Grammys have no plans to broadcast tributes to Natalie Cole or Maurice White

[luke]

Per NY Post. Unlike planned full scale tributes to Glenn Frey and David Bowie. Cole and White will be part of a video package tribute. And life achievement award for Run-DMC Wil not be televised. Due to pressure something for Maurice White may be done. "It's still in limbo."one music industry source said "people are afraid to speak on it but there's a history of them not acknowledging black artists."

[marv2]

Per NY Post. Unlike planned full scale tributes to Glenn Frey and David Bowie. Cole and White will be part of a video package tribute. And life achievement award for Run-DMC Wil not be televised. Due to pressure something for Maurice White may be done. "It's still in limbo."one music industry source said "people are afraid to speak on it but there's a history of them not acknowledging black artists."

They will have plenty of time for "special crap" designed to stir up controversy though. I am not watching the Grammys!

[Jerry Oz]

I'm not watching them. I'm a fan of Bowie and Frey, but Maurice White and Natalie Cole took their hardware home and deserve more than a mention of being among the artists who passed since last year.

[marv2]

I'm not watching them. I'm a fan of Bowie and Frey, but Maurice White and Natalie Cole took their hardware home and deserve more than a mention of being among the artists who passed since last year.

I loved and respected all of those artists. The problem is the Grammys doesn't!

[reese]

I guess it remains to be seen. I saw a commercial for the Grammys this morning and they showed footage of Maurice. I was in another room, so I didn't hear the audio. It may have been a promo for the Lifetime Achievement Award that EWF is slated to receive. But it still seems more than what most lifetime achievement award recipients get.

[thomas96]

Never cared for the Grammy's, Academy Awards, etc. Too bad they won't do a tribute to Ms. Cole and Mr. White, but they won't be getting my view.

[daddyacey]

The Grammy's have become a horse and pony show after the late 70's IMO. Maybe because I'm 60 and from whatI remember the Grammy was based on a combination of sales , popularity and talent. Then it was a different time in music , the media it was available on [[which were records and tapes and later CD's) and airplay. Records suffered back in the 70's with the oil crisis and then in the 80's they shoved the Digital CD's down the public's throat. I remember how I was amazed when you couldn't get releases on vinyl at all. With CD's on the way out ,there's nothing but numbers of downloads and ring tones . Grammy's today are based too much on hype because the music today is so saturated with "Showbiz". Tits ,ass and sales will get you a Grammy. They would be better off backtracking and giving the artists that should have got Grammy's back in the day and didn't and educating the kids so they know better than to think that Kanye West discovered Paul M. The Grammy's need to change with the times BUT also represent and educate the history of music. To not honor White and Ms Cole as icons in a respectful fashion is disrespectful to me because they both were artists who made music history during the period when the big 3 record companies took over the Black Music market. It {GRAMMY} just don't carry the respect it once had with me. If I remember when it's on I might flip back and forth but the Grammy's now just make me enjoy my collection of real music i collected over the years.

[splanky]

I haven't cared about the Grammys in over 25 years. I don't even need them to acknowledge
Maurice and Natalie for me to celebrate their legacies. F##k em....

[soulster]

What can you expect from an industry run by White men?

[ralpht]

Cheap shot Soulster.

[soulster]

Cheap shot Soulster. No, it's not intended to be a cheap shot, but it's a cold hard fact. Allow me to explain why:

I'm not saying that the industry doesn't care, but the perception is that David Bowie and Glenn Frey are more visible, better known, and more popular than Maurice White or Natalie Cole. They are better known to the majority who run the industry and the Academy. And, most of the people in charge of the Academy are, well, White men, and that's what they are more familiar with. That is why Frey and Bowie get special attention, while the other two are lumped in together. I get David Bowie, but there's no way that Glenn Frey did more, and was more important than Maurice White.

[luke]

As reported due to criticisms they may come up with something for Maurice, or maybe even Natalie I'm thinking.

[ralpht]

Its the "white guy" remark that offended me. I'm White. Do you include me in their category?

