[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 78
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,375
    Rep Power
    218

    DRATS/REFLECTIONS - Live! At The Roostertail, 1967 - Recording Only

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGptF9Kf98w

    Many thanks to Mactheox for the YouTube posting.
    Last edited by Methuselah2; 06-11-2013 at 01:01 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,823
    Rep Power
    388
    Were Mary and Cindy's mics at the Copa? LOL.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    This live version makes me think that the Andantes were dubbed in to hit the high notes of the background on the 45.

    Just like on You Can't Hurry Love live ~ the background doesn't sound the way it sounds on the 45.

  4. #4
    revvy Guest
    Not being able to hear Mary and Cindy is a disgrace. Cindy can hit the high notes just fine.

  5. #5
    RossHolloway Guest
    I still think this song is about Florence leaving/breaking away from the Supremes.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,823
    Rep Power
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by RossHolloway View Post
    I still think this song is about Florence leaving/breaking away from the Supremes.
    I think the song that's about Florence is "Keep an Eye":

    "There used to be three of us, seen all over town, now there's only two; someone's missin', guess who".

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,454
    Rep Power
    222
    Reflections is a great song. Sounds great here. Good strong vocal from Diana.

  8. #8
    supremester Guest
    I'm not a huge fan of Reflections - although when Miss Ross does it now, I like it better. I don't hear Mary & Flo on it period - perhaps they are there, I just can't hear it and I don't like the bg arrangement or mix at all on the record anyway.
    Flo is not on You Can't Hurry Love so I guess that's why it sounds different. It might be why she went over the edge as it was their biggest record in two years and she wasn't involved. Unless you are old, you won't know how huge that record was - the charting for 2 weeks at #1 doesn't tell the whole story.
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    This live version makes me think that the Andantes were dubbed in to hit the high notes of the background on the 45.

    Just like on You Can't Hurry Love live ~ the background doesn't sound the way it sounds on the 45.

  9. #9
    RossHolloway Guest
    I always heard that song as the woman and her female friend all hanging out with her [[lead singers) boyfriend, and then all of a sudden, the lead singer is left behind because her girlfriend has taken her boyfriend from her.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by revvy View Post
    Not being able to hear Mary and Cindy is a disgrace. Cindy can hit the high notes just fine.
    If you can't hear Mary or Cindy, why bother?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    I can hear Mary Wilson and Florence Ballard on "Reflections". Mary still sings a line of her background part as a part of the lead she sings in concert now.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,375
    Rep Power
    218
    Quote Originally Posted by RossHolloway View Post
    I always heard that song as the woman and her female friend all hanging out with her [[lead singers) boyfriend, and then all of a sudden, the lead singer is left behind because her girlfriend has taken her boyfriend from her.
    I totally agree with you, Ross--the "someone's missin'" of the three is the lead on the song. Any connection to it being a reference to Flo or the song being about Flo strikes me as a real stretch. A stretch that went "Pop!"

    On this version of REFLECTIONS, Diana's voice is certainly much more prominent than that of Mary and Cindy. But I can still hear both clearly, and they sound great to me. But the sound level differences are apparent; could have been the mics or possibly adjustments made later in the processing of the recording. Live recordings can be dicey--but I always preferred equal time and space given to Flo, Mary, and Cindy. But the given seemed to be that it wouldn't be given. And live performances were best on those rare occasions when it was. On the 3 times that I got to attend performances by Diana, Mary, and Flo, I was there to see and hear Diana, Mary, and Flo.
    Last edited by Methuselah2; 06-11-2013 at 05:02 PM.

  13. #13
    RossHolloway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Methuselah2 View Post
    I totally agree with you, Ross--the "someone's missin'" of the three is the lead on the song. Any connection to it being a reference to Flo or the song being about Flo strikes me as a real stretch. A stretch that went "Pop!"

