PDA

View Full Version : The Supremes original plan...


test

floyjoy678
08-15-2013, 08:29 AM
It's been said that the original plan for the Supremes [[just in case Cindy wasn't accepted as a Supreme) was to have "Reflections" be the last single and they would put out one more album and go on a final tour. Florence would be brought back for the final dates and then that would be the end of the Supremes and Diana would begin her solo career. This explains why it was said at first that Florence would be back in the group and she was taking a "break". Do you they should have stuck with this original plan? Considering the next two years the Supremes struggled just to get a couple of hits I would say yes. The fact that after Florence left most of the singles featured only Diana would also point to yes for me. I think she held on too long, she probably felt she owed it to Mary which makes sense because as soon as their friendship turned sour that's when she wanted out, but I think she should have left earlier than when she did. This is NOT a bashing thread, just opinions on if you think The Supremes and Motown made the right choice in keeping Diana in the group longer than originally planned.

ejluther
08-15-2013, 09:01 AM
I also think it would have been a good plan - in fact, as you point out, this is essentially the plan they followed [[starting on Diana's solo career) even though Diana officially stayed in the group. What would have happened to Mary and Flo? Attempts at solo material? Or is there any chance Flo would have taken over for Diana as the lead singer of the group and they got another member? Oh, the things we'll never know...

marybrewster
08-15-2013, 09:18 AM
I question whether it would have good plan; naturally there are way too many "what if's".

Would DRATS still have released "In and Out of Love" and "Forever Came Today" from the 'Reflections' LP?

Would H-D-H still have left Motown?

Would "Some Things You Never get Used To" been Diana's first single?

Would Berry have assembled "The Clan"?

Diana needed a HIT out of the gate; as it stands her "Supremes sound" didn't change until the mid-70's. Listen to all of her early singles: "Ain't No Mountain High Enough", "Remember Me", "Surrender", "Last Time I Saw Him"....ALL rely and are HEAVY on background vocals: Diana could have left the Supremes in 1967 or 1970, but she didn't truly go "solo" until much, much later.

reese
08-15-2013, 09:48 AM
I question whether this was a plan at all, if for no other reason than Cindy Birdsong.

What would Cindy do if this plan had taken place? She made some moves that couldn't be taken back, ditching both her colleagues and friends in the Bluebelles without even a discussion. It is not like she could go back to them. What would Motown do with her? Would she be dropped into another Motown group? I doubt they would have been interested in her as a soloist.

floyjoy678
08-15-2013, 09:54 AM
Actually the more I'm thinking about it, if I were Berry I would have put her out as a soloist after "Love Child" hit. Have "TCB" be her final project with the Supremes. Diana definitely was established enough as a single by 1969 in my opinion.

BigAl
08-15-2013, 10:15 AM
Actually the more I'm thinking about it, if I were Berry I would have put her out as a soloist after "Love Child" hit. Have "TCB" be her final project with the Supremes. Diana definitely was established enough as a single by 1969 in my opinion.

I agree.

In 1967 Diane had not garnered enough name recognition outside of fan circles, so it was pretty imperative that she continue to be linked to The Supremes in order for the general public to make the connection, hence the change to DRATS. In addition, with HDH on mutiny and a seeming lack of top-notch material available, this would have been a bad time for her solo breakout. She could still trade on The Supremes' name, even with mediocre material, but probably would not have fared so well as a solo with the same fairly lackluster material. As far as Gordy was concerned, Mary and Florence, and later Cindy, would be dispensable once Diane's name became more widely recognized, but until then it was necessary to keep the act intact [[as it were), so they hired Cindy for the last leg of the run [[primarily for all the advance concert bookings I suppose) and for the next two and half years they largely limped along on the charts but still packed the houses which Diane as solo probably could not have done. Since it was determined that she should not go solo until the "group" had one more blockbuster hit, she just had to cool her heels. In my opinion, "Love Child" could probably have served that purpose quite well so I'm not sure why they didn't set the plan in motion then. Probably because of all the advance concert bookings as a group I suppose. Also, perhaps they just felt that they didn't have the right song at hand for her solo debut. Then when the group foundered on the charts after "Love Child," she just had to wait a little longer until they had yet one more major hit and eventually had to agree to use "Someday" for that purpose even though that was supposed to be her debut. In retrospect, I feel that letting "Love Child" be the group's swan song and "Someday" be Diane's first solo would have worked fine. "Reach Out and Touch," turned out to be something of a disappointment, especially while the "new" Supremes charted better at the same time with "Up The Ladder," and Diane had to wait until "Ain't No Mountain" hit big to have the big success which a solo career would require.

ejluther
08-15-2013, 10:32 AM
PS: I only really like this plan if somehow we still get to keep all the great 70's Supremes material - I don't want a world where all those great songs just don't exist...

luke
08-15-2013, 12:06 PM
Diana leaving had been considered as early as 1966. There was much concern how it would look if she left too soon[[group loyalty...) and whether she would make it or not. [[Remember they had to bribe people to go to her solo show initally). Gordy knew he could not abandon the other Supremes completely per a public relations disaster.

