[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 27 of 27

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Wait a minute! The Chief of Police of Houston said that? Really?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,994
    Rep Power
    656
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Wait a minute! The Chief of Police of Houston said that? Really?
    You can't make this stuff up.
    Houston Police Department – We Don’t Have To Protect Or Serve You
    SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 BY STEVEN THOMAS

    More than a decade ago, the Supreme Court ruled that police have no obligation to ‘protect’ the public. The landmark case dealt with a woman and her estranged husband. The husband kidnapped their children and the woman called police to report the crime. The police never investigated and the man later killed all three kids. [[Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales)


    The police’s motto is ‘to protect and service’ – if they are under no obligation to ‘protect’, what about ‘serve’? According to Police Chief Charles McClelland, of the Houston Police Department, police are under no obligation to ‘serve’ either.


    A city-commission study found that HPD failed to investigate over 20,000 crimes in 2013 – crimes with ‘workable’ leads. When questioned about the potentially damning figures, Chief McClelland said that the Houston Police Department does not and should not have a goal of aggressively probing every crime reported to it.


    Most of the crimes that HPD were too lazy to investigate, dealt with burglaries. However, over 6,000 of those cases were assaults, hit-and-runs, and other violent crimes. Chief McClelland had a response for these numbers as well – “They’re very minor crimes. I don’t want to dismiss that if someone was a victim of crime, but they are.”


    Personally, I don’t see how someone violently assaulting you, your spouse, or even your children are ‘minor crimes’. I would care to guess that if a member of Chief McClelland’s family was robbed, assaulted, or was the victim of a hit-and-run, he would have every officer within a 100 miles investigating the crime. I think what the chief meant to say, was that ‘some people aren’t important enough, rich enough, or [[dare I say) white enough, for my officers to help’.

    To quote Ademo Freeman, co-founder of CopBlock.org,


    If the police don’t have to protect [[or serve) us then what are we paying them for? To harass us for petty motor vehicle violations [[Samuel Dubose was murdered for this), raid our homes for ‘illegal’ property [[Jason Westcott was killed during a raid) or to scare us into compliance for those they do serve? I guess it could be a mixture of all of those things, yet, none of it is good for us [[or the LEO).
    http://www.copblock.org/140553/houst...-or-serve-you/

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.