PDA

View Full Version : The Supremes - "Model of the Year", 1973


test

marybrewster
06-16-2017, 05:30 PM
Question regarding this performance:

Can anyone take a guess why Jean, Mary, and Lynda performed "Touch" for this special? The song didn't fare well when it was released [[with Cindy's vocals) two years earlier in 1971 [[charting at #71); there had been several subsequent releases: "Floy Joy" [[1971: #16), "Automatically Sunshine" [[1972: #37), "Your Wonderful Sweet, Sweet Love" [[1972, #59) that fared better, and while perhaps they didn't chart better, "I Guess I'll Miss the Man" and "Bad Weather" were at least two of their newer releases.

marv2
06-16-2017, 05:34 PM
I don't have a clue, but I remember they sounded nice.

BayouMotownMan
06-16-2017, 05:39 PM
I don't have a clue, but I remember they sounded nice.

At the time of this special Mary knew fully well that Jean was leaving and suspected Lynda would be too.

Jean Terrell demanded to do her solo "He Ain't Heavy" for this show. Since there was no new product coming out on the group Mary attempted to renew interest in Touch and Bad Weather. She shot down Jean's demand in a rare act of rebellion [[Mary had been trying to convince Jean to stay) and told both Jean and Lynda in no uncertain terms that these were the two songs they'd do for this show. Jean knew this was her last performance so she did it.

marybrewster
06-16-2017, 05:45 PM
At the time of this special Mary knew fully well that Jean was leaving and suspected Lynda would be too.

Jean Terrell demanded to do her solo "He Ain't Heavy" for this show. Since there was no new product coming out on the group Mary attempted to renew interest in Touch and Bad Weather. She shot down Jean's demand in a rare act of rebellion [[Mary had been trying to convince Jean to stay) and told both Jean and Lynda in no uncertain terms that these were the two songs they'd do for this show. Jean knew this was her last performance so she did it.

Thank you Bayou!

marybrewster
06-16-2017, 05:46 PM
Has the "Bad Weather" clip from this performance ever surfaced?

bradsupremes
06-16-2017, 09:08 PM
For years it's been said this was filmed at the Ed Sullivan Theatre in New York, but this was filmed at CBS Television City in Los Angeles.

marv2
06-16-2017, 09:32 PM
For years it's been said this was filmed at the Ed Sullivan Theatre in New York, but this was filmed at CBS Television City in Los Angeles.

Yes, I had heard that about the Ed Sullivan Theater. thanks Brad.

Bluebrock
06-17-2017, 02:13 AM
[QUOTE=BayouMotownMan;392922]At the time of this special Mary knew fully well that Jean was leaving and suspected Lynda would be too.

Jean Terrell demanded to do her solo "He Ain't Heavy" for this show. Since there was no new product coming out on the group Mary attempted to renew interest in Touch and Bad Weather. She shot down Jean's demand in a rare act of rebellion [[Mary had been trying to convince Jean to stay) and told both Jean and Lynda in no uncertain terms that these were the two songs they'd do for this show. Jean knew this was her last performance so she did it.[

And therefore all but signalled the end of the Supremes as we knew them.

PeaceNHarmony
06-17-2017, 07:16 AM
[And therefore all but signalled the end of the Supremes as we knew them.[/QUOTE]

Absolutely agree. Surely Mary tried but just did not learn anything about management and marketing even after nearly 15 successful years. I think Jean and Lynda saw the reality of the situation and had therefore decided to leave the 'contract Supremes' and move on. Whether Mary was really trying to 'keep the spirit' of the Supremes or merely cling to a paycheck we'll never know. I may tend toward the latter since she is always advertised as '... of the Supremes' but in fact does not tour simply as The Supremes with any of the many other ladies who tour under the group name. Just my opinion.

Circa 1824
06-17-2017, 09:07 AM
Cocaine ain't free.

daviddh
06-17-2017, 11:05 AM
oops Circa 1824.lol
was this their last performance together?
sad to see the group end on this note but it seems to be the beginning of the end.
poor management and poor decisions,'but talented ladies.
at least Mary picked some talent to be in the group

marv2
06-17-2017, 12:22 PM
[QUOTE=BayouMotownMan;392922]At the time of this special Mary knew fully well that Jean was leaving and suspected Lynda would be too.

Jean Terrell demanded to do her solo "He Ain't Heavy" for this show. Since there was no new product coming out on the group Mary attempted to renew interest in Touch and Bad Weather. She shot down Jean's demand in a rare act of rebellion [[Mary had been trying to convince Jean to stay) and told both Jean and Lynda in no uncertain terms that these were the two songs they'd do for this show. Jean knew this was her last performance so she did it.[

And therefore all but signalled the end of the Supremes as we knew them.