Zantellor
08-15-2013, 02:37 PM
Diana Ross could have and should have put out some solo work while still with The supremes [[Mary and Flo) in 1967.Also Supremes' albums should have featured more leads by Mary and Flo in order to present them as lead singers, which they were.Another singer could have been gently eased in to replace Diana.There werea few women at Motown at the time who would have been excellent. Brenda Holloway, Saundra Edwards, Tammi Terrell all would have be great.

BayouMotownMan
08-15-2013, 03:36 PM
Berry Gordy was/is an astute businessman and he surrounded himself with the same. Singling Ross out of the group was a delicate matter in the late 60s. The Supremes were heavily marketed as being close friends, even though we know now, they really weren't. Florence's dismissal kind of shattered that image a bit, HDH bolted and all of this brought negative attention to the group. Image was everything during this period, far different than what it is now. How would it look if Diana just ditched her singing partners. This had to be a gradual doing, first by changing the billing which actually didn't go over well with radio programmers or the public. Sales tanked. So Gordy had to rebuild the interest in Diana Ross and the Supremes. With all new writers and producers it was hit and miss.

The timing was good to pull Diana out at the beginning of a new decade, to get the public ready for the change. There was still money to be made off the name Supremes so Motown had no interest, yet, of ditching the name. After the new groupings became problematic and Diana made a firm comeback with LSTB, then Motown decided it was time to retire the Supremes.

Mary Wilson however had other plans....

captainjames
08-15-2013, 03:39 PM
Diana was going to be a success in one year, five years or ten ~~~ She was going to be a star. If "Let's See If Diana Ross can make it on her own" would have flopped then Berry would have realized that he needed to add Diana Ross of The Supremes to the Billboard so people would know who she was !!!!

mowsville
08-15-2013, 04:37 PM
so how well did it go over with radio programmers and the public when The Miracles became Smokey Robinson & The Miracles and Martha & The Vandellas became Martha Reeves & The Vandellas?...oh and didn't this all happen in 1967.

BayouMotownMan
08-15-2013, 04:59 PM
Actually, and oddly, Motown started releasing Miracles albums as Smokey Robinson and... over a year before releasing the singles. As I recall the first Smokey Robinson and the Miracles single was The Love I Saw In You....

Martha Reeves has said that adding the Reeves to the billing wasn't any big deal as the public already knew her as Martha. She was singled out from the start. She also sensed that Gordy feared retaliation from her is he didn't single her out fully after putting Ross's full name in front of her group.

This decision had a greater impact on the Supremes as they were Motown's stellar group. Now the name was being compromised and technically, according to the billing, there were now just two Supremes and Diana was somehow above that. It was viewed as egotistical on her part. But it truly was not her decision

Methuselah2
08-15-2013, 06:24 PM
Highlighting the lead singers in the groups' name changes may have been a company decision but considering The Four Tops never changed their name and also considering how Levi Stubbs felt about group cohesion and even how he turned down Gordy's wanting him for the role of 'Louis McKay' in LADY SINGS THE BLUES so as not to draw focus on himself and away from The Tops, it would seem, perhaps, that the groups still had final say-so about name changes. That The Four Tops remained simply The Four Tops has always been something that I felt was very indicative of who Levi was. The richness and beauty of his decision is as apparent as that of his voice has always been.

Seriously, have I erred in drawning such a conclusion?

marv2
08-15-2013, 06:30 PM
It's been said that the original plan for the Supremes [[just in case Cindy wasn't accepted as a Supreme) was to have "Reflections" be the last single and they would put out one more album and go on a final tour. Florence would be brought back for the final dates and then that would be the end of the Supremes and Diana would begin her solo career. This explains why it was said at first that Florence would be back in the group and she was taking a "break". Do you they should have stuck with this original plan? Considering the next two years the Supremes struggled just to get a couple of hits I would say yes. The fact that after Florence left most of the singles featured only Diana would also point to yes for me. I think she held on too long, she probably felt she owed it to Mary which makes sense because as soon as their friendship turned sour that's when she wanted out, but I think she should have left earlier than when she did. This is NOT a bashing thread, just opinions on if you think The Supremes and Motown made the right choice in keeping Diana in the group longer than originally planned.