    On this version of REFLECTIONS, Diana's voice is certainly much more prominent than that of Mary and Cindy. But I can still hear both clearly, and they sound great to me. But the sound level differences are apparent; could have been the mics or possibly adjustments made later in the processing of the recording. Live recordings can be dicey--but I always preferred equal time and space given to Flo, Mary, and Cindy. But the given seemed to be that it wouldn't be given. And live performances were best on those rare occasions when it was. On the 3 times that I got to attend performances by Diana, Mary, and Flo, I was there to see and hear Diana, Mary, and Flo.
    Well if you think about the song Reflections, never once does the lyrics refer to a boyfriend/husband/lover, but rather the sadness and heartbreak over a broken relationship/friendship. And wouldn't HDH have known about the conflict and fights within the Supremes? The lyrics reflect on when the Supremes first got started before all the hits and fame when they were all just friends dreaming of making it big and the love that they all shared for one another. And then it was gone.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,845
    Rep Power
    179
    Well rest assured....Mary/Flo/Cindy sang those songs live on stage for millions w/o an Andante backing them up. Obviously it was good enough for BG! History dictates that the world fell in love w/our girls DMF, and Cindy.


    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    I can hear Mary Wilson and Florence Ballard on "Reflections". Mary still sings a line of her background part as a part of the lead she sings in concert now.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by detmotownguy View Post
    Well rest assured....Mary/Flo/Cindy sang those songs live on stage for millions w/o an Andante backing them up. Obviously it was good enough for BG! History dictates that the world fell in love w/our girls DMF, and Cindy.
    Yes, yes, they also sang on the majority of the hit records.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,680
    Rep Power
    193
    The version of "Reflections" on the "No. 1's" album has drastically improved background vocals, including the oft-excluded bridge line sung by Mary and Flo.

    For a while, I thought it was the Andantes [[or at least an Andante) on the record. The back-ups don't sound like Mary and Flo [[at least not to me), and it's always bothered me that the back-up vocals were so pushed back and muddled.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    It became clear to me after the 45 of Stop in the Name of Love, that the sound I thought was the Supremes was often the sound of the Andantes.

    Florence Ballard you can pick out here and there; but to me, Mary Wilson and the Andantes blend together way too much and I can't separate them very well except if there are high notes; if there are high notes [[like in Love Child and a part of the background in Reflections) I now know or expect that is the Andantes and not the Supremes.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,281
    Rep Power
    349
    Mary Wilson is very much on "Reflections." The Andantes as a group are not on the song. There are only two women singing and one of them is Mary. The other lady is for you to decide...

  19. #19
    supremester Guest
    History is defined in many ways. That history also could include The Andantes or Marlene Barrow. That history could just be Miss Ross as they hit #1 3 times without the public knowing anything but Ross' voice, HDH & the Funk Bros. Not all Supremes fans fell in love with all three. Some only liked Flo. Many liked all 3. Many only liked Miss Ross. I fell in love with Miss Ross first. Period. Then all three. When I first saw DMF in 1966, they were all goddesses in the round - always one facing us. Typical of Miss Ross however, by the time they got to I Hear A Symphony, she ramped it up enough that, while still wonderful, left the other two in the dust. Lots of fans only liked one or two. I didn't accept Cindy until Youtube. I was a fool not to see she was the ideal replacement. I see The Supremes as an entity of many pieces with the essentials being HDH, the Funk Bros and Miss Ross.
    Quote Originally Posted by detmotownguy View Post
    Well rest assured....Mary/Flo/Cindy sang those songs live on stage for millions w/o an Andante backing them up. Obviously it was good enough for BG! History dictates that the world fell in love w/our girls DMF, and Cindy.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    Brad: Is the "other lady" hitting the high notes in the background on Reflections? Is it Cindy? Or Louvain Demps?

    One song I hear Mary Wilson clearly on is Where Did Our Love Go. That is one song on which I do not hear Florence Ballard, but Mary is clearly there.

    I think many Supremes fans need to take a listen to the 45 of Stop in the Name of Love and relearn the voices.

    Other than Diana, nothing is clear any more.

