[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 28 of 28
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257

    "In These Changing Times" by The Four Tops - Why?!!

    The fantastic Four Tops recorded this brilliantly soulful tune for their 1970 album Changing Times. It was also released as a single the following year.



    However, what is up with that introduction!!? Why does it have to ruin a perfectly good song, why!? Lol
    To me it just seems messy, distorted and unnecessary, and just outright weird...
    Last edited by TomatoTom123; 10-25-2016 at 09:46 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    472
    Rep Power
    177
    "However, what is up with that introduction!!? Why does it have to ruin a perfectly good song, why!? Lol
    To me it just seems messy, distorted and unnecessary, and just outright weird..."


    I think it’s a nod to the psychedelia of the times.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by mowest View Post
    I think it’s a nod to the psychedelia of the times.
    Ahh, like... The Temptations! Actually, I believe the producer of the track is Frank Wilson, who was supposed to be the protege of Norman Whitfield...?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by TomatoTom123 View Post
    The fantastic Four Tops recorded this brilliantly soulful tune for their 1970 album Changing Times. It was also released as a single the following year.

    However, what is up with that introduction!!? Why does it have to ruin a perfectly good song, why!? Lol
    To me it just seems messy, distorted and unnecessary, and just outright weird...
    I like the intro. You gotta remember it was 1970 and the times really were changing, musically, and otherwise.

    Musically, Norman Whitfield, like him or not, got The Temptations' back in the upper registers of the pop chart, and gave them a new voice for the younger Black generation coming up. Curtis Mayfield, George Clinton, and The Isley Brothers were also making socially relevant music, and The Tops wanted a piece of that. It was no longer cool for soul artists to just keep making three-minute love songs. Police brutality, Viet Nam, drugs, jobs, equality...all of those things were becoming more important, especially in the Black community. Problem is, the Motown suits still preferred those little love songs. It's what they knew, and what paid the bills. They were content to allow Whitfield and Frank Wilson use The Temptations, Undisputed Truth, and Edwin Starr for the youngbloods. My guess is that Motown decided message music wasn't for the Four Tops. The group tried to be creative, but my guess is that Motown wouldn't support them on it, let them run out their contract, and then they bolted for ABC-Dunhill in 1972. Marvin Gaye and Stevie Wonder had to fight for their creative rights, but stayed. Notice that Rare Earth was given their own label.
    Last edited by soulster; 10-26-2016 at 04:22 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    I like the intro. You gotta remember it was 1970 and the times really were changing, musically, and otherwise.
    Hmm, I think they could have been current and with-it and what-not without that weird intro. I don't know.

    As for everything else...

    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    Musically, Norman Whitfield, like him or not, got The Temptations' back in the upper registers of the pop chart, and gave them a new voice for the younger Black generation coming up. Curtis Mayfield, George Clinton, and The Isley Brothers were also making socially relevant music, and The Tops wanted a piece of that. It was no longer cool for soul artists to just keep making three-minute love songs. Police brutality, Viet Nam, drugs, jobs, equality...all of those things were becoming more important, especially in the Black community. Problem is, the Motown suits still preferred those little love songs. It's what they knew, and what paid the bills. They were content to allow Whitfield and Frank Wilson to use The Temptations, Undisputed Truth, and Edwin Starr for the youngbloods. My guess is that Motown decided message music wasn't for the Four Tops. The group tried to be creative, but my guess is that Motown wouldn't support them on it, let them run out their contract, and then they bolted for ABC-Dunhill in 1972. Marvin Gaye and Stevie Wonder had to fight for their creative rights, but stayed. Notice that Rare Earth was given their own label.
    I make you right! Norman Whitfield and Frank Wilson were Motown's most adventurous producers. The Tops did score hit with the socially-conscious "Still Water [[Love)" but most of their '70s Motown output was still love songs!
    Last edited by TomatoTom123; 10-26-2016 at 04:39 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    3,993
    Rep Power
    351
    I don't see anything wrong with the introduction. I've always assumed it was a nod to sounds through time culminating in the sound of a jet engine and then the sound of clocks to define "time". It also provides a theme for the whole "In These Changing Times" album making it a kind of concept album. I also think it was a good album track but maybe not strong enough for a single - this applies to all the songs on the LP for me. I do listen to it from time to time.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,878
    Rep Power
    259
    Gimmick?
    Producers experimenting with something new..not necessarily music either

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1,284
    Rep Power
    168
    I like how the album cover fits the title tracks' title. You have the old man [[who represents the past) sitting out front with his hand on his face, as if to say, "I don't understand what's happening with our young folks!" And then you have the Four Tops dressed in the then current clothes. What a contrast!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,750
    Rep Power
    211
    Stick with the single mix, no freaky intro there...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    312
    In these changing times is good, my problem is with some of those corny songs before they left motown...if i were a carpenter[picture the founding fathers dancin to it in 1776].

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3,990
    Rep Power
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by TomatoTom123 View Post
    The fantastic Four Tops recorded this brilliantly soulful tune for their 1970 album Changing Times. It was also released as a single the following year.



