[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 96

Thread: Missing You

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481

    Missing You

    Name:  IMG_1666.jpg
Views: 858
Size:  19.9 KB

    The final big hit - well big American pop hit

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481
    Darn, it’s blurry

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    “Missing You” marked a return to the soulful type ballad Diana excelled at. Compared to much of the forgettable pop fluff she was turning out at the time, it was something of a relief to know she still had it in her.
    Had she followed this up with a Lionel Ritchie produced album her hit making days might have continued a while longer.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,110
    Rep Power
    240
    i remember this song taking a while to take off here in USA, then she appeared on the awards show and it took off.
    good song, surprised she doesnt do this as much as anymore. it was a nice seller.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    809
    Rep Power
    166
    Never really got Missing You.

    Obviously the sentiment is fine but for me it's a bit dull, not one of her finest ballads.

    It was dropping down the charts having peaked around the 40s/50s when her appearance on the awards show regalvanised the record.

    It was a strange one in the UK.

    At that time a record became a hit when it entered the Top 75 - Missing You peaked at #76!

    But it sold steadily for quite a long period and spent 29 weeks in The UK Top 200 selling more than many of her minor "hits" which charted in the Top 75.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481
    It’s not one of my favourite songs - but I think it’s a good recording and I like hearing it once in a while

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by florence View Post
    Never really got Missing You.

    Obviously the sentiment is fine but for me it's a bit dull, not one of her finest ballads.

    It was dropping down the charts having peaked around the 40s/50s when her appearance on the awards show regalvanised the record.

    It was a strange one in the UK.

    At that time a record became a hit when it entered the Top 75 - Missing You peaked at #76!

    But it sold steadily for quite a long period and spent 29 weeks in The UK Top 200 selling more than many of her minor "hits" which charted in the Top 75.
    I remember it being played a plenty on UK radio at the time.
    It remains a touching song, but i don’t consider it to be one of Diana’s strongest ballads. I think it’s appeal lay in the sentiment of the song, with most of us missing someone at some point in our lives.
    It certainly marked a return to the Diana of old who at that point in time i thought gone forever.
    Unlike her American fans, the UK didn’t particularly warm to the Swept Away album or subsequent singles. She hadn’t had a hit single since “Muscles” in 82 so her profile was kind of low here. Like the USA, it needed a tv appearance to give it a nudge.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    809
    Rep Power
    166
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    Unlike her American fans, the UK didn’t particularly warm to the Swept Away album or subsequent singles. She hadn’t had a hit single since “Muscles” in 82 so her profile was kind of low here. Like the USA, it needed a tv appearance to give it a nudge.
    After 1982 EMI in the UK dropped the ball on promoting Diana.

    Had Touch been a release in that year it was almost certainly at least Top 20.

    Strangely, I suppose given its American success, they did pull out the stops for Missing You including re-promoting it several times to no avail.

    If they had given it the same attention when it was released Touch would certainly have been a sizeable hit and perhaps the Swept Away album would have benefited

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by florence View Post
    After 1982 EMI in the UK dropped the ball on promoting Diana.

    Had Touch been a release in that year it was almost certainly at least Top 20.

    Strangely, I suppose given its American success, they did pull out the stops for Missing You including re-promoting it several times to no avail.

    If they had given it the same attention when it was released Touch would certainly have been a sizeable hit and perhaps the Swept Away album would have benefited
    “Touch” did receive a fair amount of radio play at the time, but the public just weren’t interested. Personally i have always hated the song, finding it rather twee and lightweight.
    They probably should have taken a chance with “Swept Away” but were probably put off by “Mirror Mirror” charting so poorly.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    678
    Rep Power
    205
    "Touch by Touch" was a surprise Top 10 hit in the Netherlands, one of her bigger hits in the 1980s. "All of You" also made the Top 10, while "Missing You" didn't even chart [[which has always surprised me). "Touch by Touch" is a fun song, but to me not really a Diana Ross song -- and I never liked that bridge which seems to be copied straight from the opening tune of The A-Team.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaap View Post
    "Touch by Touch" is a fun song, but to me not really a Diana Ross song A-Team.
    At that point in time i don’t think there was anything typical of a Diana Ross song.
    The SA album alone contained soft rock, calypso shuffler, r&b, weird techno, a bland retro cover and perhaps one of the worst pop songs of her career in “We Are The Children”.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,671
    Rep Power
    246
    I like the song and the video which I think shows the good vibes between Diana and Marvin. However, what sounds like an edit at track time 2:00 lets the recording down as it spoils the flow of the song to my ears.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    913
    Rep Power
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    At that point in time i don’t think there was anything typical of a Diana Ross song.
    The SA album alone contained soft rock, calypso shuffler, r&b, weird techno, a bland retro cover and perhaps one of the worst pop songs of her career in “We Are The Children”.

