[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    I saw that this morning. I'm glad someone took notice and investigated. No doubt, police all over the place are trying to rewrite history, or put a pro-police slant on things. I hope Wiki put the original text back and locked the page.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,827
    Rep Power
    654
    That's the nature of Wikipedia. Everything that you read there should be taken with a grain of salt. I'm sure someone in the union regularly reads and edits posts. I'm also sure they post in the comment sections of articles about their abuses, trying to discredit the writers and victims.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    I saw that this morning. I'm glad someone took notice and investigated. No doubt, police all over the place are trying to rewrite history, or put a pro-police slant on things. I hope Wiki put the original text back and locked the page.
    I just think that it is incredibly arrogant for them to attempt to do such a thing. Cover ups are one thing, changing the facts that have been public for years is another...............

  5. #5
    Crystaledwards Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Oz View Post
    That's the nature of Wikipedia. Everything that you read there should be taken with a grain of salt. I'm sure someone in the union regularly reads and edits posts. I'm also sure they post in the comment sections of articles about their abuses, trying to discredit the writers and victims.

    We cannot expect accuracy from Wikipedia since it can be edited by anyone with access to the site.

    Step 1: Find the “edit” button on a page in Wikipedia that you would like to correct.

    Step 2: Edit said page so it is correct to your favorable viewpoint.
    Step 3: OH MY GOD! IT’S NOW CORRECT!!!!

    Wikipedia will NEVER be reliable until it allows public discourse, a.k.a “comments” to it’s articles.

    CE

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    28,827
    Rep Power
    654
    Exactly. It was not permitted to be cited for my college papers for those reasons. However, it was a great resource for legitimate articles that helped me do my research.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.