    However, what is up with that introduction!!? Why does it have to ruin a perfectly good song, why!? Lol
    To me it just seems messy, distorted and unnecessary, and just outright weird...
    I guess Frank Wilson [[who produced the song) wanted a piece of the psychedelic sounds that were in vogue at the time. It also sounded like an attempt to follow up the Still Waters Run Deep LP with something that sounded a little more ambitious.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3,990
    Rep Power
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    I like the intro. You gotta remember it was 1970 and the times really were changing, musically, and otherwise.

    Musically, Norman Whitfield, like him or not, got The Temptations' back in the upper registers of the pop chart, and gave them a new voice for the younger Black generation coming up. Curtis Mayfield, George Clinton, and The Isley Brothers were also making socially relevant music, and The Tops wanted a piece of that. It was no longer cool for soul artists to just keep making three-minute love songs. Police brutality, Viet Nam, drugs, jobs, equality...all of those things were becoming more important, especially in the Black community. Problem is, the Motown suits still preferred those little love songs. It's what they knew, and what paid the bills. They were content to allow Whitfield and Frank Wilson use The Temptations, Undisputed Truth, and Edwin Starr for the youngbloods. My guess is that Motown decided message music wasn't for the Four Tops. The group tried to be creative, but my guess is that Motown wouldn't support them on it, let them run out their contract, and then they bolted for ABC-Dunhill in 1972. Marvin Gaye and Stevie Wonder had to fight for their creative rights, but stayed. Notice that Rare Earth was given their own label.
    Rare Earth was NEVER given their own label. Motown simply agreed with the group's suggestion that they name their rock & pop label after them.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3,990
    Rep Power
    455
    Another thing about "In These Changing Times"; psychedelic sounds [[like the one used on the song's intro) were used to try to get The Tops airplay on FM rock stations at the time. After seeing this work for The Temptations, Frank Wilson must have decided to give it a try. It's certainly dated now and at least you can listen to the single version of 'Changing Times' without the intro.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by TomatoTom123 View Post
    Ahh, like... The Temptations! Actually, I believe the producer of the track is Frank Wilson, who was supposed to be the protege of Norman Whitfield...?
    No he wasn't. Frank was not a protege of Norman Whitfield's.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    No he wasn't. Frank was not a protege of Norman Whitfield's.
    Oh, sorry, my bad Marv. I thought I had read that somewhere.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by Motown Eddie View Post
    Rare Earth was NEVER given their own label. Motown simply agreed with the group's suggestion that they name their rock & pop label after them.
    Same thing, really.It's called a boutique label. The rationale was so that rock stations would play their records,since most would shy away from the Motown logo, thinking it was soul music.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    133
    Rep Power
    97
    It's weird that the Dixieland song is heard in parts of the intro lol

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    The flip-side is somewhat funkier but still very nice...


  19. #19
    thomas96 Guest
    I don't particularly love the intro, but don't feel it ruins the song. Could certainly be shorter...

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    18,203
    Rep Power
    390
    Minus the circus background


  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by thomas96 View Post
    I don't particularly love the intro, but don't feel it ruins the song. Could certainly be shorter...
    Yea, thomas96. I don't know but I think it feels more like a "proper" [[i.e. good) song without the intro.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    For reference, the single [[that is, without the intro) made #70 on the Billboard Hot 100 and #28 on the R&B Charts in July of 1971.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    LYRIC QUESTION!

    I have really been struggling with the lyrics for the first verse of this song, and having both written them down myself and consulted lyrics websites I came up with this:

    How much of a sinner do you see [[Stray away)
    Mind you, how you miss the scenery
    That's why the day the love don't last [[Stray away)
    Makes life is movin' much too fast

    I think I must have got something wrong here 'cause that don't make much sense to me at all...!!??

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,473
    Rep Power
    192
    Tom:

    you can't trust lyric websites ... they consistently get it wrong. This is what I hear ...

    How much of the city do you see [[Stray away)
    Flyin' to high, you miss the scenery
    That's why today love don't last [[Stray away)
    Because of life, it's movin' much too fast

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,473
    Rep Power
    192
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    I think the first two lines are:

    How much of a city do you see,
    Blind to how you miss the scenery.
    Oh, I think you're right ... I hear that now!

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    6,825
    Rep Power
    257
    Thanks johnny and 144man
    I'm normally alright at making out lyrics but I have to say I could NOT do this one!!!

    I'm listening again and think I got this:

    How much of a city do you see [[Stray away)
    Flying too high, you miss the scenery
    That's why today love don't last [[Stray away)
    The pace of life is moving much too fast

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    351
    Quote Originally Posted by johnny_raven View Post
    Oh, I think you're right ... I hear that now!
    I deleted my attempt because I think yours is more accurate.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,473
    Rep Power
    192
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    I deleted my attempt because I think yours is more accurate.
    Aha! - So you ARE putting words into my head! LOL

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.