  21. #21
    supremester Guest
    I just played 3 versions of Reflections. I believe that Mary and Flo are doing the "oooooooooo's" and The Andantes are doing the muddled, nearly indecipherable backing words. I simply cannot discern Mary there at all, and only a maybe for Flo. I know there are those who hear Mary & Flo where they are not, so who is to say. Personally, I think the worded bgs sound exactly like those on Forever Came Today - and I don't care for either.

    Quote Originally Posted by antceleb12 View Post
    The version of "Reflections" on the "No. 1's" album has drastically improved background vocals, including the oft-excluded bridge line sung by Mary and Flo.

    For a while, I thought it was the Andantes [[or at least an Andante) on the record. The back-ups don't sound like Mary and Flo [[at least not to me), and it's always bothered me that the back-up vocals were so pushed back and muddled.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by supremester View Post
    I just played 3 versions of Reflections. I believe that Mary and Flo are doing the "oooooooooo's" and The Andantes are doing the muddled, nearly indecipherable backing words. I simply cannot discern Mary there at all, and only a maybe for Flo. I know there are those who hear Mary & Flo where they are not, so who is to say. Personally, I think the worded bgs sound exactly like those on Forever Came Today - and I don't care for either.
    If you had the ability to listen without prejudice, you would clearly hear Mary Wilson singing in the lower voice on this record that I and everyone else in the World has heard for 45-46 years now!


  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    And it sure sounds like Flo's high operatic soprano to me!

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,312
    Rep Power
    218
    Louvain Demps recently said the andantes are in fact on stop in the name of love but she also could hear Florence on the song. Before you go and say "we don't know which version she heard" it was the version from the number ones which is the 45 version except it is extended.

    Regarding "Reflections" I don't really care who is doing the backgrounds they sound like crap, it could be Flo...her voice wasn't holding up that well around that period neither was Diana's. Diana's vocal is the only thing about the song that I like and the funky intro.
    Last edited by floyjoy678; 06-12-2013 at 06:28 PM.

  25. #25
    supremester Guest
    Mary is so effective in WDOLG - impeccable. Flo fans could be having fits that Flo is buried, but don't. HDH/Motown were so adept at use of Bgs - they didn't care who was who - they wanted to make the best record possible. The grammatically incorrect slogan"It's what's in the grooves that counts" says it all.
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Brad: Is the "other lady" hitting the high notes in the background on Reflections? Is it Cindy? Or Louvain Demps?

    One song I hear Mary Wilson clearly on is Where Did Our Love Go. That is one song on which I do not hear Florence Ballard, but Mary is clearly there.

    I think many Supremes fans need to take a listen to the 45 of Stop in the Name of Love and relearn the voices.

    Other than Diana, nothing is clear any more.

  26. #26
    supremester Guest
    I don't listen with prejudice, I just didn't hear it. It's funny coming from someone who has clearly shown a lack of objectivity for years and is known for it [[along with your homophobic remarks like the word "faggy" you used the other day.) I can just imagine your rant had the tables been turned. Anyway, after listening to this way-too-fast 45, I agree that I think I can hear the barely audible Mary, finally. I thank you and still don't like the bg arrangement.
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    If you had the ability to listen without prejudice, you would clearly hear Mary Wilson singing in the lower voice on this record that I and everyone else in the World has heard for 45-46 years now!


  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,281
    Rep Power
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    Brad: Is the "other lady" hitting the high notes in the background on Reflections? Is it Cindy? Or Louvain Demps?
    Mary is singing the lower part of the harmony. The higher notes are "the other lady." It's not Cindy, but Louvain has said she didn't like "Reflections." Possibly could be her. Then again, Marlene Barrow was Florence's stand-in in concert and previous recording sessions. Could be her as well... A lot was going on at the time and a lot of tension.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    Quote Originally Posted by bradsupremes View Post


