PDA

View Full Version : Imagine what it was like for Mary


test

jim aka jtigre99
10-30-2020, 06:50 AM
Seeing some posts, I started to imagine what certain periods were like for Mary. The original grouping were friends who came up together and achieved much success. I would think it must have been very hard for Mary to see her two friends take such different paths and leave her. I am sure the feelings were very different as three friends conquering the show business world then to lose Florence while Diana focused on her future aspirations while inside the group. I am sure once Florence left and Diana was with Berry she must have felt very alone. She has stated it felt different once Flo left and that Cindy was one of the nicest human beings that it changed the feelings of 3 friends together. Once Diana left and they chose Jean, it was more about the group as a business. It was more what will work best for success. Starting the new Supremes she was with relatively 2 new people and was no longer with the others that she formed.The original Supremes became friends as young people, now Motown was choosing members. They no longer formed the group, the group was being formed for them. Plus, Mary has even stated that Motown was worried about how Florence was feeling and worried about Diana but during the problems they had, no one worried about her. That had to have hurt her. Plus, once Cindy left and they chose Lynda it was for the business. Once Jean and Lynda left, Mary must have felt very alone. Fortunately, she became friends with Cindy and she was there for her to come back. Mary searched for a replacement and chose Scherrie for her looks and voice. It turned out that Scherrie was also very nice and Mary said this grouping was perhaps the nicest. Once Cindy left, Mary's husband was managing since she felt Motown did not care about her or the group and he found Susaye. Still, by this time Mary wanted to show the world her talents and this group had 3 talented, very headstrong people. It was no longer 3 friends who came up together to conquer the World. Of course, Flo's passing had to have affected both Mary and Diana. I think everyone neglects how all of this must have made Mary feel. I think it had to be tough but she realized she was an entertainer and that she loved to sing no matter what. I give her much credit for her strength and resilience during what must have been very hard for her professionally and personally.

Albator
10-30-2020, 07:43 AM
It's especially difficult if she regrets not having been able to keep the group at a high level of commercial success or if she compares her notoriety to that of Diana Ross.

reese
10-30-2020, 08:57 AM
I'm sure Mary felt much like Otis and Melvin from the Tempts. In one article or book, she even made the comparison, saying like them, she would always be outnumbered by new members. I guess the biggest difference is that the Tempts managed to remain successful longer.

It must have been hard for the original group to break up. That emotional bonding of forming the group, rehearsing day and night, playing dives and then enormous success, plus whatever personal issues each had must have been enormous. And there's no way a new member could come in and have the same sort of feeling, no matter how great they were. It seems bound to become a business relationship [[albeit friendly) at some point.

Ollie9
10-30-2020, 09:34 AM
I agree in that it must have felt a lonely road at times. I do wonder if she ever spoke privately to B.G, prior to that final meeting at his house in an attempt to defend Flo?. If so, she has never mentioned it. Naturally she would have been fearful of jeopardising her own position within the group.
I guess like any other job, music is a business and you have to learn to bend and adapt to various folk in order to survive. That’s life.
The wonderful thing about Mary is that she has proved herself a survivor in the face of adversity. She has demonstrated both strength and resilience when times were tough. As such I consider her an inspiration.

Circa 1824
10-30-2020, 11:36 AM
Mary and Cindy had a great gig with Diana doing almost all the work.

sup_fan
10-30-2020, 11:44 AM
so many different ways to look at this

DMF started as good childhood friends. but did that actually make it harder to deal with problems? since there was the emotional element mixed in with the professional

blackguy69
10-30-2020, 12:02 PM
All of them worked hard. Not just Diana

Mary and Cindy had a great gig with Diana doing almost all the work.

jobeterob
10-30-2020, 12:24 PM
I'm sure the personal part of this was absolutely brutal on all of them except Diana. Of course, they were jealous. They were just human beings and very young for most of it. One of the got nominated for an Oscar at 28; and for the rest of them by 1972 at the latest, the group was floundering and there was no chart success as individuals. Mary had to fight to stay employed - and so that's what she did; get out there at every opportunity and charge for it.

The only real mistake I believe she made was she pushed too hard and so she ended up, as Randy Tarraborelli said, "losing Diana forever" and she got no reunion, no tour, and there would have been the best money she could ever hope to make. She's got to regret that and Cindy certainly did.

I wish the remaining Supremes would all get together at a show - but Mary probably will never go along with that - and if it were done at a Diana concert, most of the people at the concert won't know who those other Supremes are.

PeaceNHarmony
10-30-2020, 01:19 PM
I'm sure the personal part of this was absolutely brutal on all of them except Diana. Of course, they were jealous. They were just human beings and very young for most of it. One of the got nominated for an Oscar at 28; and for the rest of them by 1972 at the latest, the group was floundering and there was no chart success as individuals. Mary had to fight to stay employed - and so that's what she did; get out there at every opportunity and charge for it.

The only real mistake I believe she made was she pushed too hard and so she ended up, as Randy Tarraborelli said, "losing Diana forever" and she got no reunion, no tour, and there would have been the best money she could ever hope to make. She's got to regret that and Cindy certainly did.

I wish the remaining Supremes would all get together at a show - but Mary probably will never go along with that - and if it were done at a Diana concert, most of the people at the concert won't know who those other Supremes are.I largely agree, but it's my outsider's opinion that ultimately Diana did indeed get Diana back. Wilson? I don't think anyone needs imagine what 'it was like'; she has told us nonstop for the past 40 years. I do, however, imagine what it is like for the many group members who have no public forum whatsoever even though their voices are heard still on a daily basis. [[Shelly Clark, anyone?)

milven
10-30-2020, 01:44 PM
I'm sure Mary felt much like Otis and Melvin from the Tempts. In one article or book, she even made the comparison, saying like them, she would always be outnumbered by new members. I guess the biggest difference is that the Tempts managed to remain successful longer..........

I think the biggest difference is that Otis and Melvin knew that any further success that they had would always be associated with the group and so they stayed with the Tempts and gave all their energy to the group even though by now they were outnumbered and the group had a revolving door.

Mary decided to leave her group, but most of any further success that she had was always associated with the group in one way or another. Her countless interviews were mostly bout the group and minutely about Mary Wilson. Even her billing always linked to the Supremes and she began her solo career performing as a Supreme as another thread shows

Financially, she probably would have been had about the same income performing with the Supremes as she has now as a soloist. In either case, venues would have been about the same too.

Otis' group of Tempts is now an oldies act and the other groups led by former Tempts are also oldies acts.

If Mary continued the Supremes, it would also be an oldies act, as are the other groups led by other former Supremes.

Mary probably has regrets for some of her decisions. We all can say that about ourselves. I doubt that she envisioned her solo career to be comparable to Cher, or Bette, or Gladys, or Teddy, or Tina or Diana or Barbra. She seems to be content where she is, and has carved out a nice niche for herself in the entertainment world.

sup_fan
10-30-2020, 03:25 PM
i think the Supremes could have continued for a while without being purely an "oldies" act. yes they would have had some opportunities around that idea - heck the Madison Sq Garden date in 77 was an oldies show even though the Supremes didn't approach it that way. I think in the 80s they could have balanced old and new, still working on new material and endeavors.

of all the lineups most likely to have sustained this, i think MSC could have, had the group and group management not been focused on Mary becoming a solo act.

Shortly after the group disbanded, you had a lot of entertainment world opportunities they could have taken advantage of. Love Boat, Fantasy Island, guest stars on 80s sitcoms, Sesame Street. Are these the most ground breaking things - of course not. but it would have keep the group in the public eye, generated income. very much like the Pointer Sisters who did all of these. the Points recorded the wonderful pinball song on S Street - 1 2 3 4 5, 6 7 8 9 10... 11 12. were guest stars on Gimme A Break. did tv specials, etc.

blackguy69
10-30-2020, 03:56 PM
You keep saying that that Mary was trying to become a solo act while the n the group but it doesn’t look like that was the case. During msc she did half of the leads in the shows and on record. If she was really trying to carve out a solo career, she would have pushed for her leads to be singles and do 85% or more of the leads in their shows. If she really wanted the full spotlight do you think she would want Scherrie’s Leads to get the push and not hers.

i think the Supremes could have continued for a while without being purely an "oldies" act. yes they would have had some opportunities around that idea - heck the Madison Sq Garden date in 77 was an oldies show even though the Supremes didn't approach it that way. I think in the 80s they could have balanced old and new, still working on new material and endeavors.

of all the lineups most likely to have sustained this, i think MSC could have, had the group and group management not been focused on Mary becoming a solo act.

Shortly after the group disbanded, you had a lot of entertainment world opportunities they could have taken advantage of. Love Boat, Fantasy Island, guest stars on 80s sitcoms, Sesame Street. Are these the most ground breaking things - of course not. but it would have keep the group in the public eye, generated income. very much like the Pointer Sisters who did all of these. the Points recorded the wonderful pinball song on S Street - 1 2 3 4 5, 6 7 8 9 10... 11 12. were guest stars on Gimme A Break. did tv specials, etc.