    An excellent summation of SA.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,749
    Rep Power
    316
    what week was that jobeterob ??
    its too blury and I'm curious how crappy the competition was [or wasn't] that week







    Last edited by Boogiedown; 02-29-2024 at 01:01 AM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481
    The date isn’t on it - but it was 1985

    Private Dancer and Like A Virgin are on the chartName:  IMG_1666.jpg
Views: 576
Size:  14.1 KB

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,890
    Rep Power
    481
    Is that better? Why are my pictures blurry?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,749
    Rep Power
    316
    no better.
    thanks for trying, I'll pick a date around WE ARE THE WORLD recording .

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    How odd that that album - Swept Away - Diana and RCA basically had this "throw everything at the wall to see what sticks" method, which is why you have:

    A rock-ish dance song [[title track)
    Power ballads [[Forever Young)
    Romantic duet [[All of You; apparently this was copy and pasted on SA)
    R&B tunes [[Missing You, Telephone)
    New wave-ish pop [[It's Your Move)
    Schlocky humanitarian anthem [[We Are the Children)

    And ironically, the one song that has endured was the new wave-ish tune, albeit in a very slowed down, reverbed, warped version and turned into a viral meme.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,854
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    How odd that that album - Swept Away - Diana and RCA basically had this "throw everything at the wall to see what sticks" method, which is why you have:

    A rock-ish dance song [[title track)
    Power ballads [[Forever Young)
    Romantic duet [[All of You; apparently this was copy and pasted on SA)
    R&B tunes [[Missing You, Telephone)
    New wave-ish pop [[It's Your Move)
    Schlocky humanitarian anthem [[We Are the Children)

    And ironically, the one song that has endured was the new wave-ish tune, albeit in a very slowed down, reverbed, warped version and turned into a viral meme.
    it really was a patchwork album. there was 0 connectivity between the tunes in terms of production approach, style, anything. but it doesn't strike me as quick as disjointed at LTISH or Cream of the Crop.

    now that said, there are some tunes that are really questionable. like Forever Young - i find her vocals way to wispy and breathy. Rescue Me is ok i guess but she always had some "oldies" tune on her albums or a knock off like So Close. the woman was now 40 and didn't need to be reminding people of "oldies" if her goal was to appear current and relevant.

    i can deal with Children, had the hideous children's choir not been included. or at least if they could have sang in tune! there's this false notion that kids sing endearingly off pitch and that it's "cute." plenty of kids choirs can sing in pitch just fine.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,868
    Rep Power
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    i can deal with Children, had the hideous children's choir not been included. or at least if they could have sang in tune! there's this false notion that kids sing endearingly off pitch and that it's "cute." plenty of kids choirs can sing in pitch just fine.
    When I hear that recording I think, why didn't they add a key change and just go all the way full shlock?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    it really was a patchwork album. there was 0 connectivity between the tunes in terms of production approach, style, anything. but it doesn't strike me as quick as disjointed at LTISH or Cream of the Crop.

    now that said, there are some tunes that are really questionable. like Forever Young - i find her vocals way to wispy and breathy. Rescue Me is ok i guess but she always had some "oldies" tune on her albums or a knock off like So Close. the woman was now 40 and didn't need to be reminding people of "oldies" if her goal was to appear current and relevant.

