[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 99
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    133
    Rep Power
    97

    Mary Wilson's Voice: Perfection

    I've always loved her beautiful, soft, sexy voice. And loved when she would soul it up! Mmm.

    Anyway i thought I would start an appreciation thread for her voice. She truly was amazing!

    I found a video on YouTube called "Mary Wilson CAN'T Sing," which is actually a video compilation of some of her strongest vocal moments intended to prove that yes, Mary actually CAN sing and very well.

    https://youtu.be/UN48C0_2e0w

    I've always said that Diana Ross was the key to the cross over success of the Supremes. But can you imagine if Mary wasn't a Supreme but had her own modest solo career already at Motown? She wouldn't be the background Supreme that wrote a book...she would be a name herself. Probably a more modest success and obviously Berry would have had the groups and Supremes given more attention, but Mary would be one of the classic Motown vocalists, and less of a background story.

    Then people could say sentences like "Aretha Franklin, Etta James, Mary Wilson" instead of her name already implied but just being referred to as "The Supremes" or DRATS.

    I honestly LOVED "Ooh Child."

    And "Early Morning Love." Wow. "You Are the Heart of Me." True I think many of the old Supremes songs aren't really a good fit for her voice [[Reflections and Back in My Arms seem to be a weird fit) but she really belts out some of those later songs where she truly shines. Floy Joy. You Danced My Heart Around the Stars.

    Swoon!
    Last edited by imakicola; 03-20-2017 at 12:13 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    346
    Rep Power
    91
    I love Mary's voice especially in the 70s Supremes incarnation, when she got to do a lot more vocal-wise. Super sexy and sensual, songs like "Can we love again", "You are the heart of me" and "Early Morning Love" are just heavenly to my ears.

  3. #3
    huntergettingcaptured Guest
    Put me in the Mary Wilson Appreciation camp as well. Way before the internet gave every naysayer a voice and platform, I had never heard this thing about Mary not being able to sing. I was in love with her smokey style. One thing that always crossed my mind is that with Diana being the lead and the focal point of the group, I thought it was pretty cool that Mary got a lead on "Supremes A-Go-Go" and then with her version of "Can't Take My Eyes Off You." The "Floy Joy" single and album were further revelations of how good Mary was. She definitely had a style of her own- nobody else sounded like her and I mean that in the best way. Hearing her sing, wow; it honestly has a very potent effect on my very soul!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    I was confused with this thread at first and watched the video. However It truly illustrates what a great singer and stylist she is. Not long ago I saw a video of her singing If I Were Your Woman and if my eyes were closed I'd think it was Gladys Knight. More is coming for Mary Wilson and she sure deserves acclaim.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,036
    Rep Power
    213
    I've loved Mary's voice the first time I heard it which was Baby Don't Go. SHe has a unique, soothingly rich sound and caresses ballads as well or better than the best of them. I just saw her in Vegas last month and she still sounds as good as she always has - her voice has only improved with age. She's currently trying to put together a scaled down version of Sophisticated Ladies and you must see it if it happens as those songs were just meant for her! QUOTE=imakicola;377141]I've always loved her beautiful, soft, sexy voice. And loved when she would soul it up! Mmm.

    Anyway i thought I would start an appreciation thread for her voice. She truly was amazing!

    I found a video on YouTube called "Mary Wilson CAN'T Sing," which is actually a video compilation of some of her strongest vocal moments intended to prove that yes, Mary actually CAN sing and very well.

    https://youtu.be/UN48C0_2e0w

    I've always said that Diana Ross was the key to the cross over success of the Supremes. But can you imagine if Mary wasn't a Supreme but had her own modest solo career already at Motown? She wouldn't be the background Supreme that wrote a book...she would be a name herself. Probably a more modest success and obviously Berry would have had the groups and Supremes given more attention, but Mary would be one of the classic Motown vocalists, and less of a background story.

    Then people could say sentences like "Aretha Franklin, Etta James, Mary Wilson" instead of her name already implied but just being referred to as "The Supremes" or DRATS.

