[REMOVE ADS]




Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460

    Smokey & Claudette Settling Over Terminated Song Rights

    I see why this was a matter of some dispute ~ there were legal issues that were unclear and because they are "settling" will remain unclear for a while.


    Smokey Robinson Settling With Ex-Wife Over Terminated Song Rights
    ArticlesNewsBusinessLegal and ManagementBy Eriq Gardner, The Hollywood Reporter | December 14, 2014 1:46 PM EST

    Smokey Robinson
    Ralph Sall
    0 0 0 Comments
    Divorces don't get more complicated than this one.
    A closely-watched dispute between Smokey Robinson and his ex-wife Claudette Robinson over song rights is about to be resolved. On Thursday [[Dec. 11), the parties told a judge that they had reached a settlement in principle.

    Smokey Robinson Exclusive: Watch The Behind-The-Scenes Clip from ‘The Art of McCartney’

    The battle involves termination rights under the 1976 Copyright Act. The legendary R&B singer, whose songs include "My Girl" and "You've Really Got a Hold on Me," is in the process of reclaiming rights to his works. But as he was doing this, the woman he was married to between 1957 and 1986, who says she put a hold on her own singing career to take care of the kids, asserted that she deserved a 50 percent share of what he recovered.

    This led Smokey to file a lawsuit for declaratory relief with Claudette filing counterclaims.

    Billboard 200 Chart Moves: Smokey Robinson Scores Highest-Charting Album in 33 Years

    Aloe Blacc & JC Chasez Talk Making of Smokey Robinson's 'My Girl' Remake

    Smokey Robinson & CeeLo Green Reinvent 'The Way You Do [[The Things You Do)': Song Premiere

    In 1989, three years after the divorce, the parties entered into a stipulated judgment. At the time, the Robinsons don't appear to have addressed what would happen if the R&B singer regained rights to his compositions and made new licensing deals.

    A quarter century later, with no real guidance on whether recaptured copyrights is community property or separate property under California family law, the two would be in court.

    Claudette's attorney argued that the termination provision wasn't intended to "result in a windfall taking of copyright... from their former spouses," and that during the divorce, "Mr. Robinson gained an unfair advantage over Ms. Robinson by his concealment of the full scope of his termination right."

    Smokey's lawyer argued that "recaptured copyrights belong to the author alone," that 1976 Copyright Act precludes any transfer of those copyrights before the terminations themselves are effective, and that his ex-wife's actions could "jeopardize" his ability to secure new agreements exploiting his newly recovered rights.

    The dispute, with some talk about the conflict between federal copyright law and state family law and the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, gathered widespread attention in the music community -- especially among artist reps.

    These issues will probably have to be sorted by another court battle because the Robinsons are calling a truce. This settlement requires great brain-power, and so the parties are asking the judge for some time to arrive at the final deal.

    The attorneys tell the judge, "Due to the complexity of the settlement issues involved in reducing the parties’ agreement to a long form, which issues include having to address different income streams, and possible future uses and disposition of the copyrights and income streams, the parties require additional time to finalize their settlement agreement. The agreement also requires input from family law and music transactional counsel, in addition to litigation counsel."

    This article originally appeared in THR.com.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    4,299
    Rep Power
    333
    Very interesting but I wish it had been settled by the courts.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    They probably had enough common sense and like each other enough to avoid the courts!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,340
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    They probably had enough common sense and like each other enough to avoid the courts!
    Its all real tricky when they have 2 kids together imo.

    Roberta

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,796
    Rep Power
    460
    Only if they were very principled [[i.e. Crazy) would they want to litigate this issue and spend many thousands of dollars and many years. Looks like the two of them are reasonably grounded.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,007
    Rep Power
    305
    I hope for all that was worth that it wasn't as dramatic as it seemed...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    43,221
    Rep Power
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by Roberta75 View Post
    Its all real tricky when they have 2 kids together imo.

    Roberta
    Yeah two kids that are now in their mid 40s LOL!!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,340
    Rep Power
    346
    Quote Originally Posted by marv2 View Post
    Yeah two kids that are now in their mid 40s LOL!!!
    Kids is something that bond parents together forever regardles of how old they are.

    Roberta

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.