[soulster]

Its the "white guy" remark that offended me. I'm White. Do you include me in their category?

I know you're White, and of course not! I overreacted. Sorry 'bout that.

What irks me is that Earth, Wind & Fire were the same status as The Eagles and David Bowie as far as chart and sales success is concerned, so why they wouldn't give Mr. White as much exposure as the other two is upsetting. During the 70s, Glenn Frey only worked within his band. Maurice White was a drummer for Chess Records in the 60s who played on major hits, had his own band with whom he wrote, produced, and performed, including several other artists. His sound influenced many other artists. On top of all that, Frey isn't the best liked person, and had a reputation for being a real dick to some of his bandmates. One viewing of the second DVD of their documentary will show that.

Update: It appears that EWF is on the Grammys tonight, so that NY Post is wrong. I should know not to trust anything in the NY Post!

[Bluebrock]

I haven't watched the grammys but did they have a proper tribute to Maurice White and Natalie Cole? I saw a clip of a tribute to Lemmy from Motorhead. No disrespect to the guy but he is not even in the same universe as Maurice and Natalie as far as talent is concerned.
Just my opinion of course. I have no problem with Bowie and Glenn Frey. Both major talents in my opinion . Also BB King.
You are never going to please everyone whatever their colour and creed.

[luke]

Grammy bowed to pressure and did a brief tribute song led by Stevie Wonder for Maurice.

[skooldem1]

Nothing but fake premature outrage.

[reese]

I haven't watched the grammys but did they have a proper tribute to Maurice White and Natalie Cole? I saw a clip of a tribute to Lemmy from Motorhead. No disrespect to the guy but he is not even in the same universe as Maurice and Natalie as far as talent is concerned.
Just my opinion of course. I have no problem with Bowie and Glenn Frey. Both major talents in my opinion . Also BB King.
You are never going to please everyone whatever their colour and creed.

As written above, Steve Wonder and Pentatonix did a nice version of THAT'S THE WAY OF THE WORLD as a tribute to Maurice. Later, EWF mentioned Maurice before they presented the Album of the Year award.

Natalie didn't get a separate tribute. She was the final person shown in the IN MEMORIAM segment.

[marv2]

Look what I found. Maurice and Natalie in 1978:

11113

[Bluebrock]

As written above, Steve Wonder and Pentatonix did a nice version of THAT'S THE WAY OF THE WORLD as a tribute to Maurice. Later, EWF mentioned Maurice before they presented the Album of the Year award.

Natalie didn't get a separate tribute. She was the final person shown in the IN MEMORIAM segment.
Thanks for that. The grammys are shown here in the UK but it is many years since I tuned in and I don't think I will be bothering this year.

[reese]

Thanks for that. The grammys are shown here in the UK but it is many years since I tuned in and I don't think I will be bothering this year.

I have to say that IMO, it was a really good show. Only five or so awards were actually presented during the telecast. The majority of the show was performances, and most were good. I even enjoyed performances by artists I had never heard of.

[soulster]

Here's a good rundown of the night, and it wasn't from the NY Post!

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/posts/la-et-ms-grammy-awards-results-winners-losers-performances-20160215-story.html

[Roberta75]

I have to say that IMO, it was a really good show. Only five or so awards were actually presented during the telecast. The majority of the show was performances, and most were good. I even enjoyed performances by artists I had never heard of.

Me too Reese I loved Alabama shakes and Lamar and Gagas tribute to David Bowie and Adele. I thought it was a top notch show and real nice to see Nile Rogers with Adele.

fondly,

Roberta

[StuBass1]