They had to keep Diane in the group whether she liked it or not. Mary says she never wanted Diane to leave to begin with. When it was inevitable, they accepted it, although they did not like it. Their personal friendship did not sour. Their professional situation made things difficult for all of them. Keeping Diane in the group until the end of 1969 was the right choice. Finding and installing Jean Terrell in the group was also the right choice.

vgalindo
08-15-2013, 06:48 PM
Highlighting the lead singers in the groups' name changes may have been a company decision but considering The Four Tops never changed their name and also considering how Levi Stubbs felt about group cohesion and even how he turned down Gordy's wanting him for the role of 'Louis McKay' in LADY SINGS THE BLUES so as not to draw focus on himself and away from The Tops, it would seem, perhaps, that the groups still had final say-so about name changes. That The Four Tops remained simply The Four Tops has always been something that I felt was very indicative of who Levi was. The richness and beauty of his decision is as apparent as that of his voice has always been.

Seriously, have I erred in drawning such a conclusion?

I love the Four Tops but I don't really think a name change would have worked for them. They would have had to change thier whole name. Levi Stubbs and the Three Tops?

vgalindo
08-15-2013, 07:08 PM
This had to be a gradual doing, first by changing the billing which actually didn't go over well with radio programmers or the public. Sales tanked. So Gordy had to rebuild the interest in Diana Ross and the Supremes. With all new writers and producers it was hit and miss.
I really don't see sales tanked. Most singers would die to have the sales success they had after the name change. They had a number one album and a number 2 album along with 5 other top forty albums, two number one singles with 4 other top ten singles, and another 5 top forty singles. This was all done within a two-year time frame. I know they didn't have the consecutive number 1s they previously had but seriously times were changing and HDH left. But you could hardly say sales tanked.

smark21
08-15-2013, 08:00 PM
I think given Flo’s personal problems and her antagonistic relationship with Berry, as well as her problems learning routines while in the Supremes, she would not have been asked back into The Supremes if Diana had left in 1967/68. More likely the group would have disbanded, or the group would have been Mary, Cindy and some other singer on lead.

reese
08-15-2013, 08:52 PM
Highlighting the lead singers in the groups' name changes may have been a company decision but considering The Four Tops never changed their name and also considering how Levi Stubbs felt about group cohesion and even how he turned down Gordy's wanting him for the role of 'Louis McKay' in LADY SINGS THE BLUES so as not to draw focus on himself and away from The Tops, it would seem, perhaps, that the groups still had final say-so about name changes. That The Four Tops remained simply The Four Tops has always been something that I felt was very indicative of who Levi was. The richness and beauty of his decision is as apparent as that of his voice has always been.

Seriously, have I erred in drawning such a conclusion?

The Four Tops were somewhat older and more experienced than the other groups at Motown. I suspect Berry respected them as mature men and performers and let them have more say so than some of the other groups.

jobeterob
08-15-2013, 08:54 PM
I really don't see sales tanked. Most singers would die to have the sales success they had after the name change. They had a number one album and a number 2 album along with 5 other top forty albums, two number one singles with 4 other top ten singles, and another 5 top forty singles. This was all done within a two-year time frame. I know they didn't have the consecutive number 1s they previously had but seriously times were changing and HDH left. But you could hardly say sales tanked.


Vgalindo is right; that track record is much better than the 70's Supremes and I think someone was touting them as the top 70's female group..........and this record is much better.

It is just that in comparison to 10 number 1's, it wasn't as good.

We also always need to remember, Mary Wilson said if a Supremes record reached the Top 30, it sold millions. Now, while there may be some exaggeration there, Mary got paid accordingly, she was there, and while some songs didn't chart as high, some of those are the songs that sold. Remember TCB got the #1 spot and the higher chart numbers and Diana Ross & the Supremes Join the Temptations got the sales number. Missing You did not thrive on airplay, it charted from it's sales ~ by that time, Diana was not a radio staple. So, you never know!

davidh
08-15-2013, 09:21 PM
the plan probably would have gone that way as Motown felt the Supremes would never recover after the loss of HDH and Ballard. it was decided to bring back Flo for a farewell tour and release the Greatest Hits with Reflections as the final single. there would not have been a Reflections lp nor probably In and Out Of love as a single?

davidh
08-15-2013, 09:27 PM
in a sense Diana did go solo as In and Out Of love was the last single to feature the Supremes. all the other songs had the Andantees on backing vocals except Someday. so really Love Child is her first solo #1. In and Out Of Love has both Supremes and Andantees

marv2
08-15-2013, 09:35 PM
in a sense Diana did go solo as In and Out Of love was the last single to feature the Supremes. all the other songs had the Andantees on backing vocals except Someday. so really Love Child is her first solo #1. In and Out Of Love has both Supremes and Andantees

It was not and stop stretching and distorting history

skooldem1
08-15-2013, 10:44 PM
It is really not a stretch. Billboard revised their rules and stated that anytime your name is featured on a single release such as "featuring" or "and" like in the case of DIANA ROSS & The Supremes that counts as a hit for the featured artist as well. This is why artist like Mariah Carey and Rhianna have so many number one records. Diana Ross is credited with "Love Child" and "Someday We'll be Together as number one hits for both her and the Supremes. Diana Ross technically has 8 #1 records.

milven
08-15-2013, 10:53 PM
in a sense Love Child is her first solo #1.



