[REMOVE ADS]




Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 63
  1. #1
    honest man Guest

    What happened to IF mary ,flo lead supremes would be successful thread 2

    Hello again lovely people what happened to the thread,Let Me Guess ,the same instigator had a Big PART Of it, could some one send me private email and let me know save playing into his hand again,thank you.cheers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,283
    Rep Power
    204
    I think it's safe to say that this should end now before the same drama unfolds again.

  3. #3
    honest man Guest
    I DON'T, Is that the answer to this forum these days i contribute to SDF threads and it should work both ways to responses ,not copping out off situations when a member gets some retribution for his-her cowardly remarks, i asked a question why it was closed yet again,not for people to shout it down before it has started THANK YOU VERY NOT MUCH.

  4. #4
    Lulu Guest
    Here...on a happy note! Enjoy your Monday.
    xo

    Name:  10561773_10154382037210461_6519709160568536344_n.jpg
Views: 763
Size:  42.2 KB

  5. #5
    honest man Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by blackguy69 View Post
    I think it's safe to say that this should end now before the same drama unfolds again.
    BY THE WAY WHAT IS THE DRAMA THING.this is a MOTOWN FORUM. GET REAL.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,342
    Rep Power
    100
    I put the question of deleting the thread to the members. Enough said to 86 it. Which I did...gladly.

  7. #7
    honest man Guest
    Goodnight,

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,342
    Rep Power
    100
    Lol.........

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    My father used to say, "If you ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer", so here's another one: If Arch -Duke Franz-Ferdinand hadn't been assassinated in 1914, would the First World War have taken place?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    743
    Rep Power
    175
    I agree with previous member ..end it now

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    THE END [[hopefully!)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,342
    Rep Power
    100
    This is like deja vu all over again...

  13. #13
    LadyLola Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by honest man View Post
    Goodnight,

  14. #14
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ralpht View Post
    This is like deja vu all over again...
    NOW there's a good song!


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    2,392
    Rep Power
    280
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    My father used to say, "If you ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer", so here's another one: If Arch -Duke Franz-Ferdinand hadn't been assassinated in 1914, would the First World War have taken place?
    No but the Andantes would have been clearly heard singing in the background.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,031
    Rep Power
    318
    ^ You sure it wasn't the Love Tones with their voices altered?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    Quote Originally Posted by midnightman View Post
    ^ You sure it wasn't the Love Tones with their voices altered?
    Of course, if you accept the quantum Theory of Parallel Worlds, there does indeed exist a world where that exists somewhere in the multiverse. We just, however, don't happen to be living in that particular reality

  18. #18
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    Of course, if you accept the quantum Theory of Parallel Worlds, there does indeed exist a world where that exists somewhere in the multiverse. We just, however, don't happen to be living in that particular reality
    Here here! Perhaps it's on the same planet where The United States of England won the war against America and Abraham Lincoln assassinated President John Wilkes Booth!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,680
    Rep Power
    194
    Quote Originally Posted by Lulu View Post
    Here...on a happy note! Enjoy your Monday.
    xo

    Name:  10561773_10154382037210461_6519709160568536344_n.jpg
Views: 763
Size:  42.2 KB
    Thank you, Lulu. Beautiful picture. I assume this is from their tour of Asia in 1966, is that correct? Where did you find this?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    Quote Originally Posted by Lulu View Post
    Here here! Perhaps it's on the same planet where The United States of England won the war against America and Abraham Lincoln assassinated President John Wilkes Booth!
    Yes, Lulu, that's one of the countless number of worlds where you find international success as lead singer of the Supremes!

  21. #21
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    Yes, Lulu, that's one of the countless number of worlds where you find international success as lead singer of the Supremes!
    Who? Me? A skinny girl from Michigan by way of New York?

  22. #22
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by antceleb12 View Post
    Thank you, Lulu. Beautiful picture. I assume this is from their tour of Asia in 1966, is that correct? Where did you find this?
    A friend who works at the Motown Museum shared it...let me find out!

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    Quote Originally Posted by Lulu View Post
    Who? Me? A skinny girl from Michigan by way of New York?
    Anything that can happen will happen

  24. #24
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    Anything that can happen will happen
    I sure do hope so...as "Anna Mae" said..."I'm the new singah, mama!!!" LOL!

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,884
    Rep Power
    481
    You gotta love it! In the new Motown Encyclopedia, the author says Diana is not to blame for any negativism toward her, nor are the other Supremes.

    He says it was caused by the fans breaking into factions!

    Excellent and true.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    242
    Rep Power
    154
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    You gotta love it! In the new Motown Encyclopedia, the author says Diana is not to blame for any negativism toward her, nor are the other Supremes.