    I honestly LOVED "Ooh Child."

    And "Early Morning Love." Wow. "You Are the Heart of Me." True I think many of the old Supremes songs aren't really a good fit for her voice [[Reflections and Back in My Arms seem to be a weird fit) but she really belts out some of those later songs where she truly shines. Floy Joy. You Danced My Heart Around the Stars.

    Swoon![/QUOTE]

  6. #6
    mpn1jco Guest
    Both Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong are very talented singers.

    Last edited by mpn1jco; 03-20-2017 at 06:31 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,823
    Rep Power
    256
    I love Mary's voice! She's a great singer. Those deep, smoky, Mary Wells-esque vocals. I LOVE "Floy Joy" and "Automatically Sunshine". And "This Is Why I Believe In You".

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    311
    I've been in love with mary and her voice since[the tears].

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    133
    Rep Power
    97
    I find the end of this to be particularly superb!!

    https://youtu.be/15pbfKS4k8k
    Last edited by imakicola; 03-24-2017 at 12:02 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    Can't open it

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    That smokey tone she has, especially on the ballads, is superb. During the 60s, ballads is where Mary shined. She was great on "Tears", "Baby Don't Go", "Sunset" and "Our Day Will Come". I wasn't impressed by "Pretty Baby" and I've come to just about hate what she did with "Come and Get These Memories". But then the 70s rolled around and I think that was a decade made for her voice, all those sexy, slow cuts. And she could tackle the uptempo very well at that point too because I love her on "Early Morning Love". Had she secured a record deal in the 80s and put out music like "Sleeping In Separate Rooms" I think she would have been a solid artist and able to carve out a discography that stood alone from her work as a Supreme.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,446
    Rep Power
    897
    Six words: "Don't Let My Teardrops Bother You." Incredible! The only version that matters...puts Dionne's to shame.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    913
    Rep Power
    192
    I saw Mary perform a whole live set at the old Sunset Junction Street Fair in Silverlake [[Los Angeles). It was 12-15 years ago. I was not impressed. I also saw her in the film "Only The Strong Survive" and questioned her inclusion.

    She certainly is a beauty and likely has many other gifts. She is just a competent vocalist.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    913
    Rep Power
    192
    Quote Originally Posted by sansradio View Post
    Six words: "Don't Let My Teardrops Bother You." Incredible! The only version that matters...puts Dionne's to shame.
    Sansradio, you typically have excellent taste in music and performers. Other than wigs, make-up and wardrobe, Mary Wilson cannot do ANYTHING that would put the legendary Dionne Warwick to shame.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by sansradio View Post
    Six words: "Don't Let My Teardrops Bother You." Incredible! The only version that matters...puts Dionne's to shame.
    Oh she's great on "Teardrops" and "You Are the Heart of Me". I wouldn't say she put Dionne's versions to shame, but great just the same. I certainly prefer Mary's leads on these songs to Dionne's though. Also the live version of "Teardrops" on Dick Cavett [[I think) is excellent. Mary sounds fantastic and Scherrie and Susaye back her up beautifully.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by Guy View Post
    I saw Mary perform a whole live set at the old Sunset Junction Street Fair in Silverlake [[Los Angeles). It was 12-15 years ago. I was not impressed.
    Isn't that how it is sometimes? Some artists grab you while others leave you cold. What I love about art is that not everyone is attracted to the same thing. Mary does it for some, but not for others. I'm glad she continues to attract folks to her shows.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,446
    Rep Power
    897
    Quote Originally Posted by Guy View Post
    Sansradio, you typically have excellent taste in music and performers. Other than wigs, make-up and wardrobe, Mary Wilson cannot do ANYTHING that would put the legendary Dionne Warwick to shame.
    I knew that I should've qualified my statement. Obviously, Miss Warwick is one of the finest vocalists of all time; I didn't mean to cast aspersions on her legendary prowess. However, her version of "...Teardrops..." leaves me atypically cold. The Sups version is the one that moves me most, and Mary's lead is a main factor for me. Sorry to disappoint you; we'll agree to disagree, I trust!