    i can deal with Children, had the hideous children's choir not been included. or at least if they could have sang in tune! there's this false notion that kids sing endearingly off pitch and that it's "cute." plenty of kids choirs can sing in pitch just fine.
    One thing I noticed about the RCA material was how old fashioned everything was. Like you said, if Diana was tried to appeal to that era's young listeners, she didn't play her cards right by adding in oldies tunes or '60s-era type of material. Because it would bring attention to her age. That definitely added to why she had such a sales slump.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    One thing I noticed about the RCA material was how old fashioned everything was. Like you said, if Diana was tried to appeal to that era's young listeners, she didn't play her cards right by adding in oldies tunes or '60s-era type of material. Because it would bring attention to her age. That definitely added to why she had such a sales slump.
    The biggest mystery for me is why she waited nine years before reconnecting with Nile for an album in the vein of diana 80. It would seem a no-brainer to me.
    She seemed clueless in thinking her fans and public craved repeats of 50’s retreads and yowling guitars.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,873
    Rep Power
    908
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    The biggest mystery for me is why she waited nine years before reconnecting with Nile for an album in the vein of diana 80. It would seem a no-brainer to me.
    She seemed clueless in thinking her fans and public craved repeats of 50’s retreads and yowling guitars.
    It may have had something to do with bad blood resulting from her decision to remix diana without his knowledge right before its release. He's said to have been seriously pissed.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by sansradio View Post
    It may have had something to do with bad blood resulting from her decision to remix diana without his knowledge right before its release. He's said to have been seriously pissed.
    A possibility, though Bernard Edward’s seems to have forgiven her being he produced “Telephone” on SA, with Nile apparently the featured guitarist on “Its Your Move”.
    I have a feeling they would have been willing to produce the whole album if Diana had been up for it. Perhaps control issues still cast a shadow.
    It’s noteworthy that the album featured a grey album cover in the vein of “diana”.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,854
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    The biggest mystery for me is why she waited nine years before reconnecting with Nile for an album in the vein of diana 80. It would seem a no-brainer to me.
    She seemed clueless in thinking her fans and public craved repeats of 50’s retreads and yowling guitars.
    i'm guessing here and trying to sort of piece together comments from fans like Bluebrock and others.

    her recording career really wasn't a #1 priority for her at this period so it seems she sort of approached it with a lackadaisical attitude. Supposedly she wanted to work with Lionel and Quincy and Michael, especially on some of her earlier albums. but i guess they were busy or she didn't get hold of them soon enough or something. I would think being asked to produce THE debut album after Diana's departure from Motown would have been a prize at the top of most producer's wish list. I realize Quincy might have had contractual obligations with other singers and maybe just really couldn't squeeze her in. but i have my doubts on that.

    Supposedly when she finally worked with the Gibbs, it was very rushed and very last minute. so perhaps she wasn't good at planning out these things or accounting for timelines.

    there's a quote from around 1981 where she talks about producing it herself. i think she mentioned the idea of working with chic again but that they wanted creative control and that was something she was not willing to give up. odds are that sentiment carried through MUCH of her working relationships with producers while at RCA

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    i'm guessing here and trying to sort of piece together comments from fans like Bluebrock and others.

    her recording career really wasn't a #1 priority for her at this period so it seems she sort of approached it with a lackadaisical attitude. Supposedly she wanted to work with Lionel and Quincy and Michael, especially on some of her earlier albums. but i guess they were busy or she didn't get hold of them soon enough or something. I would think being asked to produce THE debut album after Diana's departure from Motown would have been a prize at the top of most producer's wish list. I realize Quincy might have had contractual obligations with other singers and maybe just really couldn't squeeze her in. but i have my doubts on that.

    Supposedly when she finally worked with the Gibbs, it was very rushed and very last minute. so perhaps she wasn't good at planning out these things or accounting for timelines.

    there's a quote from around 1981 where she talks about producing it herself. i think she mentioned the idea of working with chic again but that they wanted creative control and that was something she was not willing to give up. odds are that sentiment carried through MUCH of her working relationships with producers while at RCA
    Yet she was prepared to hand control of production duties to Gary Katz and Barry Gibb as opposed to reuniting with the producers of her best selling album.
    The fact both Nile and Bernard are both featured on the SA album makes me think they would have been more then prepared for a follow up album at that point in time.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,854
    Rep Power
    397
    Diana would also receive songs from writers and producers as potential tunes to record. she might favor a few of those and want to include. so a project might not be 100% with 1 producer.

    katz only did about 2/3 of the Ross lp. although supposedly there are unreleased tunes. not sure if they're his or Parkers though

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    Diana would also receive songs from writers and producers as potential tunes to record. she might favor a few of those and want to include. so a project might not be 100% with 1 producer.

    katz only did about 2/3 of the Ross lp. although supposedly there are unreleased tunes. not sure if they're his or Parkers though
    I don’t visualise a huge problem if she had presented certain songs she liked to any would be producer. Unless of course they were at the quality of “We Are The Children”.
    Katz produced five of the eight songs featured on ross 83, with the disjointed “Girls’ the only Ross production.That’s a fair few.
    My point being, when you have the best selling album of your career, why not go for a follow up. If anything, it was a style and genre of music she appeared for the most part to avoid.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,749
    Rep Power
    316
    I'm not sure the Chic sound is worth revisiting. Do you really want even more of UPSIDE DOWN kind of stuff from her?
    Seems like the artists that got the Chic treatment tapped into it briefly then moved on.
    A little goes a long way.
    Even Chic's own albums ....well I don't listen to them.