    He says it was caused by the fans breaking into factions!

    Excellent and true.

    Well it is true, isn’t it? That was also the most tactful way I could think of putting it.

    Can I just say, when I first joined up here at Soulful Detroit, I was rather under the impression that I was connecting with lots of like-minded Motown fans. The almost constant bickering, petty comments and sometimes outright hostility from certain members, almost always concerning The Supremes, has often resulted in me giving the site a miss for a few days, hoping that when I return the temperature has cooled.
    Frankly, I see more grown up behaviour when I pass the local infant school in the morning.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    That's because a lot of us have reached our second childhoods

  28. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    21,884
    Rep Power
    481
    You did a superb job of being succinct and to the point and sidestepping the nonsense. It has nothing to do with Mary or any other Supreme or Diana ~ it has to do with a few stupid, obsessed fans with no life. [[Ooops, that is making it more dramatic than you did)!

    You reminded me of Berry Gordy in his book talking about Diana being the lead singer: I thought Diana had it and Mary didn't. No more discussion, no drama, it was his company and his group and the decision was made and over.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Amazing! The moderator shuts down a thread about the same damn thing, and yet up pops up another one! And, then you guys proceed to argue in it...AGAIN!

    The obsessed, disturbed Supremes/Ross fans here are unbelievable, and the main reason a lot of longtime members no longer post here, or have left. Instead of it being a valuable resource for information about Motown, Detroit music, and soul music in general, it's a constant Supremes/Ross-fest. Some of you seriously need professional help!
    Last edited by soulster; 07-30-2014 at 01:27 PM.

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    I only see a discussion, not an argument.

  31. #31
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jobeterob View Post
    You gotta love it! In the new Motown Encyclopedia, the author says Diana is not to blame for any negativism toward her, nor are the other Supremes.

    He says it was caused by the fans breaking into factions!

    Excellent and true.
    OK, I'm usually pretty defensive of Gordy BUT I have to take this "Encyclopedia" with a grain of salt considering DIONNE WARWICK is on the cover...WHAT, pray tell does she have to do with MOTOWN?

    Name:  e9a9ffbdcca95441a0d50a670c86e7f3.jpg
Views: 453
Size:  51.3 KB

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Rep Power
    352
    Quote Originally Posted by Lulu View Post
    OK, I'm usually pretty defensive of Gordy BUT I have to take this "Encyclopedia" with a grain of salt considering DIONNE WARWICK is on the cover...WHAT, pray tell does she have to do with MOTOWN?
    Hotspurman has admitted the error and is trying to get the cover changed.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by 144man View Post
    I only see a discussion, not an argument.
    The point is that the obsessed fans are persistent in discussing the same old things year after year. It's crazy!

    Ralph has said that he couldn't outright ban Supremes talk because they are part of Detroit and Motown history, but I think he should do it temporarily, until further notice.
    Last edited by soulster; 07-30-2014 at 01:30 PM.

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,342
    Rep Power
    100
    You may have something there, soulster.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    605
    Rep Power
    173
    Soulster your last 2 posts are spot on...this is my second stint as a member and im seriously thinking of going again..this site is going to end up with nothing but bitter Supremes fans slogging it out day after day going over the same questions day after day....thread after thread after thread.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4,000
    Rep Power
    353
    Give The Supremes their own forum and keep Motown for the rest [[not including Dionne Warwick lol).

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,454
    Rep Power
    223
    Oh god. Here we go again.......

  38. #38
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mowsville View Post
    Soulster your last 2 posts are spot on...this is my second stint as a member and im seriously thinking of going again..this site is going to end up with nothing but bitter Supremes fans slogging it out day after day going over the same questions day after day....thread after thread after thread.
    A bit of advice to the Ross/Wilson/Supremes fans:

    Facebook has NUMEROUS Diana Ross Groups along with Mary Wilson Groups and Supremes Groups. The conversations are civil for the most part as the moderators simply do not allow for any of the bickering. With a wider range of topics here, I know it's difficult for Ralph to monitor every single post but over on Facebook, it's a more controlled setting and most of the groups are CLOSED which means you must be approved for access.

    Example: The two Diana Ross groups I belong to, ya don't mention Mary Wilson or the other Supremes or anything remotely "dramatic". Ya do? Ya get a warning. Do it again, your'e banned - it's that simple.

    I just think "fans" should migrate over there and get their jollies off posting pictures of Mary at the Kentucky Derby in the "Mary Wilson Group" or Evan's wedding updates in the "Diana Ross" group.