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    One of my favorites from '96:


  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,798
    Rep Power
    350
    When I saw Mary Wilson perform live in the 70s, she was a revelation. I couldn't believe how good she was.

    To this day, I don't think any producer has managed to capture the excellence of her voice on record. To me the closest is "Ooh Child" as a soloist and "I Don't Want to Lose You" as a Supreme.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    This is great. Thx Marv. When and for who did she record this?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    179
    Rep Power
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by sansradio View Post
    I knew that I should've qualified my statement. Obviously, Miss Warwick is one of the finest vocalists of all time; I didn't mean to cast aspersions on her legendary prowess. However, her version of "...Teardrops..." leaves me atypically cold. The Sups version is the one that moves me most, and Mary's lead is a main factor for me. Sorry to disappoint you; we'll agree to disagree, I trust!
    Sansradio, I agree with all you say regarding 'Teardrops'.Dionne Warwick is one of the all time greats but her teaming with Holland Dozier Holland didn't deliver the magic for me. For me,Mary Wilson's lead on the Supremes version is the definitive version.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by luke View Post
    This is great. Thx Marv. When and for who did she record this?
    You are welcome Luke! She recorded "Turn Around" for Da Bridge Records. It got some radio airplay in NYC back in 1996-97.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    44,446
    Rep Power
    897
    Thanks for the support, Ozmo.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,845
    Rep Power
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    Oh she's great on "Teardrops" and "You Are the Heart of Me". I wouldn't say she put Dionne's versions to shame, but great just the same. I certainly prefer Mary's leads on these songs to Dionne's though. Also the live version of "Teardrops" on Dick Cavett [[I think) is excellent. Mary sounds fantastic and Scherrie and Susaye back her up beautifully.
    The blend of MSS nearly rivals the harmony of the early Sups. As someone mentioned here, Mary has a very unique and pleasing voice. Her voice added something very special to the sound of The Supremes.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    I too agree Sansradio!

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,845
    Rep Power
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    One of my favorites from '96:

    Thanks Marv. I been outta pocket for a while. Catch up soon, take care.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by detmotownguy View Post
    Thanks Marv. I been outta pocket for a while. Catch up soon, take care.
    You're welcome. No problem. Be safe, be happy!

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,773
    Rep Power
    187
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozmo View Post
    Sansradio, I agree with all you say regarding 'Teardrops'.Dionne Warwick is one of the all time greats but her teaming with Holland Dozier Holland didn't deliver the magic for me. For me,Mary Wilson's lead on the Supremes version is the definitive version.
    I agree also. I love Dionne Warwick and she is in my top 5 of favorite female singers. Have all her albums. However I do prefer Mary's version over Warwicks.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by detmotownguy View Post
    The blend of MSS nearly rivals the harmony of the early Sups. As someone mentioned here, Mary has a very unique and pleasing voice. Her voice added something very special to the sound of The Supremes.
    Mary has this unique talent of being able to blend perfectly with whoever her singing partners were. I remember hearing this scratch demo years ago of Mary, along with Scherrie Payne and Cindy Birdsong for the song "This is Why I Believe In You" and was floored at how Mary led them through all that layering of vocals like she was a Baptist church choir director! LOL! I mean Mary did everything from cueing them to ad-libbing on top of Scherrie and Cindy! I wished I could find that and Scherrie's He's My Massa" comedy recording again.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    She is one of the most versatile singers still out there today:


  31. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,845
    Rep Power
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Mary has this unique talent of being able to blend perfectly with whoever her singing partners were. I remember hearing this scratch demo years ago of Mary, along with Scherrie Payne and Cindy Birdsong for the song "This is Why I Believe In You" and was floored at how Mary led them through all that layering of vocals like she was a Baptist church choir director! LOL! I mean Mary did everything from cueing them to ad-libbing on top of Scherrie and Cindy! I wished I could find that and Scherrie's He's My Massa" comedy recording again.
    Yes yes yes I remember that sound footage! A perfect example of Mary's skills in leading the group. I bel the producer could also be heard working with the ladies. She is not given enough credit for leading the group. We need to find and save that sound footage for posterity. The hunt begins!