    Disco worked best as a kaleidoscope of songs and artists and sounds being interweaved together. You got a bit of this and a bit of that and you moved on. That was a big factor in its magic.
    Last edited by Boogiedown; 03-06-2024 at 12:57 PM.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,854
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I don’t visualise a huge problem if she had presented certain songs she liked to any would be producer. Unless of course they were at the quality of “We Are The Children”.
    Katz produced five of the eight songs featured on ross 83, with the disjointed “Girls’ the only Ross production.That’s a fair few.
    My point being, when you have the best selling album of your career, why not go for a follow up. If anything, it was a style and genre of music she appeared for the most part to avoid.
    i think you're right about the importance of a follow up lp. the story is that chic was to produce a 2nd album on her at motown but of course she left the label before that could happen.

    had she stayed - maybe she would have done more chic and maybe not. even if they had produced something, it might not have been released. the very early 80s were really a period of musical change as "disco" died and other more new wave sounds went mainstream.

    I believe the next lp would have been a full Masser production with all new tunes, as opposed to the mishmash we got on To Love Again. That would have taken her through 1981

    so that puts us at 1982. maybe the label would have brought Michael on board to work with her after the phenomenal success of Off The Wall and the Jackson's work at epic. MJ still had a good relationship with Berry and so even being at a different label probably wouldn't have totally stopped it. and if it was for Diana, hey no rules apply.

    Lionel would almost undoubtedly produced her too. Assuming Endless Love still happened [[no reason it shouldn't in this timeline), then Dreaming Of You would probably have been a released too since both artists would have been on the Motown label.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Boogiedown View Post
    I'm not sure the Chic sound is worth revisiting. Do you really want even more of UPSIDE DOWN kind of stuff from her?
    Seems like the artists that got the Chic treatment tapped into it briefly then moved on.
    A little goes a long way.
    Even Chic's own albums ....well I don't listen to them.

    Disco worked best as a kaleidoscope of songs and artists and sounds being interweaved together. You got a bit of this and a bit of that and you moved on. That was a big factor in its magic.
    I think the public were clamouring for another “Upside Down” from her. Far more so than dated musical retreads or fluffy pop. There was definitely room for one more album.

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,749
    Rep Power
    316
    you seem certain.
    but there is the risk of overstaying your welcome with that sound . the risk of the " hoo-hum she already did that" result.

    As it is I already think of it as a Chic album that features Diana Ross. Does she want to get over identified as a performer under their shadow?


    [i guess one could argue it worked with HDH]
    Last edited by Boogiedown; 03-06-2024 at 02:19 PM.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,730
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I think the public were clamouring for another “Upside Down” from her. Far more so than dated musical retreads or fluffy pop. There was definitely room for one more album.
    He's right that the Chic sound was dead. She didn't need to revisit that. Besides, Nile Rodgers had moved on had some huge successes.

    So in all my criticisms of Diana during this time, I have failed to remember what she was dealing with. She apparently recorded the SA album when her mother was battling cancer. Then her mom dies like a month or two after the album dropped. There's no way Diana was thinking clearly during this time, nor that of when the EA album was being recorded. While I like the SA album, I've been brutal with my thoughts about the EA album and the dumb decisions I feel Diana made with the entire thing. I'm officially forgiving her EA. It's unfair to ask someone to be focused during such a tough time.

    That being said, Nile would have been perfect for the follow up to SA. Like A Virgin had blown up, among some of his other projects, and while I wouldn't think Diana needed to be doing Madonna songs, Nile had certainly proven that he could produce quality albums around unique talent. I think he would have found a way to give Diana age appropriate songs that would appeal to the youth market and the more adult market. He most certainly would have given her a better all around album than EA.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    He's right that the Chic sound was dead. She didn't need to revisit that. Besides, Nile Rodgers had moved on had some huge successes.