    Now, I know I've been guilty of acting like a damn deputy here every time certain facts are muddied by flat out biased opinions BUT I've taken Ralph and soulster's comments into consideration over the last week or so and as of now, Lulu is bowing out of any Diana Ross/Supremes threads. I have much more to offer the group with regards to the music and the other artists which don't get enough attention here. That being said, I'm reserving my "Supremes" posts for Facebook.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,342
    Rep Power
    100
    LuLu,
    Good for you regarding bowing out. Its a shame it has to come to that, but I'm hoping you start a trend and more follow and THEN I can omit any Supremes threads from the forum. [[Like that will really happen)
    But maybe you will help others become more self aware of the idiodicy that comes off those threads in the name of music.

  40. #40
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ralpht View Post
    LuLu,
    Good for you regarding bowing out. Its a shame it has to come to that, but I'm hoping you start a trend and more follow and THEN I can omit any Supremes threads from the forum. [[Like that will really happen)
    But maybe you will help others become more self aware of the idiodicy that comes off those threads in the name of music.
    It won't change a thing BUT for me, it's a huge weight lifted. Look, when you have a female artist who is that big in stature be it Ross, Streisand, Cher or Whitney,Mariah,Madonna or Britney,GaGa,or Kati Perry, this kind of stuff ALWAYS comes up among the fans and detractors. Throw in the added element of myth that The Supremes history has enough alleged drama to make Peyton Place and Knots Landing look like documentaries and you've got a recipe for disaster!

  41. #41
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    What motivates these Supremes/Ross fans? What is the pathology that drives them to obsess about these women in particular? I've been clued in on some of it, which will upset them if I say it, but isn't liking the music enough?

    I love The Beatles' music, and what the band collectively stood for, but it stops there. I don't spend my waking hours obsessing over every aspect of their personal lives and their interpersonal conflicts.


    The opposite of staying out of these Supremes/Ross/Wilson threads is to hijack all of them with, say, sports talk. Frustrate them to the point where they finally give up.
    Last edited by soulster; 07-30-2014 at 03:57 PM.

  42. #42
    Lulu Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by soulster View Post
    What motivates these Supremes/Ross fans? What is the pathology that drives them to obsess about these women in particular? I've been clued in on some of it, which will upset them if I say it, but isn't liking the music enough?

    I love The Beatles' music, and what the band collectively stood for, but it stops there. I don't spend my waking hours obsessing over every aspect of their personal lives and their interpersonal conflicts.


    The opposite of staying out of these Supremes/Ross/Wilson threads is to hijack all of them with, say, sports talk. Frustrate them to the point where they finally give up.
    Well, what was said above is partially true: the fans have created this divisive environment. The ladies themselves had less to do with it than what you'd think based on what you read here and on other sites. I've raised a few points in other threads. I'm answering your questions based on my observations because you asked and then I'm out for good:

    1. Diana Ross has always been controversial particularly among black women. Her voice and "look" has always strayed from the norm of what is expected. Again, she succeeded at rocket speed and launched an extremely successful global solo career while more "authentic" black girls' careers languished. Bettye LaVette is a good example. She also married two white men which, to many, is the ultimate betrayal.

    2. Florence Ballard died penniless and again, folks resent Diana Ross. Ballard was on welfare while Ross was in Rome filming her second film...draped in fur and diamonds.

    3. Motown 25: Diana Ross allegedly "pushed" Mary Wilson. That incident, while it predates the Central Park Concert, got a lot of wheels turning.

    4. Dreamgirl: Mary's book, while not AS harsh as some make it out to be, paints Diana Ross as a narcissistic overly ambitious character who clawed her way to the top without little regard for where she came from or who she apparently trampled over to make it in the business.

    5. Return To Love: This was basically the nail in the coffin and I'm not even going to begin to get into it as it's been discussed AD NAUSEUM for the last 15 years.

    Those are just a few of my observations. Feel free to chime in but I'm out!

  43. #43
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    5,454
    Rep Power
    223
    What I find ironic is all the threads that have nothing to do with Diana or the Supremes, and people who claim to not be "fanatics" always find a way to bring them up. The ones that often complain about them, bring them up for no reason. I will start to note the offenders when it happens from now on.

  44. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    I feel like if I reply that i'll fan the flames. What you wrote is not what I was getting at, but, here goes anyway:

    Quote Originally Posted by Lulu View Post

    1. Diana Ross has always been controversial particularly among black women. Her voice and "look" has always strayed from the norm of what is expected. Again, she succeeded at rocket speed and launched an extremely successful global solo career while more "authentic" black girls' careers languished. Bettye LaVette is a good example. She also married two white men which, to many, is the ultimate betrayal.
    I do not understand why Black women would care. Most Black men never looked at Ross as any kind of sex symbol. However, Gay Black men might be a different story. There. I said it.