I had the opportunity to experience firsthand some of the workings of NARAS as pertains to the Grammys. I was heavily involved in the awarding of a Lifetime Achievement Award to The Funk Brothers several years ago from the inception of the honor to it's successful conclusion. The people I dealt with at NARAS were quite welcoming to the concept, despite the fact that The Funk Brothers were not a group that were widely known and had no recorded titles under their name, yet the upper level staff had all seen the SITSOM documentary and helped me along the path for the ensemble to garner that honor. They were even convinced to give the Funk Brothers a slot for an appearance on the main telecast and had planned a segment for it. It was a certain [[unnamed) black star performer who refused to participate, while another performer [[happened to be white) who readily agreed to take part. Due to the fact that the one performer refused...they cancelled the segment and instead did a tribute to Luther Vandeross [[who was still alive at the time). I received a very nice letter from Neil Portnow...the head guy at NARAS expressing his appreciation of The Funk Brothers and his disappointment that the appearance didn't come off...but the failure wasn't due to NARAS...it was a certain performer and The Funk Brothers management who blew the whole deal. I did find the people at NARAS to be quite diverse and inclusive in their actions and behavior, perhaps unlike some other entertainment industry organizations...not passing judgement on all that...but passing judgement on NARAS due to the fact that someones favorite performer was somehow "dissed" is in my opinion unfair...You can't please all the people all the time...

[marv2]

I had the opportunity to experience firsthand some of the workings of NARAS as pertains to the Grammys. I was heavily involved in the awarding of a Lifetime Achievement Award to The Funk Brothers several years ago from the inception of the honor to it's successful conclusion. The people I dealt with at NARAS were quite welcoming to the concept, despite the fact that The Funk Brothers were not a group that were widely known and had no recorded titles under their name, yet the upper level staff had all seen the SITSOM documentary and helped me along the path for the ensemble to garner that honor. They were even convinced to give the Funk Brothers a slot for an appearance on the main telecast and had planned a segment for it. It was a certain [[unnamed) black star performer who refused to participate, while another performer [[happened to be white) who readily agreed to take part. Due to the fact that the one performer refused...they cancelled the segment and instead did a tribute to Luther Vandeross [[who was still alive at the time). I received a very nice letter from Neil Portnow...the head guy at NARAS expressing his appreciation of The Funk Brothers and his disappointment that the appearance didn't come off...but the failure wasn't due to NARAS...it was a certain performer and The Funk Brothers management who blew the whole deal. I did find the people at NARAS to be quite diverse and inclusive in their actions and behavior, perhaps unlike some other entertainment industry organizations...not passing judgement on all that...but passing judgement on NARAS due to the fact that someones favorite performer was somehow "dissed" is in my opinion unfair...You can't please all the people all the time...

Stu, I heard that Diana Ross and Stevie Wonder were approached to participate in the SITSOM documentary and both declined for failed to respond at all.

[StuBass1]

Stu, I heard that Diana Ross and Stevie Wonder were approached to participate in the SITSOM documentary and both declined for failed to respond at all.

As far as the documentary is concerned, yes...I understand that both of those artists and several others were invited to participate including some musicians who also declined for various reasons. I don't see problem with them declining to participate in what was a for profit project, albeit designed to honor The Funk Brothers...That said...it was disappointing that a legendary artist refused to participate in an honor [[Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award)...particularly an artist who's career was greatly enhanced by their association with the Motown musicians...Nuff said on that...Had the Grammy segment come off, I have little doubt that it would have led to additional financial security for the surviving Funk Brothers, as well as the families of the deceased, just based on the national exposure and connections they would have made at the various associated festivities and the telecast, which coincidentally was themed "Funk Music" that year...BTW...For The Funk Brothers Hollywood Walk of Fame honor...Initially we tentatively had Chaka Khan lined up as a guest speaker, but that fell through when she had another commitment to fulfl that day. We did reach out to Diana Ross and she sent a nice note, however, she was performing in Europe that day...Stevie did come through at the last moment and did a very nice job, along with Mickey Stevenson when I asked him, and Ray Parker Jr who helped raise the funds to put the event over the finish line. Stevie also came to our afterparty and performed for the guests...

[luke]

Why on earth would performers not want to appear with them??

[StuBass1]

Why on earth would performers not want to appear with them??
We couldn't figure that out...I called the individuals management and they told me that the individual was performing elsewhere that week...I later found that to be not true, and in fact, that artist did a benefit performance in Los Angeles the very week of the Grammys. I suspect it was likely a problem that had developed between that artist and The Funk Brothers management unknown to me at the time...