Yeah just long enough for Mary Wilson to recruit that beautiful, luscious powerhouse singer Scherrie Payne,as well as bring back the great Cindy Birdsong and together they sang:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6Hq6HXmsoU

marv2
06-17-2017, 12:25 PM
Let me educate you Bluerock. When Florence Ballard was fired from the Supremes some said that it was the "end of the Supremes" as we knew them. When Diana Ross departed, for some that was the end of the Supremes. Some thought that the group was not the same when Cindy Birdsong left the first time. When Jean Terrell and Lynda Lawrence left, the Supremes were down to one Mary Wilson until she hired Scherrie Payne and brought back Cindy Birdsong. When Cindy left the second, they were never the same again either until Susaye Greene joined and they blew the roof off the sucka! Hi Susaye! LOL!

jim aka jtigre99
06-17-2017, 12:41 PM
Mary wrote about this in Supreme Faith. Nothing new, by this time Jean & Mary were not speaking with each other. Jean & Lynda had been wanting to leave Motown and tried to convince Mary to do so. At the show, Mary said she had asked what songs they wanted to sing since they had no new single to promote and received blank stares as a response. Jean probably thought she would use her solo as a spotlight because she would be leaving. Funny, she did not record until 5 years later though. Mary probably was sensing that she needed to keep some consistency and that she would be the only one there figured to use Touch to spotlight her own vocals, even if the song was not a hit single. It also offered Lynda a chance to sing lead on a few lines. In ways, it was similar to when Mary, Cindy & Scherrie sang on Sonny & Cher they had no new single to promote so they sang All I Want from their last album with Jean, this time with all three also singing lead lines. It may have looked like Mary was flexing her position in the group but she chose something where all three sang lead and the sharing of the lead lines gave the group a real group feeling.

PeaceNHarmony
06-17-2017, 01:07 PM
Mary wrote about this in Supreme Faith. Nothing new, by this time Jean & Mary were not speaking with each other. Jean & Lynda had been wanting to leave Motown and tried to convince Mary to do so. At the show, Mary said she had asked what songs they wanted to sing since they had no new single to promote and received blank stares as a response. Jean probably thought she would use her solo as a spotlight because she would be leaving. Funny, she did not record until 5 years later though. Mary probably was sensing that she needed to keep some consistency and that she would be the only one there figured to use Touch to spotlight her own vocals, even if the song was not a hit single. It also offered Lynda a chance to sing lead on a few lines. In ways, it was similar to when Mary, Cindy & Scherrie sang on Sonny & Cher they had no new single to promote so they sang All I Want from their last album with Jean, this time with all three also singing lead lines. It may have looked like Mary was flexing her position in the group but she chose something where all three sang lead and the sharing of the lead lines gave the group a real group feeling.
I hadn't realized Mary had alienated Jean; she sure had a hard time dealing with lead singers.

luke
06-17-2017, 01:20 PM
Jean and Lynda had alienated Mary. And subsequently Jean alienated the Flos. Good for Mary for saving the group. They were the most successful female group of the 7Os, thanks to Mary Wilson who has kept their legacy alive regardless of who came and went

daviddh
06-17-2017, 01:35 PM
[QUOTE=BayouMotownMan;392922]At the time of this special Mary knew fully well that Jean was leaving and suspected Lynda would be too.

Jean Terrell demanded to do her solo "He Ain't Heavy" for this show. Since there was no new product coming out on the group Mary attempted to renew interest in Touch and Bad Weather. She shot down Jean's demand in a rare act of rebellion [[Mary had been trying to convince Jean to stay) and told both Jean and Lynda in no uncertain terms that these were the two songs they'd do for this show. Jean knew this was her last performance so she did it.[

And therefore all but signalled the end of the Supremes as we knew them.
Bluebrock, wasn't jean under contract for 5 years??? did she violate her contract or was this incorrect info. wonder if Motown had to pay her out of her contract . not sure how that would play out.

daviddh
06-17-2017, 01:37 PM
I do think the JML was a good line up.

marv2
06-17-2017, 01:40 PM
Jean and Lynda had alienated Mary. And subsequently Jean alienated the Flos. Good for Mary for saving the group. They were the most successful female group of the 7Os, thanks to Mary Wilson who has kept their legacy alive regardless of who came and went

Exactly! The Supremes had the most successful track record of any female group in the 70s and when Mary left the group disbanded.

PeaceNHarmony
06-17-2017, 01:42 PM
I do think the JML was a good line up.
They are three talented ladies, that's for sure.

marv2
06-17-2017, 01:42 PM
[QUOTE=Bluebrock;392991]
Bluebrock, wasn't jean under contract for 5 years??? did she violate her contract or was this incorrect info. wonder if Motown had to pay her out of her contract . not sure how that would play out.