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,845
    Rep Power
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    She is one of the most versatile singers still out there today:

    Absolute perfection.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    To this day, I don't think any producer has managed to capture the excellence of her voice on record. To me the closest is "Ooh Child" as a soloist and "I Don't Want to Lose You" as a Supreme.
    Vocally she was good on "Ooh Child" but that arrangement sucked and it didn't compliment her voice at all, IMO. Had the Supremes covered this back in the 70s I bet Mary would have gotten the lead and she would have killed it. I so much prefer Phyllis Hymen's version of "I Don't Want to Lose You" that all the others, including the Supremes version, pales in comparison. Again, Mary is good on it but it doesn't do much for me.

    If I were to pick the two studio songs that best showcase just how good Mary is, I would choose "Love Talk" as a soloist and maybe "You Are the Heart of Me" as a Supreme.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by detmotownguy View Post
    The blend of MSS nearly rivals the harmony of the early Sups.
    Perhaps when they [[MSS) were at their best, but to be honest, more often than not I find that grouping to sound as if they were competing with one another to be heard as opposed to finding the harmony. That's why it's my least favorite lineup.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Mary has this unique talent of being able to blend perfectly with whoever her singing partners were. I remember hearing this scratch demo years ago of Mary, along with Scherrie Payne and Cindy Birdsong for the song "This is Why I Believe In You" and was floored at how Mary led them through all that layering of vocals like she was a Baptist church choir director! LOL! I mean Mary did everything from cueing them to ad-libbing on top of Scherrie and Cindy! I wished I could find that and Scherrie's He's My Massa" comedy recording again.
    Mary was the key to the Supremes' harmony in every lineup. Lead vocal wise, everyone seems to be all over the place with what they think of Mary's singing, but she always gets praised for harmonizing ability. I understand her need to find solo stardom after the Supremes ended, but I wish in between record company auditions and book releases that Mary had forged a secondary career as an in demand background vocalist, like a Cissy Houston. I really am surprised that Mary's post Supremes background discography isn't as extensive as one might imagine with her ear for harmony.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    264
    Rep Power
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    Mary was the key to the Supremes' harmony in every lineup. Lead vocal wise, everyone seems to be all over the place with what they think of Mary's singing, but she always gets praised for harmonizing ability. I understand her need to find solo stardom after the Supremes ended, but I wish in between record company auditions and book releases that Mary had forged a secondary career as an in demand background vocalist, like a Cissy Houston. I really am surprised that Mary's post Supremes background discography isn't as extensive as one might imagine with her ear for harmony.
    That's a very good point, which never occurred to me.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    Oh she's great on "Teardrops" and "You Are the Heart of Me". I wouldn't say she put Dionne's versions to shame, but great just the same. I certainly prefer Mary's leads on these songs to Dionne's though. Also the live version of "Teardrops" on Dick Cavett [[I think) is excellent. Mary sounds fantastic and Scherrie and Susaye back her up beautifully.
    I have to agree with you here. Whilst Mary is not even in the same vocal hemisphere as Dionne at her peak somehow the Supremes version is superior. Mary's voice is perfectly suited to the song and the production is superior to Dionne's. Strange but true.
    Last edited by Bluebrock; 03-25-2017 at 01:40 PM. Reason: Not finished my post

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    Perhaps when they [[MSS) were at their best, but to be honest, more often than not I find that grouping to sound as if they were competing with one another to be heard as opposed to finding the harmony. That's why it's my least favorite lineup.
    I totally agree again. MSS did not look or sound like the traditional Supremes. Vocally both Scherrie and Susaye were of course excellent , but visually this line up was all over the place. They looked awkward and ill rehearsed on stage. As a long term fan i was secretly relieved when they called it a day. They made some great records of course, but to me they were no longer the Supremes.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,340
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluebrock View Post
    I totally agree again. MSS did not look or sound like the traditional Supremes. Vocally both Scherrie and Susaye were of course excellent , but visually this line up was all over the place. They looked awkward and ill rehearsed on stage. As a long term fan i was secretly relieved when they called it a day. They made some great records of course, but to me they were no longer the Supremes.
    I agree with you dear Bluebrock they looked real awkward and MSS compete for the lead and it was messy and needed rehearsal. My favorite grouping aside from Diana and Mary and Florencce was Jean and Lynda and Mary. I liked Cindy but shes not much of a vocalist.