[marv2]

We couldn't figure that out...I called the individuals management and they told me that the individual was performing elsewhere that week...I later found that to be not true, and in fact, that artist did a benefit performance in Los Angeles the very week of the Grammys. I suspect it was likely a problem that had developed between that artist and The Funk Brothers management unknown to me at the time...

I know Mary Wilson attended both premiers of SITSOM and performed with the Funks at one of them.

[StuBass1]

That's true...Following the SITSOM documentary, The Funk Brothers embarked on several tours across the US and Europe...The original lineup of guest artists were Joan Osborn, Darlene Love, Maxi Priest, and I believe Montel Jordan. Darius Rucker [[Hootie & The Blowfish), and Jim Gilstrap took on the male leads at one point. The Philly backup singers, mainly Johnnie Ingram and Carla Benson also did those tours. Later on, other artists would join their tours, including Mary Wilson, Issac Hayes, and some others did some performances here and in Europe...

[soulster]

Now you have us all wondering who it was.

[StuBass1]

Now you have us all wondering who it was.

LOL...Won't say!!!...But the artist who happily agreed to do the segment with The Funks was Michael McDonald...

[reese]

That's true...Following the SITSOM documentary, The Funk Brothers embarked on several tours across the US and Europe...The original lineup of guest artists were Joan Osborn, Darlene Love, Maxi Priest, and I believe Montel Jordan. Darius Rucker [[Hootie & The Blowfish), and Jim Gilstrap took on the male leads at one point. The Philly backup singers, mainly Johnnie Ingram and Carla Benson also did those tours. Later on, other artists would join their tours, including Mary Wilson, Issac Hayes, and some others did some performances here and in Europe...

I saw one of these concerts and it was one of the best shows I ever attended. I can still remember the loud ovation Joan Osborne received after WHAT BECOMES OF THE BROKENHEARTED. Originally the ads had Mavis Staples taking part as well, but she ended up being replaced by Darlene Love, who sang MY GUY right to me.

[luke]

Huge uproar on daytime TV about lack of tribute to Natalie

[Jerry Oz]

This was worth mentioning and being reported, but ultimately it is not something for most of us to fret over. You cannot demand respect, especially now that the event has passed, and it's embarrassing to have to do so. The lack of a tribute doesn't diminish her accomplishments or the significance of her life. I believe that most of those who have an opinion think she should have been given more than a mention, but in the grand scheme it doesn't matter.

[timmyfunk]

Gotta side with Soulster on this one. It's a simple fact. The Grammy are run primarily by white men. Maurice White's influence on American popular easily matches Bowie and certainly surpasses Glenn Frey. The Grammys have been criticized by many other media outlets for being way too safe when awarding in the big categories. Taylor Swift's win over Kendrick Lamar is just another blatant example. The Grammys in many ways possesses the same problem that the Oscars have. And before anyone mentions that the Oscars president is a Black woman, also be reminded that the judges are mainly white. The entire entertainment industry is in need of serious overhaul.
11118

[timmyfunk]

Nevermind the fact that Cynthia Robinson of Sly and The Family Stone was also completely overlooked in the memoriam part of the show. That is absolutely inexcusable.

[marv2]

Nevermind the fact that Cynthia Robinson of Sly and The Family Stone was also completely overlooked in the memoriam part of the show. That is absolutely inexcusable.

Really? I did not watch. They left out Cynthia? Ridiculous.

[timmyfunk]

And insulting.

[Jerry Oz]

Gotta side with Soulster on this one. It's a simple fact. The Grammy are run primarily by white men. Maurice White's influence on American popular easily matches Bowie and certainly surpasses Glenn Frey. The Grammys have been criticized by many other media outlets for being way too safe when awarding in the big categories. Taylor Swift's win over Kendrick Lamar is just another blatant example. The Grammys in many ways possesses the same problem that the Oscars have. And before anyone mentions that the Oscars president is a Black woman, also be reminded that the judges are mainly white. The entire entertainment industry is in need of serious overhaul.