    Mary is singing the lower part of the harmony. The higher notes are "the other lady." It's not Cindy, but Louvain has said she didn't like "Reflections." Possibly could be her. Then again, Marlene Barrow was Florence's stand-in in concert and previous recording sessions. Could be her as well... A lot was going on at the time and a lot of tension.
    I wondered if it was Louvain. I don't really know the Cindy or Marlene voice well enough to identify them but it was pretty clear to me that it wasn't Mary doing the high parts and there is a similarity in that sound to some of the background in Love Child and Stop in the Name of Love.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,432
    Rep Power
    177
    I, too, hear Mary very clearly and Flo ever so faintly in the background throughout ' Reflections' . And I believe it was mixed that way for a definite reason and purpose.
    The track [[sans vocals) for 'The Happening', 'Reflections' and 'In And Out Of Love' were recorded in Detroit on March 2, 1967- the first 2 were used for the released versions; for 'In And Out Of Love' the music track was rerecorded on April 20, 1967 in L.A.
    In "the Lost Supreme: The Life Of A Dreamgirl Florence Ballard" Peter Benjaminson quotes Flo's recollection/objection surrounding the recording of "The Happening" as regards Berry Gordy's desire to add the Andantes to the background vocal mix:
    "Look, Berry, we're getting paid for doing these tunes. I'm not going to work and have these other girls singing with me. ...To me, they're not the group; they're just a whole bunch of other people.... We started off singing three together, and I think it should stay like that."
    Berry did not add the Andantes to 'The Happening'.
    But then, when 'Reflections' was recorded it appears that Berry honored Flo's wishes again, but used them to turn the tables on her. Mary is quite audible throughout but Flo can only be heard mixed very, very low [[in certain spots) in the background.
    When released, 'Reflections' attained the #2 spot on the pop chart- a great showing considering the fact that the Supremes' backgrounds were not as audibly clear as they had been in 'The Happening'.
    For 'In and Out Of Love', background vocals were recorded by Mary and Flo on June 12, 1967 and by Andantes on June 13, 1967. By the time the single was released [[October 25, 1967) Flo had been out of and Cindy in the group for 3 months- hence the strong presence of the Andantes in the background on that release- again possibly sending a message to Flo.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    2,432
    Rep Power
    177
    One possible thing that confuses listeners about this single is that we are used to hearing Flo on the top note and Mary on the bottom. Here the voices are reversed [[the tables are turned in a second way, so to speak). I definitely hear Mary ascending to a near falsetto to hit the higher notes. Flo has that bite to her voice that is so distinctive- and it is present in the lower notes where she can be heard. It wouldn't surprise me if an alternate master were found in the vaults that included a full background vocal by Flo. It appears that only bits and pieces of Flo's background vocal are added for effect and to possibly get a clear message to Flo to not challenge the boss, Mr. Gordy, so openly.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,454
    Rep Power
    222
    I don't know who that is, but that doesn't sound like Florence at all.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,747
    Rep Power
    194
    first,it is one of my favorites and I like the version on the @1's cd the best.
    this was going to be the final single by the Supremes in 1967 with a farwell tour and a returning Flo Ballard. things obviously changed and the group continued with Cindy Birdsong and the song was deleted from the Greatest Hits album and replaced with Standing At The Crossroads.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by supremester View Post
    Mary is so effective in WDOLG - impeccable. Flo fans could be having fits that Flo is buried, but don't. HDH/Motown were so adept at use of Bgs - they didn't care who was who - they wanted to make the best record possible. The grammatically incorrect slogan"It's what's in the grooves that counts" says it all.

    I don't know who told you that, but that is not what Eddie & Brian Holland said. They both have said that they used Mary Wilson and Florence Ballard on their productions. On the hits and otherwise. They recorded them as a group! They did care to use the actual group members when recording. Frank Wilson had made a similar statement.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by carole cucumber View Post
    pieces of Flo's background vocal are added for effect and to possibly get a clear message to Flo to not challenge the boss, Mr. Gordy, so openly.
    They weren' that devious! All this shit people on here are making up or repeating is nothing more than urban myths! They weren't sending Flo any messages. It reminds me that most of you don't even know what type of people that were at Motown. If Berry wanted to say something to Flo , he would just tell her flat out to her face and vice-versa. There were none these "covert operations" going on. Some of this makes me laugh, some of it makes me angry that people just make stuff up and post it! Everyone at Motown were not afraid of Berry Gordy Jr. These were all neighborhood people in those days. I can't explain it, but all this weird crazy talk has nothing to do with the real Motown.