TheMotownManiac
10-30-2020, 04:09 PM
Seeing some posts, I started to imagine what certain periods were like for Mary. The original grouping were friends who came up together and achieved much success. I would think it must have been very hard for Mary to see her two friends take such different paths and leave her. I am sure the feelings were very different as three friends conquering the show business world then to lose Florence while Diana focused on her future aspirations while inside the group. I am sure once Florence left and Diana was with Berry she must have felt very alone. She has stated it felt different once Flo left and that Cindy was one of the nicest human beings that it changed the feelings of 3 friends together. Once Diana left and they chose Jean, it was more about the group as a business. It was more what will work best for success. Starting the new Supremes she was with relatively 2 new people and was no longer with the others that she formed.The original Supremes became friends as young people, now Motown was choosing members. They no longer formed the group, the group was being formed for them. Plus, Mary has even stated that Motown was worried about how Florence was feeling and worried about Diana but during the problems they had, no one worried about her. That had to have hurt her. Plus, once Cindy left and they chose Lynda it was for the business. Once Jean and Lynda left, Mary must have felt very alone. Fortunately, she became friends with Cindy and she was there for her to come back. Mary searched for a replacement and chose Scherrie for her looks and voice. It turned out that Scherrie was also very nice and Mary said this grouping was perhaps the nicest. Once Cindy left, Mary's husband was managing since she felt Motown did not care about her or the group and he found Susaye. Still, by this time Mary wanted to show the world her talents and this group had 3 talented, very headstrong people. It was no longer 3 friends who came up together to conquer the World. Of course, Flo's passing had to have affected both Mary and Diana. I think everyone neglects how all of this must have made Mary feel. I think it had to be tough but she realized she was an entertainer and that she loved to sing no matter what. I give her much credit for her strength and resilience during what must have been very hard for her professionally and personally.

very thoughtful post with insights that never crossed my mind before. I’ve talked to Mary a lot, but not that much about the original group because I don’t want to seem like I’m being friendly just for the dirt…… Even though I want every drop! Mary has told me that things went from having a wonderful time as they struggled to make it, and then all of a sudden, they never had another minute to themselves. Everything was about work and their personal lives didn’t mean anything anymore. She said it was wonderful in many ways, but indicated that humanity was now out of the group in place of the $. Cindy told me that from the moment she joins the group, Mary was trying very hard to get Cindy “on her side “and for the longest time Cindy didn’t see a reason to be on a side, and she likes Diana a lot. Looking back, she said mary was very very unhappy with Diana and wanted others to feel the same way and then after a while that feeling could become contagious as she continued to point out things. I asked Cindy if she felt that Mary was acting that way with Florence when they were in the group and Cindy said she didn’t know, but Mary definitely had an ass versus them attitude from the day she joined the group, she did not feel Diana had the same attitude as she never spoke ill of Mary to her. Cindy wasn’t bothered by Diana getting the star treatment, because she thought that’s just how it always has been and that was normal to her. But I can definitely see Mary being sad and wistful about sharing a dream with three friends and having it overtake and eventually destroy their friendship. I have a close friend that did the circumstances mostly beyond my control, is no longer the great friend he was and I miss it very much. We are still in each others lives, but it’s ridiculously not the same at all, so I can empathize with Mary. It appears to me that Diana didn’t care that much about the friendships changing because she was very focused on her career, and she’s always been extremely close to her large family and perhaps didn’t need that much outside social interaction on a close basis. Even in the early days, Mary and Flo partied while Diana often remained by herself by choice.

I never thought about the fact that replacing best friends with just anybody and being in that close environment as much as they are, could’ve been really miserable. It’s one thing to get along, it’s another thing to really enjoy and care about each other’s company. Plus, as you mentioned, relationships had to be protected for the sake of the group. I’m sure it was hell and I never ever thought about that before.

The Temptations were better able to withstand changes in the group because they had several lead singers who were very capable of holding an audience. The Supremes never had that luxury. The Temptations lost David, and, amazingly, thrived. Losing Paul and Eddie hurt a lot, but vocally, they remained basically intact. The star power, however dwindled, and their tickets sales declined immeasurably even while Papa was a Rolling Stone was number one. They weren’t The Temptations anymore, really. Just like JMC weren’t The Supremes. It must have been hard clinging to the dream that had basically vanished.

sup_fan
10-30-2020, 04:39 PM
You keep saying that that Mary was trying to become a solo act while the n the group but it doesn’t look like that was the case. During msc she did half of the leads in the shows and on record. If she was really trying to carve out a solo career, she would have pushed for her leads to be singles and do 85% or more of the leads in their shows. If she really wanted the full spotlight do you think she would want Scherrie’s Leads to get the push and not hers.

i'm basing this off of her book - Supreme Faith. on page 158, she discusses when she, Scherrie and Cindy started recording again in Dec 74. in regards to her singing more leads, she says "I finally accepted the responsibility to prepare myself for future personnel changes and possibly the end of the group."

now considering this is her POV right after MSC signed contracts and just started to record for the first time is telling. this does not sound to me like the opinion of someone who is looking at this stage of their career as a rebirth or comeback. this does not sound like the opinion of someone that is thinking this MSC lineup could run for many years and have a long, fruitful career.

in addition, Mary was handling all of the group decisions. on the board here, when Susaye was active, i asked her if group approached gowns and songs from a collective decision. she responded no, Mary made those decisions.

in the show mary did more than 50% of the leads. she also did nearly all of the stage dialog. on tv, she handled the majority of the interviews [[at least in the clips we're able to see) and interacted with the hosts.

drlorne
10-30-2020, 05:14 PM
I just watched a documentary on Teddy Pendergrass and what I came away with was how notoriously crooked the music "business" was/is. How often were entertainers not paid for a performance [[probably why Aretha demanded cash up front, in her purse), and the involvement of mobs or gangs, and of course drugs, pimps and everything else. And that was a guy who was street wise. How did a girl group survive, let alone thrive?
When you realize that you are a commodity and only valuable while you're making money, you have to figure that out and make decisions in terms of who to trust, and how to move forward if you want a career. I think Mary has demonstrated she is a survivor, has found a niche [[holder of the Supremes' history and gowns, and spokesperson). Diana Ross has not ventured into this territory at all leaving this to Mary and a career for Mary. [[My humble opinion).

jobeterob
10-30-2020, 05:16 PM
If Scherrie was the lead singer in the same sense Diana had been [[or at least close to it), the Supremes could have continued on in a similar vein to the Temptations. If the Supremes were trying for dual lead singers, they were moving to a sound that was not identifiable as a Supremes sound when one of those singers was Mary.

I think it was a huge mistake for Mary to leave, a huge mistake to let Jean go, and a huge mistake to move away from the Jean/Scherrie sound. Basically all that did was led to the demise of the Supremes and it never did anything for a solo career for Flo, Mary or Cindy. My recollection is that Scherrie and Lynda had a semi hit or two as members of another group, but no one in the Supremes other than Diana actually had what you would call a solo hit.

I know these situations are rife with personality conflicts; I'm sure Otis Williams has his fair share of critics. But it's hard for me to see that if the Supremes could have carried on with someone like an Otis, they could hardly have been less successful than what happened for Flo, Mary, Cindy, Scherrie, Susaye, Jean, Lynda. Essentially, the FLOS were as successful as any of them.

sup_fan
10-30-2020, 05:20 PM
If Scherrie was the lead singer in the same sense Diana had been [[or at least close to it), the Supremes could have continued on in a similar vein to the Temptations. If the Supremes were trying for dual lead singers, they were moving to a sound that was not identifiable as a Supremes sound when one of those singers was Mary.

I think it was a huge mistake for Mary to leave, a huge mistake to let Jean go, and a huge mistake to move away from the Jean/Scherrie sound. Basically all that did was led to the demise of the Supremes and it never did anything for a solo career for Flo, Mary or Cindy. My recollection is that Scherrie and Lynda had a semi hit or two as members of another group, but no one in the Supremes other than Diana actually had what you would call a solo hit.

I know these situations are rife with personality conflicts; I'm sure Otis Williams has his fair share of critics. But it's hard for me to see that if the Supremes could have carried on with someone like an Otis, they could hardly have been less successful than what happened for Flo, Mary, Cindy, Scherrie, Susaye, Jean, Lynda. Essentially, the FLOS were as successful as any of them.

good summary Job. i think Scherrie and Lynda have done quite a bit of session work too.

agree that there was an opportunity with the SMC lineup to have something more longer term. I do think a multilead approach would have worked. Scherrie should have definitely be the primary lead and handled the majority of the leads on singles. I do think though that M and C could be more featured than before. like in Up the Ladder, they had those echo lines. i think that made excellent use of a group even though Jean was lead. and some shared leads are fun in tv appearances and on albums.

overall i'd have Scherrie do 60 - 70% of leads, mary doing 25% and Cindy filling in the rest

blackguy69
10-30-2020, 05:38 PM
I know that quote she wrote. And I said before the push for her to go solo was more from Pedro than her. You also have to take account that she wrote it out if retrospect of looking back. And like I said before if she was truly trying to set up a solo career that early she would have picked someone more like Cindy than Scherrie.

sup_fan
10-30-2020, 06:44 PM
I know that quote she wrote. And I said before the push for her to go solo was more from Pedro than her. You also have to take account that she wrote it out if retrospect of looking back. And like I said before if she was truly trying to set up a solo career that early she would have picked someone more like Cindy than Scherrie.

if she had picked another Cindy, that would have basically defaulted Mary as the lead and motown had already said no to that. they had no interest in Mary as a singer really. otherwise they would have done more to support her and develop her

jobeterob
10-30-2020, 06:45 PM
I just watched a documentary on Teddy Pendergrass and what I came away with was how notoriously crooked the music "business" was/is. How often were entertainers not paid for a performance [[probably why Aretha demanded cash up front, in her purse), and the involvement of mobs or gangs, and of course drugs, pimps and everything else. And that was a guy who was street wise. How did a girl group survive, let alone thrive?
When you realize that you are a commodity and only valuable while you're making money, you have to figure that out and make decisions in terms of who to trust, and how to move forward if you want a career. I think Mary has demonstrated she is a survivor, has found a niche [[holder of the Supremes' history and gowns, and spokesperson). Diana Ross has not ventured into this territory at all leaving this to Mary and a career for Mary. [[My humble opinion).