    fondly,

    Roberta

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluebrock View Post
    I totally agree again. MSS did not look or sound like the traditional Supremes. Vocally both Scherrie and Susaye were of course excellent , but visually this line up was all over the place. They looked awkward and ill rehearsed on stage. As a long term fan i was secretly relieved when they called it a day. They made some great records of course, but to me they were no longer the Supremes.
    They did make some great music. But yeah, the live look just doesn't do it for me. Visually they look "funny" because of the height difference between the two smalls and Mary. I never noticed any awkwardness or lack of rehearsal whenever I watch their performances though, but if so, it could be because their hearts weren't in the music. I love disco [[the more soulful and latin beat disco, not the what I call electronic disco like "I Feel Love" or "Lovin, Livin and Givin".) but not every artist is suited to the genre and a lot of artists at the time were moving in that direction because that's what was happening. Mary was a soulful balladress, not a disco queen. Likewise, Susaye should have been doing what Deniece Williams was doing. Scherrie was probably the only one suited to disco. I always thought that Scherrie was disco or Broadway. The Supremes were a disco act by MSS and they had no business in that arena.

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    I agree with you dear Bluebrock they looked real awkward and MSS compete for the lead and it was messy and needed rehearsal. My favorite grouping aside from Diana and Mary and Florencce was Jean and Lynda and Mary. I liked Cindy but shes not much of a vocalist.
    That lead competition is irritating, especially when remembering that the three women were such great singers on their own and should have been able to come together beautifully. I've always gotten the feeling that one of them wasn't much of a group person anyway and was more or less using the group as a stepping stone. And not that I'm knocking that. I think it's a logical step for some. But I think that some of the competition, even when singing background, had a lot to do with future plans. Just my opinion.

    As for favorite groupings, Roberta we're on the same page. It doesn't get any better than Florence, Diana and Mary for me, be it live or on record. Record wise my second favorite lineup is a tie between DRATS and JMC. I just love most of the recorded music the two lineups put out. But live, my second fav lineup is JML. They sound like a group that could vocally compete with the other female groups out at the time. IMO single worst decision made regarding the 70s Supremes was Mary's refusal to leave Motown with Jean and Lynda and become another group. The Supremes were always going to be Diana Ross and the three ladies she sang with, while everyone else would be just as Supreme but constantly in the 60's shadow. JML were three gifted and gorgeous, brown skinned women. Their look [[when they weren't wearing DRATS hand me downs and going for the 60s glamour) was as seventies as the Supremes would ever get. They could sing their asses off and dance too. There's was no GOOD reason why the three of them shouldn't have left Motown and the Supremes name behind and joined another record company. Several high profile artists had already left and went on to great success elsewhere. These ladies were good enough to do it too.

  42. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,798
    Rep Power
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    One of my favorites from '96:

    That is rather good vocally. Thanks for posting, Marv.

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    That is rather good vocally. Thanks for posting, Marv.
    You are most welcome.

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Here is another favorite of mine................"Walk the Line".


  45. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    346
    Rep Power
    91
    That's catchy, I really like that. Thanks for the post.

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,248
    Rep Power
    291
    As I posted recently Walk was one of the two fave songs of the audience when Mary performed at BB Kings last month. The place went wild

  47. #47
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    6,060
    Rep Power
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by RanRan79 View Post
    That lead competition is irritating, especially when remembering that the three women were such great singers on their own and should have been able to come together beautifully. I've always gotten the feeling that one of them wasn't much of a group person anyway and was more or less using the group as a stepping stone. And not that I'm knocking that. I think it's a logical step for some. But I think that some of the competition, even when singing background, had a lot to do with future plans. Just my opinion.