It was not and stop stretching and distorting history

Well, then perhaps it would be more accurate to say that Love Child was Diana's first number one record without any of the other Supremes

marv2
08-15-2013, 11:50 PM
It is really not a stretch. Billboard revised their rules and stated that anytime your name is featured on a single release such as "featuring" or "and" like in the case of DIANA ROSS & The Supremes that counts as a hit for the featured artist as well. This is why artist like Mariah Carey and Rhianna have so many number one records. Diana Ross is credited with "Love Child" and "Someday We'll be Together as number one hits for both her and the Supremes. Diana Ross technically has 8 #1 records.

Ok that's cool. Then Florence Ballard had 10 number one records and Mary Wilson had 13!

skooldem1
08-15-2013, 11:55 PM
They would only be credited with #1's under the name "Supremes". Their names were not featured as Mary Wilson and the Supremes, or Florence Ballard and the Supremes. In the case with the group post 1967 they were billed as Diana Ross AND the Supremes. Technically based on the new rules, Diana Ross gets separate credit as DIANA ROSS apart from the Supremes.

Zantellor
08-16-2013, 04:21 AM
just a crazy thought ran through my mind tonight.What if Diana was replaced by lrts say Bettye Lavette,or Thelma Houston and TheSupremes really rook on a new direction.I'm surewould havenever allowed it,butdamn can u imagine what the musicwould have sounded like.

jobeterob
08-16-2013, 11:22 AM
just a crazy thought ran through my mind tonight.What if Diana was replaced by lrts say Bettye Lavette,or Thelma Houston and TheSupremes really rook on a new direction.I'm surewould havenever allowed it,butdamn can u imagine what the musicwould have sounded like.

That is another of the 'what if's' but by 1972 the Supremes needed a completely innovative new style, new direction and it just didn't happen; they didn't let go of a style they had but they never came up with anything and ended up looking old; the membership changes, the management and internal problems that plagued girl groups and times when nothing happened at all hurt them. But the remake that didn't happen, in retrospect, would have been a good one.

arrr&bee
08-16-2013, 11:53 AM
Did anyone mention that berry want[syreeta wright]to replace diana but mary didn't.

marv2
08-16-2013, 01:16 PM
just a crazy thought ran through my mind tonight.What if Diana was replaced by lrts say Bettye Lavette,or Thelma Houston and TheSupremes really rook on a new direction.I'm surewould havenever allowed it,butdamn can u imagine what the musicwould have sounded like.

It would have been tremendous! An even more R&B sound.....sophisticated and complex.

marv2
08-16-2013, 01:18 PM
Did anyone mention that berry want[syreeta wright]to replace diana but mary didn't.

That is true. He wanted Syreeta right away to replace Jean once it was discovered that Jean was not going to participate in any extra curricular activities.........hehehehehehehehehe........

luke
08-16-2013, 02:07 PM
I always thought it was odd that he decided that night to try to fire Jean. Now THAT makes much more sense!!

jobeterob
08-16-2013, 06:01 PM
I doubt that Syreeta would have been easier for either Berry or Mary to get along with in the end.

stopinthenameoflove
08-16-2013, 06:23 PM
That is true. He wanted Syreeta right way to replace Jean once it was discovered that Jean was not going to participate in any extra curricular activities.........hehehehehehehehehe........

Has this been stated by anyone involved?

marv2
08-16-2013, 06:27 PM
Has this been stated by anyone involved?

Yeah but not publicly. I probably shouldn't have mentioned it but Hell, it's been well over 40 years so who the freak cares?

BayouMotownMan
08-16-2013, 08:43 PM
The main reason for Berry's re-thinking was that it became apparent that Jean was in no way like Diana and would speak up or shoot down his opinions. She was very liberated in that way.

luke
08-16-2013, 08:55 PM
For Berry to try it the night jean was publicly introduced there has to be more to the story. He could have done it the day before their final show andrisked much less public embarrassment.

skooldem1
08-16-2013, 08:56 PM
Although it appears that Diana went along with the plan, she was just as outspoken as others when it came to Berry- from what I've read in both her and his bios. It cracks me up how fans put out there what they think was the reality. No one here was in the inner circle of Diana, Berry, Jean or Mary.

marv2
08-16-2013, 09:28 PM
For Berry to try it the night jean was publicly introduced there has to be more to the story. He could have done it the day before their final show andrisked much less public embarrassment.