  35. #35
    revvy Guest
    It has been said that the Andantes were used because DMC were touring constantly or doing TV appearances or being fitted for costumes and it just didn't make sense to have Mary and Cindy in the studio for mere album fillers. The big money was in live appearances.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,680
    Rep Power
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by supremester View Post
    I just played 3 versions of Reflections. I believe that Mary and Flo are doing the "oooooooooo's" and The Andantes are doing the muddled, nearly indecipherable backing words. I simply cannot discern Mary there at all, and only a maybe for Flo. I know there are those who hear Mary & Flo where they are not, so who is to say. Personally, I think the worded bgs sound exactly like those on Forever Came Today - and I don't care for either.
    I was thinking the same thing. The "#1's" version has the extended ending with just Mary & Flo [[or Marlene, or Jane, or Susie) singing a held out "Reflections" almost a capella. I want to say it's the Andantes, but I've read too much about how it was Florence's last recording session with the Supremes. Of course, Florence and Mary could have recorded their parts and then other voices could have been overdubbed or something...but I've never heard of them doing that with "Reflections" as I have with the other known tracks.

    Here's a version that someone "enhanced" the background vocals.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRjCqaX2IvQ

    I still can't tell LOL. If there's one thing that frustrates me, it's the mixing on the background vocals!

  37. #37
    revvy Guest
    What I don't understand is why does every background have to be analyzed as an equation: 40% Mary, 10% Florence, 5% Louvain, 8.5% Jackie, etc. Florence and Mary were more than capable of providing background harmonies. That's why they were hired in the first place. If you listen to "Back in My Arms Again", you'll notice it's only Mary and Florence in the background and they do a bang up job!

    In another area, if Lynda and Scherrie were so great, why did they need 3...count them...3...backup singers on the Return to Love tour?

    Now that's something to think about!
    Last edited by revvy; 06-13-2013 at 01:06 PM.

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,680
    Rep Power
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by revvy View Post
    What I don't understand is why does every background have to be analyzed as an equation: 40% Mary, 10% Florence, 5% Louvain, 8.5% Jackie, etc.
    Because it's interesting! I think it's interesting that producers chose to highlight certain voices on different songs - i.e. WDOLG is basically Mary carrying it, whereas "Come See..." is basically Florence carrying it.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,317
    Rep Power
    173
    and then you have "Baby Love" "Back in My Arms Again" and Nothing But Heartaches, that are all exclusivly Mary and Flo, as well as , My World Is Empty without you [[yes its Mary and Flo) "Love is LIke an Itching" You Keep Me Hangin On, & The Happening. All Mary Wilson and Florence Ballard, and no other background help. Which means the majority of the singles are Diana Mary and Florence only.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,845
    Rep Power
    179
    Amen Franjoy! I do not post here all that much and come and go for short periods of time. But this issue of backgrounds keeps surfacing. I have to wonder why.
    Great post!






    Quote Originally Posted by franjoy56 View Post
    and then you have "Baby Love" "Back in My Arms Again" and Nothing But Heartaches, that are all exclusivly Mary and Flo, as well as , My World Is Empty without you [[yes its Mary and Flo) "Love is LIke an Itching" You Keep Me Hangin On, & The Happening. All Mary Wilson and Florence Ballard, and no other background help. Which means the majority of the singles are Diana Mary and Florence only.

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    Revvy, in a big show, it's great to put on a GOOD SHOW............Dancers, backup singers, flashy dresses, explosions, wind, rain, lightning, all of that.

    We need an analysis of all the Supremes and Vandellas and Marvelettes songs; the Andantes would feel so approved of and so validated. The are on many songs and the fans did not understand the extent of it until the last couple years.

