[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 31 of 31
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295

    The Loudness War


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    756
    Rep Power
    239
    Many thanks for posting this.

    Sadly, it might take a generation or two to set things straight, just as is probably the case with literacy in the UK, wherein spelling, punctuation and pronunciation all went out of the window for several decades, and wherein some of the subtleties of language went with them.

    In the UK we now have a situation where there are efforts to correct this, but there are probably two generations of adults wherein many, many people simply can't pronounce "th" and instead come out with "f", and where "was" is used instead of "were".

    Can you imagine Barbra or Gladys singing "The Way We Was", or Len Barry singing "1-2-free"?

    Given what's happened with language, It might take a looong time, therefore, to get dynamic range and subtlety back into mainstream pop music .

    I'm depressed, now!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    What's more depressing is the lack of interest in the issue among the forum membership. Apparently, they don't care how their music sounds.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    14,979
    Rep Power
    402
    Name:  av-5.jpg
Views: 383
Size:  21.1 KB
    The songs of the day reflect the language used by the average person, as those are the people singing [[at least, before they start making big money), and those are the target market. What else would we expect, given that the billionaires all over The World, favour, support, and, indeed, foster, the destruction of adequate public education, and the continuing descent into sloth and laziness of the masses?

    Those selfish, stingy power mongers want a giant, uneducated, and, thus, ignorant underclass, to do their bidding, working for almost no gain, so they [[the billionaires) can reap most of the rewards from all their cheap labour. In other words, the average person these days, is not only an imbecile, but an uneducated, ignorant one, who is even too lazy to rise up against his or her oppressors [[or to sing songs using proper grammar ).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    311
    Soulster,what is this about?are we talking about remakes of classic songs or just today's music in general.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,337
    Rep Power
    100
    I think he means today's music, arr&bee.

    I found the video interesting and so accurate. I remember as a very young musician in a band, being informed by a group of older, experienced musicians telling us the importance of "dynamics", the ebb and flow of volume, in our performances. I think I was about 12 when I learned that, but it made a lasting impression on my approach to making music, playing or studio.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,473
    Rep Power
    311
    Ok,i remember being in the studio telling the band to tone it down because the vocalist were straining thier voices,today's music seems to be all about loudness.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    4,092
    Rep Power
    242
    Quote Originally Posted by Sotosound View Post
    Many thanks for posting this.

    Sadly, it might take a generation or two to set things straight, just as is probably the case with literacy in the UK, wherein spelling, punctuation and pronunciation all went out of the window for several decades, and wherein some of the subtleties of language went with them.

    In the UK we now have a situation where there are efforts to correct this, but there are probably two generations of adults wherein many, many people simply can't pronounce "th" and instead come out with "f", and where "was" is used instead of "were".

    Can you imagine Barbra or Gladys singing "The Way We Was", or Len Barry singing "1-2-free"?

    Given what's happened with language, It might take a looong time, therefore, to get dynamic range and subtlety back into mainstream pop music .

    I'm depressed, now!
    Sotosound, I hear ya. It's the same here in the U.S. Back in school [[I graduated in 1969), I was really good at only two things – Band [[drums), and English grammar. Now, it’s like everything I learned and excelled at in English class has gone down the drain. I recently heard that the incorrect "conversate" [[incessantly and inadvertently used for the word "converse") has been misused so much, it is now an accepted word in the DICTIONARY! Majority ignorance has now taken over grammatical correctness. Makes ya wonder what’s next?
    Last edited by Philles/Motown Gary; 03-28-2015 at 04:56 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    899
    Rep Power
    175
    Loved the bit about 'ear fatigue'. That's what gets me with 'loud' productions and it means that I can't listen to the music for very long without wanting to turn it off. The music itself also tends to sound distorted because it's overloud, losing the natural original sound of the instruments [[and voice). If I ever come across music mastered at the right level, allowing the music to 'breathe', it's so refreshing!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,337
    Rep Power
    100
    I got some of my best mixes by very low level speakers. I learned this one from Russ. He told me if you can feel the energy in the mix when played at low level, it will hold up at much higher db's and give you the better balanced loud sound.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by arr&bee View Post
    Soulster,what is this about?are we talking about remakes of classic songs or just today's music in general.
    I mean about the AUDIO quality, the QUALITY of the sound that was mastered from the mixes, and the sound comes out of your stereo.