Luke, I told you what's behind the story. Everything else you might read here about it is bullshit!

marv2
08-16-2013, 09:32 PM
Although it appears that Diana went along with the plan, she was just as outspoken as others when it came to Berry- from what I've read in both her and his bios. It cracks me up how fans put out there what they think was the reality. No one here was in the inner circle of Diana, Berry, Jean or Mary.

I know what you mean. It is hilarious sometimes what some people post on here. I just say what I know! I only say about 30 % of what I know LOL!
I cannot get into all that stuff, but what I post........I know! These posts that talk about what Berry must have been thinking or what Florence was planning to do, Mary was thinking this, Diane was thinking that is all fantasy made up stuff! When you see a posting using phrases similar to these it is your big clue! I know enough to know when someone is making shit up or fantasizing........

davidh
08-16-2013, 09:41 PM
distorting????????????? really. the only singles that feature Mary and Cindy are the two singles with the Temptations. the rest are just Diana! akthough they perfprmed with her in concert. its a fact.

davidh
08-16-2013, 09:48 PM
as far as #1 for many artist. I have noticed that they now claim songs that go to #1 on any charts where as with Diana she [[or they} only count the songs that went to #1 on Billboard pop charts.
but if you count her songs that have gone to #1 on other charts , she would have about 15 or so....
Last Time I Saw Him #1 A/C
I'm Still Waiting #1 UK
Missing You #1 RB
The Boss #1 Dance
Im Coming Out #1 dance
Chain Reaction #1 UK
If We Hold On Together #1 Japan
etc
so why do the other artist count all those #1 on various charts but not Diana?

supremester
08-20-2013, 02:50 PM
I think they did it perfectly. They got Diana's name out there - as it should have been as it was her voice, work ethic and talent that put the group over the top. 54 years after they arrived at Motown, she is still thrilling audiences and packing venues at top prices. Berry was not taking a chance - he knew what he had: a rare, superstar talent that could and would make history. That's not dissing the others who were also talented, but, Ross' kind of talent comes around very, very rarely. It was still a tough launch because her sound was still very similar and no one KNEW that many Supremes records weren't only The Supremes. Had the public been told that since 1963 Ross was the only constant voice on the releases, the transition would have been much easier. That way, Motown could have also disbanded The Suporemes at the same time with no trouble at all. Clearly, despite silly arguments to the contrary, that was not the case. My personal opinion is that Motown really felt that that the new Supremes would be a consistent money maker for years and no one would be worried about competition between the two acts. Hence the decision to add a super singer like Jean. I think it was a bad choice, but there's no doubting her talent. I think the Thelma Houston, Brenda, Tammi, syreeta ideas better. Harvey Fuqua told me that no way would tammi - even if healthy, join the Supremes. She had no interest in being in a group. I also do not believe that Berry dumped on Jean because she wouldn't put out. He saw her onstage with the others on their turf and realized that she was wrong - he was correct - an opinion that Mary Wilson now shares, btw. HDH wasn't a problem when the Flo issue began - I don't think that had anything to do with Supremes personnel choices. Diana had to gain the confidence and name recognition to work solo, the plan worked. Had Syreeta taken her place, me thinks the new Supremes would have lasted a lot longer and made a lot more money. Every group needs a star - JMC didn't have one.

supremester
08-20-2013, 02:56 PM
David - it's not exactly a fact fact. Mary & Cindy are not, contrary to popular belief, on all Supremes/Temptations tracks. Personally, I don't care who is on them - I loved the songs and loved thinking it was The Supremes - now that I know differently, it means nothing at all to me!
distorting????????????? really. the only singles that feature Mary and Cindy are the two singles with the Temptations. the rest are just Diana! akthough they perfprmed with her in concert. its a fact.

supremester
08-20-2013, 02:57 PM
Let Somebody Know was #1 in Curacao!

thanxal
08-20-2013, 04:44 PM
Is there definitive proof [[session logs, session cards, etc) of who sang on what during the DRATS period? I know about Stop! and the controversy in the 50th Ann liner notes, but is there a scanned copy of some evidence of who sang what, where and when?