I agree with this too.

I think all Supremes, especially M F D, realized they were being tried like a commodity and were being used pretty intensely, particularly Diana and I think the other two started to feel expendable.

I agree that Mary did what she had to in order to survive; it wasn't always pretty but she had her butt kicked pretty hard as well and she knew she'd have nothing if she didn't do what she viewed as necessary.

blackguy69
10-30-2020, 11:21 PM
I highly doubt Motown would have pushed a Scherrie led group or a solo Scherrie.

if she had picked another Cindy, that would have basically defaulted Mary as the lead and motown had already said no to that. they had no interest in Mary as a singer really. otherwise they would have done more to support her and develop her

LoveSupreme
11-02-2020, 01:44 PM
To be honest with you by 1973-1974 The Supremes came off like an oldies act. They were still running around in gowns designed in 1967, 1968 and 1969. They looked dated - frozen in time.

jobeterob
11-02-2020, 03:50 PM
It was so obvious they had run out of money; that's what Mary said in her books; and no record company could pour more and more money into an act that was giving them much of a return.

TheMotownManiac
11-02-2020, 05:32 PM
I highly doubt Motown would have pushed a Scherrie led group or a solo Scherrie.


Motown would push anything they felt could make them a nickel. In ‘73, the J5, Smokey and tempts had slipped, Gladys and the tops were gone, interest in JML was very weak and there were Bills to pay that would not be covered by Marvin Stevie and Diana alone. They needed big acts desperately and worked the commodores well, plus, they did their best for MSC in 75 - getting them on tv, plugging the album in clubs and stores. I saw the poster at tower and a local shop. The group was a hot mess on TV and spoiled any interest they might have generated with their crazy antics. I think it’s POSSIBLE that Motown would try to work with a Scherrie grouping, but it got quashed. Too bad they couldn’t get Thelma Houston in the group - that might have helped.

TheMotownManiac
11-02-2020, 05:39 PM
To be honest with you by 1973-1974 The Supremes came off like an oldies act. They were still running around in gowns designed in 1967, 1968 and 1969. They looked dated - frozen in time.

I used to cringe when I saw five and eight-year-old dresses maybe 10-year-old dresses on the group, it was just sad but I kind of understood it because even the old gowns in many ways were better than the new ones they were getting most of which were just simply atrocious.

Plus they couldn’t get any hot producers to work with them. It wasn’t just Motown that had lost interest in and there was no interest in them in the industry. If you had a hot idea for a record or a great song, would you give it to a struggling group that hasn’t had a hit in years and even then disappointing album sales, or pitch it to somebody who’s hot? the supremes were cold. In hindsight, they began cooling off when Diana left.

sup_fan
11-02-2020, 06:04 PM
i agree that one of the biggest problems during the Scherrie years was the disconnect between what they did on vinyl and what they did live. there was some really good music during these years [[and some duds of course). Had they had sound and solid managerial advice, things could have been different.

during the 60s, Berry personally oversaw every single thing the group did. he had a vision for where the group needed to go and what to do to get them there. the girls' natural sophistication, charm and talent was in complete harmony with his strategy

as i've said many times, the managerial decisions and the strategy for the group during these years were just off. big old fashioned chiffon ball gowns. singing silly MOR and Broadway tunes. complete chaos on the stage.

had they applied the same level of thoughtful strategy, it could have been different. the disco era was known for glitz, glamour and image, the group's core personality would have fit perfectly.

jobeterob
11-02-2020, 07:10 PM
Yes they were cooling off when Diana left. And the show tune songs only indicated how out of touch they had become.

TheMotownManiac
11-02-2020, 10:31 PM
Yes they were cooling off when Diana left. And the show tune songs only indicated how out of touch they had become.


it was a huge mistake to say no to BG to manage the group. They had to have done better. At least with Diana, There was someone in the group with some vision as to what would look good on stage which is why she could stand up to Cholly and say we shouldn’t do this or that. With MSS they had great talent but no direction and that’s a shame.

sup_fan
11-03-2020, 10:29 AM
it was a huge mistake to say no to BG to manage the group. They had to have done better. At least with Diana, There was someone in the group with some vision as to what would look good on stage which is why she could stand up to Cholly and say we shouldn’t do this or that. With MSS they had great talent but no direction and that’s a shame.

Bayou has shared some fascinating stories over the years here on this general topic. i'll paraphrase him and say that motown was pretty much done with the group when J and L left. but mary soldiered on and motown was rather surprised that the shows were still selling pretty well. fans still wanted to come see the girls. plus the reviews with MSC were much stronger than MJL. And so they figured "ok - let's test them out with a handful of producers and see if anything sticks." That gave us Sup 75 and HMM did well on the disco charts and with the gay and black dance clubs. even without any effort or promotion.

motown wasn't super big in Disco and so when some of these things started to click with the Sups, the higher ups figured "hell it's easier to push an established act than to break out a brand new one." so they thought to have the Sups as sort of a disco act on the label. But yes, they then wanted to manage the group in order to keep things going in the right direction. mary said no and then motown was like "fine, whatever, SMH" lol

TheMotownManiac
11-03-2020, 05:28 PM
Bayou has shared some fascinating stories over the years here on this general topic. i'll paraphrase him and say that motown was pretty much done with the group when J and L left. but mary soldiered on and motown was rather surprised that the shows were still selling pretty well. fans still wanted to come see the girls. plus the reviews with MSC were much stronger than MJL. And so they figured "ok - let's test them out with a handful of producers and see if anything sticks." That gave us Sup 75 and HMM did well on the disco charts and with the gay and black dance clubs. even without any effort or promotion.

motown wasn't super big in Disco and so when some of these things started to click with the Sups, the higher ups figured "hell it's easier to push an established act than to break out a brand new one." so they thought to have the Sups as sort of a disco act on the label. But yes, they then wanted to manage the group in order to keep things going in the right direction. mary said no and then motown was like "fine, whatever, SMH" lol

unless there was proof, I refuse to believe that there was no effort or promotion because everything to the contrary suggests otherwise. There were ads in fan and trade publications, they were on TV including the tonight show Which was a great gig for them considering they were now C+ list celebrities. There were posters and and Hand bills - I think the record failed because it’s too hard to understand the lyrics and basically it was a nice but not extraordinary disco record that would have a hard time finding its way on playlists.

Jimi LaLumia
11-03-2020, 06:46 PM
The Supremes was a business, not an encounter group... the whole 'friends' thing is ridiculous.. If Mary had been the chosen one, you think she would have said , 'no these are my friends'? I don't think so.. welcome to show biz..

Bluebrock
11-04-2020, 04:14 AM
The Supremes was a business, not an encounter group... the whole 'friends' thing is ridiculous.. If Mary had been the chosen one, you think she would have said , 'no these are my friends'? I don't think so.. welcome to show biz..
Exactly Jimi. Showbusiness is a cut throat business. Dog eat dog.
Berry spotted Diana's potential and very sensibly concentrated his efforts on fulfilling that potential. Had he seen similar star quality in Mary or Flo he would have focused his efforts on them. Do you honestly think Mary or Flo would have hesitated had they been given the opportunity that Diana was given? There is no room for sentiment in showbusiness. It is a ruthless unforgiving business. People fall by the wayside. What happened to Flo was very sad, but showbusiness is littered with tragedies of which this was just one of many. As regards Mary she made a very good living on the back of Diana. Her bestselling first book would never have got beyond the planning stages had it not been for the numerous juicy stories about Diana. It afforded her a lavish lifestyle which she managed to maintain for several years until the money ran out. Even now she attempts to live a champagne lifestyle on lemonade wages. It need not have been this way had she invested some of that money rather than waste it all on high living. She has no-one to blame but herself for the situation she now finds herself in.

sup_fan
11-04-2020, 11:41 AM
unless there was proof, I refuse to believe that there was no effort or promotion because everything to the contrary suggests otherwise. There were ads in fan and trade publications, they were on TV including the tonight show Which was a great gig for them considering they were now C+ list celebrities. There were posters and and Hand bills - I think the record failed because it’s too hard to understand the lyrics and basically it was a nice but not extraordinary disco record that would have a hard time finding its way on playlists.

oh i agree that the fan theory that motown simply abandoned the 70s supremes is misleading. The first several albums had considerable promotion behind them and only did lukewarm at best.