Florence Ballard was still under contract when Mr. Gordy fired her. Cindy Birdsong was under contract through 1977 even though she was out of the group for all but a few weeks at the beginning of 1976 and beyond.

luke
06-17-2017, 02:13 PM
I wonder who paid Cindy when She went with Mary to finish though already contracted performances in South America after Mary left the group?

jim aka jtigre99
06-17-2017, 02:17 PM
I think she was still contracted through Mary's Supremes, inc. so there was probably a set percentage from that contract on what she would receive for performing. Mary said in Supreme Faith that she also contacted Lynda, who asked for far too much money.

luke
06-17-2017, 03:33 PM
Oh yea. Thanks

marv2
06-17-2017, 03:40 PM
I wonder who paid Cindy when She went with Mary to finish though already contracted performances in South America after Mary left the group?

I am pretty sure she was paid by Mary through "Mary Wilson Supremes, Inc." or some variation of that name.

marv2
06-17-2017, 03:41 PM
I think she was still contracted through Mary's Supremes, inc. so there was probably a set percentage from that contract on what she would receive for performing. Mary said in Supreme Faith that she also contacted Lynda, who asked for far too much money.

Yes Jim that's right.

PeaceNHarmony
06-17-2017, 06:58 PM
It seems that the group would have done better if Mary had listened to Berry's [[she says) statement 'I wash my hands ...' ) and had started with a new group/label/management somewhere else. Gotta admire her for making a silk purse from a sow's ear for decades, though, and taking any job offered. Many more talented non-lead members of other groups seemingly didn't have Wilson's claws! Good for her.

marv2
06-17-2017, 07:36 PM
It seems that the group would have done better if Mary had listened to Berry's [[she says) statement 'I wash my hands ...' ) and had started with a new group/label/management somewhere else. Gotta admire her for making a silk purse from a sow's ear for decades, though, and taking any job offered. Many more talented non-lead members of other groups seemingly didn't have Wilson's claws! Good for her.

Mary is the bomb! However, I would not describe The Supremes, the greatest female group in history as a "sow ear". They were always the best out there in my opinion.

Bluebrock
06-18-2017, 02:31 AM
Let me educate you Bluerock. When Florence Ballard was fired from the Supremes some said that it was the "end of the Supremes" as we knew them. When Diana Ross departed, for some that was the end of the Supremes. Some thought that the group was not the same when Cindy Birdsong left the first time. When Jean Terrell and Lynda Lawrence left, the Supremes were down to one Mary Wilson until she hired Scherrie Payne and brought back Cindy Birdsong. When Cindy left the second, they were never the same again either until Susaye Greene joined and they blew the roof off the sucka! Hi Susaye! LOL!
However much you try to gloss over the facts by the time Jean and Lynda left the group the general public had all but fallen out of love with the Supremes. They had just one more moderate hit despite making some great records, and their concerts no longer attracted regular large audiences. Didn't they get booed off stage at Madison? Their act was tired despite the immense talents of Scherrie and Susaye. Those two ladies worked their butts off but the chemistry was all wrong and the public would not accept it. They were finished.

PeaceNHarmony
06-18-2017, 08:37 AM
However much you try to gloss over the facts by the time Jean and Lynda left the group the general public had all but fallen out of love with the Supremes. They had just one more moderate hit despite making some great records, and their concerts no longer attracted regular large audiences. Didn't they get booed off stage at Madison? Their act was tired despite the immense talents of Scherrie and Susaye. Those two ladies worked their butts off but the chemistry was all wrong and the public would not accept it. They were finished.
Do you think the last iteration of the group could have had success under another name? As we know the public at large had moved on to other dynamic - and let's face it, younger - groups [[First Choice, The Ritchie Family, Silver Convention etc) and were disinterested in 'The Supremes' who seemed to be 3 different people every time they appeared on TV. 'High Energy' was a terrific LP and I wonder if it could have risen higher on the charts credited to a 'new' group name.

marv2
06-18-2017, 09:11 AM
That would have been rather dumb move. The Supremes were World wide famous whereas those other groups you mentioned were still fighting to become that famous. Why would Mary Wilson and Motown want to throw away a household brand name that they all worked hard to build? The Supremes had more Top 40 Hits than any other female group in the 70s.

I think it is just YOUR perception that there was something wrong with them, the Supremes in the 70s. I am asking this only because it will help me understand why you don't remember how great the Supremes were in the 70s and how Motown dropped the ball promoting them. So, how old are you?