Note: I'm not accusing or maintaining that I know something someone else doesn't, I have just never seen any hard evidence. Its always been surmising and guessing and 2nd hand knowledge. And I'm not saying the evidence doesn't exist. I just haven't seen it.

davidh
08-20-2013, 09:48 PM
u r correct, at this point , I don't care who sang on what. it's pointless

thisoldheart
08-21-2013, 06:19 AM
I think they did it perfectly. They got Diana's name out there - as it should have been as it was her voice, work ethic and talent that put the group over the top. 54 years after they arrived at Motown, she is still thrilling audiences and packing venues at top prices. Berry was not taking a chance - he knew what he had: a rare, superstar talent that could and would make history. That's not dissing the others who were also talented, but, Ross' kind of talent comes around very, very rarely. It was still a tough launch because her sound was still very similar and no one KNEW that many Supremes records weren't only The Supremes. Had the public been told that since 1963 Ross was the only constant voice on the releases, the transition would have been much easier. That way, Motown could have also disbanded The Suporemes at the same time with no trouble at all. Clearly, despite silly arguments to the contrary, that was not the case. My personal opinion is that Motown really felt that that the new Supremes would be a consistent money maker for years and no one would be worried about competition between the two acts. Hence the decision to add a super singer like Jean. I think it was a bad choice, but there's no doubting her talent. I think the Thelma Houston, Brenda, Tammi, syreeta ideas better. Harvey Fuqua told me that no way would tammi - even if healthy, join the Supremes. She had no interest in being in a group. I also do not believe that Berry dumped on Jean because she wouldn't put out. He saw her onstage with the others on their turf and realized that she was wrong - he was correct - an opinion that Mary Wilson now shares, btw. HDH wasn't a problem when the Flo issue began - I don't think that had anything to do with Supremes personnel choices. Diana had to gain the confidence and name recognition to work solo, the plan worked. Had Syreeta taken her place, me thinks the new Supremes would have lasted a lot longer and made a lot more money. Every group needs a star - JMC didn't have one.
syreeta would have been an interesting choice. her hip black look and writing skill might have brought more interest to the group. with syreeta taking the lead the supremes could have been the anti-ross group. no evening gowns, no copa ... they could have gone total r/b and had the youth market and the music critics the way aretha did ... especially if stevie wonder produced them.

but, dang, we woulda never had all those great terrell songs. jean sure had a voice!

144man
08-21-2013, 04:43 PM
u r correct, at this point , I don't care who sang on what. it's pointless

I'd like to know out of academic interest, but I don't have any emotional attachment towards the subject.

BayouMotownMan
08-21-2013, 06:03 PM
Speculation is always fun, but I have to say Jean Terrell indeed proved herself a star when she debuted on Sullivan in Feb 1970. I, like most others, felt that Diana would prosper and in the case of the Supremes, it was like, what for? They were nothing without Ross. Reluctantly I watched the new group on Sullivan that night while doing my homework. After the opening medley, my opinion was, ok, she's tall, she can sing ok but... It was when they broke into Up The Ladder that I became a die hard Jean Terrell fan. For two years she kept the group going despite obvious comparisons and the public embraced the new group. Had Motown not gone through its own metamorphosis in 1972 I feel certain the Supremes would have lasted longer.

supremester
08-22-2013, 12:35 AM
I agree: I don't care who sang background - not at all. I only care about the sound. I prefer The Andantes to Mary & Cindy. Period. I wouldn't change love Child or Someday for anything. I don't like the bgs on Reflections, in & Out and Forever Came Today and they are 3 different bg groups! lol. I think The A's would have helped Stoned Love like they did on Up The Ladder. And it's no indictment on anyone's talent - - it may be grammatically incorrect, but Berry was right: it's what's in the grooves that counts. I love Gladys' Nitty Gritty - better than Ross' by a mile. Does it mean I don't like Ross? Mary Wilson has a wonderful, rich, unique voice - Cindy...... let's face it, not too special. Add Flo to Mary - you have a killer sound. Add Cindy - you need The A's on many many many tracks. Every record is different. I ADMIRE producers who add what they need to make their record great. I know it makes some unhappy, I'm sorry - everyone wants to hold theirbeliefs. I have a good bud who takes The Bible literally - the burning bush talked - everything verbatim. He knows it's a stretch, but he wants to hold onto his long held beliefs. I love him and respect him, but personally, I don't believe it spoke. I agree with 144: it's academic interest only for me as I'm not emotionally invested.

supremester
08-22-2013, 02:07 AM
Posted by Thisoldheart;
syreeta would have been an interesting choice. her hip black look and writing skill might have brought more interest to the group. with syreeta taking the lead the supremes could have been the anti-ross group. no evening gowns, no copa ... they could have gone total r/b and had the youth market and the music critics the way aretha did ... especially if stevie wonder produced them.

but, dang, we woulda never had all those great terrell songs. jean sure had a voice!