What i'd love to see though is the total marketing budget allotted to the group each year. and how was that money then budgeted out. Sure we can still find today the Billboard ads. But there's much more to it than that. how much was paid for on-air ads? I have a bootleg copy of the radio ad for Sup 75. but just because an ad was recorded doesn't guarantee airplay. you buy that. Also what was done to promote more directly to djs, station managers and program managers? were the girls at as many industry conventions hob knobbing with these guys? were the girls granting as many on-air [[or pre taped) interviews?

And what about the marketing and promotion to record stores? how much was spent on large cardboard displays? window treatments, clings and posters? what was done to court the merchandise buyers for these stores and chains? What was done with store managers to encourage them to have the lps playing in the stores during peak times?

none of these can be deciphered by the availability of copies of old billboard ads. the only way to truly understand the promotional activity would be to see the budgets. what was spent, where and was that the best use of resources

TheMotownManiac
11-04-2020, 01:54 PM
[QUOTE=Jimi LaLumia;596488]The Supremes was a business, not an encounter group... the whole 'friends' thing is ridiculous..

that is my all-time favorite, balls to the wall, absolutely most absolute perfect statement in the history of statementia.

thank you - I needed that today!

jobeterob
11-04-2020, 04:17 PM
Exactly Jimi. Showbusiness is a cut throat business. Dog eat dog.
Berry spotted Diana's potential and very sensibly concentrated his efforts on fulfilling that potential. Had he seen similar star quality in Mary or Flo he would have focused his efforts on them. Do you honestly think Mary or Flo would have hesitated had they been given the opportunity that Diana was given? There is no room for sentiment in showbusiness. It is a ruthless unforgiving business. People fall by the wayside. What happened to Flo was very sad, but showbusiness is littered with tragedies of which this was just one of many. As regards Mary she made a very good living on the back of Diana. Her bestselling first book would never have got beyond the planning stages had it not been for the numerous juicy stories about Diana. It afforded her a lavish lifestyle which she managed to maintain for several years until the money ran out. Even now she attempts to live a champagne lifestyle on lemonade wages. It need not have been this way had she invested some of that money rather than waste it all on high living. She has no-one to blame but herself for the situation she now finds herself in.

Another “most perfect” post

midnightman
11-04-2020, 06:46 PM
I agree with Jimi. I also agree that the Supremes would've faded anyway. If Jean was actually the "second coming" of Diana, it probably would've worked. It was hard to fill those shoes [[Scherrie had a similar problem once Jean left). Same with anyone filling in for Florence [[Cindy, Lynda and Susaye). The public only knows the Supremes as Flo, Diana and Mary and that's how it always was.

RanRan79
11-05-2020, 08:40 AM
At the risk of being attacked again for having the minority opinion in this forum, I'm going to blaze ahead and let whatever comes, come.


Business, shmusiness. Business gets personal all the time. If it hadn't, Gordy would've never been screwing Ross, and vice versa. "It's just business" is often an excuse used to treat other people like shit, especially when one person has power over the other, or some kind of upperhand. "It's just business" should never be a reason to kick folks around just because you can. But when a person is seen as nothing more than dollars and cents- as even Diana found out and promptly exited stage right- humanity goes out the window and often all hell breaks loose. Diana did what she needed to do to be successful. Mary did what she needed to do to simply survive. Flo did what she felt she needed to do to maintain an ounce of sanity in a crazy situation. And even Gordy sometimes did what he felt he needed to do because, at the end of the day, he was the owner of a business and he needed his money streams to run smoothly. None of that means their decisions are free from consequences or criticism. But my goodness. I'm amazed at all the things we've heard about the Supremes history being brushed aside because, well, it's just business. Reminds me of a time or two when I've heard "It's just politics", and we see the kinds of fallout from that bullshit. Demand better of our fellow human beings. While there is absolutely nothing any of us can do about the things that went down in the 60s and 70s for this fantastic musical group, expressing a little understanding and compassion even with hindsight can't be too hard for some of us. Or can it?

jobeterob
11-05-2020, 08:21 PM
Yes I think everyone pretty much agrees with you.

For a time, they lived a high flying, hugely successful, top of the world life. And after a very few years, where at times they acted badly or drank too much or crapped on each other, one got kicked and then the person attracting the attention left. Then the one who didn't say much soldiered on with a little success for a year or two, then she hooked up with a domineering husband and things collapsed and the solo career never took off - so she did what she had to do to survive.

Nothing really wrong with any of it.

But when you get right down to it - Berry and Diana got a lot of money, lots of accolades, lots of glory. And for 40 years, Mary played the background singer or secretary sent to collect somebody's award as she once said - so she has some bitterness and regrets. It's life - hopefully Donald Trump has some too in a few days.

PeaceNHarmony
11-05-2020, 08:38 PM
Yes I think everyone pretty much agrees with you.

For a time, they lived a high flying, hugely successful, top of the world life. And after a very few years, where at times they acted badly or drank too much or crapped on each other, one got kicked and then the person attracting the attention left. Then the one who didn't say much soldiered on with a little success for a year or two, then she hooked up with a domineering husband and things collapsed and the solo career never took off - so she did what she had to do to survive.

Nothing really wrong with any of it.

But when you get right down to it - Berry and Diana got a lot of money, lots of accolades, lots of glory. And for 40 years, Mary played the background singer or secretary sent to collect somebody's award as she once said - so she has some bitterness and regrets. It's life - hopefully Donald Trump has some too in a few days.A 'near perfect' post until the last sentence. Did you hear ... its ... address to the nation a few minutes ago about the entire election being a fraud?

nomis
11-07-2020, 09:02 PM
when Berry told Mary on that fateful early morning phone call "I wash my hands of the group" he really meant it..Mary was fighting an uphill battle with both Depasse and Roshkind its a credit to Mary's tenacity that she managed to keep the group going to 1977 with lacklustre promotion and energy from Motown executives

Roberta75
11-08-2020, 12:15 AM
A 'near perfect' post until the last sentence. Did you hear ... its ... address to the nation a few minutes ago about the entire election being a fraud?

Exept President Pussy Grabber has zero evidence to back up his fake claims. Hes throwing tantrums on twitter. What a big fat loser!!!!

Jimi LaLumia
11-08-2020, 01:53 PM
well getting back to the subject at hand [[yea, President Biden!) regarding the group once Jean lost her taste for the whole thing, it became a matter of "There's no business, like NO BUSINESS, like no business.... I Know!"

Jimi LaLumia
11-08-2020, 01:54 PM
and you all can find a proper 'encounter group' [[if they still do such things) via Google!

jim aka jtigre99
11-08-2020, 02:44 PM
when Berry told Mary on that fateful early morning phone call "I wash my hands of the group" he really meant it..Mary was fighting an uphill battle with both Depasse and Roshkind its a credit to Mary's tenacity that she managed to keep the group going to 1977 with lacklustre promotion and energy from Motown executives
Yes, Mary had quite a bit of tenacity to continue to keep the group going. I understand it is a business but the genesis was formed through friendship.I started this because I wondered-as a human being-how Mary may have felt. Yes, we all know Diana Ross is special and talented. The other members were special and talented, as well, even if not at that same level. Also, business is personal as personal relationships affect many business decisions. When Berry told Mary he washed his hands of the group, she surely knew she was going to fight an uphill battle. Also, despite what anyone thinks of her-Mary was an integral part of the original group and DRATS. She is beautiful and talented and yes special in her own way. Mary has tremendous inner strength-something Diana Ross even wrote in her book Secrets of a Sparrow. Mary has tenacity and she has succeeded in her own way to share her love of the group she cofounded and her two friends Florence Ballard and Diana Ross. Motown may have felt by the 70's they were "sequined out" and that they didn't care for Mary's vocal talents but Mary's sheer will has allowed her to get over her personal hurt to soldier on. We don't need an encounter group, just wondered how as a human being Mary really felt about what had happened. Mary always felt that Florence and Diana's vocal talents exceeded hers and she worked to have the 70's lineups do much more sharing going forward. Had she been picked and sand Where Did Our Love Go I am sure she would have ran with it but I still feel she would have wanted Florence and Diana to share with the lead vocals as she stated her loyalty was always to the group.

PeaceNHarmony
11-08-2020, 08:08 PM
Also worth noting that 'The Supremes' was Wilson's only $ source so of course she fought to maintain it.

RanRan79
11-09-2020, 09:58 AM
when Berry told Mary on that fateful early morning phone call "I wash my hands of the group" he really meant it..Mary was fighting an uphill battle with both Depasse and Roshkind its a credit to Mary's tenacity that she managed to keep the group going to 1977 with lacklustre promotion and energy from Motown executives

Agreed. But I think Mary would've been better served to have exited with Jean and Lynda when they first started discussing it. After Jean left, Mary was basically at a label that didn't care if she was there or not. Even with her first solo album, Mary was recording for a label that really didn't give a shit. Why stay somewhere you're not wanted? Life is too short for that kind of stuff. I wish Mary had the self confidence to give Motown the finger, along with Jean and Lynda, and go somewhere else. No one will ever get me to change my mind that at another label, and even under another name, that these three in the right hands couldn't have been a major recording unit for at least the rest of the 70s.