    You do bring up a point that it is very rare that a Black woman has maintained long-lasting star status. Tina Turner, Beyonce, Pointer Sisters, Natalie Cole, and Rihanna are about the only ones I can think of. I don't know of any Black women who have a problem with them.

    2. Florence Ballard died penniless and again, folks resent Diana Ross. Ballard was on welfare while Ross was in Rome filming her second film...draped in fur and diamonds.
    We all know about Ross' narcissism, and how the two were childhood friends, but, at the risk of sounding cold, Ross had no responsibility to financially prop up Ballard. And, why does Wilson not get criticized for not helping her?

    3. Motown 25: Diana Ross allegedly "pushed" Mary Wilson. That incident, while it predates the Central Park Concert, got a lot of wheels turning.
    Yup. Classic Ross behavior. Which makes me wonder why these Ross fans like her?

    4. Dreamgirl: Mary's book, while not AS harsh as some make it out to be, paints Diana Ross as a narcissistic overly ambitious character who clawed her way to the top without little regard for where she came from or who she apparently trampled over to make it in the business.
    To be fair, that can be said of 90% of everyone in the record business.
    Last edited by soulster; 07-30-2014 at 04:33 PM.

  45. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    824
    Rep Power
    273
    I must be in the minority. I like all of the former Supremes. I appreciate each one's contribution to the legacy and the music. I think it is a testament that most of them are still performing today. I advise most of you to listen to Stop! in the name of love when you are ready to post unnecessary negative coments and , well, just stop! Listen to the great music from the Supremes-all of them- and appreciate their supremacy.

  46. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    I'm not listening to Supremes songs. I'm sick of hearing them after being on this forum. I'll buy some of the Ross RCA remasters, but i'll probably not play them. Besides, I already have three of the Japanese CDs.

  47. #47
    smark21 Guest
    I'm always amused how soulster loves to bitch and moan about Supremes threads and obsessive Supremes fans yet he's constantly posting in these threads, saying pretty much the same things over and over again himself. I think Soulster is just bitter because most of the threads he launches are boring and die pretty quickly.

    I do get bored with constant repetition of Supremes/Ross debates; but I click on them and blame no one but myself for subjecting myself to them, and sometimes joining in. If one is not interested in such threads, don't click on them and if you do click, don't join in. If you want to other topics to be discussed, then start some threads. But don't get mad if they don't get off the groud or demand that Ralph ban all Supremes threads because not enough members are clicking in and responding to your threads. Members here will click on what they want and participate where they want. And if they feel regret for clicking, so be it, just owe up to the fact that you clicked on something that you ought to know better to click on as Supremes and Ross threads are almost always full of [[at best) passionate debate and [[at worst) down and dirty name calling.

  48. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    13,342
    Rep Power
    100
    Well so far this is going okay. Don't make a big deal out of it.

  49. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,552
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by smark21 View Post
    I'm always amused how soulster loves to bitch and moan about Supremes threads and obsessive Supremes fans yet he's constantly posting in these threads, saying pretty much the same things over and over again himself. I think Soulster is just bitter because most of the threads he launches are boring and die pretty quickly.
    You guys crack me up! If I repeat myself, it is because some of you are thick in getting the message.

    As for my threads being boring, that may be because all you guys do is think of the same things. I brought you the audiophile concept. It may be boring to you, but it is different. I talk about technical things. Again, they may be boring to you, but it's different. I may even talk about politics, but, it's different than what is usually discussed here. My threads are a lot more interesting than what Diana Ross belched while wearing her gown before a 1968 show after they kicked out Ballard. It beats cat fights over who would have made a better lead singer. It beats the hell out of discussing a Ross meltdown at a restaurant.

  50. #50
    supremester Guest
    LIAR! I was there - that was definitely Mary & Cindy, fool!

    Quote Originally Posted by thanxal View Post
    No but the Andantes would have been clearly heard singing in the background.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

[REMOVE ADS]

Ralph Terrana
MODERATOR

Welcome to Soulful Detroit! Kindly Consider Turning Off Your Ad BlockingX
Soulful Detroit is a free service that relies on revenue from ad display [regrettably] and donations. We notice that you are using an ad-blocking program that prevents us from earning revenue during your visit.
Ads are REMOVED for Members who donate to Soulful Detroit. [You must be logged in for ads to disappear]
DONATE HERE »
And have Ads removed.