__________________________________________________ ___________________

Exactly my point. No one is ever gonna beat Diana Ross on her own turf - not Jean terrell, not no one. The new Supremes needed to be NEW. I'm sure than Jean was technically a much better singer than Syreeta, but she had a matronly quality that, without Ross' glow, made the gowns and such seem out of touch and separated the group from the new generation. Syreeta could have avoided that and maybe Thelma as well. Tammi would have been ideal, but...... As for Jean, with Martha slipping badly, Motown could have built her into quite an act more tailors to her true calling.

I disagree that the public embraced the new group. Their albums sold less and less - even while containing hits and all the TV and touring. Ticket sales continued to slump. Some Supremes fans held on, some slipped away and there were some new fans, but the net gain was a loss until they weren't making much money at all - so Jean split with almost no bookings on the horizon.

captainjames
08-22-2013, 08:32 AM
Loved Jean Terrell but the lady could have done so much more as a solo artist. Diana was definitely the Queen at Motown but Jean could have been promising as a new artist. Once established as a solo she could have moved on. Mary once said that they had to move in a new direction well they sorta kinda maybe tried. The Look stayed to me even with the Afro's. I think a lot of folks must have forgotten what the "Love Child" album looked like. The really needed creativity and coming on stage and album covers in the same gowns only made me go ................naw !!! I often thought just come on stage in your street clothes and now a days BAM !!! most artists are doing just that.

marv2
08-22-2013, 08:32 AM
That's funny because Jean Terrell made us completely forget Diana Ross was ever in the group. Jean was able to make us not miss Ross at all. She was that good!

supremester
08-22-2013, 10:27 AM
I don't know who "us" is or was, but it I know "us" doesn't mean the record buying public in North America. ALL Motown groups slipped in '72 - even The j5. The Tops, Tempts, Jr Walker - everyone that hit in '65 was in trouble by '72. The New Supremes needed to be new - not wearing Ross' old gowns or, worse, those wretched gold pantsuits. Lots of new girl groups hit and hurt JMC: Honey Cone especially made them seem old - but JMC could out-sing Honey Cone into oblivion. Ditto Labelle, Three Degrees, Love Unlimited........ but they were all new when JML were posing in sandboxes in the green TCB Swirl gowns.
That's funny because Jean Terrell made us completely forget Diana Ross was ever in the group. Jean was able to make us not miss Ross at all. She was that good!

thisoldheart
08-22-2013, 04:45 PM
the groups suffered, but wonder & gaye were able to become part of the singer/songerwriter wave that swept the pop world. at this time no critics took anybody seriously if they were unable to write.

marv2
08-22-2013, 07:10 PM
I don't know who "us" is or was, but it I know "us" doesn't mean the record buying public in North America. ALL Motown groups slipped in '72 - even The j5. The Tops, Tempts, Jr Walker - everyone that hit in '65 was in trouble by '72. The New Supremes needed to be new - not wearing Ross' old gowns or, worse, those wretched gold pantsuits. Lots of new girl groups hit and hurt JMC: Honey Cone especially made them seem old - but JMC could out-sing Honey Cone into oblivion. Ditto Labelle, Three Degrees, Love Unlimited........ but they were all new when JML were posing in sandboxes in the green TCB Swirl gowns.

We didn't give a shit about no gowns. Those girls could SING! All of them were finally getting the chance to sing and show off. All three were finnnneeee too! That's what got our attention.

captainjames
08-22-2013, 07:24 PM
I remember watching the ED Sullivan with a bunch of friends of mine, actually a Champagne celebration and The Supremes came on. There was complete silence and I remember the statement as clear as if it was yesterday................"Where is Diana Ross ?!!!" That is the impact Ross had on the group. People have said some cruel things in the past but Diana was really and truly a beautiful woman. Diana could sing anything and make you believe every note.

Jimi LaLumia
08-22-2013, 07:38 PM
I loved the early stages of JMC [[the first two and a half albums), but the horrific "Touch" single sank the group for good, and those terrifying medley of hits where Jean butchered the Ross era classics totally reminded everyone of the good old Ross days.. it was all over after "Touch" and the shared -lead vocals singles, which turned out to be commercial suicide and an on going downward spiral...

thisoldheart
08-22-2013, 07:59 PM
i liked the "shared" vocals of the jmc supremes. i thought mary never gave herself enough credit for her very good smokey voice. jean & mary sounded fine together.

captainjames
08-22-2013, 08:18 PM
Its too bad Mary was not comfortable, ready or qualified to be lead singer after Diana left.

marv2
08-22-2013, 08:22 PM
Its too bad Mary was not comfortable, ready or qualified to be lead singer after Diana left.