daviddh
06-18-2017, 11:11 AM
just my opinion, Motown didn't just stop promoting them.
berry offered to manage the group twice and Mary turned him down twice. in her book she wrote something to the effect, I Wont Loose Control again" then he washed his hands of the group.
so to her it was about her being in control apparently. she ran the group into the ground. poor management.
now on the other hand, Motown closed down the Detroit location. as a result, many artists,.. producers left behind. see Standing In The Shadows Of Motown . great documentary! and facts.
the last few years they were booed off stage at Madison Square Garden. a show scherrie and susaye didn't want to do but Mary did and insisted on.
the medleys of hits so fast we thought we were at the Kentucky Derby which was a shame since the ladies talented could rock versions of Someday Well Be Together. the over top broadway non sense just were not the supremes. it was slick vegas shumaltz. the show should have been wrapped around the ladies talents.
the last album had some great vocals....You Are The Heart Of Me...
Sweet Dream Machine.etc
there were good moments and and some bad. we are were hoping the ladies would come back. we wanted them to. I'm Gonna Let My Heart.....was a tremendous return to form.
I don't think it fair to blame Motown exactly even though that si what happened. for me its 50 percent Motown and 50 percent Mary Wilson.

marv2
06-18-2017, 12:13 PM
just my opinion, Motown didn't just stop promoting them.
berry offered to manage the group twice and Mary turned him down twice. in her book she wrote something to the effect, I Wont Loose Control again" then he washed his hands of the group.
so to her it was about her being in control apparently. she ran the group into the ground. poor management.
now on the other hand, Motown closed down the Detroit location. as a result, many artists,.. producers left behind. see Standing In The Shadows Of Motown . great documentary! and facts.
the last few years they were booed off stage at Madison Square Garden. a show scherrie and susaye didn't want to do but Mary did and insisted on.
the medleys of hits so fast we thought we were at the Kentucky Derby which was a shame since the ladies talented could rock versions of Someday Well Be Together. the over top broadway non sense just were not the supremes. it was slick vegas shumaltz. the show should have been wrapped around the ladies talents.
the last album had some great vocals....You Are The Heart Of Me...
Sweet Dream Machine.etc
there were good moments and and some bad. we are were hoping the ladies would come back. we wanted them to. I'm Gonna Let My Heart.....was a tremendous return to form.
I don't think it fair to blame Motown exactly even though that si what happened. for me its 50 percent Motown and 50 percent Mary Wilson.


I was around then and Motown DID stop promoting the Supremes. It became more and more difficult to find their records in the stores. Oh I wouldn't even count trade ads place in industry publications like Billboard or Cash Box because those were not generally read by the general public.

Berry offered to manage the group.......HA! LOL!
Berry Gordy also tried to offer Florence Ballard a "solo deal" LOL!!!! What better or easier way to kill off a group than with the first hand approach. When he said "I was my hands of the whole goddamned group" ..........he meant it!

marv2
06-18-2017, 12:16 PM
just my opinion, Motown didn't just stop promoting them.
berry offered to manage the group twice and Mary turned him down twice. in her book she wrote something to the effect, I Wont Loose Control again" then he washed his hands of the group.
so to her it was about her being in control apparently. she ran the group into the ground. poor management.
now on the other hand, Motown closed down the Detroit location. as a result, many artists,.. producers left behind. see Standing In The Shadows Of Motown . great documentary! and facts.
the last few years they were booed off stage at Madison Square Garden. a show scherrie and susaye didn't want to do but Mary did and insisted on.
the medleys of hits so fast we thought we were at the Kentucky Derby which was a shame since the ladies talented could rock versions of Someday Well Be Together. the over top broadway non sense just were not the supremes. it was slick vegas shumaltz. the show should have been wrapped around the ladies talents.
the last album had some great vocals....You Are The Heart Of Me...
Sweet Dream Machine.etc
there were good moments and and some bad. we are were hoping the ladies would come back. we wanted them to. I'm Gonna Let My Heart.....was a tremendous return to form.
I don't think it fair to blame Motown exactly even though that si what happened. for me its 50 percent Motown and 50 percent Mary Wilson.

Your comment about the Richard Nader's Oldies Show at MSG in March 1977 is wrong! None of them were sure if they wanted to do that show or not so they asked us, the fans at the time. They ended doing it for the money and exposure. It did not work which further made Mr. Ferrer determined to have Mary go solo! The group was not split over whether or not they should have done that particular show.

PeaceNHarmony
06-18-2017, 02:40 PM
just my opinion, Motown didn't just stop promoting them.
berry offered to manage the group twice and Mary turned him down twice. in her book she wrote something to the effect, I Wont Loose Control again" then he washed his hands of the group.
so to her it was about her being in control apparently. she ran the group into the ground. poor management.
now on the other hand, Motown closed down the Detroit location. as a result, many artists,.. producers left behind. see Standing In The Shadows Of Motown . great documentary! and facts.
the last few years they were booed off stage at Madison Square Garden. a show scherrie and susaye didn't want to do but Mary did and insisted on.
the medleys of hits so fast we thought we were at the Kentucky Derby which was a shame since the ladies talented could rock versions of Someday Well Be Together. the over top broadway non sense just were not the supremes. it was slick vegas shumaltz. the show should have been wrapped around the ladies talents.
the last album had some great vocals....You Are The Heart Of Me...
Sweet Dream Machine.etc
there were good moments and and some bad. we are were hoping the ladies would come back. we wanted them to. I'm Gonna Let My Heart.....was a tremendous return to form.
I don't think it fair to blame Motown exactly even though that si what happened. for me its 50 percent Motown and 50 percent Mary Wilson.
50/50 seems a fair assessment. I never bought the 'no label support'; it's the last refuge of anyone who had a bomb. Not to mention that the group seemed to be on TV all the time.

luke
06-18-2017, 03:45 PM
As a number of authors have said how would it look if Berrys pearl was overshadowed by her former group...just a thought!

marv2
06-18-2017, 04:42 PM
As a number of authors have said how would it look if Berrys pearl was overshadowed by her former group...just a thought!