    So in all my criticisms of Diana during this time, I have failed to remember what she was dealing with. She apparently recorded the SA album when her mother was battling cancer. Then her mom dies like a month or two after the album dropped. There's no way Diana was thinking clearly during this time, nor that of when the EA album was being recorded. While I like the SA album, I've been brutal with my thoughts about the EA album and the dumb decisions I feel Diana made with the entire thing. I'm officially forgiving her EA. It's unfair to ask someone to be focused during such a tough time.

    That being said, Nile would have been perfect for the follow up to SA. Like A Virgin had blown up, among some of his other projects, and while I wouldn't think Diana needed to be doing Madonna songs, Nile had certainly proven that he could produce quality albums around unique talent. I think he would have found a way to give Diana age appropriate songs that would appeal to the youth market and the more adult market. He most certainly would have given her a better all around album than EA.
    Without sounding hard hearted, it’s hard to comprehend that she spent two years not thinking clearly owing to her mother’s illness. It must have been difficult having to perform at Radio City every night, but i can’t believe the task of finding a strong producer would have added additional strain to the process of recording an album.
    Many of us have to deal with the grief of losing a parent while still having to make important business decisions. Having a single producer take control would i have thought been an asset in freeing up time for her to concentrate on more personal matters during that difficult time.
    I definitely think she should have teamed up with Nile and Bernard anytime between 81 -87. None of the albums she recorded during that time frame will ever be considered classics.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    The biggest mystery for me is why she waited nine years before reconnecting with Nile for an album in the vein of diana 80. It would seem a no-brainer to me.
    She seemed clueless in thinking her fans and public craved repeats of 50’s retreads and yowling guitars.
    Beats me. I think Diana would've found herself stuck anyway because the early '80s was not a great time for female pop-R&B artists prior to the arrivals of the "new blood" like Whitney and Janet.

    Plus she was older, had kids to look after, too much was going on, you know?

    Diana wanted control too and I think Nile and Bernard would've still butted heads with her. I think she should've rehired Ashford & Simpson - but I think by then, A&S were becoming stars on their own right. Luther Vandross became the go-to for the older divas [[Dionne, Aretha) in the '80s as well some younger ones [[Cheryl Lynn). Luther gave Diana a few songs. But again, probably would've butted heads [[as we now know about those legendary heated sessions Luther had with Aretha).

    Maybe it just wasn't in the cards to work?

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    A possibility, though Bernard Edward’s seems to have forgiven her being he produced “Telephone” on SA, with Nile apparently the featured guitarist on “Its Your Move”.
    I have a feeling they would have been willing to produce the whole album if Diana had been up for it. Perhaps control issues still cast a shadow.
    It’s noteworthy that the album featured a grey album cover in the vein of “diana”.
    I'm still confused by who was the guitarist on IYM. People have said it's Nile but others say it's Jeff Beck so I don't know who's telling the truth [[though Nile is credited with playing guitar on the album).

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    I'm still confused by who was the guitarist on IYM. People have said it's Nile but others say it's Jeff Beck so I don't know who's telling the truth [[though Nile is credited with playing guitar on the album).
    It is an odd one, unless Nile was hanging around the studio due to Bernard producing “Telephone”. Personally i have my doubts.
    As a whole i find the SA” album dull and uninspiring, receiving mainly negative reviews upon it’s release here in the UK. The only decent songs for me are, “SA”, “Missing You” and the brilliant Telephone”.
    One of the glaring faults with those rca albums being the weak tracks were particularly awful as opposed to just fillers as in the Motown years.

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,854
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    It is an odd one, unless Nile was hanging around the studio due to Bernard producing “Telephone”. Personally i have my doubts.
    As a whole i find the SA” album dull and uninspiring, receiving mainly negative reviews upon it’s release here in the UK. The only decent songs for me are, “SA”, “Missing You” and the brilliant Telephone”.
    One of the glaring faults with those rca albums being the weak tracks were particularly awful as opposed to just fillers as in the Motown years.
    i think Telephone is absolutely dreadful. it plods along with no direction and she sounds thin and whiney.

    i agree that SA is a hodge podge but i think it holds together ok. SA, Missing, Touch, it's your move, all of you are all solid tracks. Rescue Me and Forever Young are ok enough but nothing great.

    I know the song Nobody Makes Me Crazy is a bit controversial. many people HATE it but i don't mind it. most definitely NOT a single but i think it's fine enough for an album track.

