I believe her RedHot if for no other reason than that viewers were expressing dissatisfaction in her constant defense of Cosby.
Printable View
I believe her RedHot if for no other reason than that viewers were expressing dissatisfaction in her constant defense of Cosby.
More fallout:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/15/entert...eat/index.html
Now Cammille is in the headlights:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/13/entert...eat/index.html
All the turncoats are coming out now i see,phillips should keep his mouth shut,cosby put money in his pockets and now he's on the crusade too..incredible.
I may have missed it, but has any of these TV reporters asked any of these women why did they wait so long to speak up? Also, why didn't they go to the police at least in the same year these alleged incidents with Bill Cosby occurred?
President Obama said drugging women for sex is RAPE.
http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/...-rape-20150715
"I’ll say this: If you give a woman — or a man for that matter — without his or her knowledge, a drug, and then have sex with that person without consent, that’s rape,"
This is absolutely true. But there is no factual evidence that he drugged anybody without their knowledge or that he had sex with anybody without their consent. And he didn't admit to drugging women without their knowledge for sex. He said he acquired the drugs to give to women he wanted to have sex with. That's no different than a couple having consensual sex while drunk on alcohol or high on any other drug. President Obama never said Bill Cosby raped anyone as that headline implies.
yes, they have been asked over and over. Their replies have been quoted over and over. Fear, shame, lack of knowledge as to what rape is..... fear of the rich and powerful.
Has anyone ever asked YOU why it matters how long they waited? Has anyone asked you what they have to gain? They don't seek money, fame or notoriety. Many have not allowed to have their names released.
has anyone asked Bill Cosby why he doesn't go on national TV and take a polygraph test live? It would get a 30 share easily. I would want to clear my name and go on with my career instead of being a pariah.
The implications there and President Obama knows good and well what Cosby did. Hes a serial rapist and his depositions about drugging women speak volume after volunme. He will pay for these vile crimes in a civil court and he and his wife will really pay when they meet there maker.
This has nothing to do with MJ - HIS accusers sought and received compensation. I have a very rare copy of Michael Jackson Was My Lover that escaped the buyout in Bolivia. Interesting read but it has nothing to do with this thread.
Cosby's do NOT seek compensation - although I hope they do.I noticed you ignored my questions above. Cat got your tongue?
I can change Marv's mind about Bill Cosby! He once said Diana Ross was the most important black entertainer of her time!
There!
Point taken. You are so right: it shouldn't surprise me, but yet, it still does. As hard as it is to relate to Cosby defenders, it's even harder to relate to those defending wife beaters. Mary Wilson's lies and duplicity concerning The Supremes is very irritating, but the thought that she or any woman, or anyone would be subjected to physical beatings sickens me. On top of her being his wife - she was his meal ticket. Where does this sicko get off beating a defenseless woman? even if his reasons for anger were justified, you leave a wife for her infidelity - not beat her. sicko - like Cosby. Yeeeech.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/06/us/bil...ation-lawsuit/
That article's from January, I'm pretty sure there have been more since then. Add on the ones that have already been settled, including the one that the most recent testimony of Cosby's was unsealed from. So to say that none of them are looking for money or that they would have nothing to gain, as was stated earlier, is ridiculous. Maybe what they have to gain is to ruin his reputation and his image because he promised them help with starting their acting careers in exchange for consensual sex and they're upset that their career never took off or that he didn't follow through on his promise. Not saying that happened, but it's a possibility. Just like it's a possibility that he raped them. But none of us know, and there is no evidence. So there's really no point in discussing it.
Polygraph is inadmissible in civil and criminal court, so you're wrong. And there is no "evidence" at all that rape occurred at any point so the cases wouldn't be easy wins. Right now it's strictly a "he-said she-said" situation, which wouldn't go anywhere in court. If it went to a jury though I'm sure he'd lose because 99% of the country believes that multiple accusations equal guilt even without any factual evidence. But that would be a breach of justice because pretty much everybody in the country has been swayed by the media on this for probably a year now, and would have prior knowledge of the case and a bias. Unfortunately for everybody who believes Cosby to automatically be guilty, he's unlikely to face any legal consequences.
Actually, I'm not wrong. Most of these women were not initially seeking money until being called liars. They did not come forward asking for money. Many remain anonymous.
You are wrong about polygraph. see below.
http://www.truthorlie.com/admissible.html
He'd lose because he's guilty and people would sense it and because he admitted in court that he bought ludes to give to women for sex. If it was consensual, why would ludes be needed? I'm not trying to sway your opinion - just informing you that the evidence so far points to quilty without much thought at all. I still say all Cos has to do is go on TV and take a polygraph - he knows this.