For a while they did over shadow her. I believe that's when Motown began to slowly pull their support from the Supremes. Some people were just not old enough or even born when all things were going on so they don't know and don't understand what happened. It is up to us Luke, us "oid timers" to teach the young un's LOL!!!!

luke
06-18-2017, 05:01 PM
lol exactly. I think that's part of reason why New Ways album didn't succeed. They were off to too fast a start!

marv2
06-18-2017, 05:19 PM
lol exactly. I think that's part of reason why New Ways album didn't succeed. They were off to too fast a start!

The Supremes were burning it up back then after a sluggish late 60s period.

Bluebrock
06-19-2017, 02:31 AM
I hadn't realized Mary had alienated Jean; she sure had a hard time dealing with lead singers.
She also had a hard time dealing with other members. There is one name that sticks out like a sore thumb when it comes to the in house feuding in every Supremes line up.

Bluebrock
06-19-2017, 02:34 AM
Do you think the last iteration of the group could have had success under another name? As we know the public at large had moved on to other dynamic - and let's face it, younger - groups [[First Choice, The Ritchie Family, Silver Convention etc) and were disinterested in 'The Supremes' who seemed to be 3 different people every time they appeared on TV. 'High Energy' was a terrific LP and I wonder if it could have risen higher on the charts credited to a 'new' group name.
It is quite possible. The ladies still had much to offer but the public were no longer interested.

Bluebrock
06-19-2017, 02:38 AM
The Supremes were burning it up back then after a sluggish late 60s period.
They were indeed, but too much product in too short a time, and some poor choices as singles did not help their cause.

Bluebrock
06-19-2017, 02:44 AM
[QUOTE=daviddh;393225]just my opinion, Motown didn't just stop promoting them.
berry offered to manage the group twice and Mary turned him down twice. in her book she wrote something to the effect, I Wont Loose Control again" then he washed his hands of the group.
so to her it was about her being in control apparently. she ran the group into the ground. poor management.
now on the other hand, Motown closed down the Detroit location. as a result, many artists,.. producers left behind. see Standing In The Shadows Of Motown . great documentary! and facts.
the last few years they were booed off stage at Madison Square Garden. a show scherrie and susaye didn't want to do but Mary did and insisted on.
the medleys of hits so fast we thought we were at the Kentucky Derby which was a shame since the ladies talented could rock versions of Someday Well Be Together. the over top broadway non sense just were not the supremes. it was slick vegas shumaltz. the show should have been wrapped around the ladies talents.
the last album had some great vocals....You Are The Heart Of Me...
Sweet Dream Machine.etc
there were good moments and and some bad. we are were hoping the ladies would come back. we wanted them to. I'm Gonna Let My Heart.....was a tremendous return to form.
I don't think it fair to blame Motown exactly even though that si what happened. for me its 50 percent Motown and 50 percent Mary Wilson.[/QUOTE
Some good points there. Mary seemed to think she was more important than she really was. Had she been as valuable as she seemed to think she was Berry would have promoted her to lead singer when Diana left, but we all knew she was not good enough to take on that responsibility at that time. As sales began to slide Berry probably thought she and the group were more trouble than they were worth. I think your 50/50 assessment is spot on.

PeaceNHarmony
06-19-2017, 07:57 AM
She also had a hard time dealing with other members. There is one name that sticks out like a sore thumb when it comes to the in house feuding in every Supremes line up.
Interesting; I didn't follow the revolving-door members after Jean left [[though I did like some of the records). This could answer my question about why Mary does not tour with-and-as 'The Supremes', ie: the other ladies simply get along better without her.

Bluebrock
06-19-2017, 02:39 PM
Interesting; I didn't follow the revolving-door members after Jean left [[though I did like some of the records). This could answer my question about why Mary does not tour with-and-as 'The Supremes', ie: the other ladies simply get along better without her.
Yes they do. Whatever certain people on here claim Mary is not well regarded or respected by several former Supremes.

detmotownguy
06-19-2017, 02:52 PM
Yes they do. Whatever certain people on here claim Mary is not well regarded or respected by several former Supremes. Well we know that Scherrie and Cindy get along. I heard Susaye compliment Mary during an recent interview. So that would leave Diane Lynda and Jean.

marv2
06-19-2017, 03:08 PM
Well we know that Scherrie and Cindy get along. I heard Susaye compliment Mary during an recent interview. So that would leave Diane Lynda and Jean.