Well, consider that Caucasian men are ~30% of the population, yet they hold probably 80% of elected positions, judgeships, company management positions, etc. And more than half of the other 20% are held by White women. We cannot effect change because we don't have the power to force it.

[luke]

Well it's forcing the academy awards to significantly add more diversity to its membership. And after the Grammys I'm sure the reaction to the dis of Natalie cole is being heard. If we all kept our mouths shut nothing would change.

[timmyfunk]

Well it's forcing the academy awards to significantly add more diversity to its membership. And after the Grammys I'm sure the reaction to the dis of Natalie cole is being heard. If we all kept our mouths shut nothing would change.

Exactly luke. We've affected change in almost every aspect of American Society regardless of how many whites were in the picture . The Grammys need to be the next target.

[soulster]

Well it's forcing the academy awards to significantly add more diversity to its membership. And after the Grammys I'm sure the reaction to the dis of Natalie cole is being heard. If we all kept our mouths shut nothing would change. That's exactly what they wish we would do is keep our mouths shut!

[soulster]

Really? I did not watch. They left out Cynthia? Ridiculous. This further demonstrates my point. Ralph may have been insulted, and i'm sorry he was, but the cold fact is that generally people go with what they know, and most white people just don't know much about R&B music. It's not in their collective wheelhouse, so most don't recognize the artists and music's impact and importance. The same could be said about Black people, too. But, look at who has the power and the position?

[Jerry Oz]

It's human nature to change as little as possible when the change is forced or encouraged from others. It's the law of inertia that suggests that items at rest tend to remain at rest and items in motion tend to remain in motion. Consequently change, especially social change, will never be sufficient to bring about equality. Consider, if you have to ask [[beg) for your rights, are they truly rights? Can't they be taken away just as easily as they were given? Awards shows will never be equitable, so long as the power players don't culturally represent the body of all who are eligible.

[honest man]

This further demonstrates my point. Ralph may have been insulted, and i'm sorry he was, but the cold fact is that generally people go with what they know, and most white people just don't know much about R&B music. It's not in their collective wheelhouse, so most don't recognize the artists and music's impact and importance. The same could be said about Black people, too. But, look at who has the power and the position?How do you know how white people or any other people think,what makes you the spokesman for all races,i would not profess to say how black people or any other color people think and lastly your statements could be taken as racist against whites you are so wrong. Good grief get a grip.

[timmyfunk]

It is a simple analysis. We cannot talk about Black celebrity and recognition without talking about who controls the access to stardom. Even in the present, that isn't us. And as long as that basic fact remains, said recognition will always be limited and it will come with a price.

[antceleb12]

Awards shows are a joke and a farce. They have a million and a half categories to cover every possible award, yet not one black person was nominated for an Oscar. Something always has to "mysteriously" happen to cause a controversy. The last time I watched any part of the Grammy's was in 2012 when they did the Amy Winehouse tribute. For once, they did a solid job recognizing someone's work. It's just proof that they can do it - they just don't. I don't bother with the Hollywood smoke and mirrors charade for that reason.

[timmyfunk]

How do you know how white people or any other people think,what makes you the spokesman for all races,i would not profess to say how black people or any other color people think and lastly your statements could be taken as racist against whites you are so wrong. Good grief get a grip.

Sorry, but that is a load of crap. Are you denying who runs the vast majority of the entertainment industry? Music, movies, TV, etc.. All mainly controlled by white males. That is something no amount of personal offense is going to get around. In other words, stop taking shit personally and face facts. I'm not trying to be antagonistic, but the facts don't stop being the facts because you are offended by them.

[ralpht]

So far, this is a good conversation of a controversial subject. Please stay on topic and respect each others views.

[Jerry Oz]

Awards shows based on judgment are subjective and should be taken with a grain of salt. If there is a racial element to who is recognized, then that's actually cool as long as it's not presented otherwise. The unfair part of it is when an artist cannot collect on being "honored" due to the fact that he or she faced a stacked deck from the beginning. If i have to be twice as good in order to win, them I'd just as soon not be considered.