    Years ago, one of the Motown guys said the Supremes were over in 1967 and don't ask these questions like why You Can't Hurry Love always sounded different live ~ because we wouldn't all like the answers we got. Some people prefer the revisionist past that isn't accurate. Some people want to delve and find the truth. It's interesting.

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7,375
    Rep Power
    218
    In the second week of Louvain's 2-part NIGHTFLIGHT interview late last year, Louvain mentioned that The Andantes were also participants on BACK IN MY ARMS AGAIN. She did not say that The Andantes exclusively provided the background but that they were included on the recording.

    Louvain had discussed STOP! earlier and confirmed The Andantes being on that one. But she went on further to say that when she hears the released recording, she hears Flo on it, as well.

    In discussing LOVE IS HERE, Louvain recalled The Andantes being in the studio at the same time as Flo, Mary, and Diana were recording the tune. She went on to say that The Andantes often recorded separately from the named artists and that the work of The Andantes could end up being used exclusively on recordings or mixed in with that of the other artists--and that The Andantes were utilized at the discretion and how and to what extent as decided by the producers. And that The Andantes were not privy to what that would turn out to be until they heard for themselves the finalized recording. So, Louvain was very clear in letting the audience know that her responses to questions about personnel on recordings were based on what she heard.

    So, where does it all leave us at this point in time as to who's who on each recording? For me, the only answer seems to be that it may be impossible to know for sure unless the producers--the ones that had final say-so, that is--come forward with specifics. But with so much time having now passed and the recording process having been so complex and layered, how many absolute answers are there left? Opinions seem to be limitless. But facts--in short-supply.
    Last edited by Methuselah2; 06-13-2013 at 04:14 AM.

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,035
    Rep Power
    213
    I think people discuss it because it interests them and they enjoy things that interest them. Those who don't find it interests them will hopefully find more interesting topics that will interest them. This topic interests me. I like knowing who is who. It's not a dig at Flo & Mary: the world's greatest bg singers ever IMHO. They can't supply everything needed always and can't always be where needed or slept in or was late [[AGAIN) and studio time was very very limited. They used Syretta as Martha Reeves for heaven's sake - this is nothing compared to that. AS for RTL, the three bg singerswere hired for Diana's half of the show. Also, depening on the day since inception, there was personnel offstage to augment MAry & Cindy if needed to round out the sound. Certainly for Love Is Here & Lovelight, but Cindy needed some support - no harm in that. After Scherrie & Lynda joined - who both are much stronger singers than Mary & Cindy - and who needed no support except on chorale pieces. RTL is a sad topic for most except the thousands who saw and loved it and of course, the cast and crew who got paid for the entire tour and only had to do 9 shows. Everybody did well financially except TNT/SFX who took it in the shorts and learned to not screw with Miss Ross, who has been gracious enough to allow SFX/Live Nation to produce dozens of her post RTL shows in North and South America.
    Quote Originally Posted by revvy View Post
    What I don't understand is why does every background have to be analyzed as an equation: 40% Mary, 10% Florence, 5% Louvain, 8.5% Jackie, etc. Florence and Mary were more than capable of providing background harmonies. That's why they were hired in the first place. If you listen to "Back in My Arms Again", you'll notice it's only Mary and Florence in the background and they do a bang up job!

    In another area, if Lynda and Scherrie were so great, whey did they need 3...count them...3...backup singers on the Return to Love tour?

    Now that's something to think about!

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,035
    Rep Power
    213
    A disgrace? A disgrace? Seriously? Who cares that much? Maybe they wanted it that way. Maybe the sound was off. Maybe Cindy didn't know it yet. geez, a disgrace? I disagree. I don't hear the audience yelling for more BG LOL Geez, do Vandellas fans have conniptions when they learn Sandra & Lois aren't on Bless You?
    Quote Originally Posted by revvy View Post
    Not being able to hear Mary and Cindy is a disgrace. Cindy can hit the high notes just fine.