There are no problems with Jean either.

luke
06-19-2017, 03:49 PM
Susaye asked fans to encourage Mary to do at least a brief reunion with the 70s Suoremes a couple of years ago. Scherrie and Mary are in touch with each other and Jean and all of the ladies except Lynda came to Mary's talk last year per Rock and Roll hall of fame i think it was ,in LA

Roberta75
06-19-2017, 05:34 PM
Well we know that Scherrie and Cindy get along. I heard Susaye compliment Mary during an recent interview. So that would leave Diane Lynda and Jean.

Mary always says she loves Diane she always refer to Diane as her sister.

detmotownguy
06-19-2017, 08:54 PM
Susaye asked fans to encourage Mary to do at least a brief reunion with the 70s Suoremes a couple of years ago. Scherrie and Mary are in touch with each other and Jean and all of the ladies except Lynda came to Mary's talk last year per Rock and Roll hall of fame i think it was ,in LA So how do we get several Supremes who don't respect or hold Mary in high regard?

PeaceNHarmony
06-19-2017, 09:00 PM
... I think the fact that they appeared on 'Model of the Year' says it all!

marv2
06-19-2017, 09:12 PM
So how do we get several Supremes who don't respect or hold Mary in high regard?

You get that from people that wished that were the case. Mary is very popular and well liked among her peers.

luke
06-19-2017, 09:32 PM
Exactly Mr Marv! Are we typing in English?lol

RanRan79
06-19-2017, 09:48 PM
Whether Mary was really trying to 'keep the spirit' of the Supremes or merely cling to a paycheck we'll never know.

I think it was both. Mary was smart enough to recognize that what she was doing was real work. Who doesn't want a check? Especially after seeing what Florence went through, falling on hard times. She was going to do what she needed to do to keep a check and I don't blame her. But I also think there was a part of her that was attached to the Supremes- even the idea of it- in a way that Diana and Flo were not, and as such she did- and is- the keeper of the flame.

marv2
06-19-2017, 09:50 PM
Exactly Mr Marv! Are we typing in English?lol

Yes, we are typing in English, but they only read in Ross-language! LOL!!!!

RanRan79
06-19-2017, 09:54 PM
I hadn't realized Mary had alienated Jean; she sure had a hard time dealing with lead singers.

The only lead singers she seemed to have a problem with were Diana and Jean, and the two situations can't be compared. Her problems with Diana were also seen through the eyes of someone who was Diana's peer. They started this thing together and when Diana's ego got out of control I can imagine Mary often taking exception, and she should have. Jean is a different story. After Diana left they may have all been "equal" but Mary was the leader of that group, and she should have been based on seniority alone. I know that if I were in Mary's shoes I would have seen myself that way and I would have wanted Jean to defer to me when necessary. Jean obviously wasn't that type and there you have the conflict. But I don't think it's fair to say Mary had a problem with lead singers. She didn't seem to have one with Scherrie.

RanRan79
06-19-2017, 11:06 PM
[QUOTE=Bluebrock;392991]
Bluebrock, wasn't jean under contract for 5 years??? did she violate her contract or was this incorrect info. wonder if Motown had to pay her out of her contract . not sure how that would play out.

Wasn't there a situation where there was no contract for the Supremes for a period of time? Wasn't Scherrie hired by Mary during that time? If that's the case, did Jean and Lynda leave when the group's contract was up? If so, at that point I would think there would be no reason for Motown to buy Jean or Lynda out.

New question: do Jean and Lynda received Supremes royalties?

RanRan79
06-19-2017, 11:10 PM
Do you think the last iteration of the group could have had success under another name? As we know the public at large had moved on to other dynamic - and let's face it, younger - groups [[First Choice, The Ritchie Family, Silver Convention etc) and were disinterested in 'The Supremes' who seemed to be 3 different people every time they appeared on TV. 'High Energy' was a terrific LP and I wonder if it could have risen higher on the charts credited to a 'new' group name.

Maybe, but I'm not convinced, mostly because I just don't think the MSS had good chemistry. I guess they could've made some noise under a new name but I don't think they could have ever set themselves apart from the other acts you mentioned and would have eventually [[quickly?) faded away anyway. IMO the grouping that should have left and rebranded themselves was JML. I do not doubt that with all the right elements JML would have been more successful than JMC.

RanRan79
06-19-2017, 11:27 PM
As a number of authors have said how would it look if Berrys pearl was overshadowed by her former group...just a thought!