She could have did it with some coaching after being held in the background all those years. You see what happened when Frank and Smokey and later the Holland Brothers started producing her and the group!
It would not have been right to bring her from backing vocals to lead in so little time. Remember Mary started out singing leads with the Primettes and early Supremes.

Jimi LaLumia
08-22-2013, 08:45 PM
well, according to many, Diane was not the original lead singer of The Supremes, and she seemed to step up front and start hitting them right out of the ballpark , onto the street,in no time at all!!..just like THAT!!!

bradsupremes
08-22-2013, 09:15 PM
well, according to many, Diane was not the original lead singer of The Supremes, and she seemed to step up front and start hitting them right out of the ballpark , onto the street,in no time at all!!..just like THAT!!!

Well, Diana had some time to develop her craft and truly become an gifted singer. Those early Supremes recordings with Diana on lead are certainly not anything I would claim as hitting out of the ballpark. Diana is WAY too whiny sounding. In fact, I thought Mary was the best singer of the four ladies in those early days. By 1964, Diana's voice matured greatly into a very distinctive voice that could catch your ear. It wasn't until 1967 that I feel her voice hit its stride.

marv2
08-22-2013, 09:27 PM
well, according to many, Diane was not the original lead singer of The Supremes, and she seemed to step up front and start hitting them right out of the ballpark , onto the street,in no time at all!!..just like THAT!!!

What a load of bullshit! The Supremes had something like 8-11 flops with Diana Ross singing lead over a 3 year period!

supremester
08-23-2013, 03:57 AM
Again, I don't know who "we" were, but "we" weren't buying enough albums and tickets - that's for sure. Lots of others cared. Yes they were fine and could SING.....but so could Patti - look at all the hits she didn't have. All of them getting a chance to sing and show off didn't seem to help the group. And Cindy was given very very little to do.
We didn't give a shit about no gowns. Those girls could SING! All of them were finally getting the chance to sing and show off. All three were finnnneeee too! That's what got our attention.

ejluther
08-23-2013, 06:57 AM
I also think, for the most part, that the commercial popularity of the vocal group was on its way out in the 70's. While I'm sure there are notable exceptions, groups like The Supremes [[no matter who was on the microphones) became the exception not the rule...

motony
08-23-2013, 09:59 AM
From memory, it seems to me the Jean led Supremes actually had more hit records then Honey Cone, Love Unlimited, & LaBelle. As far as singers go I think Edna Wright & Patti LaBelle couold certainly hold their own against Jean Terrell.

marv2
08-23-2013, 10:01 AM
From memory, it seems to me the Jean led Supremes actually had more hit records then Honey Cone, Love Unlimited, & LaBelle. As far as singers go I think Edna Wright & Patti LaBelle couold certainly hold their own against Jean Terrell.

You are right Motony! They had more Top 40 hits than any other female group in the 70's!

captainjames
08-23-2013, 10:42 AM
Edna Wright was Tough !!! Shelly was Pretty [[could have been a Supreme) and Carolyn was wicked [[I think that was the word we used back then).

Want Ads
Stick Up
One Monkey Don't Stop No Show
The Day I Found Myself
Take Me With You
When Will It End
Girls It Ain't Easy
Sitting On A Time Bomb [[Waiting For The Heart To Come)
Innocent Till Proven Guilty
Ace In The Hole
If I Can't Fly
and a song about out looking for Sugar or something

Don't remember where or how they charted but I do know they made a few people nervous with HDH and General Johnson at the Helm. The Honey Cone was on fire and so were the Emotions [[those women could SANG). There were a lot of girls groups then that were fierce and who could sing their butts off but it all came back to one thing still......Diana Ross had something [[and not just Berry Gordy) that made her stand out !!!!

motony
08-23-2013, 11:04 AM
I LOVED Honey Cone...have all their 45's & LPs BUT they only had 4 Top 40 Hits, "Want Ads", "Stick Up", "One Monkey...." & "The Day I Found Myself". From memory Emotions 2 Top 40, "So I Can Love You" & "Best of My Love" LaBelle only 1 "Lady Marmelade", Love Unlimited only 2 "Walkin In The Rain[[With The One I Love)" & "I Belong To You".This is from memory, I have the facts at home.

supremester
09-02-2013, 01:15 PM
Yes, your comment IS a load of bullshit, Marvie Poo. How does one have 8-11 flops? Either you have 8 OR 9 OR 10 OR 11 OR, in this case, the correct answer, 6. Not an insignificant number, but not the nearly double you tried to stretch it to. Beginning with a song I never cared for [[but certainly understand the message ; ) I Want A Guy.
What a load of bullshit! The Supremes had something like 8-11 flops with Diana Ross singing lead over a 3 year period!