RanRan79
11-09-2020, 10:02 AM
and you all can find a proper 'encounter group' [[if they still do such things) via Google!

Ah, it's good to see that the pandemic, death and destruction, hasn't dampened your condescension Jimi. I had to look up "encounter group" because I had never heard of it. I still fail to understand what it has to do with the friendships of the original Supremes, who, by the way, were not "business partners" at 13,14,15 years old the way they would be later on. These were kids from around the way who got together to do what they loved to do, not three savvy women who sat down and said "We're entering into a business contract with one another..."

sup_fan
11-09-2020, 11:00 AM
Agreed. But I think Mary would've been better served to have exited with Jean and Lynda when they first started discussing it. After Jean left, Mary was basically at a label that didn't care if she was there or not. Even with her first solo album, Mary was recording for a label that really didn't give a shit. Why stay somewhere you're not wanted? Life is too short for that kind of stuff. I wish Mary had the self confidence to give Motown the finger, along with Jean and Lynda, and go somewhere else. No one will ever get me to change my mind that at another label, and even under another name, that these three in the right hands couldn't have been a major recording unit for at least the rest of the 70s.

problem is i think that there was enough bad blood between MJL that going to another label wouldn't have been productive. sure it may have helped get them out from under the weight of the Sup legacy but M and J had conflicts almost from the start. not saying they had throw down fights every day but they had very different ideas and goals and frankly just were not ever going to align.

Plus as we saw with her A&M record, Jean's very VERY strong personal convictions and attitude really prevented her from going forward in the industry. Jean is a wonderful singer, a decent entertainer and only soso when it comes to the business side of show business.

jobeterob
11-09-2020, 05:05 PM
Also worth noting that 'The Supremes' was Wilson's only $ source so of course she fought to maintain it.

And she's been short of money a lot of times. You need to hang on to what works and she had to use The Supremes and more so, Diana Ross.

I wonder what happens to all of these heritage artists as the pandemic wears on. The big names can come back as long as they aren't too old but what happens to artists like Mary Wilson who will be 77 before there is any hope of a return to any semblance of normalcy in the concert business.

thanxal
11-09-2020, 06:08 PM
The big names can come back as long as they aren't too old but what happens to artists like Mary Wilson who will be 77 before there is any hope of a return to any semblance of normalcy in the concert business.

This is key: we won't just flip a switch and everything's back to normal. It will take at least 2-3 years and then people's finances will remain wrecked. All that disposal income before the pandemic will be in short supply. Even this assumes that significant number of people will take the vaccine [[95%) to get us back in 2-3 years. Current estimates in the US are that only about 50% will take the vaccine. That is a 20 year recovery period.

It is very, very sad, but I think this is it for legacy acts.

PeaceNHarmony
11-09-2020, 07:20 PM
And she's been short of money a lot of times. You need to hang on to what works and she had to use The Supremes and more so, Diana Ross.

I wonder what happens to all of these heritage artists as the pandemic wears on. The big names can come back as long as they aren't too old but what happens to artists like Mary Wilson who will be 77 before there is any hope of a return to any semblance of normalcy in the concert business.Of course we'll wish Mary and all the others well. Mary is a decade past her ability to obtain Social Security and Medicare so she should be able to have a happy life in the way that any other person of her age should. There are those who think that anyone who had a brush with stardom is entitled to an ... well, entitled ... retirement, and I for one agree that all the singers we love should have a better share of royalties. But I don't at all agree that someone should have a 'better' life simply because they were on tv and/or radio 50 years ago. Lesson: every one of us needs to prepare for their own future.

milven
11-09-2020, 10:15 PM
Of course we'll wish Mary and all the others well. Mary is a decade past her ability to obtain Social Security and Medicare so she should be able to have a happy life in the way that any other person of her age should. There are those who think that anyone who had a brush with stardom is entitled to an ... well, entitled ... retirement, and I for one agree that all the singers we love should have a better share of royalties. But I don't at all agree that someone should have a 'better' life simply because they were on tv and/or radio 50 years ago.
Lesson: every one of us needs to prepare for their own future.

How true that everyone should prepare for their future. I learned that as a teenager. I was working in a little record shop and down the block a guy about ten years older than me was working at a fruit stand. He made a record and it became a giant national hit. He also had a follow up hit. He must have riding high making good money because one day he came in flashing rings on his fingers and driving a brand new pink Cadillac [[I was surprised that it wasn't a Lavender Blue Cadillac) But it wasn't long after that he was back working at the fruit stand.

That taught me that if I ever made some money, I would save and invest some of it and then let that money make money for me so that I wouldn't have to work when I was in my seventies.

I fear that many of our oldies acts aren't touring just because they like it. I think they financially have to.

RanRan79
11-09-2020, 11:30 PM
problem is i think that there was enough bad blood between MJL that going to another label wouldn't have been productive. sure it may have helped get them out from under the weight of the Sup legacy but M and J had conflicts almost from the start. not saying they had throw down fights every day but they had very different ideas and goals and frankly just were not ever going to align.

Plus as we saw with her A&M record, Jean's very VERY strong personal convictions and attitude really prevented her from going forward in the industry. Jean is a wonderful singer, a decent entertainer and only soso when it comes to the business side of show business.

Of course like all conjecture in these threads, some of the outcomes definitely depend on the details. In a "perfect" world, whatever issues Mary and Jean had were more a result of the stress of being at Motown, stress that may have been alleviated somewhere else. Plus "The Supremes" presented Mary with baggage that was not applicable to Jean, or Lynda. So shedding that old might have also proved a good thing. Even still, Mary might have found that even if things went south at a number label, she may have ended up in the crosshairs of someone who truly believed in her God given abilities and known how to capitalize on them. And thus she may not have even needed to bother with another group. Of course the reality is that she did stay with Motown, and ultimately, past 1972, she has not much to show for that time. Time that might have been best spent elsewhere.

RanRan79
11-09-2020, 11:32 PM
And she's been short of money a lot of times. You need to hang on to what works and she had to use The Supremes and more so, Diana Ross.

I wonder what happens to all of these heritage artists as the pandemic wears on. The big names can come back as long as they aren't too old but what happens to artists like Mary Wilson who will be 77 before there is any hope of a return to any semblance of normalcy in the concert business.

Alright Rob, we get it, Mary isn't as rich as Diana. Geez. It's not like she's in the welfare line.:p

blackguy69
11-09-2020, 11:41 PM
Some on here are thinking she’s a paycheck away from poverty and been saying this for quite a while. Clearly that’s not the case. Somewhere down the line Mary must’ve stashed something away for her to still have her house in Henderson and to afford her comfortable life.

Alright Rob, we get it, Mary isn't as rich as Diana. Geez. It's not like she's in the welfare line.:p

RanRan79
11-09-2020, 11:45 PM
That taught me that if I ever made some money, I would save and invest some of it and then let that money make money for me so that I wouldn't have to work when I was in my seventies.


Sadly you're often in the minority with that type of thinking. Most young people aren't thinking much further ahead than next weekend. So consider yourself truly blessed.

As it relates to Mary, there's always this scuttlebutt in the forum that Mary is one overdue bill away from government assistance, but never anything sourced. Far as I've been able to tell, the last time she was in a very bad way was when she was forced to do the unthinkable and ask Diana for money. If I'm not mistaken, I did read that she was making about a million dollars [[I'm assuming a combo of music and book royalties and performance fees) around the time of RTL, which for a person with Mary's resume [[i.e. claim to fame being 1/3 of the biggest female group in the history of music who's role was backing vocalist) seems extremely well off. What evidence is there that her money is funny today? In fact, other than Cindy's medical induced financial issues, I haven't heard of any of the living Supremes having money issues, even if they aren't as wealthy as Diana.



I fear that many of our oldies acts aren't touring just because they like it. I think they financially have to.

This is probably true for a lot of them, but don't underestimate the power of the stage either. What they get from performing before a live audience can be like a drug. Many of these folks were among the best to ever do it. It's hard to give that up, money or no money, young or old, in sickness or in health.

RanRan79
11-09-2020, 11:48 PM
Some on here are thinking she’s a paycheck away from poverty and been saying this for quite a while. Clearly that’s not the case. Somewhere down the line Mary must’ve stashed something away for her to still have her house in Henderson and to afford her comfortable life.