These 2 Clown's are bring up Mary Wilson again,when this whole post is about Bill Cosby,they are Sick,they'll say anything to get a respond,the best thing is to pay no attention to them.
Act like there's tumbleweeds when the two BC defenders show up. :)
Anyway, did anyone else post this? Whoopi Goldberg is NOW saying BC "may" be guilty:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=ejBC_U2NaBU
Also President Obama was asked about the Cosby thing. They asked if it was possible to revoke BC's Presidential Medal of Freedom award and he said it was impossible due to the way the medal is given out, like once it's given to you, they can't take it away kinda thing. That said, he CLEARLY wasn't on BC's side of things when it came to his admission of "offering" drugs to women, saying "if you give drugs to women for 'sex', it's rape".
Polygraph can only be submitted to the court in certain states and only if both parties agree to it--and in many states is completely inadmissible. Even if Cosby is guilty [[or innocent and wouldn't want to take it because they're based on pulse and breathing rates which can change--indicating lies--when one is nervous about something even if they're not lying) he could not be forced to take it for use in court, therefore there is no way a polygraph could be used against him in court.
It would be illegal for people in a jury to base their opinions in a new case off of his testimony from a previous case that was settled. He said he acquired the drugs to give to women he wanted to have sex with. That's not rape. He never said they were needed. Maybe that's just what he enjoys and with the woman's consent there is nothing wrong with that. It doesn't matter though because that testimony has nothing to do with any of the other accusations and couldn't be used against him in any other case.
You saying "he'd lose because he's guilty and people would sense it" is completely outrageous and I hope to God that you never serve on a jury, because that would be a breach of justice in and of itself.
You're not informing me of any "evidence" at all as you so claim because none of what you said is factual evidence that he raped anybody.
Taking a polygraph on TV would not help Cosby at all. They vary so much that he could be asked 100 questions and tell the absolute 100% truth on all of them and it would show that he was likely lying on at least 5-10 of them just based on changes in pulse and breathing rate, which would occur when one is in the spotlight on national television. Even if it showed 1 out of 100 he was lying, he would get destroyed my the media and general public based on that 1. He'd have nothing to gain at all by doing that. Even if he did it and it said he was telling the truth, the media would be writing about how he's a master manipulator or a sociopath who believes he isn't lying even when he is. The media is after him because this is selling and making headlines, and I don't blame them because the general public is stupid enough to eat it up, so they'd spin that into a negative story any way they could. He's smart to just keep his mouth shut and not say anything. Whether he's guilty or not.
Well ill hes ruined his own legacy and hes pretty much a leper in society so this must be eating him up inside. He drugged and raped darned near 40 ladies and now the chickens are coming home to roost.
hes no Cliff Huxtable thats for darned sure and his wife is his greatest enabler IMO. Smh at both of them and they few defenders.
Why would you listen to such horrible people yet also believe that the Cosby Show should not be aired because a horrible person acted in it? Even if he's guilty I really don't understand how anybody can support not airing movies or shows that Cosby has acted in. Hundreds of other actors and actresses and writers and directors, etc. were all involved in those, why punish them? They were entertaining and funny with a lot of values in them as well. Why does 1 actor's personal life change anything? Yes he's a PoS. That doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the show, or give reason to punishing everybody else involved.
I listen to Ike Turner cause I like Ike and Tina music but I don't have to look at Ike's evil face when listening to CDs and I paid for the CDs. I really like James brown music. I will watch the Cosby show once hes paid out hundreds of millions of dollars to the women he drug and raped and when hes donated money to rape shelters and abused women shelters. Thats showing me hes trying to making it right with God and taking responsibility for his actions.
Barack & Whoopi are now against him!
As soon as Diana drops the axe, I'm convinced!
Relax, I was convinced before. He's a loser.
Oh how I'd love the ensuing meltdown here if Diane Ross came out publicly in support of Bill Cosby.
Yeah like Stephen Collins who admitted to molesting children.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPnWqrt_rvM
I can absolutely understand you personally not wanting to see Cosby's face, but why should they take the show off? Others enjoy watching it regardless of Bill's personal life. The other actors and actresses are all tremendous and it's an entertaining and funny show. I understand you already have the Ike and JB CDs [[similarly I have Cosby Show dvds) but pretend that you didn't. How would you feel if they stopped selling all of the CDs and records and took them off of the internet too--just because some people didn't want to hear a wife-beater's voice--so you wouldn't be able to hear these singers that you enjoy listening to? My point is, there is nothing wrong with the show being aired and there's no reason to take it off. If some don't want to watch it then they don't have to. Don't stop others from watching it and the other actors and actresses, producers and directors from making money from it that they've earned and deserve. Did James Brown and Ike Turner pay out hundreds of millions of dollars or try to make it right?