I know this photo has been discussed before, but I'm not sure if the write-up has been shared. If it has, please excuse the repeat.
Attachment 15243
Printable View
I know this photo has been discussed before, but I'm not sure if the write-up has been shared. If it has, please excuse the repeat.
Attachment 15243
I've only seen the photo...never the article....Not exactly one of my favorite looks for the group, I looked very quickly when I saw it, I thought that was his shadow on Mary's back. Now that I've seen the text I can SEE it is the cut out on the gown.
My eyes aren't as good as they used to be: are Cindy and Jean in the same color? I wonder if these were ever used onstage? The flowers give the group a Pointer Sisters feel.
NOW we know for sure that the man in this photo is not [[as has been theorized):
1) Eddie Kendricks
2) Frank Wilson
It's clothing designer Bernard "The Beautiful" Johnson!
And the article also references the outfits in this photo:
Attachment 15244
It's very strange. Bernard Johnson's archives don't have the designs for those costumes. In fact, the only thing they have is a sketch he did for them in the 60s that was never created. Very odd.
Stranger still, Stephen Burrows mentions in his biography designing for the Supremes, yet the man in the picture looks nothing like him and exactly like Eddie Kendricks from this facial hair, shape and complexion. His clothing is the style that Eddie wore in the early 70s and he was very familiar with Mary Wilson. I have to give my vote to Eddie Kendricks being the guy in that pic!
I'm sorry, but that is Eddie Kendricks in that picture:
Attachment 15245
As Mr. Johnson was the fashion designer for the film "Willie Dynamite", it looks as if he is wearing one of his own creations at the photo-shoot with the Supremes, similar to designs that he made for some male participants in the movie.
And since the photo and write-up were originally published in Essence Magazine, I would think that the photographer and/or writer would know if Eddie Kendricks was the man in the picture and would have so identified him.
He looks nothing like Eddie Kendricks.
The guy in the photo is not Eddie Kendricks nor Stephen Burrows. It’s Bernard Johnson.
Stephen Burrows designed the short white fringe dresses worn at the Central Park concert and later with Lynda on the Flip Wilson Show doing “Your Wonderful Sweet Sweet Love.”
ok - the guy could be peter pan for all we know lol. what i find strange is that other than this 1 shoot in the shorts and this 1 pic in the peach gowns, nothing. Did the girls EVER wear this clothing again? from a timing perspective this seems to be 71. Cindy is quite thin here, as she was around this time. And the girls recently had Stephen do those white fringe mini dresses [[sexy as all hell!!!) It's commendable that they're using black designers. wonder why they didn't do more for the girls? why they didn't wear them more, etc
He didn't always wear a beard/goatee:
Attachment 15247
The styling on both Sup's pics is ... grotesque.
Lol. Not grotesque but, actually, I had to take a second look at both photos, because they decidedly did not look like The Supremes! At first glance, I would have thought First Choice and Emotions. I guess I'm just used to seeing The Supremes in a more glamorous or sophisticated light.
The guy may or may not be Eddie Kendricks. I'd have to see a picture of Bernard Johnson [[or Stephen Burrows).
Attachment 15249Stephen Burrows
Attachment 15248
At a younger age:
Attachment 15250
Stephen Burrows From 1973:
Attachment 15252
Not much help, but this photo is of Bernard Johnson from 1957:
https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/n...hoto/558667741
Luckyluckyme, I would need to see pics of both Stephen Burrows and Bernard Johnson with facial hair. I do know that Eddie Kendricks was touring with the Supremes as their opening act at the time of the photo. Jean Terrell says that is Stephen Burrows in the pic. I still say it is Eddie.
I can confirm it is not Stephen Burrows. The photos are pretty evident. Stephen had a lighter skin complexion.
The man in the photo is Bernard Johnson. Why else would they talk about him and the Supremes in the article? Of course they are going to have a photo of the subjects to match what's being discussed in the article. It's not Eddie Kendricks or else it would be mentioned in the article that it was him. Can you imagine an article on Eddie Kendricks with a photo of him surround by the Supremes and nowhere in the article does it mention that it's the Supremes with him? Believe me, it's Bernard Johnson in the photo.
Magazines do make mistakes. I think that was from Essence Magazine and during it's first or second year of publication. The designer of the dresses the Supremes are wearing in the photo may have been Bernard Johnson, but that is Eddie Kendricks kissing Mary Wilson's back!
https://soulfuldetroit.com/attachmen...4&d=1552187627
Dear God....did they actually perform in these Beverly Hillbilly outfits? This is about
as un-Supreme as it gets. They really did jazz things up a bit by giving Jean blue
straps on those clodhoppers.
I also meant to mention to check out the hairline for Bernard Johnson and then Eddie Kendricks. Now unless Bernard could grow younger from 1971 to 1973, there is no way
I'll believe he is in that pic with the girls.
The article is about him and designing for the Supremes. That’s why there is a picture of him with the group. Why would there be a picture of anyone else? Please make it make sense.
If you read the first two sentences on the magazine page, it literally says that the man in the picture is Bernard Johnson.
Those incomparable Motown misses. Superfine, supercharged, supra-stars... here getting the "max" of attention, and a little putting on, from talented show-biz designer Bernard Johnson.
I mean, If he actually designed the dresses that The Supremes are wearing in the picture, I feel like it would make sense for him to be with them in the picture...
Also, great pictures!!!! :)
Brad - as you've worked with the gowns and done some research, any info on why they seemed to bounce around to much in the 70s? i realize that as budgets got tighter they might not have been able to afford Bob Mackie or Mike Travis. but with these other designers it seems like they'd do 1 dress and that was it. who did the floral gowns the MJL used in LA for that Grove appearance with the Tempts? or the yellow wool ones that now have the sleeves removed?
i also find it interesting that fans and the public felt the Sups weren't as relevant in the 70s or keeping up with trends. But they did try out a variety of less Vegas/glam looks:
these blue overalls - as few fans here thought they were the Emotions!
the red satin haltertops with blue hot pants - worn on Flip
the chiffon Kate Smith gowns
the floral Grove gowns
the red hexagon Touch gowns
the black pants and coats and lavender sequin tops from Touch
the white Central Park mini dresses
the deep purple MJL gowns from Lean On me from flip