Lol I just said something similar. I would hate to find out that even after all this time and the troubles she had, like having to go to Diana for money when she so bravely escaped the brutality that was Pedro, that she wouldn't have secured her future somehow, especially for her children. I'm going to give Mary much more credit than to assume that her mind never progressed beyond a 20 something year old woman.

sup_fan
11-10-2020, 10:58 AM
Of course like all conjecture in these threads, some of the outcomes definitely depend on the details. In a "perfect" world, whatever issues Mary and Jean had were more a result of the stress of being at Motown, stress that may have been alleviated somewhere else. Plus "The Supremes" presented Mary with baggage that was not applicable to Jean, or Lynda. So shedding that old might have also proved a good thing. Even still, Mary might have found that even if things went south at a number label, she may have ended up in the crosshairs of someone who truly believed in her God given abilities and known how to capitalize on them. And thus she may not have even needed to bother with another group. Of course the reality is that she did stay with Motown, and ultimately, past 1972, she has not much to show for that time. Time that might have been best spent elsewhere.

the stories i've heard is that M and J started having issues pretty much immediately. again, i don't think they had big bad fights. but i think Jean pretty early on was trying to push the group in a different direction. My understanding is that she felt that as the lead singer, she would LEAD the group. Mary felt differently. so even before things started to sour, they were showing some degree of incompatibility. Jean was doing all of the leads in the studio, the leads on stage, some bg work with M and C and yet wasn't able to lead the direction of the group. that frustration combined with the issues around pay and the slow decline of the group probably made things so conflicted by 72 and there was no way the LMJ lineup could have continued on any label.

sup_fan
11-10-2020, 11:01 AM
Of course we'll wish Mary and all the others well. Mary is a decade past her ability to obtain Social Security and Medicare so she should be able to have a happy life in the way that any other person of her age should. There are those who think that anyone who had a brush with stardom is entitled to an ... well, entitled ... retirement, and I for one agree that all the singers we love should have a better share of royalties. But I don't at all agree that someone should have a 'better' life simply because they were on tv and/or radio 50 years ago. Lesson: every one of us needs to prepare for their own future.

according to Randy's book, Social Security was never deducted from their royalties. SS is deducted from salaries not royalties. so the women wouldn't have this to utilize today

so yes, Mary is continuing to work. so is Diana. i don't know personally what either of their finances are. Fans state that Mary lived beyond her means for years. money from her books quickly was used up. she's had tons of high priced lawsuits.

jobeterob
11-10-2020, 02:05 PM
And royalties have fallen so significantly that they don't count for much - this is why they need the concert business. And now it's gone.

blackguy69
11-10-2020, 06:21 PM
Without proof that’s all we can do is speculate . And by the looks of it she won’t be back in the projects anytime soon
according to Randy's book, Social Security was never deducted from their royalties. SS is deducted from salaries not royalties. so the women wouldn't have this to utilize today

so yes, Mary is continuing to work. so is Diana. i don't know personally what either of their finances are. Fans state that Mary lived beyond her means for years. money from her books quickly was used up. she's had tons of high priced lawsuits.

jobeterob
11-10-2020, 06:51 PM
Those crap sites that give you net worth say Berry is worth $400 million, Diana $250 million, Smokey $150 million, Mary $8 million, Cindy $500,000 and Jean $3 million - so if those were true Mary and Jean are doing fine enough. But I think these are wildly inflated and financial people in Canada often won't include your house in your net worth - because we all need somewhere to live.

I think Mary has contributed to the questions about her financial well being by some of what she has said - that she borrowed money from friends [[why not the bank?), that she has to work, and by requiring to be paid for interviews.

But as we all say, she's 77, looks 50, and has survived whatever the means is.

blackguy69
11-10-2020, 07:05 PM
Why go to a bank when you can borrow it from someone you know. Nothing wrong with that. As long as it’s paid back there should not be a problem.
Those crap sites that give you net worth say Berry is worth $400 million, Diana $250 million, Smokey $150 million, Mary $8 million, Cindy $500,000 and Jean $3 million - so if those were true Mary and Jean are doing fine enough. But I think these are wildly inflated and financial people in Canada often won't include your house in your net worth - because we all need somewhere to live.

I think Mary has contributed to the questions about her financial well being by some of what she has said - that she borrowed money from friends [[why not the bank?), that she has to work, and by requiring to be paid for interviews.

But as we all say, she's 77, looks 50, and has survived whatever the means is.

milven
11-10-2020, 07:16 PM
Why go to a bank when you can borrow it from someone you know. Nothing wrong with that. As long as it’s paid back there should not be a problem.

Many times it is not paid back. And then you lose your money and your friend.

PeaceNHarmony
11-10-2020, 08:50 PM
Those crap sites that give you net worth say Berry is worth $400 million, Diana $250 million, Smokey $150 million, Mary $8 million, Cindy $500,000 and Jean $3 million - so if those were true Mary and Jean are doing fine enough. But I think these are wildly inflated and financial people in Canada often won't include your house in your net worth - because we all need somewhere to live.

I think Mary has contributed to the questions about her financial well being by some of what she has said - that she borrowed money from friends [[why not the bank?), that she has to work, and by requiring to be paid for interviews.

But as we all say, she's 77, looks 50, and has survived whatever the means is.OK up to the 'looks 50'. Sorry; ain't so.

blackguy69
11-10-2020, 09:36 PM
In this case she paid the money plus interest.

Many times it is not paid back. And then you lose your money and t your friend.

blackguy69
11-10-2020, 09:37 PM
And sho made you the authority

OK up to the 'looks 50'. Sorry; ain't so.

jobeterob
11-10-2020, 10:30 PM
Usually you go to a friend if the bank says no to your request for a loan

Ok - um 52?

sup_fan
11-10-2020, 10:48 PM
Without proof that’s all we can do is speculate . And by the looks of it she won’t be back in the projects anytime soon

true - we don't know the details of her finances.

As for SS, my assumption is that if you're not earning a salary then there aren't any deductions. royalties are not salary and therefor wouldn't qualify for the deductions

sup_fan
11-10-2020, 10:51 PM
i would assume that Diana was not Mary's first choice to go to for the money. in her book, she states how she tried to hold off as long as possible but finally her mother convinced her.

so in regards to Bank vs Diana, it would seem she could NOT get a loan from a bank and therefore had to go to Diana. banks do not offer loans without some form of collateral. and given her financial situation, there most likely wouldn't have been assets readily available or ones that the bank would be interested in. i don't know that a storage locker of gowns would qualify for assets to a bank ;) lol

jobeterob
11-10-2020, 11:32 PM
i would assume that Diana was not Mary's first choice to go to for the money. in her book, she states how she tried to hold off as long as possible but finally her mother convinced her.

so in regards to Bank vs Diana, it would seem she could NOT get a loan from a bank and therefore had to go to Diana. banks do not offer loans without some form of collateral. and given her financial situation, there most likely wouldn't have been assets readily available or ones that the bank would be interested in. i don't know that a storage locker of gowns would qualify for assets to a bank ;) lol

Silly banks!

blackguy69
11-10-2020, 11:54 PM
Like I said before, all we can do is speculate since we were not there so don’t assume she couldn’t go to the bank.

i would assume that Diana was not Mary's first choice to go to for the money. in her book, she states how she tried to hold off as long as possible but finally her mother convinced her.

so in regards to Bank vs Diana, it would seem she could NOT get a loan from a bank and therefore had to go to Diana. banks do not offer loans without some form of collateral. and given her financial situation, there most likely wouldn't have been assets readily available or ones that the bank would be interested in. i don't know that a storage locker of gowns would qualify for assets to a bank ;) lol

sup_fan
11-11-2020, 12:12 AM
Like I said before, all we can do is speculate since we were not there so don’t assume she couldn’t go to the bank.

well actually we don't have to speculate.

the money was for a down payment on a house. banks will not allow you to use a loan or borrow for a down payment. you need cash. so no, mary couldn't go to a bank for that. but we can assume that she would for the mortgage itself.

this was also back in 1981 when there were many less financial tools used by lenders [[as opposed to some of the more creative mortgage options available today). so my earlier comment about collateral and assets wouldn't apply here. And in Supreme Faith, on page 255 Mary states that all of her cash was tied up in her marriage and she was in process of divorce.

blackguy69
11-11-2020, 01:38 AM
I know where the money went to. I do have the books too. What we don’t know if she went to the bank first or just went to Diana. She was going thru a divorce and the financial part wasn’t settled when she needed the money.

well actually we don't have to speculate.

the moneys was for a down payment on a house. banks will not allow you to use a loan or borrow for a down payment. you need cash. so no, mary couldn't go to a bank for that. but we can assume that she would for the mortgage itself.

this was also back in 1981 when there were many less financial tools used by lenders [[as opposed to some of the more creative mortgage options available today). so my earlier comment about collateral and assets wouldn't apply here. And in Supreme Faith, on page 255 Mary states that all of her cash was tied up in her marriage and she was in process of divorce.