    I'm talking about ALL music, today's music, and the reissues of the old music. It makes no difference.

    Quote Originally Posted by ralpht View Post
    I think he means today's music, arr&bee.
    No! All music. Think of the hyped-up bass, and the near-distortion on those bbr soul reissues.

    I found the video interesting and so accurate. I remember as a very young musician in a band, being informed by a group of older, experienced musicians telling us the importance of "dynamics", the ebb and flow of volume, in our performances. I think I was about 12 when I learned that, but it made a lasting impression on my approach to making music, playing or studio.
    I'm talking about retaining the dynamics of the final mixes during the mastering phase.
    Last edited by soulster; 03-29-2015 at 01:35 AM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by alanh View Post
    Loved the bit about 'ear fatigue'. That's what gets me with 'loud' productions and it means that I can't listen to the music for very long without wanting to turn it off. The music itself also tends to sound distorted because it's overloud, losing the natural original sound of the instruments [[and voice). If I ever come across music mastered at the right level, allowing the music to 'breathe', it's so refreshing!
    Yes! Yes! You get the whole point of it! Finally!

    Quote Originally Posted by ralpht View Post
    I got some of my best mixes by very low level speakers. I learned this one from Russ. He told me if you can feel the energy in the mix when played at low level, it will hold up at much higher db's and give you the better balanced loud sound.
    Exactly! But, what these people are doing today is taking those nice mixes, say one your brother did back in the day, and an applying tons of compression, limiting, and EQ to the entire mix to make it louder. It the process, the dynamics are squashed, and it causes that ear fatigue alanh was talking about.

    Thank God some people around here get it!
    Last edited by soulster; 03-29-2015 at 01:58 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,337
    Rep Power
    100
    I think I mentioned in the past how Russ used an old speaker from the car radio of an Oldsmobile, mounted on the console. This was during the 45rpm mono records era. He would make a mix sound good by going through that small speaker. When it sounded good on that, he had something.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by ralpht View Post
    I think I mentioned in the past how Russ used an old speaker from the car radio of an Oldsmobile, mounted on the console. This was during the 45rpm mono records era. He would make a mix sound good by going through that small speaker. When it sounded good on that, he had something.
    Eh, I guess you're focused on the mixing aspect. I'm talking about mastering, after the tapes leave the mixer's hands, a whole 'nother part of it.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    756
    Rep Power
    239
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    Eh, I guess you're focused on the mixing aspect. I'm talking about mastering, after the tapes leave the mixer's hands, a whole 'nother part of it.
    Cutting a single back in the 60s and early 70s was quite a challenge since it had to have dynamics but it also had to survive AM radio, which was compressed and limited in every sense.

    There's a fabulous track called "Lady Eleanor" from the early 70s by a UK band called Lindisfarne which opens with a quiet acoustic guitar-led intro and then slowly builds up through the verse to a full-on chorus; and this cycle is repeated three times during the single prior to a final a quiet finish.

    In the mid-80s, Porky [[yes, THE Porky) cut a single of a track for myself and fellow [[main) producer, Ken Gibson, for the purpose of pressing white label copies for initial promotion; and it was Porky who cut the "Lady Eleanor" single.

    Whilst mastering our track, Porky talked about how difficult it had been to get the feel of dynamic range of "Lady Eleanor" down on 7" vinyl whilst also not making either the quiet passages too quiet or the loud passages too loud for the format. Then, after he'd got it right and it got pressed and released, he heard it on AM radio, and all his wonderful crescendos and diminuendos got squashed down to a uniform level, which broke his creative heart.

    So, I can understand the car radio speaker, and I can imagine that Russ might have compressed the mix during playback to see whether or not it would survive the AM radio loudness wars.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by Sotosound View Post
    Cutting a single back in the 60s and early 70s was quite a challenge since it had to have dynamics but it also had to survive AM radio, which was compressed and limited in every sense.

