[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,138
    Rep Power
    261

    The Supremes-The Only Time I'm Happy: Bad Note!

    More Hits By The Supremes is easily the most played album I've ever owned. Not a bad song on this set.

    But someone does hit a bad note!

    If anyone cares to listen and verify, and I've noticed this since 1965, that on the final verse of the chorus before the fade, when the ladies sing in unison, "The only TIME I'm happy..." on the word TIME someone, sounds like Flo, really hits a bad note. Surprising that got past HDH

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,867
    Rep Power
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by BayouMotownMan View Post
    More Hits By The Supremes is easily the most played album I've ever owned. Not a bad song on this set.

    But someone does hit a bad note!

    If anyone cares to listen and verify, and I've noticed this since 1965, that on the final verse of the chorus before the fade, when the ladies sing in unison, "The only TIME I'm happy..." on the word TIME someone, sounds like Flo, really hits a bad note. Surprising that got past HDH
    Yes, I believe it is Flo but I don't think it's a bad note. It sounds ;like a harmony note but the bottom is a little soft so it hits harder than it should. Also, the soprano sound of the note would pull it out a bit whether it was too loud or not.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,138
    Rep Power
    261
    Well, if you notice thom the ladies sing this song in unison except for the parts where Diana takes the lead and Mary and Flo harmonize behind her. Whether it was a bad note or a bad mix someone should have caught this.

    It's kinda like that bad squeak the sax player mad on There's No Stopping Us Now. Motown was sophisticated enough by this time to mix these things out.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,680
    Rep Power
    194
    Are you talking about the moment at 1:59 here? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZz4t7FxNwc

    If you are, what you're hearing is a dissonant harmony. I don't think it sounds bad. It's just instead of being a third apart from the melody note [[what most harmonies are), its a second apart, which can sound unusual to most ears.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,029
    Rep Power
    391
    Mary's voice double tracked is the only one i hear in the background. I am sure she has mentioned before that Florence was not on this recording?. Someone correct me if i am wrong.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    20,256
    Rep Power
    378
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    Mary's voice double tracked is the only one i hear in the background. I am sure she has mentioned before that Florence was not on this recording?. Someone correct me if i am wrong.
    All seems on key to me.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,867
    Rep Power
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by BayouMotownMan View Post
    Well, if you notice thom the ladies sing this song in unison except for the parts where Diana takes the lead and Mary and Flo harmonize behind her. Whether it was a bad note or a bad mix someone should have caught this.

    It's kinda like that bad squeak the sax player mad on There's No Stopping Us Now. Motown was sophisticated enough by this time to mix these things out.
    I've really come to enjoy that squeak! Mary Wells also has a break in her voice on My Guy that I've grown to look forward to.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,029
    Rep Power
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by midnight johnny View Post
    All seems on key to me.
    Thats good???

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,312
    Rep Power
    530
    To me, it sounds like Mary hitting a wrong note while singing the word TIME during the last singing of the title line. One of those things that slip through the cracks, I guess. Like the slightly botched ending on the stereo version of REMOVE THIS DOUBT.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    20,256
    Rep Power
    378
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    Thats good???
    I'm not sure what THAT means. I hear Mary's double tracked background vocal.... I hear Mary's "voices" singing "time" at around 1:59....and each voice is singing a different note on "time"...but both are in key...to me. I tried singing them myself...still on key.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,138
    Rep Power
    261
    Flo is on that track. If you listen to the stereo version Flo takes the song out. I don't hear Mary double tracked here and I seriously doubt that Mary would remember Flo not showing up on a session 50 years ago.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    101,538
    Rep Power
    1339
    Just for what it's worth, to my own ears, both Florence and Mary are there [[possibly joined by at least one other voice on the chorus), but their voices are slightly unbalanced, accentuated by the use of echo.

    Mary is more audible. She may be standing closer to the mike, if she and Florence were sharing - or her voice may be given more prominence for another reason.

    Re: 'that' note. Not sure exactly who it is, but probably Mary - who may indeed be double-tracked, or perhaps simply singing with another, similar voice - but the 'only time I'm happy' chorus is sung in unison.

    One of the ladies slips out of singing in unison on just that one 'time' note. While she is still in key, she pitches her note 'sharp' from the intended note, hitting another just above it in the musical scale.

    That note stands out, simply because it differs from the note[[s) sung by the other background voice[[s). It may not have been at all noticeable, had she been singing alone.

    Just IMO, although technically it is incorrect , the recording still has a lot of charm and character.

    I always enjoy being able to hear both Mary and Florence, in preference to some other of their recordings which present a smoother 'blend' of them.... or whomever....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,138
    Rep Power
    261
    Thank you West Grand, and I agree the song is charming. I think it likely that third voice in the background is Eddie Holland

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    101,538
    Rep Power
    1339
    That's a good enough suggestion for me, BMM.

    My understanding is that any voice talents which were to hand when the Hitsville recordings were made, were utilised to ensure the right sound was achieved...and why not......

    The final result was recordings which are still as great now, as ever they were.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    839
    Rep Power
    158
    Goodness, how thorough we are! I had never given this even a passing thought before, but when the topic was broached here I instantly remembered that one off-note — even after decades of not having heard the song — and went back to give a listen. I suspect the half-tone variance was unintentional but it sounds perfectly fine — just a little odd in the context of that phrase's being sung in unison throughout the rest of the song, and I wouldn't call it a sour note at all. My guess is that it would surely have been noticed by Quality Control, if not by HDH themselves, and in all likelihood was knowingly allowed to remain as it was. Had this song been planned as an A-side, it's possible that it might have been "corrected" at some additional expense, but its having been just a filler track for the album, it was probably more cost-effective to just leave it. Little imperfections like this give recordings a certain charm anyway.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    20,256
    Rep Power
    378
    [QUOTE=BigAl;298588] I suspect the half-tone variance was unintentional but it sounds perfectly fine — just a little odd in the context of that phrase's being sung in unison throughout the rest of the song, and I wouldn't call it a sour note at all. QUOTE]

    Al....I totally agree with your summary!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,029
    Rep Power
    391
    [QUOTE=midnight johnny;298567]I'm not sure what THAT means. I hear Mary's double tracked background vocal.... I hear Mary's "voices" singing "time" at around 1:59....and each voice is singing a different note on "time"...but both are in key...to me. I tried singing them myself...still on key.

    I was a little confused about your comment as i had mde no reference to the perceived bum note which your message referred to. Happily all is clear now.
    I thought i had read somewhere that Mary had mentioned Florence was not present when this song was recorded. I was not entirely sure.
    No matter how many times i listen to this song i still can't hear florence's voice in the mix. Just my opinion.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,375
    Rep Power
    219
    MotownJunkies' interesting take on the recording--and MORE HITS BY itself:

    http://motownjunkies.co.uk/2013/02/28/588/

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.