at best. that they'd never really promote or develop her as an artist.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,751
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by gman View Post
    Mary performed all 4 of those songs on a UK TV show called Black Stage I think...the performances are youtube....You Danced My Heart is a masterpiece....Love Talk and Save Me are also nice songs...I am a CCR fan and find Mary's Green River horrible and unlistenable. It strips Linda Ronstadt for her version of Tumblin' Dice of my "Worst Cover Ever" trophy.
    all four songs are strong. You Danced is absolutely a masterpiece. she should simply amazing and it's one of the best performances ever [[prior or since) that mary has waxed. this should have been her "Ain't No Mountain" IMO

    Save Me is my next favorite and she sounds great here too. this would have been a strong follow up to the lead single of You Danced.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    2,386
    Rep Power
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    all four songs are strong. You Danced is absolutely a masterpiece. she should simply amazing and it's one of the best performances ever [[prior or since) that mary has waxed. this should have been her "Ain't No Mountain" IMO

    Save Me is my next favorite and she sounds great here too. this would have been a strong follow up to the lead single of You Danced.
    I do hope the plan is to reisssue MW solo with these songs added as bonus tracks. I’ve been listening to mp3 rips from vinyl of her solo album for too long!

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,523
    Rep Power
    120
    You danced my heart around the Stars is the most awkward and ridiculous song title ever, besides Buttered Popcorn. Mary’s vocal was ...... well .... unpleasant.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    ah gotcha! id read online something about Motown suing mary following the SA tour, which I thought strange. I would understand if there were conflicts between Scherrie/Susaye and Motown and mary over this.

    Mary's suit was a strong one, with a lot of important issues addressed in it. But one has to wonder if she should or shouldn't have launched it. Was Motown in summer of 77 doing anything to move mary into a solo career? was there any activity with producers? Seems like she should have clearly understood that if she filed such as grievance it would all but destroy any hope of a future successful career. And even if the did offer a solo contract, she should have been more than savvy enough with Motown's behavior to realize any solo work would simply be token at best. that they'd never really promote or develop her as an artist.
    Motown knew Mary Wilson was leaving the Supremes to go solo in 1977. It made the news around the World, so they knew. After the album that was to be produced by Marvin Gaye never materialized, Motown did not have any concrete recording plans set up for Wilson in '77 as far as I know. She was almost forced to do what she did. Remember, they screwed her out of full ownership of the Supremes name in 1974. Mary also learned to act from a stance of strength rather than just emotion knowing what happened to Florence Ballard. Still she came out triumphant. That Motown no longer exists and she's got her next show to do here in 2018! LOL! I love it!

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,973
    Rep Power
    229
    I'll be seeing Mary along with Martha Reeves tomorrow in Daytona Beach.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by motony View Post
    I'll be seeing Mary along with Martha Reeves tomorrow in Daytona Beach.
    I know you will enjoy it. Two of my favorite ladies!

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    169
    Rep Power
    155
    Too bad Universal did not get their hands on these tapes. I would have preferred to have seen these four tracks released with her 1979 solo album, but I suppose Mary was waiting on Universal to finally green light a solo collection and we all know how it's been with Motown releases lately...

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    927
    Rep Power
    187
    Red Hot grew on me, but only after I saw Mary perform it live....first in 1985. Then I got the 12" and that arrangement is much closer to the live version she was doing. She really worked the song live and I missed it when she cut it from her shows. A Song For You/ How Lucky Can You Get were also stand outs of her live performances. As far as Supremes songs go....Reflections, Stoned Love and Someday We'll Be Together were my favorites. Incidentally, these were performed in full and not part of a fast paced medley. As much as I love the group in all units, the live shows with the speedy arrangements and the overuse of medleys in general were an annoyance and always left me with a feeling of..."What if..."