But as I previously stated, it cannot be fair unless all of the judges are equally as familiar with each kind of music. That's not going to ever be true. I'm not convinced that every judge heard every song just like I'm doubt that every Oscar judge watched every movie. With that being said, country, reggae, R&B, jazz, and hard rock acts aren't as likely to win as pop and mainstream rock acts are. I may be wrong, but that's just why I don't really care for awards that are not based on objective information.

[honest man]

Sorry, but that is a load of crap. Are you denying who runs the vast majority of the entertainment industry? Music, movies, TV, etc.. All mainly controlled by white males. That is something no amount of personal offense is going to get around. In other words, stop taking shit personally and face facts. I'm not trying to be antagonistic, but the facts don't stop being the facts because you are offended by them.
What a load of verbal Diarrhea you have just spewed out,i have no problem who controls what after all i was not complaining because a singer did not get much airtime,If producers paid tribute to every passed artists[ dread to think running times.]I have better things to think about, anyway must dash i've got a life see ya.

[splanky]

As offensive as soulster's original remark was to some including our moderator it does
indeed have roots in actual ,historically documented fact. Decisions about who gets what,
plays where, receives when, etc. etc...have for decades and decades been based on race
and ethnicity with white males holding the cards and everyone else getting played. That can't be denied. What some are failing to mention is that White American, World, in fact, consciousness and ideas about race have and still are evolving. That's why in the same day
and age you can see both white supremacists Tea Party backers and white supporters of
Black Lives Matter. I really, as I said, don't give a moose booty about the folks behind the
Grammys but I imagine they probably are the kind of folks who still have come much further
than say , 1955 in their thinking. The wrong white men to be running such a popular institution. In a moving towards perfection world those positions would be held be the kind
of men [[and women) who have long been staunch supporters and interpreters of various
areas of black culture and arts. I've known more than a few who know more about our
contributions than we do ourselves. Author John Szwed, for one. Producer Bob Porter.
Musician Peter Gabriel. I'm not gonna waste the day listing them but there are others
yet some black people fail to see or acknowledge them. I guess in brief I'm saying these
would be the right white men. Yet of course to really level the playing field, those at the
top as far as control would reflect the diversity of the audience. We're not there yet in
any arena of life but it's coming.....

[timmyfunk]

That's the vibe I'm seeing, Ralph.

[timmyfunk]

What a load of verbal Diarrhea you have just spewed out,i have no problem who controls what after all i was not complaining because a singer did not get much airtime,If producers paid tribute to every passed artists[ dread to think running times.]I have better things to think about, anyway must dash i've got a life see ya.

Prove it. I do have a problem with people running any American industry that don't represent the population that keeps that industry alive and thriving. So unless you have some actual evidence to the contrary, I'm going to stand by my position, thank you very much.

[timmyfunk]

That's the vibe I'm seeing, Ralph.

[soulster]

If there is a racial element to who is recognized, then that's actually cool as long as it's not presented otherwise. The unfair part of it is when an artist cannot collect on being "honored" due to the fact that he or she faced a stacked deck from the beginning.

But as I previously stated, it cannot be fair unless all of the judges are equally as familiar with each kind of music. That's not going to ever be true. I'm not convinced that every judge heard every song just like I'm doubt that every Oscar judge watched every movie. With that being said, country, reggae, R&B, jazz, and hard rock acts aren't as likely to win as pop and mainstream rock acts are.

This, and what Timmyfunk posted is exactly what i'm saying.

I'm sorry the White men on this forum are taking offense, but why, when all I did was state a fact about whom primarily runs the entertainment business. Sure, you have female and Black presidents - figureheads - in place, but things aren't changing much. Look at the Academy Awards this year. It's getting serious and heavy criticism and boycotts for good reason.

The Grammy Awards show was very diverse, but what musical legacy of music made by Black and R&B artists of the past is gradually being diminished. That is the fault of the media as a whole. Sure, we're getting our little CD reissues and downloads, and whatnot, but it still pales in contrast to some of the most obscure rock reissues are out there, and i've been saying this for years.

