[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 50 of 66

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,940
    Rep Power
    402
    oh i always liked the cover! i think it was a cool design and interesting

    the back cover i was less excited about

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,280
    Rep Power
    269
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    oh i always liked the cover! i think it was a cool design and interesting

    the back cover i was less excited about
    I also loved the cover. The back cover, from the day I got it, bothered me because of the my perceptions of the photo of Diana. I never quite understood if there was something wrong with her left shoulder [[as you're looking at the picture). To the right looks like a strap from a gown. What's on the left? That's always been a mystery to me. [[I am not sure if I attached the photo correctly)

    Name:  supremes back cover.jpg
Views: 1889
Size:  67.0 KB
    Last edited by jobucats; 07-28-2020 at 02:17 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,065
    Rep Power
    230
    [QUOTE=jobucats;584700]I also loved the cover. The back cover, from the day I got it, bothered me because of the my perceptions of the photo of Diana. I never quite understood if there was something wrong with her left shoulder [[as you're looking at the picture). To the right looks like a strap from a grown. What's on the left? That's always been a mystery to me. [[I am not sure if I attached the photo correctly)

    Hi Jobucats... That picture did always look odd, didn't it? Turns out, having FINALLY found other photos of that gown in the ensuing years, it's a strap [[embroidered/beaded?) on the girls' left shoulders and basically a pretty simple gown the rest of the way down. To my non-professional opinion, it looks like a 1966, off-the-rack gown which the girls were still buying until about mid-1966 when the more 'serious' sequined and beaded gowns from pro designers started becoming a steadier part of their stage wardrobe. In that photo on the back of the album with the way it's cropped, the 'strap' on one side looks odd--almost like a guitar strap--and then the dark shadow on Diana's other shoulder, I believe, is coming from the microphone she's holding.

    I've attached another photo of the girls in these gowns--I believe from the same appearance at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco. There are other shots at the same venue in different gowns, too. This would not be one of my favorite "rare" gowns worn by the girls... but it's still neat to see it, right?

    Name:  E2E77BDE-EE10-41A5-9C7B-8492C0A48586_1_105_c.jpg
Views: 1144
Size:  20.3 KB

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,280
    Rep Power
    269
    [QUOTE=danman869;584709]
    Quote Originally Posted by jobucats View Post
    I also loved the cover. The back cover, from the day I got it, bothered me because of the my perceptions of the photo of Diana. I never quite understood if there was something wrong with her left shoulder [[as you're looking at the picture). To the right looks like a strap from a grown. What's on the left? That's always been a mystery to me. [[I am not sure if I attached the photo correctly)

    Hi Jobucats... That picture did always look odd, didn't it? Turns out, having FINALLY found other photos of that gown in the ensuing years, it's a strap [[embroidered/beaded?) on the girls' left shoulders and basically a pretty simple gown the rest of the way down. To my non-professional opinion, it looks like a 1966, off-the-rack gown which the girls were still buying until about mid-1966 when the more 'serious' sequined and beaded gowns from pro designers started becoming a steadier part of their stage wardrobe. In that photo on the back of the album with the way it's cropped, the 'strap' on one side looks odd--almost like a guitar strap--and then the dark shadow on Diana's other shoulder, I believe, is coming from the microphone she's holding.

    I've attached another photo of the girls in these gowns--I believe from the same appearance at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco. There are other shots at the same venue in different gowns, too. This would not be one of my favorite "rare" gowns worn by the girls... but it's still neat to see it, right?

    Name:  E2E77BDE-EE10-41A5-9C7B-8492C0A48586_1_105_c.jpg
Views: 1144
Size:  20.3 KB
    Thanks, danman869. I can add your response to my list of answers another one of life-long mysteries which have perplexed me. I had thought also that strap [[which turned out to be gown) was a guitar strap [[however, I've only seen one picture of Diana holding a guitar and that was on a Jet Magazine cover...ha ha. And that other shoulder shadow makes her shoulder looked like she had been injured.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,940
    Rep Power
    402
    [QUOTE=danman869;584709]
    Quote Originally Posted by jobucats View Post
    I also loved the cover. The back cover, from the day I got it, bothered me because of the my perceptions of the photo of Diana. I never quite understood if there was something wrong with her left shoulder [[as you're looking at the picture). To the right looks like a strap from a grown. What's on the left? That's always been a mystery to me. [[I am not sure if I attached the photo correctly)

    Hi Jobucats... That picture did always look odd, didn't it? Turns out, having FINALLY found other photos of that gown in the ensuing years, it's a strap [[embroidered/beaded?) on the girls' left shoulders and basically a pretty simple gown the rest of the way down. To my non-professional opinion, it looks like a 1966, off-the-rack gown which the girls were still buying until about mid-1966 when the more 'serious' sequined and beaded gowns from pro designers started becoming a steadier part of their stage wardrobe. In that photo on the back of the album with the way it's cropped, the 'strap' on one side looks odd--almost like a guitar strap--and then the dark shadow on Diana's other shoulder, I believe, is coming from the microphone she's holding.

    I've attached another photo of the girls in these gowns--I believe from the same appearance at the Fairmont Hotel in San Francisco. There are other shots at the same venue in different gowns, too. This would not be one of my favorite "rare" gowns worn by the girls... but it's still neat to see it, right?

    Name:  E2E77BDE-EE10-41A5-9C7B-8492C0A48586_1_105_c.jpg
Views: 1144
Size:  20.3 KB
    this was their debut at the Fairmont in San Fran. Played there from 5/19 - 6/8/66. so not even a full year after their Copa debut. Once they played the Copa, they pretty much made similar debuts in similar clubs across the US [[i'm just listing some of the bigger clubs and the first time at that level of club in each city)

    Safari Room - San Jose in Sept 65
    Lincoln Center - NYC Oct 65
    Blinstrub's - Boston, Oct 65
    Latin Quarter - Philly, Oct/Nov 65
    Lyric Theater - Baltimore, Nov 65
    Twin Coaches - Pitts, Dec 65
    Shamrock Hilton - Houston, Deb 65
    Eden Rock - Miami, Dec 65
    Roostertail - Detroit, Jan 66
    El San Juan Hotel - Puerto Rico, Jan 66
    Kiel Opera House - St Louis, March 66
    The Cave - Vancouver, May 66
    Venetian Room - San Fran, May/June 66
    Flamingo Hotel - Vegas, Sept 66
    Latin Casino - Philly, March 67


    For that Fairmont engagement, they had a bunch of new gowns which they debuted

    Attachment 17963
    Attachment 17964
    Attachment 17965
    Attachment 17966
    Attachment 17967

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    1,537
    Rep Power
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by jobucats View Post
    To the right looks like a strap from a gown. What's on the left? That's always been a mystery to me. [[I am not sure if I attached the photo correctly)

    Name:  supremes back cover.jpg
Views: 1889
Size:  67.0 KB
    I always thought it was a shadow on her right shoulder.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,940
    Rep Power
    402
    at least i think the first pic i posted of Flo doing People at the mic is them at the Fairmont. now that i see it larger [[vs on my phone), i'm not sure

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.