  45. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,035
    Rep Power
    213
    Seriously? Interesting concept. The idea of the song came from Brian & Eddie hearing some guy named Russ Terranna[ using a tone generator while tuning the room. The loved the sound and ran and wrote Reflections. This was before the meeting at Berrys so it's unlikely that they wrote the song based on info they didn't have yet, but possible they heard something. Personally, I don't think they even thought about it. . QUOTE=RossHolloway;170751]I still think this song is about Florence leaving/breaking away from the Supremes.[/QUOTE]

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,340
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by revvy View Post
    In another area, if Lynda and Scherrie were so great, why did they need 3...count them...3...backup singers on the Return to Love tour? Now that's something to think about!
    You need to see a therapist my dear cause its real real clear that you need help getting over RTL . You seem more than a tad obsess with a tour from 13 years ago. It aint healthy sweetie and for the good of your health you need to get over it.

    Roberta

  47. #47
    supremester Guest
    RTL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! S_L_O_W_L_Y I T_U_R_N ...........step by step.........INCH BY INCH.......... I crept up on..........oh, it's YOU,........ I'm sorry, I just always go crazy when I hear: DON'T SAY IT......!!!!!!!!!!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    You need to see a therapist my dear cause its real real clear that you need help getting over RTL . You seem more than a tad obsess with a tour from 13 years ago. It aint healthy sweetie and for the good of your health you need to get over it.

    Roberta

  48. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by revvy View Post
    What I don't understand is why does every background have to be analyzed as an equation: 40% Mary, 10% Florence, 5% Louvain, 8.5% Jackie, etc. Florence and Mary were more than capable of providing background harmonies. That's why they were hired in the first place. If you listen to "Back in My Arms Again", you'll notice it's only Mary and Florence in the background and they do a bang up job!

    In another area, if Lynda and Scherrie were so great, why did they need 3...count them...3...backup singers on the Return to Love tour?

    Now that's something to think about!

    I hear ya! It had to have been very insulting to Scherrie and Lynda. Maybe Diane realized after hearing them that it would be impossible for them to sound like Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong. Heck, Diane didn't even sound like Diane! From the few clips I've seen of RTL, she sounded all hoarse and gruff on most of the songs.

  49. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,126
    Rep Power
    201
    Quote Originally Posted by TheMotownManiac View Post
    I think people discuss it because it interests them and they enjoy things that interest them. Those who don't find it interests them will hopefully find more interesting topics that will interest them. This topic interests me. I like knowing who is who. It's not a dig at Flo & Mary: the world's greatest bg singers ever IMHO. They can't supply everything needed always and can't always be where needed or slept in or was late [[AGAIN) and studio time was very very limited. They used Syretta as Martha Reeves for heaven's sake - this is nothing compared to that. AS for RTL, the three bg singerswere hired for Diana's half of the show. Also, depening on the day since inception, there was personnel offstage to augment MAry & Cindy if needed to round out the sound. Certainly for Love Is Here & Lovelight, but Cindy needed some support - no harm in that. After Scherrie & Lynda joined - who both are much stronger singers than Mary & Cindy - and who needed no support except on chorale pieces. RTL is a sad topic for most except the thousands who saw and loved it and of course, the cast and crew who got paid for the entire tour and only had to do 9 shows. Everybody did well financially except TNT/SFX who took it in the shorts and learned to not screw with Miss Ross, who has been gracious enough to allow SFX/Live Nation to produce dozens of her post RTL shows in North and South America.
    Scherrie and Lynda a great singers but IMO they don't blend well live in the background, it sounds like a vocal fight to me most of the time.

  50. #50
    smark21 Guest
    The best part of the RTL clips I’ve seen are the musical arrangements. Whoever wrote those charts should be commended as well as Diana Ross and SFX for hiring enough musicians to bring those songs to life and give the audience their money’s worth, music wise. Worst part of the RTL clips I’ve seen: Easy, those cheesy dancers. Not necessary.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.