[soulster]

As offensive as soulster's original remark was to some including our moderator it does
indeed have roots in actual ,historically documented fact. Decisions about who gets what,
plays where, receives when, etc. etc...have for decades and decades been based on race
and ethnicity with white males holding the cards and everyone else getting played. That can't be denied. What some are failing to mention is that White American, World, in fact, consciousness and ideas about race have and still are evolving. That's why in the same day
and age you can see both white supremacists Tea Party backers and white supporters of
Black Lives Matter. I really, as I said, don't give a moose booty about the folks behind the
Grammys but I imagine they probably are the kind of folks who still have come much further
than say , 1955 in their thinking. The wrong white men to be running such a popular institution. In a moving towards perfection world those positions would be held be the kind
of men [[and women) who have long been staunch supporters and interpreters of various
areas of black culture and arts. I've known more than a few who know more about our
contributions than we do ourselves. Author John Szwed, for one. Producer Bob Porter.
Musician Peter Gabriel. I'm not gonna waste the day listing them but there are others
yet some black people fail to see or acknowledge them. I guess in brief I'm saying these
would be the right white men. Yet of course to really level the playing field, those at the
top as far as control would reflect the diversity of the audience. We're not there yet in
any arena of life but it's coming.....

Thank you! With my use of the phrase "white guy", I did not mean to even suggest that all white men are bigots. Nothing of the sort! Shall I be offended when someone says that the NBA players are over-represented by Black guys?

Again, I am talking about how, for the most part, people act on what they know, what they are familiar with, what they are used to, and what they are comfortable with. I believe that is why we still see people upset over the slighting of Natalie Cole, or Taylor Swift beating out Kendrick Lamar [[and yes I have both albums).

And, I resent some people are trying to make me out to be something I am not.

[soulster]

In case this hasn't already been posted:
http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/tv-film/6882770/behind-the-grammys-complicated-in-memoriam-situation

Here's what caught my attention the most:

Counters Ehrlich, "For the record, there was an email exchange. I told Timolin what we were doing, and she seemed very happy with it." Rumors circulated that the production team tried and failed to get a female superstar to salute Cole before landing on the video. Even if that had happened, having someone cover Cole's Grammy smash "Unforgettable" would have been weirdly meta, as a salute to her salute to her late father, Nat "King" Cole [[http://www.billboard.com/artist/277002/nat-king-cole/chart). "At one point I was playing around with 'Miss You Like Crazy,' because I love that song," Ehrlich says. "But when I looked again at the Grammy show where she won for 'Unforgettable,' and I saw the last 45 seconds of that number, where her father [[Nat 'King' Cole, on the big screen) throws her a kiss, she throws him a kiss, and then she turns to the audience and throws everybody a kiss -- that just was so touching and emotional to me," and he decided that would beat any artist they could get to re-create it. "It's not like we were trying to get in there and be done with it," adds Wild. "Ken often had Natalie back on the show, went to her service, and always spoke lovingly of her. When he showed that clip to me, he was in tears because it meant so much to him."

This demonstrates my view that whatever the person in charge says, goes. Understood that it was emotional for him, and thought it was enough, but the fans, and, allegedly, the family saw it differently.

Thing is, they were able to pull up a Lemmy tribute on a larger scale, but not for Cole.

[timmyfunk]

In case this hasn't already been posted:
http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/tv-film/6882770/behind-the-grammys-complicated-in-memoriam-situation

Here's what caught my attention the most:


This demonstrates my view that whatever the person in charge says, goes. Understood that it was emotional for him, and thought it was enough, but the fans, and, allegedly, the family saw it differently.

Thing is, they were able to pull up a Lemmy tribute on a larger scale, but not for Cole.

Exactly. It is all about perception. Something they should have been conscious of after the Grammy debacle hit the fan. You're gonna tell me that you couldn't have Stevie perform with EWF to do a Maurice White tribute. How long would it have taken for them to run through That's The Way Of The World? Excuses.....

