[QUOTE=BobC;92972]Ralph--thanks for putting up with us.[/QUOTE
Yes, Ralph; thank you for putting up with us low lifes, cretins, and undesirables; we simply are not worthy! How DARE anyone question your omnipotence!! LOL! Who ARE these people?
[QUOTE=BobC;92972]Ralph--thanks for putting up with us.[/QUOTE
Yes, Ralph; thank you for putting up with us low lifes, cretins, and undesirables; we simply are not worthy! How DARE anyone question your omnipotence!! LOL! Who ARE these people?
No, here's the part:
And anyone calling themselves a ''peacemaker'' or a ''voice of reason'', or ''respected'' yet is ALWAYS amongst the first to take shots at people, while complaining about about the shots that their target takes at them & others, then guess what?
You're anything but a ''peacemaker'' or ''reasonable''. You're just another shit-stirring pot calling the kettle black.
And you're one of the reasons why things don't get better here. It won't get better because in truth, you don't really care if it does or doesn't.
Ha! Ha! Once again, Marv2, your powers of deduction never fail to stun! Once Ralph and I have met, I'll let him inform you about my gender status. LOLOLOLOL!! Good try though! I'm sorry you didn't enjoy my profile photo, but I would hardly chaharacterize it as "tired." ;0)
Well gang, I can only absorb so much fat-mouthing from someone who may not be who she says she is. I banned her....for life...I wonder who "she" will resurface as?
Yeah, I think we were being played. Juice, I don't understand it either. Kind of sad when you think about it.
Soulster,
Indeed I addressed you but when I did, I was responding to your addition about the removal of Diana Ross fans leading to an empty forum. That's why I opened my remarks with the references to The Supremes.
Now as Marv said, I wasn't referring to you & perhaps the fact that I didn't separate my thoughts may have led you to believe otherwise & if so, I apologize for my lack of clarity. I thought that given the fact I spoke about this previously & have said similar words when these dust-ups occur, that it was rather clear the parties whom I was referring to. After all, we've had numerous dust-ups on this forum about this very same topic.
I also thought that by referring to things which was going on in ''The Supremes'' thread it was clear that I was only referring to the people & their actions in that thread, people who tend to champion the banning of someone, let's say Marv, for example, while doing the SAME EXACT THINGS which they accuse him of doing.
Now re-read what I wrote again & please explain to me how you could possibly believe that I'm going off on you for behavior that you didn't practice in the thread that I mentioned & I was very specific about it.
Again, perhaps I assumed that everyone could connect the dots with this situation which has been occurring here for years. If my assuming otherwise led you to believe that I was referring to you in anything that I wrote aside from the remarks about The Supremes fans, then I apologize for being so vague about the matter. But in no way was I referring to you in my assessment.
Last edited by juicefree20; 02-13-2012 at 06:34 PM. Reason: I hate spelling mistakes!
Roberta...WHAT!
LaDonna,
Verbiage...I like that
Either way here's the bottom line...you & others are guilty of practicing some stirring of your own & keeping the pot boiling. Perhaps if a few of you would simply refrain from keeping the fires going & act like the classy, intelligent & refined adults that I keep reading that you are, we could've put an end to this crap YEARS ago.
But you don't, you won't & here we are bringing in yet another New Year, with the same old garbage. Where where I sit we call B.S. exactly what it is...B.S. And constantly carping to Ralph while doing the same thing[[s) that you accuse others of doing is exactly that...B.S.
On another note, your complaint against Ralph is very vague. You still haven't pointed out what offense[[s) occurred, nor have you pointed out where. Now I'm pointing out specific things that I see and/or have witnessed. You tell me to re-read what you said in order to better comprehend what you've said But that's exactly the point...you aren't saying anything. You've levelled an accusation, but haven't defined what Ralph's offenses against you, nor anyone else. Perhaps if you were more specific about your gripe[[s), I could understand your point.
On a brighter note, I didn't have to edit this message for excessive verbiage. Hopefully it will meet with your approval.
Last edited by juicefree20; 02-13-2012 at 06:46 PM. Reason: See above^^^^
Marv,
Destroying the forum is a little deep. If this forum can be destroyed over arguments over musical groups, then we're in serious trouble.
Ladonna, simmer down there, Sweetpants. Ralph has been very nice to me, and I think you secretly love him. You're just being coy.
Ralph,
Nah...no one was played. It was nothing more than business as usual & if the person is indeed the same person that Marv says that they are, then both you & I both have been fried together in that particular wok years ago.
And if what Marv says is correct, it's even funnier to consider that even though I've seen some pretty errr...unpleasant things written about myself there, that I never allowed what was written outside of these doors cause me to start an argument with them inside of these doors. In fact, considering that I personally read some of the less than nice things that was written about quite a few of us elsewhere, I've been quite cordial & didn't take any of it to heart.
I don't know, I'm just not into writing or saying things over the internet that I couldn't say in public. Beyond that, I think that it's cowardly to talk about people or instigate a fight, if I'm not going to put my own name to it. If I feel a certain way about someone, I want them to know how I feel about it & not some unnamed pseudonym.
Barring state secrets, if I'm going to say something over the internet that moves me to have to use a pseudonym, then most likely it's something that I really shouldn't be saying at all.
But maybe it's just me.
Those guys in the "Diana Ross" threads always refer to anyone with an opposing view of her as a "troll". Your friend RossHolloway routinely admonishes you all to "not to feed the trolls" and you say nothing. In fact, you are known for ganging up and piling on those you and the others disagree concerning "Miss Ross"! Miss Ross for pete sakes LOL! So don't even try it Roberta, you are looking pretty hypocritical here at this moment my friend.......
Ok I should have said destroying the peace and tranquility of this forum by always personally attacking other forum members for not agreeing with them.
RossHolloway :
Senior Member Join Date Aug 2010
Posts 646
You really should just ignore the trolls, they just feed off of the attention that you give them.
Originally Posted by Roberta75:
There isn't a day goes passed that he doesn't talk about Diane Ross but he doesn't care. Right. LOL
Now Roberta the above is just one example. If you really feel the way that you say you feel about people calling others "trolls", then why didn't you say something against it in your conversation with RossHolloway? Your "LOL" at the end of your response here to RossHolloway looks like you are laughing about his calling someone a "troll".
Marv
Last edited by marv2; 02-13-2012 at 07:17 PM.
I haven't seen this much activity on this forum in one day since I can remember!
As you just stated, it was the way in which your thoughts weren't separated.
I don't pay too much attention to those Supremes threads, but since it was mentioned, I thought i'd take a look at the thread in question and did add a couple of remarks. I got it out of my system for a while.
We can't get rid of the Supremes fans, and I don't like to see people banned unless they are absolute trolls or totally disruptive. Even then, I like to see the mod work with them first. If it were, say, The Beatles, i'd feel the same way.
I feel like I'm in some bizarre psychology experiment. Are you all actually reading these paragraphs-long diatribes? I mean, seriously? I could never drum up that kind of enthusiasm for something so pointless.
If somebody's posts annoy you, don't read them. I mean who cares?
Ralph,
You do a great job as it is.
Life is life.
as Eddie Kendricks said "Keep On Truckin'"
edafan
Thank you edafan. I will do just that.
Talk about time to close down a thread. Enough already...
Yeah, I think we took his about as far as needed. I'm closing it down. Thanks everyone for participating.
Bookmarks