PeaceNHarmony
11-11-2020, 09:17 AM
Usually you go to a friend if the bank says no to your request for a loan

Ok - um 52?Mary does indeed look good, but like most ladies, after 50 'effortlessly ageless' is the best descriptor!

blackguy69
11-11-2020, 09:27 AM
Actually I should correct myself. the money she borrowed was for a house. I was thinking more on the lines that she brought it outright then I remembered Mary saying she needed a down payment. So unless She brought it directly from the owner, or Diana brought the house and she was paying her, she still owed whichever bank that held the mortgage. Which means she did get a loan from the bank but also borrowed money from Diana to put down.

sup_fan
11-11-2020, 11:27 AM
Actually I should correct myself. the money she borrowed was for a house. I was thinking more on the lines that she brought it outright then I remembered Mary saying she needed a down payment. So unless She brought it directly from the owner, or Diana brought the house and she was paying her, she still owed whichever bank that held the mortgage. Which means she did get a loan from the bank but also borrowed money from Diana to put down.

exactly - once i dug the book out again, i reread the part where it was for the downpayment. not just money for whatever living expenses. Mary would have been applying for a mortgage and there's no reason to assume she COULDN'T get the mortgage provided the overall price and the monthly payment were within her means. so the bank would have been fine with that. it was just the down payment, which banks do no allow you to finance. so that's apparently what Diana helped with

RanRan79
11-11-2020, 11:31 AM
the stories i've heard is that M and J started having issues pretty much immediately. again, i don't think they had big bad fights. but i think Jean pretty early on was trying to push the group in a different direction. My understanding is that she felt that as the lead singer, she would LEAD the group. Mary felt differently. so even before things started to sour, they were showing some degree of incompatibility. Jean was doing all of the leads in the studio, the leads on stage, some bg work with M and C and yet wasn't able to lead the direction of the group. that frustration combined with the issues around pay and the slow decline of the group probably made things so conflicted by 72 and there was no way the LMJ lineup could have continued on any label.

Like I said before, that was Jean's fault for believing she could come into Mary's group and have her way. I can't imagine a Temptation coming in during the 70s and 80s and on thinking they were going to be in charge of something instead of Otis. Wasn't happening. But my point about the Supremes being "baggage" is tied into some of what you say. Mary was one of the original cultivators of the Supremes brand. Whatever changes were going to occur, Mary probably was invested in staying on brand. Meanwhile, Jean, the up and comer, comes in with all these innovative ideas and to Mary it starts to feel like the original messaging is becoming lost.

In all likelihood they would not have been able to leave the company with the name Supremes. So if they were able to start from the ground up somewhere else, things might have turned out differently. Things sucked between the ladies toward the end, but the way Mary puts it in her book [[her POV of course), the worst of it seemed to arise when Mary refused the idea to leave and go somewhere else. If Jean is the kind of lady I suspect she is based on what has been written and recollected, if she didn't think she could work with Mary, she would've pulled Lynda aside, said "let's blow this joint", found another woman to join them and gone somewhere else per her suggestion.

One of Mary's biggest flaws was not taking risks. She always seemed to play it safe. I'm not sure that's a winning formula for making it in the industry.

RanRan79
11-11-2020, 11:32 AM
Those crap sites that give you net worth say Berry is worth $400 million, Diana $250 million, Smokey $150 million, Mary $8 million, Cindy $500,000 and Jean $3 million - so if those were true Mary and Jean are doing fine enough. But I think these are wildly inflated and financial people in Canada often won't include your house in your net worth - because we all need somewhere to live.

I think Mary has contributed to the questions about her financial well being by some of what she has said - that she borrowed money from friends [[why not the bank?), that she has to work, and by requiring to be paid for interviews.

But as we all say, she's 77, looks 50, and has survived whatever the means is.

When did she have to borrow money from friends? Is that the Diana thing 40 years ago?

RanRan79
11-11-2020, 11:38 AM
When did she have to borrow money from friends? Is that the Diana thing 40 years ago?

Okay, I see my question has been answered. Since that time, Mary appears to have done very well for herself. Diana is uber wealthy because of her position in the Supremes, which launched her into solo superstardom. She parlayed that into an extremely lucrative recording contract with RCA and since has apparently been fairly smart with her money. Mary was never in a position to sing her way into the kind of money Diana has. The comparisons in their finances really doesn't make sense.

sup_fan
11-11-2020, 02:22 PM
Like I said before, that was Jean's fault for believing she could come into Mary's group and have her way. I can't imagine a Temptation coming in during the 70s and 80s and on thinking they were going to be in charge of something instead of Otis. Wasn't happening. But my point about the Supremes being "baggage" is tied into some of what you say. Mary was one of the original cultivators of the Supremes brand. Whatever changes were going to occur, Mary probably was invested in staying on brand. Meanwhile, Jean, the up and comer, comes in with all these innovative ideas and to Mary it starts to feel like the original messaging is becoming lost.

In all likelihood they would not have been able to leave the company with the name Supremes. So if they were able to start from the ground up somewhere else, things might have turned out differently. Things sucked between the ladies toward the end, but the way Mary puts it in her book [[her POV of course), the worst of it seemed to arise when Mary refused the idea to leave and go somewhere else. If Jean is the kind of lady I suspect she is based on what has been written and recollected, if she didn't think she could work with Mary, she would've pulled Lynda aside, said "let's blow this joint", found another woman to join them and gone somewhere else per her suggestion.

One of Mary's biggest flaws was not taking risks. She always seemed to play it safe. I'm not sure that's a winning formula for making it in the industry.

yes and no. in terms of tenure, yes Mary had that.

but look at the output and content:

the albums - Mary sings no leads on RO and has only a couple echo lines in Ladder. 1 shared lead on NW, 1 shared lead on Touch, 1 full lead and 2 shared leads on FJ, 1 full lead on JW. That's a total of 6 songs.

the duet - there are a few lines on a few songs but no significant leads

the unreleased tracks - we've come across only a couple of Mary leads - Still Water, Soft Days, the rumored If You Let Me Baby. there might be another one or two that we don't know of.

BG vocals - Mary also isn't on a significant amount of the background vocals. the A's and other groups were used heavily during this time.

Live - she had her spotlight of Can't Take My Eyes, would sometimes do a few of the 60s hits in the medley. and certainly did much more of the speaking parts than she did in the 60s. she was much more active in interviews and talk shows too

Jean was an adult when she came into the group. simply looking at the volume of singing she was required to do, i don't think it's beyond reason to assume that she should have some amount of leadership in the group. she was handling the majorityof the work.

as for the Temps, they had established a system of multi leads. Dennis, Eddie, sometimes Paul. Dennis was probably one of the most utilized after David left. And Dennis was in the group until they left Motown. Richard Street took over the parts that Paul did.

blackguy69
11-11-2020, 02:48 PM
I actually asked this from George not long ago and basically he told me that during the Jean led era Mary and Cindy sang on all of the released singles and most of the album cuts. Most of the songs that don’t have them were recorded prior to Jean’s inclusion of the group. As far as the promise kept tracks, there is a good portion that Mary and Cindy did not record, keeping in mind that these were incomplete tracks not ready for release so in most cases the girls hadn’t payed their vocals yet.

yes and no. in terms of tenure, yes Mary had that.

but look at the output and content:

the albums - Mary sings no leads on RO and has only a couple echo lines in Ladder. 1 shared lead on NW, 1 shared lead on Touch, 1 full lead and 2 shared leads on FJ, 1 full lead on JW. That's a total of 6 songs.

the duet - there are a few lines on a few songs but no significant leads

the unreleased tracks - we've come across only a couple of Mary leads - Still Water, Soft Days, the rumored If You Let Me Baby. there might be another one or two that we don't know of.

BG vocals - Mary also isn't on a significant amount of the background vocals. the A's and other groups were used heavily during this time.

Live - she had her spotlight of Can't Take My Eyes, would sometimes do a few of the 60s hits in the medley. and certainly did much more of the speaking parts than she did in the 60s. she was much more active in interviews and talk shows too

Jean was an adult when she came into the group. simply looking at the volume of singing she was required to do, i don't think it's beyond reason to assume that she should have some amount of leadership in the group. she was handling the majorityof the work.

as for the Temps, they had established a system of multi leads. Dennis, Eddie, sometimes Paul. Dennis was probably one of the most utilized after David left. And Dennis was in the group until they left Motown. Richard Street took over the parts that Paul did.

Jimi LaLumia
11-11-2020, 06:14 PM
The Supremes didn't launch Diana Ross into super stardom, Diana Ross launched The Supremes into 60's superstardom..

RanRan79
11-12-2020, 07:49 AM
The Supremes didn't launch Diana Ross into super stardom, Diana Ross launched The Supremes into 60's superstardom..

Stop rewriting history, please and thank you. No one knew who Diana Ross was without the Supremes. Those records said "Supremes". The concert and television performances were of the Supremes, not Diana Ross solo artist. The Supremes launched Diana Ross into super stardom in the same way the Beatles launched it's group members into solo success, as did the Jackson 5 for Michael, and even Jermaine, the Commodores for Lionel Richie, and countless others. Saying that does not take away Diana's key role in the success of the group or from the fact that she put in the work to get where she is.

RanRan79
11-12-2020, 07:59 AM
yes and no. in terms of tenure, yes Mary had that.

but look at the output and content:

the albums - Mary sings no leads on RO and has only a couple echo lines in Ladder. 1 shared lead on NW, 1 shared lead on Touch, 1 full lead and 2 shared leads on FJ, 1 full lead on JW. That's a total of 6 songs.

the duet - there are a few lines on a few songs but no significant leads

the unreleased tracks - we've come across only a couple of Mary leads - Still Water, Soft Days, the rumored If You Let Me Baby. there might be another one or two that we don't know of.