[soulster]

Exactly. It is all about perception. Something they should have been conscious of after the Grammy debacle hit the fan. You're gonna tell me that you couldn't have Stevie perform with EWF to do a Maurice White tribute. How long would it have taken for them to run through That's The Way Of The World? Excuses.....

Word! Look at how fast the Eagles regrouped with Jackson Browne for his tribute! Less than a week! People on this thread are insinuating that i'm accusing "white guys" of being racists. I wish they would stop, take a deep breath, and read all I have written on this thread, and realize that my intentions, nor my motivations are anywhere close to what their knee-jerk reaction was.

[timmyfunk]

Word! Look at how fast the Eagles regrouped with Jackson Browne for his tribute! Less than a week! People on this thread are insinuating that i'm accusing "white guys" of being racists. I wish they would stop, take a deep breath, and read all I have written on this thread, and realize that my intentions, nor my motivations are anywhere close to what their knee-jerk reaction was.

Agreed, Soulster. The facts are there as plain as day.

[Jerry Oz]

I'm curious about how they couldn't find a "female superstar" to do the tribute. Who would that be, exactly? Katy Perry? Nope. Gwen Stefani? Nope. Britney Spears? Haaaaahaa!! [[sorry...) Jennifer Lopez? [[Nope. LOL.)

There aren't a lot of female superstars out there who could cover one of her songs. Celine Dion probably needs time after her loss, Beyonce is likely overextended at this point, Nicki Minaj is completely in the wrong genre, Christina Aguilera might work but was she influenced at all by Natalie Cole? Jennifer Hudson, Debra Cox, and Jill Scott could have done it, but are they 'superstars'?

I just wonder how much they put into the idea. They could have found someone to do it but it sounds like they wanted to either make a splash or not do one at all. That's too bad because she wasn't a splashy personality and there were probably several artists who would have done it, either out of respect for her or for the chance to be seen.

[marv2]

I'm curious about how they couldn't find a "female superstar" to do the tribute. Who would that be, exactly? Katy Perry? Nope. Gwen Stefani? Nope. Britney Spears? Haaaaahaa!! [[sorry...) Jennifer Lopez? [[Nope. LOL.)

There aren't a lot of female superstars out there who could cover one of her songs. Celine Dion probably needs time after her loss, Beyonce is likely overextended at this point, Nicki Minaj is completely in the wrong genre, Christina Aguilera might work but was she influenced at all by Natalie Cole? Jennifer Hudson, Debra Cox, and Jill Scott could have done it, but are they 'superstars'?

I just wonder how much they put into the idea. They could have found someone to do it but it sounds like they wanted to either make a splash or not do one at all. That's too bad because she wasn't a splashy personality and there were probably several artists who would have done it, either out of respect for her or for the chance to be seen.

Gladys Knight would have been perfect for it. She had stood in for Natalie at a concert New Year's Eve.

[soulster]

Gladys Knight would have been perfect for it. She had stood in for Natalie at a concert New Year's Eve.
Again, it is possible they never thought about Gladys Knight

[marv2]

Again, it is possible they never thought about Gladys Knight

Another of their Grammy winners they forgot? Heck Gladys and them should be in the Grammy Hall of Fame if they are not already.

[Jerry Oz]

Again, it is possible they never thought about Gladys Knight
They were looking for superstars, which in my mind translates to "young", "topical", or "has had a hit in the last couple of years". They wanted to create buzz and lacking that, they weren't going to do it. That's why they chose Pentatonix [[who in a big fan of) to join Stevie instead of EWF.

[soulster]

They were looking for superstars, which in my mind translates to "young", "topical", or "has had a hit in the last couple of years". They wanted to create buzz and lacking that, they weren't going to do it. That's why they chose Pentatonix [[who in a big fan of) to join Stevie instead of EWF.

However, they got Alice Cooper to do Lemmy's tribute. When's the last time Cooper had a pop hit?

[jack020]

How about Diana Krall for a Nathalie Cole tribute? They had worked together.