[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,798
    Rep Power
    460

    Lesley Gore Interview



    Listen to how much Money she owed Mercury when they let her go in 1969 - $175,000; and she says she was one of the lucky ones.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,646
    Rep Power
    317
    interesting interview. I would have liked to have seen the Gene Pitney interview too. They both had major hits in the early sixties. It is a shame how they and so many artists wind up with nothing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,973
    Rep Power
    229
    everything is charged against the artists royalties.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,798
    Rep Power
    460
    She was talking about the little house in the South of France that everyone assumes they will have.

    I wonder if Motown was actually easier on their artists that other record companies. Didn't Berry let Martha out of her contract? I wonder at what cost?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,973
    Rep Power
    229
    From what I understand, Richard Perry &/or MCA had to buy out Marthas' contract from Motown.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,198
    Rep Power
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by motony View Post
    everything is charged against the artists royalties.
    It's how it is re-charged that interests me. How do you recharge the cost of a track that is used more than once and many years later as in.....I gotta let you go for Jimmy Ruffin and then Martha several years later.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,798
    Rep Power
    460
    I suppose it is all in the wording of the contract. So when you become Beyoncé, you can dictate all sorts of things for a while. But when you are a starving novice, you sign anything; when you are over the hill and you've overspent, you will sign anything. And then you reach an age where you've got nothing left.

    It's not good.

    I assume they made Martha/MCA etc., pay for all her studio time etc. in order to get out.

    It's no wonder some of these people end up asking Berry and Stevie and Diana for money.

    So few got so much. So many got very little.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,198
    Rep Power
    389
    I suppose there's consolation for those artists that recorded fewer songs but which sold commercially albeit not HUGE sellers. Consolation in that they now do get royalties.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    9,279
    Rep Power
    519
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post

    I assume they made Martha/MCA etc., pay for all her studio time etc. in order to get out.
    In Sepia magazine, Martha said that the company also advanced her money to pay for her hospital bills. But once she was on her feet, she had to pay it back.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,798
    Rep Power
    460
    Quote Originally Posted by reese View Post
    In Sepia magazine, Martha said that the company also advanced her money to pay for her hospital bills. But once she was on her feet, she had to pay it back.
    It is easy to see why so many people think something is wrong with corporate America.

    As long as the artist knew up front what they were doing, what they committed themselves to, what they were signing away - I suppose that is legal and perhaps fair.

    But it would be hard to believe that 16 year old Lesley Gore had much of a clue ~ as she says, she had one hit record and was a kid, they weren't going to listen to her ~ so she got Judy's Turn to Cry! Quite fortunate for her that Judy's Turn to Cry was not a bad song.

    All of which equally applies to a 23 year old Florence Ballard ~ what would she understand and know.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,798
    Rep Power
    460
    Here's the interview.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,831
    Rep Power
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    I suppose it is all in the wording of the contract. So when you become Beyoncé, you can dictate all sorts of things for a while. But when you are a starving novice, you sign anything; when you are over the hill and you've overspent, you will sign anything. And then you reach an age where you've got nothing left.

    It's not good.

    I assume they made Martha/MCA etc., pay for all her studio time etc. in order to get out.

    It's no wonder some of these people end up asking Berry and Stevie and Diana for money.

    So few got so much. So many got very little.
    Diana herself lucked out; when she left Motown for RCA, didn't she have a paltry $100k to her name? Or isn't that how the story goes? After 2 decades of #1 hits?

    The only millionaires Motown made were the Gordy's.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,798
    Rep Power
    460
    Diana & Lionel have millions; I think Stevie and Smokey do too.

    But almost everyone ends up like Lesley Gore.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,256
    Rep Power
    186
    Quote Originally Posted by marybrewster View Post
    Diana herself lucked out; when she left Motown for RCA, didn't she have a paltry $100k to her name? Or isn't that how the story goes? After 2 decades of #1 hits?

    The only millionaires Motown made were the Gordy's.
    I agree

    Edafan

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,831
    Rep Power
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Diana & Lionel have millions; I think Stevie and Smokey do too.
    But WHY do Diana and Lionel and Stevie and Smokey have millions?

    Diana, because of RCA.

    Lionel, Stevie and Smokey because of songwriting.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.