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    10
    Rep Power
    147
    Quote Originally Posted by gman View Post
    I am a CCR fan and find Mary's Green River horrible and unlistenable. It strips Linda Ronstadt for her version of Tumblin' Dice of my "Worst Cover Ever" trophy.
    Worst cover ever is the Rita Coolidge version of "The Way You Do The Things You Do". She sucks all the life out of this joyful, upbeat classic written by Smokey for the Temps. To add insult to injury she leaves out the best line in the song, "The way you stole my heart you know you coulda been a cool crook".
    Last edited by garyr; 02-26-2018 at 03:59 AM.

  37. #37
    Im def buying when it comes out. I know people criticize her voice but I love Marys voice :-)

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by aarondillon2011@gmail.com View Post
    Im def buying when it comes out. I know people criticize her voice but I love Marys voice :-)
    I love it too. She can sing for me anytime.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,826
    Rep Power
    388
    I've read and reread the post from Sweet Feet Music; unless I'm missing something, is everyone just assuming it's the Gus tracks? This was never mentioned outside of the fact that it's four unreleased tracks. I suppose it's easy to connect A and B, but is it possible that it's four other tracks?

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by marybrewster View Post
    I've read and reread the post from Sweet Feet Music; unless I'm missing something, is everyone just assuming it's the Gus tracks? This was never mentioned outside of the fact that it's four unreleased tracks. I suppose it's easy to connect A and B, but is it possible that it's four other tracks?
    Her Atlantic Records demos were great as well. If those are cleaned up and released I'd be just as happy.

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,036
    Rep Power
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Cindy Birdsong was under contract through the end of 1977. Mary was officially finished with the Supremes as of June 12, 1977. She was still signed to Motown as single artist [[until she found out that it was inactive). Scherrie and Susaye were also still signed to Motown as "Supremes". The lawsuit of Wilson v Motown had nothing to do with the South American Tour, but with the fact that Motown had taken advantage of Mary Wilson [[Florence Ballard and Diana Ross) by signing them illegally as they were all underage and had no legal representation prior to contract signing [[Mary's mother couldn't even read or write). That violated California labor laws for starters. There were a lot of other things involved in this lawsuit including the fact that Motown had illegally "replaced" Mary on some Supremes recordings between 1968-69, which according to her contract they could not due if she was not ill and available to record. etc,etc. Mary had strong case. Motown settled with her by offering her a new solo contract. Motown never threaten to sue Mary at that time.
    marv, you need some correcting.
    ‘First, there is no contract law anywhere requiring legal representation. Period.

    Second, no child labor laws were broken as there was no labor involved [[recording as an artist is not labor - also every kid under age 14-16, depending on the state, who had recorded would be in violation.) their parents/guardians were required for this reason. It is not Motown fault Johnnie Mae was illiterate - reading tests are not required to sign contracts how was Motown supposed to know she was illiterate and why would the onos not be on Mary to correct the situation with someone who could read? You can’t blame Motown for everything.

    Third, how on earth would a Michigan contract signed in 1961 in Violate a s law in California? DMF signed new contracts, also in Michigan, as adults, in 1965.

    ‘’Fourth, as Motown owned The Supremes, and had total control of the group, how could they be violating anything replacing Mary in ‘68&69? What about the dozens of tracks before and after without Mary on them?

    Mary did not gave a strong case, she didn’t have ANY case at all. Motown only settled with offering that joke solo contract to avoid legal fees. If Mary had a lick of sense, she would never, ever have trusted Motown to have her best interest at heart when she wasn’t even allowed to lead the group for a single night. They chose a neophyte Supreme with not one show under her belt to to the chore for ailing Jean. Maybe Pedro had already shopped Mary around and found no takers, so a deal with Motown was better than no deal at all.

    Where do you get this stuff?
    Last edited by TheMotownManiac; 02-27-2018 at 05:02 AM.

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,036
    Rep Power
    213
    I’m so jealous! How was the show? How long were their sets? Did they sing together at all? What did they sing?

