I'm hoping--although it seems extremely unlikely--that someday there will be a Motown symposium held with those employees who were involved with the company's Quality Control Dept. And just as much as I'd like to hear about what went into deciding what would be A-side releases, I'd just as much want to hear about B-side selection. In fact, B-side choices often seem to be an even more difficult issue to get a handle on and understand from the position of consumer. Notwithstanding one's own personal likes and individual taste, B-sides often confound me as to what the criteria was or may have been. Such as: Was the B-side chosen so as not to draw attention from the A-side? Was it chosen for being strong so as to assist sales, if needed? Would it be taken from the artists' previous album to make it clear it wasn't an A-side and emphatically not meant to be? Or, perhaps, was it chosen out of necessity so as to keep on reserve other recordings for likely A-side release? There could be many other considerations, as well. All of us have heard B-sides that seem to fall into these possible categories. Some even attain substantial recognition in regional and local markets, as well as in markets overseas. And, reportedly, a few B-sides have gone on to overshadow the A-side in popularity.
I'd just like to know what the B-side selection strategy/strategies were. I assume they did exist since nothing seems left open to chance--and yet chance is the one thing that's always there no matter what you do.
Bookmarks