    There's a fabulous track called "Lady Eleanor" from the early 70s by a UK band called Lindisfarne which opens with a quiet acoustic guitar-led intro and then slowly builds up through the verse to a full-on chorus; and this cycle is repeated three times during the single prior to a final a quiet finish.

    In the mid-80s, Porky [[yes, THE Porky) cut a single of a track for myself and fellow [[main) producer, Ken Gibson, for the purpose of pressing white label copies for initial promotion; and it was Porky who cut the "Lady Eleanor" single.

    Whilst mastering our track, Porky talked about how difficult it had been to get the feel of dynamic range of "Lady Eleanor" down on 7" vinyl whilst also not making either the quiet passages too quiet or the loud passages too loud for the format. Then, after he'd got it right and it got pressed and released, he heard it on AM radio, and all his wonderful crescendos and diminuendos got squashed down to a uniform level, which broke his creative heart.

    So, I can understand the car radio speaker, and I can imagine that Russ might have compressed the mix during playback to see whether or not it would survive the AM radio loudness wars.
    I know about how records were/are mixed, and I see the subtle attempt to change the topic.

    I am specifically talking about the mastering, not mixing. It is the mastering that affects the way the final product that you hear and buy will sound. When something is mixed, it is not finished. The mix is not the final word. When you hear your CD or download, what they mixed isn't necessarily what they heard when they mixed it.

    Now, you mentioned radio. All radio stations have set compressors. So, anything you put through it is going to get squashed. And, if you put in a modern squashed CD or worse, an mp3, it's going to sound even worse on the radio. Their compressor will not see that the original source was already squashed, and further squish it, bringing down the overall volume with it.
    Last edited by soulster; 03-30-2015 at 10:24 PM.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,337
    Rep Power
    100
    That's too bad. The original intent of mastering was to slightly beef up the mix, if needed at all. If the mix was good the only thing done would be to cut it at hot as possible. But done correctly will not distort.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by ralpht View Post
    That's too bad. The original intent of mastering was to slightly beef up the mix, if needed at all. If the mix was good the only thing done would be to cut it at hot as possible. But done correctly will not distort.
    Right, but it doesn't need to be compressed in mastering.

    I guess it's true that mastering is a mystery to many people. The concept of tweaking and massaging the sound is lost on people, even recording/mixing engineers. It's not about, or shouldn't be about making everything louder for the sake of making it louder. because, when you do that, you must trade something, and that is dynamics.

    Making everyone aware of, and ending the practice of compressing the life out of the music is what this is all about.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,337
    Rep Power
    100
    You're preaching to the choir, Soul.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by ralpht View Post
    You're preaching to the choir, Soul.
    Well, when I read on this forum that people don't know what i'm talking about, or that they are happy with certain CDs from companies that are known to compress the life out of the music, i'm obviously not.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,337
    Rep Power
    100
    I was referring to me, Soul. But you should understand, most people, no matter how much they may be into a particular style of music, have no idea what compression is or what it does. They're just buying the music as dished, which in itself is a damn shame.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,618
    Rep Power
    642
    I have always had a difficult time registering high frequencies. I've been on the fence about getting hearing aids since I was seven years old. Consequently, my ears are really sensitive to certain sounds, usually women's voices in everyday life, but horns, synths, pads, and guitars on records. If they are just right, I'm fine. But there has been a lot of music in the past decade or so that just irritates the heck out of me and this thread provides a reason for it.

    The one album that I love AND hate is Michael Jackson's HIStory. For some reason, it is twice as loud as any CD that I own and even the classic disc in the set is difficult to listen to. I assumed it was my hearing that got worse between the mid-80s to 1995 [[It's been that long since that record came out!!!). This thread has given me pause to consider that it was more likely the remastering of the the tracks that irritated me than it was my degraded hearing.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,337
    Rep Power
    100
    A good example of a properly compressed album was the Beatles "Abbey Road" It was perfect. Russ ran the music through some sort of processor to prove what he was thinking. The VU meter reached a certain level and then barely moved. It was steady but the music flowed as it should. That is proper compression.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by ralpht View Post
    I was referring to me, Soul. But you should understand, most people, no matter how much they may be into a particular style of music, have no idea what compression is or what it does. They're just buying the music as dished, which in itself is a damn shame.
    Oh! I know. But, things can't change for the better if people aren't aware.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,618
    Rep Power
    642
    You may as well face it by realizing that people are much less interested in the subtleties of music than they used to be. That's why Top 40 exemplifies this topic. And since the people moving into sound engineering are influenced by what they're hearing in their youth, it's likely that the little bit of nuance that still exists will be gone forever in the next decade.