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,036
    Rep Power
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Motown knew Mary Wilson was leaving the Supremes to go solo in 1977. It made the news around the World, so they knew. After the album that was to be produced by Marvin Gaye never materialized, Motown did not have any concrete recording plans set up for Wilson in '77 as far as I know. She was almost forced to do what she did. Remember, they screwed her out of full ownership of the Supremes name in 1974. Mary also learned to act from a stance of strength rather than just emotion knowing what happened to Florence Ballard. Still she came out triumphant. That Motown no longer exists and she's got her next show to do here in 2018! LOL! I love it!
    Marv,

    You bring a lot to this group, but child, how you do go on forgetting yourself!

    mary was never screwed out of full ownership of the name as she had zero right to it in the first place. If she had, she would, at best, own a fourth with Diana, Barbara And Flo the others. If the name had been an asset, that asset would have been shared 4 ways at its inception, and since no one signed away their right to that asset when leaving the group, their ownership would have remained intact after they left. This naive assumption that Mary owned the name because she held on the longest is, at best, just plain wishful thinking.

    ‘‘Stance Of strength??????” Where? When? She had nothing and got nothing. I don’t agree that Mary learned a damn thing from Flo’s plight: she, like Flo agreed to terms she later regretted and, worse, exactly like Flo, allowed her know-nothing hubby to helm her career with disasterous results. Mary followed Flo’s footsteps right into oblivion. If she hadn’t dumped cowardly wife beating Pedro and taken over her career herself, she’d probably still be in oblivion - but she fought, adjusted, blossomed and succeeded all without the help of Pedro and Motown [[although Motown was an essential element to her career boosting books.)

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,036
    Rep Power
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by Circa 1824 View Post
    You danced my heart around the Stars is the most awkward and ridiculous song title ever, besides Buttered Popcorn. Mary’s vocal was ...... well .... unpleasant.
    I disagree completely. The title, while hardly trendy or clever, IS romantic. I think Mary’s vocal is excellent. Her read doesn’t break any new ground for innovation, but she’s quite strong and unusually radio friendly. I think, had it been released in 1975, it would have been certified gold and given Mary a big boost. It was a little sappy for 1980, but I’ll get it was written years before.

  45. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMotownManiac View Post
    marv, you need some correcting.
    ‘First, there is no contract law anywhere requiring legal representation. Period.

    Second, no child labor laws were broken as there was no labor involved [[recording as an artist is not labor - also every kid under age 14-16, depending on the state, who had recorded would be in violation.) their parents/guardians were required for this reason. It is not Motown fault Johnnie Mae was illiterate - reading tests are not required to sign contracts how was Motown supposed to know she was illiterate and why would the onos not be on Mary to correct the situation with someone who could read? You can’t blame Motown for everything.

    Third, how on earth would a Michigan contract signed in 1961 in Violate a s law in California? DMF signed new contracts, also in Michigan, as adults, in 1965.

    ‘’Fourth, as Motown owned The Supremes, and had total control of the group, how could they be violating anything replacing Mary in ‘68&69? What about the dozens of tracks before and after without Mary on them?

    Mary did not gave a strong case, she didn’t have ANY case at all. Motown only settled with offering that joke solo contract to avoid legal fees. If Mary had a lick of sense, she would never, ever have trusted Motown to have her best interest at heart when she wasn’t even allowed to lead the group for a single night. They chose a neophyte Supreme with not one show under her belt to to the chore for ailing Jean. Maybe Pedro had already shopped Mary around and found no takers, so a deal with Motown was better than no deal at all.

    Where do you get this stuff?
    I am just sharing the facts. You cannot sign underage people to contracts. Everything I said is true and factual. Thanks.

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,036
    Rep Power
    213
    You better check with a lawyer - The Olson Twins had contracts. So did Jackie Coogan, so did Mc Cauly Culkin. Any child performer is under contract or they would be no reason to pay them. The Supremes were still in high school when they signed, they were not signed to do labor, but to record solely for Motown. And not in California.

    In any case, they re-signed in 1965 as adults with basically the same bs so they had no reason to complain about the first one if they signed up for more of the same. At some point, the blame, if blame there be, needs to be on those agreeing to the terms.