BG vocals - Mary also isn't on a significant amount of the background vocals. the A's and other groups were used heavily during this time.

Live - she had her spotlight of Can't Take My Eyes, would sometimes do a few of the 60s hits in the medley. and certainly did much more of the speaking parts than she did in the 60s. she was much more active in interviews and talk shows too

Jean was an adult when she came into the group. simply looking at the volume of singing she was required to do, i don't think it's beyond reason to assume that she should have some amount of leadership in the group. she was handling the majorityof the work.

as for the Temps, they had established a system of multi leads. Dennis, Eddie, sometimes Paul. Dennis was probably one of the most utilized after David left. And Dennis was in the group until they left Motown. Richard Street took over the parts that Paul did.

And Mary had more leads than Otis. Dennis was a lead singer in the group. Nobody considered the Temptations to be Dennis' group. After the exits of most of the Big 5, the Temptations was Otis' and Melvin's until it was just Otis', no matter who was singing lead. And I don't think any guy coming into that unit would think otherwise without being on a serious ego trip. Jean stepped into the lead singer position. That did not entitle her to outrank Mary who had been there from the beginning. Love Jean as y'all know I do, but if she wanted a group to look at her as the top dog, she should've started her own. Her job was to sing and she deserved a seat at the planning table. I said it before, if Mary really was pulling rank in the sense of dismissing Jean, after the experience she had with Diana, that made Mary a hypocrite. Yes, I realize the dynamic was a bit different because Mary and Diana did start out as equals, but the point is that Mary knew how it felt to be dismissed. So if she did that to Jean, that's fucked up. But for Jean to be mad and throw fits because Mary's thoughts carried more weight, then she needed to do some more growing up. I can't imagine that if Levi left the Tops and some other dude came in to take over Levi's lead responsibilities that the new dude would've ever thought he should be the leader of Obie, Duke and Lawrence, and if he did, he probably wouldn't live to tell the tale.

jobeterob
11-12-2020, 03:19 PM
LOL, love the line "Mary had more leads than Otis" - just very funny because Otis maybe had one.

Wasn't Jean only an employee of either Supremes Inc. or Motown? Was Cindy an employee? If they were, it puts things in a certain way to start. Although I can certainly see that Jean may have felt she was the lead voice on all the singles and she may have known the Andantes were also on a lot of the singles as well as some Supremes - then she might have started being a little aggressive for things to change.

sup_fan
11-12-2020, 04:08 PM
I actually asked this from George not long ago and basically he told me that during the Jean led era Mary and Cindy sang on all of the released singles and most of the album cuts. Most of the songs that don’t have them were recorded prior to Jean’s inclusion of the group. As far as the promise kept tracks, there is a good portion that Mary and Cindy did not record, keeping in mind that these were incomplete tracks not ready for release so in most cases the girls hadn’t payed their vocals yet.

that's very true. On RO - there are definitely tunes that have quite a bit of additional vocals. but that doesn't necessarily mean M and C are not on there too.

it does seem that by the time of NW, M and C are being used. there are multiple backing vocal tracks and so it's hard to always know if M and C just recorded multiple or if session singers were added. Or perhaps both. on the song Touch, there are at least 3 or 4 things happening in the bg vocals.

sup_fan
11-12-2020, 04:10 PM
LOL, love the line "Mary had more leads than Otis" - just very funny because Otis maybe had one.

Wasn't Jean only an employee of either Supremes Inc. or Motown? Was Cindy an employee? If they were, it puts things in a certain way to start. Although I can certainly see that Jean may have felt she was the lead voice on all the singles and she may have known the Andantes were also on a lot of the singles as well as some Supremes - then she might have started being a little aggressive for things to change.

Supremes Inc, i believe, came about later. Was it when S and C came into the picture? Motown was pretty much still controlling things prior. It's possible [[guessing here) that Mary set it up so that things could continue after L and J left. motown most likely would not have done anything

blackguy69
11-12-2020, 04:35 PM
Supremes inc. was set up after J and L left to handle most of the groups business. With the exception of recording sessions and booking[[ handled by Motown and the William Morris agency).

Supremes Inc, i believe, came about later. Was it when S and C came into the picture? Motown was pretty much still controlling things prior. It's possible [[guessing here) that Mary set it up so that things could continue after L and J left. motown most likely would not have done anything

milven
11-13-2020, 09:44 AM
Supremes inc. was set up after J and L left to handle most of the groups business. With the exception of recording sessions and booking[[ handled by Motown and the William Morris agency).

This section of the final days of the Supremes always confused me. If Sherrie and Susaye were set to continue with a new member, would Mary and Pedro's Supremes Inc be managing them? Was it now their group and not Motown's? If it was still Motown's group and Motown owned the name, and Motown or William Morris did the bookings, then why did Mary feel compelled to have to fill those booking obligations?

And after those obligations were met, why did Mary continue to bill herself with the Supremes name?

And then later, why did she lose millions in failed lawsuits trying to own the name Supremes even though, like Diana in 1969, Mary left it behind in 1977 to start a solo career?

And what about Marion? Will she ever leave Conoga Falls?

sup_fan
11-13-2020, 10:34 AM
all 9 women had official contracts with motown. so in terms of membership, that's at least settled

Mary's book is sketchy at best, in terms of the specific details. and that's understandable. she wasn't writing a case study. I believe she mentioned that in later 76 the girls resigned with William Morris. that's how they got that last minute gig at Caesar's. as for who was managing bookings prior, i don't know.

Sup Inc might have been handling other aspects of the work and bills - photo shoots, dress designs and maintenance, arranging new music for the shows, hiring choreographers. I'd also assume Sup Inc was the one determining what music would be in the show

but yes, it's all a bit speculative

blackguy69
11-13-2020, 12:47 PM
There’s a lot of overlap here. I’m guessing once Mary was gone any commitments that Scherrie and Susaye had with Supremes inc was cut. Motown was supposed to be handling any new business but clearly didn’t. so when Mary was notified about the South American tour it put her in a peculiar situation also it didn’t help the fact that Mary was still signed on as a Supreme. She must’ve gotten some form of a threat since she went on the tour. As far as the name I don’t know how anyone can unpack that mess.


This section of the final days of the Supremes always confused me. If Sherrie and Susaye were set to continue with a new member, would Mary and Pedro's Supremes Inc be managing them? Was it now their group and not Motown's? If it was still Motown's group and Motown owned the name, and Motown or William Morris did the bookings, then why did Mary feel compelled to have to fill those booking obligations?

And after those obligations were met, why did Mary continue to bill herself with the Supremes name?

And then later, why did she lose millions in failed lawsuits trying to own the name Supremes even though, like Diana in 1969, Mary left it behind in 1977 to start a solo career?

And what about Marion? Will she ever leave Conoga Falls?

jim aka jtigre99
11-13-2020, 01:45 PM
Wow! Okay, from my understanding about the post 1973 era was that Mary hired Scherrie and Cindy through Supremes Inc since when Lynda and Jean left that Motown did not follow through to hire anyone-they were probably thinking it was the end of the group. Mary continued to perform with Cindy & Scherrie and hired them on her own. She states that they basically were working for her under this. Mary stated Ewart Abner[[sp) was not happy that she hired Scherrie on her own since as was stated before they signed their Motown contracts that "none of you are Supremes" and he included Mary in that. Once Motown came through they had contracts with Motown and still worked for Supremes Inc with agreed upon percentages. In 1977 when Mary left Motown was not automatically offering her anything until after she filed her lawsuit against them to the labor commission. Mary knew how important the Supremes name was since even in the press they were using the Supremes name in connection with Diana Ross, yet Motown forbade Florence Ballard from using it and she saw some resulting problems from not capitalizing on that connection. Other record companies probably felt since Ross was chosen that everybody else would not be worth their time since they were not chosen. Jean did end up with 1 LP on A&M and Scherrie had some releases but nothing was befitting their talents and legacy. Mary may have played it safe but she saw the disparity between how Diana was regarded and how the rest of the group was after all of those years. I also don't think a leap for JML to another label would have been successful with the Supremes name and Motown. As far as the legal issues with the name-remember that she signed post 1973 after getting 50% of the name, although the legalese was quite different from that basic premise. Mary was in the group from beginning to end and she loved the group and still felt after leaving it was her legacy and not just Motown. As far as Jean & Mary having issues I just heard a You Tube in 1971 with Jean saying that her and Mary had issues and disagreed. I think if after Gordy had chosen her that the three of them along with Gordy spoke about the plans for the group going forward that maybe Jean would have had a better understanding of the group and her role. Mary even alludes to Gordy perhaps telling Jean it would be a launching pad for a solo career. Mary states in her book that before Jean left she let little things slip that it had. Gordy also met with Mary with Scherrie and told her she gave the other girls too much power and that she had really done it with Jean. Perhaps that was his way to make Mary more assertive. who knows?

jobeterob
11-13-2020, 02:51 PM
Seems all pretty unclear but I will say that the legalese - what actually got signed and what those contracts and documents said - will "trump" [[eeks, sorry for that word) feelings and wishes and hopes.