    Fight For It was apparently dropped from the album once she got permission to include All Of You. Frankly she should have dropped Rescue Me or Forever.

    I think Children is cheesy but had they cut the horrible children choir, it would have been ok. it's full on 80s teen movie when there was some goofy montage action sequence of the nerds and the dweebs finally overcoming the stuck up snooty girls and jocks, to triumph in the climax of the movie. but it's not terrible - at least it had some potential.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    i think Telephone is absolutely dreadful. it plods along with no direction and she sounds thin and whiney.

    i agree that SA is a hodge podge but i think it holds together ok. SA, Missing, Touch, it's your move, all of you are all solid tracks. Rescue Me and Forever Young are ok enough but nothing great.

    I know the song Nobody Makes Me Crazy is a bit controversial. many people HATE it but i don't mind it. most definitely NOT a single but i think it's fine enough for an album track.

    Fight For It was apparently dropped from the album once she got permission to include All Of You. Frankly she should have dropped Rescue Me or Forever.

    I think Children is cheesy but had they cut the horrible children choir, it would have been ok. it's full on 80s teen movie when there was some goofy montage action sequence of the nerds and the dweebs finally overcoming the stuck up snooty girls and jocks, to triumph in the climax of the movie. but it's not terrible - at least it had some potential.
    I don’t consider “We Are The Children” would ever have been ok lol.
    I think “Telephone” one of the best songs she cut in the 80’s. Her voice is high, but soulful and expressive. “Rescue Me” is utterly devoid of any soul or feeling whatsoever when compared to the terrific version by Fontella Bass.
    “”All Of You” only became popular owing to the fact it featured the immensely popular Inglesias. It would otherwise have fallen flat.
    The rest with the exception of “SA”, “Missing You” and perhaps “Touch” [[if you like bubblegum pop) sounds flat and uninspired
    The album garnered terrible reviews, with esteemed Motown historian and author Sharon Davis commenting “Why does she keep recording these awful songs”.
    I’m with Sharon on that one.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,730
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    Without sounding hard hearted, it’s hard to comprehend that she spent two years not thinking clearly owing to her mother’s illness. It must have been difficult having to perform at Radio City every night, but i can’t believe the task of finding a strong producer would have added additional strain to the process of recording an album.
    Many of us have to deal with the grief of losing a parent while still having to make important business decisions. Having a single producer take control would i have thought been an asset in freeing up time for her to concentrate on more personal matters during that difficult time.
    I definitely think she should have teamed up with Nile and Bernard anytime between 81 -87. None of the albums she recorded during that time frame will ever be considered classics.
    As I have to repeatedly remind people, grief affects everyone in different ways. And yes, cloudy judgement is one of those things. And because one person can do "thing A" while grieving, another person may find it hard to even get out of bed. So yeah, I can forgive her these mistakes. Now, of course I have no way of knowing if this was Diana's issue or not. Contrary to popular belief, she doesn't confide in me. I'm just giving her the benefit of the doubt.

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,730
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    It is an odd one, unless Nile was hanging around the studio due to Bernard producing “Telephone”. Personally i have my doubts.
    As a whole i find the SA” album dull and uninspiring, receiving mainly negative reviews upon it’s release here in the UK. The only decent songs for me are, “SA”, “Missing You” and the brilliant Telephone”.
    One of the glaring faults with those rca albums being the weak tracks were particularly awful as opposed to just fillers as in the Motown years.
    I like the album, with my favorites being the three you mentioned. I'm also rather partial...wait for it...to "We Are the Children".

    But you are absolutely right, the weak tracks on the RCA albums are leaps and bounds worst than the worst of the ones on her Motown albums.

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,730
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    I think “Telephone” one of the best songs she cut in the 80’s. Her voice is high, but soulful and expressive. “Rescue Me” is utterly devoid of any soul or feeling whatsoever when compared to the terrific version by Fontella Bass.
    I used to love "Telephone", then I cooled off of it, now I really like it again. My problem with it is that it needed a total remixing. But it was definitely the type of song I would from her during this period.

    She should have been slapped for what she did to "Rescue Me". Honestly, I'm not convinced there is anything she could have done differently to be a worthy cover of such a great song. Nothing about the original sounds like it was in her wheelhouse. But then again, I wouldn't have thought she could do anything good with "Tell Mama", but I was pleasantly surprised that, at best, she didn't mess it up.