    I'm going to dig out some Lenny Kravitz records tonight because I know he is a throwback to the '70s with his music. I'm wondering if his songs are mastered with heavy compression.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Oz View Post
    You may as well face it by realizing that people are much less interested in the subtleties of music than they used to be.
    I already know that! But, we not going to let that stop us from spreading the message, and by us, I mean a whole lot of industry pros, like Bob Ludwig and Bob Katz. And, why is it that people are less interested? Is it because music has been so squashed that they no longer care? It no longer draws you in like it once did?


    I'm going to dig out some Lenny Kravitz records tonight because I know he is a throwback to the '70s with his music. I'm wondering if his songs are mastered with heavy compression.
    Oh yeah! At least since about 2003. His last two albums were slightly better, but not by much. Do you know how to identify the effects of compression?

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,618
    Rep Power
    642
    I watched a few other follow up videos on YouTube after watching the one you provided and they were pretty informative. I open up a few songs in a sound editor to confirm if I have to.

    I don't understand why remastered records from the '80s and before would need it since those who are likely to buy the collections like the songs as originally produced. It's unnecessary from a financial or artistic standpoint. I guess they think 90% of listeners use ear buds.

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    295
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Oz View Post
    I don't understand why remastered records from the '80s and before would need it since those who are likely to buy the collections like the songs as originally produced. It's unnecessary from a financial or artistic standpoint. I guess they think 90% of listeners use ear buds.
    Thank you! The reissue producers think they are trying to bring the music to a younger audience, but that's bullshit! The younger generation does not pick music on the basis of whether it is loud or not. Hell, they don't even buy music as much as the older audience does. All the producers/engineers/labels have to do is gradually lower the levels down over two or three years until we are back to where we were in the 90s. That way, no one will notice. And, if they think they are doing because of radio programmers, that's a crock too. First, radio is not impressed by how much louder a song is, and, second, radio gets promos that are not compressed [[!).

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,618
    Rep Power
    642
    But the producers still get paid. Unless there's a monetary reason to stop, they'll look at it from an 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' perspective. You may have noticed that there were no counter arguments on YouTube, explaining why this became industry norm. I assure you that whenever something shifts like this, there's a financial reason behind the shift. Fig deep and you'll find that listeners are being manipulated psychologically. It's like musical MSG, where they are beefing up the flavor without adding to the substance or nutrional value of the food.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,618
    Rep Power
    642
    But the producers still get paid. Unless there's a monetary reason to stop, they'll look at it from an 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' perspective. You may have noticed that there were no counter arguments on YouTube, explaining why this became industry norm. I assure you that whenever something shifts like this, there's a financial reason behind the shift. Fig deep and you'll find that listeners are being manipulated psychologically. It's like musical MSG, where they are beefing up the flavor without adding to the substance or nutrional value of the food.

    It's not about whether the music sounds good, soulster. It's about whether they can produce songs on an assembly line without having to pay craftsmen for their experience.

  31. #31
    For those Motown fans here, a good way to hear how the loudness war has crept in on these reissues, is to take a listen to those early to mid 90s' Motown Master Series Box Sets and individual CDs [['Hitsville USA', 'Emperors of Soul, Motown Year By Year etc.)

    Now go and play the late 90s' till present reissue titles, such as the 'Ultimate Collection' series, and 'The Complete Motown Singles' sets, and see how much louder [[and sometimes different) the same mixes can sound due to the kind of compression/limiting applied.

    I know it was claimed that the 'Ultimate Collection' & TCMS sets where mastered to make them sound more like the actual 45s as opposed to the master tapes, but opinion seems divided over them.

    I've read comments from people who have said they prefer the sound of the 'Ultimate Collection' and TCMS sets over the same songs found on the 'Hitsville USA' box, whilst others have described the former as 'ear bleeders'!

    Cheers

    Paul

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.