    As for favorite groupings, Roberta we're on the same page. It doesn't get any better than Florence, Diana and Mary for me, be it live or on record. Record wise my second favorite lineup is a tie between DRATS and JMC. I just love most of the recorded music the two lineups put out. But live, my second fav lineup is JML. They sound like a group that could vocally compete with the other female groups out at the time. IMO single worst decision made regarding the 70s Supremes was Mary's refusal to leave Motown with Jean and Lynda and become another group. The Supremes were always going to be Diana Ross and the three ladies she sang with, while everyone else would be just as Supreme but constantly in the 60's shadow. JML were three gifted and gorgeous, brown skinned women. Their look [[when they weren't wearing DRATS hand me downs and going for the 60s glamour) was as seventies as the Supremes would ever get. They could sing their asses off and dance too. There's was no GOOD reason why the three of them shouldn't have left Motown and the Supremes name behind and joined another record company. Several high profile artists had already left and went on to great success elsewhere. These ladies were good enough to do it too.
    I have to agree with my dear friend Roberta and yourself. JML had so much potential. Had the internal strife not taken over i firmly believe this line up could have done some great things. Lynda was an exceptional vocalist who could easily have succeeded Jean as lead singer or at least shared more leads. They were also the most visually striking line up. I kind of fell in love with Lynda all over again when i met her recently. She is one classy lady and i have the ultimate respect for her. I also agree that MSS were given material they didn't really believe in, despite many of us fans liking it.

  48. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,313
    Rep Power
    218
    I agree also. The Jean, Mary and Lynda line up we're exciting live and Lynda had a strong soprano that was much needed to balance out Mary's strong alto, it hadn't been there since Flo left. And I do think Lynda added some spunk and sass back into the group, she reminded me a lot of Florence and I think that was why she worked so well with Mary. But as we all know Jean wanted out by this point and it ended up being very short lived...

  49. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by Bluebrock View Post
    I have to agree with my dear friend Roberta and yourself. JML had so much potential. Had the internal strife not taken over i firmly believe this line up could have done some great things. Lynda was an exceptional vocalist who could easily have succeeded Jean as lead singer or at least shared more leads. They were also the most visually striking line up. I kind of fell in love with Lynda all over again when i met her recently. She is one classy lady and i have the ultimate respect for her. I also agree that MSS were given material they didn't really believe in, despite many of us fans liking it.
    They looked GREAT together. You're right Bluebrock, they were striking. The original Supremes, and then with the addition of Cindy, and JML were the lineups that looked the most cohesive. The other groupings it always seemed like something was off, visually.

    JMC- Jean always looked slightly awkward to me.
    MSC- the age differences were obvious sometimes.
    MSS- again, that height thing plus at times Mary did appear older than the other girls.

    Surrounding Mary with Jean and Lynda was perfect. All three were fine as hell, physically and vocally.

  50. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    8,644
    Rep Power
    525
    Quote Originally Posted by floyjoy678 View Post
    I agree also. The Jean, Mary and Lynda line up we're exciting live and Lynda had a strong soprano that was much needed to balance out Mary's strong alto, it hadn't been there since Flo left. And I do think Lynda added some spunk and sass back into the group, she reminded me a lot of Florence and I think that was why she worked so well with Mary. But as we all know Jean wanted out by this point and it ended up being very short lived...
    I think it was Mary who said that Florence gave her stamp of approval for Lynda, and as far as I'm concerned that's the best endorsement a "replacement" Supreme could get. Lynda did add personality to the group, which IMO was something that was missing since the 60s lineups. I've read accusations that Lynda sings too loud or screams. If so, I haven't heard that in any of the performances I've seen of her with Jean and Mary. If she does it now...well that's unfortunate.

    Floyjoy do you think Jean would have still wanted out if Mary had agreed to leave Motown? I suspect that move would have gone a long way to smoothing over some of the tension.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.