I don't believe the Supremes would have EVER sustained any "overshadowing" of Ross. That was a force that was going to be no matter what. But I'd bet money that the thought of Ross falling flat and the Supremes' success continuing on made Gordy sick to his stomach. Lol At the same time I find it difficult to believe that he would stop the Supremes' money train to make Diana look good, especially when his goal was for her music career to take a backseat to her acting. I think he washed his hands of the group like Mary said he did. I don't buy for a second that the other powers at the label did the same thing. As good as the Supremes were in the 70s talent wise, their musical output just wasn't knocking the public out. As I've come to find out, thanks to the internet and especially Youtube, they were on television ALL THE TIME performing those songs and it still didn't help. Their records were packaged and shipped out to stores just like everyone else's records, which is why you can walk into any record shop in the country and pick up all those old albums and 45s, and why those records aren't on anyone's "rarity" lists...because they were out there in abundance. It's just that people weren't knocking down record store doors to purchase some of those singles.

RanRan79
06-19-2017, 11:38 PM
So how do we get several Supremes who don't respect or hold Mary in high regard?

I find it difficult to believe that all of those ladies are holding on to past problems. Not saying that they aren't, just that I find it hard to believe. True, it's entirely possible that not all of them are interested in maintaining either professional or personal relationships with Mary or any others. That's life. But I doubt they don't have respect for Mary and she for them. I think there are a lot of "fans" who are invested in the Supremes hating each other, including Diana and Mary, but the ladies themselves are not interested in such nonsense, including Diana and Mary.

thanxal
06-20-2017, 05:58 AM
I think there are a lot of "fans" who are invested in the Supremes hating each other, including Diana and Mary, but the ladies themselves are not interested in such nonsense, including Diana and Mary.

RanRan, you're on a roll with the good observations today. I would only add that there are many fans also not interested in such nonsense.

BayouMotownMan
06-20-2017, 09:37 AM
Excellent observation RanRan. The ladies don't have such problems between each other nearly as much as fans portray it to be. The surviving Supremes are moms and grandmothers now and they focus most of their attention on family and simply survival. They are in or close to their 7th decade of life and they must deal with the issues of anyone going into advanced years of living. Most of the problems occurred over 40 years ago.

marv2
06-20-2017, 11:59 AM
[QUOTE=daviddh;393080]

Wasn't there a situation where there was no contract for the Supremes for a period of time? Wasn't Scherrie hired by Mary during that time? If that's the case, did Jean and Lynda leave when the group's contract was up? If so, at that point I would think there would be no reason for Motown to buy Jean or Lynda out.

New question: do Jean and Lynda received Supremes royalties?

Jean does. What would Lynda receive royalties from? "Bad Weather" and "Produced by Jimmy Webb"? "Live in Japan"?

luke
06-20-2017, 12:27 PM
Lolol. That cracked me up!!

marv2
06-20-2017, 04:48 PM
Lolol. That cracked me up!!

I'm just sayin'...............hehehehehehehehehe!

BayouMotownMan
06-20-2017, 05:48 PM
[QUOTE=RanRan79;393457]

Jean does. What would Lynda receive royalties from? "Bad Weather" and "Produced by Jimmy Webb"? "Live in Japan"?

Wrong as usual. The only Supremes to receive royalties are Diana and Mary. The main cause of Jean's bitterness is that she signed away future royalties when she negotiated her release from Motown in 1974. When re-issues of her product with the Supremes came out Jean was invited to participate in these releases and she declined because she receives no remuneration.

Other 70s Supremes, also not receiving royalties from re-issues graciously participated in annotations of their body of work.

marv2
06-20-2017, 07:03 PM
[QUOTE=marv2;393542]

Wrong as usual. The only Supremes to receive royalties are Diana and Mary. The main cause of Jean's bitterness is that she signed away future royalties when she negotiated her release from Motown in 1974. When re-issues of her product with the Supremes came out Jean was invited to participate in these releases and she declined because she receives no remuneration.

Other 70s Supremes, also not receiving royalties from re-issues graciously participated in annotations of their body of work.

I hate having to keep doing this and from now on I am just going to let you go around stupid. Jean Terrell sued and had her royalties reinstated in 1994!

RanRan79
06-20-2017, 08:57 PM
RanRan, you're on a roll with the good observations today. I would only add that there are many fans also not interested in such nonsense.

Absolutely Thanxal. I like to think that the messy fans are just a very vocal minority.

RanRan79
06-20-2017, 09:00 PM
Jean does. What would Lynda receive royalties from? "Bad Weather" and "Produced by Jimmy Webb"? "Live in Japan"?

LOL...well yeah! I'm not well versed in the way royalties are worked out, but wouldn't Lynda receive royalties from any compilation that included her work with the Supremes? So for instance, would Lynda receive royalties from the 70s Anthology?

marv2
06-20-2017, 09:06 PM
LOL...well yeah! I'm not well versed in the way royalties are worked out, but wouldn't Lynda receive royalties from any compilation that included her work with the Supremes? So for instance, would Lynda receive royalties from the 70s Anthology?