  47. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,340
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I am just sharing the facts. You cannot sign underage people to contracts. Everything I said is true and factual. Thanks.
    Your facts are wrong again. Gary Coleman and Miley Cyrus and Mayim Bialik and every kid thats been a regular on any TV sitcom or TV shows been signed to a contract.

  48. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,007
    Rep Power
    305
    If the Supremes had chose to leave Motown in 1965, they could've done what Mary Wells did when she left. Mary signed as a 17-year-old. When her contract expired in 1964 after she turned 21, she hired a lawyer who told her that she could argue her contract with Motown was "invalid" because she was a minor at the time and that was how she got out of it. I believe Berry had the contract rules to change afterwards because he didn't wanna have any of his artists argue about contracts [[that didn't quite work with Stevie since he hired one of the smartest attorneys in the business, Vigoda, to have things go in Stevie's favor rather than Motown's).

    Then again, the Supremes, when they renewed their contract in 1965, could've hired lawyers who told them "look, girls, your group's name is important, you need to make sure you get it trademarked so Mr. Gordy don't do nothing with that name". I'm sure that's how Otis and Melvin got "The Temptations" trademarked because how else were they gonna exist in the industry with Motown controlling their name?

    They controlled the Marvelettes'. The Four Tops were the Four Tops BEFORE signing with Motown. I think Martha and the original Vandellas eventually got their name back in their possession [[not to mention a chunk of performing royalties they were probably denied when the group dissolved in 1972) after suing Motown in 1983 and 1989 [[Martha sued first and the original Vandellas - Rosalind and Annette - sued after; which probably explains why Martha didn't join Mary in the streaming bill push, just speculating).

    But I think like the Marvelettes, the Supremes were LOYAL to Berry Gordy so they didn't question nothing. And since they were one of THE biggest acts of the '60s, they were wined and dined more than the other Motown acts who lived on crumbs compared to them save for Marvin [[who had the Gordy connections by technicality due to who he married), The Tempts and the Tops.

    Also, when you start a group at 14, 15 years old, you're too naive. All you wanna do is sing. Education goes out the window since you're so determined to be a superstar. I mean, the Supremes each achieved their status before they were mature enough to understand what was really going on. They were all fresh out of high school when they made chart history. Just 20, 21 years old. Basically CHILD PRODIGIES. They bought into the "we are family" hype that the company told them so of course they weren't gonna question Motown about royalties or name possession or any kind of artistic control. Flo could've but she was going through so much, all she can do is rant and fight. Mary and Diana were so used to the good life and all of that [[by their own admissions), they couldn't really see how much people played them.

    They each found out too late that they were being taken advantage of. Flo couldn't leave the label to use her Supremes connections to help out her post-Supremes career, Diana left with only $250,000 in her possession [[and she had three kids to support when she left) and had to invest in real estate and become a producer/executive producer of her concert shows, TV specials and albums and Mary basically had to do whatever she had to do to make sure she kept the finances right [[as far as I know, unlike Flo, she nor Diana never had to file bankruptcy and after Mary cut her husband Pedro out of the picture, she turned everything around for her).

    I still wonder if Mary is still fighting to retain the Supremes name for her, the estate of Florence and Diana since if the name belongs to any of the members, it's those three.

    And to note, they could've gotten control of things while still in Michigan rather than before they and the company relocated to California.

  49. #49
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,036
    Rep Power
    213
    Mary has given up on the name, which is why she went to plan B: Truth in Music. The Temptations made up their name and so they owned it. Motown employee made up The Supremes so Motown owns it. There’s nothing to discuss, sadly. I wish it were theirs. People have to stop blaming Motown for things their artists agreed to and later regretted. I love Mary but she does play the victim card well. I admire that she fights back as well. This streaming thing she’s doing is amazing - not exactly selfless, but so what? History may just honor her mightily for her work on behalf of artists. She will deserve it. It’s a commonality that could possibly even get her and Diana speaking.

  50. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,007
    Rep Power
    305
    Oh yeah. I forgot Janie Bradford gave them the name...

    And someone renamed the Marvelettes.

    I guess I'm still in that belief that Flo named the Supremes when she didn't.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.