    Her 80s cover songs mostly have a cheesy karaoke feel to them. I would say the exceptions are "Selfish One", which I think is great, "Sweet Soul Music", which also surprised me at how well she did it, and "There Goes My Baby".

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    I like the album, with my favorites being the three you mentioned. I'm also rather partial...wait for it...to "We Are the Children".

    But you are absolutely right, the weak tracks on the RCA albums are leaps and bounds worst than the worst of the ones on her Motown albums.
    Just for clarification, you actually like “We Are The Children”!!!. Perhaps she was taking advice from certain fans when compiling those rca albums. It would certainly be one explanation.

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    As I have to repeatedly remind people, grief affects everyone in different ways. And yes, cloudy judgement is one of those things. And because one person can do "thing A" while grieving, another person may find it hard to even get out of bed. So yeah, I can forgive her these mistakes. Now, of course I have no way of knowing if this was Diana's issue or not. Contrary to popular belief, she doesn't confide in me. I'm just giving her the benefit of the doubt.
    I think few of us need any lessons on grief, but can’t really see it was responsible for her making questionable decisions over a two year period.
    Until that all revealing book arrives, i guess we will never know for sure.

  45. #45
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    599
    Rep Power
    136
    It's funny that people think Nile & Bernard's music was dated in the early 1980s when they went on to have huge successes with Madonna, David Bowie, Power Station, Duran Duran, INXS and many more that decade.

    Nile & Bernard also wrote many lovely ballads. Pretty much all of them were superior to anything Diana recorded during the RCA years.

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5,035
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Levi Stubbs Tears View Post
    It's funny that people think Nile & Bernard's music was dated in the early 1980s when they went on to have huge successes with Madonna, David Bowie, Power Station, Duran Duran, INXS and many more that decade.

    Nile & Bernard also wrote many lovely ballads. Pretty much all of them were superior to anything Diana recorded during the RCA years.
    Very much agree.

  47. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,854
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Ollie9 View Post
    Just for clarification, you actually like “We Are The Children”!!!. Perhaps she was taking advice from certain fans when compiling those rca albums. It would certainly be one explanation.
    Children is definitely a product of it's time. lol very 80s sound but the track itself is also energetic and she commits to the vocals with more effort than other tracks. it's not a highlight of her discography but [[apart from the ill conceived child voices) it's hardly the worst she sounded on vinyl. IMO it's more enjoyable than most of Eaten Alive lp

  48. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,854
    Rep Power
    397
    Quote Originally Posted by Levi Stubbs Tears View Post
    It's funny that people think Nile & Bernard's music was dated in the early 1980s when they went on to have huge successes with Madonna, David Bowie, Power Station, Duran Duran, INXS and many more that decade.

    Nile & Bernard also wrote many lovely ballads. Pretty much all of them were superior to anything Diana recorded during the RCA years.
    very true but that was all a little after a "cooling off" period of a couple years. chic was so hot in the late 70s and then the diana album in 80. but then the next big hit was Bowie's Let's Dance.

  49. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,730
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by Levi Stubbs Tears View Post
    It's funny that people think Nile & Bernard's music was dated in the early 1980s when they went on to have huge successes with Madonna, David Bowie, Power Station, Duran Duran, INXS and many more that decade.
    I can only speak for myself, but when I say the sound was dead, I was talking about the Chic sound. Everyone knows a Chic production of the late 70s into early 80s. It has a signature sound. Diana got that sound when it was fast on the way out. She did not need to have any more productions post 1980 that sounded like the diana80 album.

    The successes Nile and Bernard moved on to throughout the 80s sounds nothing like the sound they became known for in the disco era. So yeah, using them during this time makes a lot of sense. But Diana could not have afforded a diana80 sound alike in 1981. The public had been there and done that and moved on.

  50. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,730
    Rep Power
    552
    Quote Originally Posted by sup_fan View Post
    Children is definitely a product of it's time. lol very 80s sound but the track itself is also energetic and she commits to the vocals with more effort than other tracks. it's not a highlight of her discography but [[apart from the ill conceived child voices) it's hardly the worst she sounded on vinyl. IMO it's more enjoyable than most of Eaten Alive lp
    It is very 80s. And like you, I've always thought it sounded perfect for some cheesy 80s movie, which is right up my alley. It's no "Swept Away", but I enjoy it for what it is.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.