Uh no if you knew what I knew. LOL! She's lucky if they are not still charging her for studio time from all those years ago.

luke
06-20-2017, 09:59 PM
I remember that lawsuit Marv. I do believe it was a collective one and Jean joined The Vandellas as well and WON!

marv2
06-20-2017, 10:11 PM
I remember that lawsuit Marv. I do believe it was a collective one and Jean joined The Vandellas as well and WON!

I've even seen her royalty statement. It showed expenses in the thousands of dollars they claimed that they were still recouping from Jean's royalties. I mean they were billing her for recordings that were never released and everything from wigs to eyelashes and all kinds of assorted bullshit! It was amazing!

BayouMotownMan
06-21-2017, 01:29 PM
[QUOTE=BayouMotownMan;393583]

I hate having to keep doing this and from now on I am just going to let you go around stupid. Jean Terrell sued and had her royalties reinstated in 1994!

The only one stupid here is you Marv and you prove it time after time.

Jean Terrell initiated a lawsuit against Motown but did NOT see it through. She dropped it. Therefore no judgment was made on her behalf.

When Universal was preparing her box set [[This Is The Story), I as well as one of the producers spoke to Jean about participating. She said that she doesn't work without being paid. I tried to reason with her that she could promote her DVD in exchange for observations about her work but even that didn't phase her.

Whatever royalties Jean Terrell received as a Supreme would have been collected in the early 70s, and that could not have amounted to much. One of Jean's reasons for leaving the group was about the money, or lack of it.

marv2
06-21-2017, 03:08 PM
[QUOTE=marv2;393595]

The only one stupid here is you Marv and you prove it time after time.

Jean Terrell initiated a lawsuit against Motown but did NOT see it through. She dropped it. Therefore no judgment was made on her behalf.

When Universal was preparing her box set [[This Is The Story), I as well as one of the producers spoke to Jean about participating. She said that she doesn't work without being paid. I tried to reason with her that she could promote her DVD in exchange for observations about her work but even that didn't phase her.

Whatever royalties Jean Terrell received as a Supreme would have been collected in the early 70s, and that could not have amounted to much. One of Jean's reasons for leaving the group was about the money, or lack of it.

She did not drop that lawsuit and I am done messing around with you since you have decided to take the dishonest route.

BayouMotownMan
06-21-2017, 03:16 PM
Check your meds Marvin. You've never spoken to Jean Terrell in your life

blackguy69
06-21-2017, 03:57 PM
[QUOTE=BayouMotownMan;393724]

Marv I think you're wrong on this account. Unless you can prove that she got her royalties other than just saying it, then you need to accept it.

She did not drop that lawsuit and I am done messing around with you since you have decided to take the dishonest route.

PeaceNHarmony
06-21-2017, 04:25 PM
Check your meds Marvin. You've never spoken to Jean Terrell in your life
You made me snort my iced tea ;)

detmotownguy
06-21-2017, 07:37 PM
[QUOTE=PeaceNHarmony;393759]You made me snort my iced tea ;)[/QUOTE If the Supremes saga was created into a mini series I am not sure there could be an end to it.

PeaceNHarmony
06-22-2017, 08:30 AM
[QUOTE=marv2;393595]

The only one stupid here is you Marv and you prove it time after time.

Jean Terrell initiated a lawsuit against Motown but did NOT see it through. She dropped it. Therefore no judgment was made on her behalf.

When Universal was preparing her box set [[This Is The Story), I as well as one of the producers spoke to Jean about participating. She said that she doesn't work without being paid. I tried to reason with her that she could promote her DVD in exchange for observations about her work but even that didn't phase her.

Whatever royalties Jean Terrell received as a Supreme would have been collected in the early 70s, and that could not have amounted to much. One of Jean's reasons for leaving the group was about the money, or lack of it.
Hey BMM - Did you ever get to see Jean's DVD? I tried many times, following countless tips and links, and was never able to secure a copy.

BayouMotownMan
06-22-2017, 08:58 AM
[QUOTE=BayouMotownMan;393724]
Hey BMM - Did you ever get to see Jean's DVD? I tried many times, following countless tips and links, and was never able to secure a copy.
I helped Jean make the DVD. You might try asking Saundra Newman for a copy, she is on Facebook.

waynesville
06-22-2017, 04:21 PM
[QUOTE=PeaceNHarmony;393895]
I helped Jean make the DVD. You might try asking Saundra Newman for a copy, she is on Facebook.

Thanks for that tip - Ive been trying to get hold of Jean's DVD too and its totally unavailable..

PeaceNHarmony
06-23-2017, 12:15 PM
[QUOTE=PeaceNHarmony;393895]
I helped Jean make the DVD. You might try asking Saundra Newman for a copy, she is on Facebook.
Thanks, as well. I'll try -